On Wed, Aug 05, 2009 at 10:57:22PM -0300, David Bremner wrote:
Description : graph isomorphism testing library, with command line tools
In which ouf our categories[1] would this package fit best according
to your opinion?
Unfortunately upstream is not interested in relicensing the
On Thu, Aug 06, 2009 at 01:05:05PM +0200, Steffen Moeller wrote:
I personally think that we should rather investigate, to what degree we could
perform the
automation of BioC packages.
This idea was the basic background of my reasonings in this thread. I would
dream of kind of a list of
On Thu, Aug 06, 2009 at 08:12:09AM -0300, David Bremner wrote:
I guess nauty in mathematics
Done. I did not added the information for prospective packages and
hope it will show up in new soon which makes the package available
on the tasks pages automatically.
maybe libnauty-dev in
Andreas Tille wrote:
On Thu, Aug 06, 2009 at 08:12:09AM -0300, David Bremner wrote:
Currently it is organised that way that you have to be a member of
Blends team on alioth. There is no explicite need for this and it
might also go into the debian-science SVN (but it has to be SVN for
the
On Thu, Aug 06, 2009 at 10:37:31AM -0300, David Bremner wrote:
For me, joining the blends group is fine.
bremner-guest added to Blends project.
But in the long run I think
moving into debian-science svn would make it more a natural part of
the team workflow, rather than something you have to
Le Thu, Aug 06, 2009 at 09:04:11PM +0200, Andreas Tille a écrit :
On Thu, Aug 06, 2009 at 10:37:31AM -0300, David Bremner wrote:
Or maybe there is some alioth magic that could make all debian-science
members automatic members of blends.
I don't think that there is such a magic. IMHO
6 matches
Mail list logo
