Uploaded as well.
I had almost no questions about your technical packaging level. I would
encourage you to apply to a DM-role, if you are interested. I will
definitely advocate your application and then give you permissions
to upload opm-stuff if you apply.
Cheers
Anton
Am Fr., 28. Jan. 2022 um 09:17 Uhr schrieb Markus Blatt :
>
> Hi Anton,
>
> thanks a lot for the work. Highly appreciated.
>
> Did you also upload opm-upscaling to NEW?
>
> opm-upscaling/2021.10-1 https://salsa.debian.org/science-team/opm-upscaling
>
> Did not receibve any notification and can't see. Maybe it just needs more
> time for processing?
>
> Markus
>
> Am Thu, Jan 27, 2022 at 07:14:45PM +0100 schrieb Anton Gladky:
> >Hi Markus,
> >
> >done!
> >
> >Best regards
> >
> >Anton
> >
> >Am Mi., 26. Jan. 2022 um 14:44 Uhr schrieb Markus Blatt :
> >>
> >> Hi,
> >> Am Wed, Jan 26, 2022 at 07:26:09AM +0100 schrieb Anton Gladky:
> >> >
> >> >I will upload it in the evening. Please prepare all other involved
> >> >packages if any. Thanks. Regards
> >> >
> >>
> >> cool. Thanks in advance.
> >>
> >> Source uploads needed for migration to testing:
> >> - opm-common/2021.10-3 https://salsa.debian.org/science-team/opm-common
> >> - opm-material/2021.10-2 https://salsa.debian.org/science-team/opm-material
> >> - opm-models/2021.10-2 https://salsa.debian.org/science-team/opm-models
> >>
> >>
> >> These are the ones that were rejected by ftpmaster and copyright should be
> >> fixed now.
> >> Please upload to new
> >> - opm-grid/2021.10-1 https://salsa.debian.org/science-team/opm-grid
> >> - opm-simulators/2021.10-1
> >> https://salsa.debian.org/science-team/opm-simulators
> >> - opm-upscaling/2021.10-1
> >> https://salsa.debian.org/science-team/opm-upscaling
> >>
> >> Cheers,
> >>
> >> Markus
> >>
> >>
> >> >
> >> >Am Di., 25. Jan. 2022 um 00:00 Uhr schrieb Markus Blatt
> >> >:
> >> >>
> >> >> Hi,
> >> >>
> >> >> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "opm-common" to do a source
> >> >> upload:
> >> >>
> >> >> * Package name: opm-common
> >> >> Version : 2021.10-3
> >> >> Upstream Author : o...@opm-project.org
> >> >> * URL : http://opm-project.org
> >> >> * License : GPL-2.0+, GPL-3.0+, ODBL-1.0 and DBCL-1.0
> >> >> * Vcs : https://salsa.debian.org/science-team/opm-common
> >> >> Section : libs
> >> >>
> >> >> The package was still not good enough.
> >> >> We had limited the architectures in d/control to 64bit, but not in
> >> >> d/tests/control and
> >> >> that would have prevented the source package from migrating to testing
> >> >> as the autopkgtests
> >> >> for 32bit would still be executed and fail due to missing binary
> >> >> packages.
> >> >>
> >> >> After a fruitful discussions on the mentors list, see
> >> >> https://lists.debian.org/debian-mentors/2022/01/msg00185.html, I have
> >> >> now
> >> >>
> >> >> - used "Architecture: any" in d/control to let buildd try to build all
> >> >> (32bit builds will fail due to failing ctest)
> >> >> - limited to 64bit architectures in d/tests/control to prevent failing
> >> >> autopkgtest
> >> >>
> >> >> I hope that this will allow for migration to testing.
> >> >>
> >> >> Thanks a lot.
> >> >>
> >> >> Cheers,
> >> >>
> >> >> Markus
> >> >>
> >> >
> >>
> >> --
> >>
> >> Dr. Markus Blatt - HPC-Simulation-Software & Services
> >> http://www.dr-blatt.de
> >> Pedettistr. 38, 85072 Eichstätt, Germany, USt-Id: DE279960836
> >> Tel.: +49 (0) 160 97590858
> >
>
> --
>
> Dr. Markus Blatt - HPC-Simulation-Software & Services http://www.dr-blatt.de
> Pedettistr. 38, 85072 Eichstätt, Germany, USt-Id: DE279960836
> Tel.: +49 (0) 160 97590858
