Re: note-taking and PDF annotation: jarnal

2009-04-08 Thread Jan Beyer
Michael Hanke wrote am 4/8/2009 7:11 AM: On Tue, Apr 07, 2009 at 05:16:00PM -0300, David Bremner wrote: At Tue, 07 Apr 2009 22:11:29 +0200, Jan Beyer wrote: Hi debian-science, I just stumbled upon jarnal [1], a free Java program to take notes using a stylus or mouse or keyboard with the

Re: note-taking and PDF annotation: jarnal

2009-04-08 Thread David Bremner
Michael Hanke wrote: On Tue, Apr 07, 2009 at 05:16:00PM -0300, David Bremner wrote: Xournal is in debian, and seems to work OK. Is jarnal superior to xournal in some way? Okular also has annotation capabilities and is in Debian. My experience with okular annotation has not been too

Re: Debian Meteorology ?

2009-04-08 Thread Antonio Amorim
Dear Alastair, Thank you for your message. You are correct the bufr software is included in the emoslib. Sorry. All the best, António Amorim Alastair McKinstry escreveu: Dear Antonio, Thanks. I have submitted a new ITP for magics++ :

Re: Bug#523077: science-physics: suggests a package with a broken name

2009-04-08 Thread Andreas Tille
On Wed, 8 Apr 2009, Eugene V. Lyubimkin wrote: Package: science-physics Version: 0.5 Severity: serious Justification: Policy 5.6.7 Suggests contains 'ESPResSo++, PWscf', but upper-case letters are not allowed in package names. Fixed in SVN. I might consider to lowercase any package names

Re: note-taking and PDF annotation: jarnal

2009-04-08 Thread Jan Beyer
David Bremner wrote am 4/8/2009 12:30 PM: Michael Hanke wrote: On Tue, Apr 07, 2009 at 05:16:00PM -0300, David Bremner wrote: Xournal is in debian, and seems to work OK. Is jarnal superior to xournal in some way? Okular also has annotation capabilities and is in Debian. My experience

Re: note-taking and PDF annotation: jarnal

2009-04-08 Thread Michael Hanke
On Wed, Apr 08, 2009 at 02:55:49PM +0200, Jan Beyer wrote: David Bremner wrote am 4/8/2009 12:30 PM: Michael Hanke wrote: On Tue, Apr 07, 2009 at 05:16:00PM -0300, David Bremner wrote: Xournal is in debian, and seems to work OK. Is jarnal superior to xournal in some way?

Re: note-taking and PDF annotation: jarnal

2009-04-08 Thread Jan Beyer
Michael Hanke wrote am 4/8/2009 3:07 PM: Hmm, I have used xournal before and it can both store anotations as an overlay, as well as producing a PDF with the original content and the annotations overlayed. That sounds great. As I wrote earlier: I didn't try it yet. Just looked around the

Re: note-taking and PDF annotation: jarnal

2009-04-08 Thread Manuel Prinz
Am Mittwoch, den 08.04.2009, 09:28 +0200 schrieb Jan Beyer: Actually I read a bit more on jarnal's homepage and it might be messy to package (quoting from http://www.dklevine.com/general/software/tc1000/jarnal-down.htm): - Source Code: The source is contained in the jar files and can be

Re: note-taking and PDF annotation: jarnal

2009-04-08 Thread Carlo Segre
On Wed, 8 Apr 2009, Michael Hanke wrote: On Wed, Apr 08, 2009 at 02:55:49PM +0200, Jan Beyer wrote: David Bremner wrote am 4/8/2009 12:30 PM: Michael Hanke wrote: On Tue, Apr 07, 2009 at 05:16:00PM -0300, David Bremner wrote: Xournal is in debian, and seems to work OK. Is jarnal

Re: note-taking and PDF annotation: jarnal

2009-04-08 Thread Chris Walker
David Bremner brem...@unb.ca writes: Do these tools seem appropriate for the increasingly-misnamed typesetting task? I think that they fit in with the other things in that task. What about renaming typesetting to document production? I agree that typesetting is too specific for what