Re: Installing the whole set of scientific packages

2007-02-14 Thread Andreas Tille
On Wed, 14 Feb 2007 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: It may not always make sense for things to stay in debian-med's tasks, even if that's where they've traditionally lived. It may make more sense for them to migrate to other task sets / packages, and for debian-med's tasks to inherit wholesale from

Re: Installing the whole set of scientific packages

2007-02-14 Thread elw
- debian-science-psychology Same as -pharmaceuticals. Ermm, psychology applications (e.g., software for response time measurement or cognitive testing) are definitely NOT the same as pharmaceutical aplications. I'm sorry to be unclear: My remark that this should be covered by Debian-Med _if

Re: Installing the whole set of scientific packages

2007-02-14 Thread Andreas Tille
On Wed, 14 Feb 2007 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: - debian-science-psychology Same as -pharmaceuticals. Ermm, psychology applications (e.g., software for response time measurement or cognitive testing) are definitely NOT the same as pharmaceutical aplications. I'm sorry to be unclear: My rem

Re: Installing the whole set of scientific packages

2007-02-14 Thread elw
- debian-science-psychology Same as -pharmaceuticals. Ermm, psychology applications (e.g., software for response time measurement or cognitive testing) are definitely NOT the same as pharmaceutical aplications. - debian-science-hci [subset of psychology? sort of.] What is "hci" ?

Re: Installing the whole set of scientific packages

2007-02-14 Thread Andreas Tille
On Tue, 13 Feb 2007 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: - debian-science-biology Fine here and dependency of med-bio would make things easy as Charles suggested. - debian-science-genomics - debian-science-pharmaceuticals *If* we had some intersting packages, I would rather create a med-pharmaceutica

Re: Installing the whole set of scientific packages

2007-02-14 Thread Andreas Tille
On Wed, 14 Feb 2007, Charles Plessy wrote: I think that you can safely make debian-science-bio depend on med-bio and med-bio-dev only. Basic biology is part of Debian Med as "preclinical research". Sounds reasonable. In addition to the suggested packages, I think that a debian-science-biblio

Re: Installing the whole set of scientific packages

2007-02-14 Thread Andreas Tille
On Tue, 13 Feb 2007, [utf-8] Damián Viano wrote: - debian-science - debian-science-bio - debian-science-math - debian-science-physics - debian-science-chem What do others think? Am I missing something? Should we s/science// from the second level packages? s/debian

Re: Installing the whole set of scientific packages

2007-02-14 Thread Andreas Tille
On Tue, 13 Feb 2007, Lisandro [utf-8] Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer wrote: Well, I am reading tasksel's README.gz. Some things I found: * To get a new task added to Debian, please file a bug report on tasksel. Did you ever tried? So we make a list (or perhaps a tree, to follow Carlo Segre's su

Re: Installing the whole set of scientific packages

2007-02-14 Thread elw
- debian-science-archaeology - debian-science-anthropology I think these are pretty much the same thing too. In the USA you get a degree in anthropology and on the other side of the pond you get a degree in archaeology. I can see your point, given that they're often collocated in the same