Re: Packaging new upstream for sundials

2016-10-09 Thread Dima Kogan
James Tocknell writes: > How much of the packaging have you done? I've almost done 2.6-2.6.2, the > main problem was trying to make octave-sundials multiarch (given the build > system used upstream is a hacky matlab script). I've got multiarch working > for the rest of

Re: Packaging new upstream for sundials

2016-10-09 Thread James Tocknell
Hi Dima How much of the packaging have you done? I've almost done 2.6-2.6.2, the main problem was trying to make octave-sundials multiarch (given the build system used upstream is a hacky matlab script). I've got multiarch working for the rest of sundials, and have added pkg-config files. James

Re: statistics: who maintains R packages in Debian (was: Re: Debhelper for R packages)

2016-10-09 Thread Joost van Baal-Ilić
On Sat, Oct 08, 2016 at 01:59:14PM -0500, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote: > > On 8 October 2016 at 20:32, Joost van Baal-Ilić wrote: > | On Sat, Oct 08, 2016 at 12:08:50PM -0500, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote: > | > On 8 October 2016 at 17:45, Joost van Baal-Ilić wrote: > | > | Otoh: currently R stuff is

Re: Packaging librsb

2016-10-09 Thread Rafael Laboissière
* Andreas Tille [2016-10-07 15:17]: On Fri, Sep 23, 2016 at 02:24:13AM +0200, Rafael Laboissière wrote: I created a Git repository [1] for packaging librsb [2]. I intend to file an ITP soon and any comments/suggestions/fixes will be welcome. Thanks for working on this.

Re: Debhelper for R packages

2016-10-09 Thread Andreas Tille
On Sun, Oct 09, 2016 at 03:04:23PM +0200, Joost van Baal-Ilić wrote: > > I was not speaking about those packages that are just team maintained. > > There are a lot of others that are not - for these a Debian R team would > > make sense ... and for r-base for sure. > > I'm sorry but to me it's not

Re: Debhelper for R packages

2016-10-09 Thread Joost van Baal-Ilić
Hi, On Sun, Oct 09, 2016 at 02:20:07PM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote: > On Sat, Oct 08, 2016 at 05:45:16PM +0200, Joost van Baal-Ilić wrote: > > > IMHO that's not matter of personal preference but a matter of how to > > > work together in a Debian maintainers team. There are tools working on > > >

Re: Debhelper for R packages

2016-10-09 Thread Andreas Tille
On Sat, Oct 08, 2016 at 05:45:16PM +0200, Joost van Baal-Ilić wrote: > > IMHO that's not matter of personal preference but a matter of how to > > work together in a Debian maintainers team. There are tools working on > > git.debian.org but not elsewhere. I keep on thinking that a Debian R > >

Packaging new upstream for sundials

2016-10-09 Thread Dima Kogan
Hi. I'm packaging the new 2.7.0 release of sundials to update our very old 2.5.0 packages. Upstream has removed (possibly temporarily) the matlab toolbox: http://computation.llnl.gov/projects/sundials/sundials-software Thus a packaging of 2.7.0 would remove the octave-sundials package. Any