, Sep 11, 2013 at 6:29 PM, Anton Gladky gl...@debian.org wrote:
I have started to package v6.0, but I am not sure, when it will be packaged.
From my point of view, there is no big reasons to upload 5.10.
Anton
2013/9/11 Mathieu Malaterre ma...@debian.org:
[top post sorry]
As i explained, I
...@gmail.com:
That sounds great! I'm going camping for a few days, but I'll be able to
test it this weekend.
Torquil
On 18/06/13 22:15, Anton Gladky wrote:
Hi,
I have done some commits into mpich2-directory. Please, check
it out and test. I am planning to make a couple of more within the next
23:31, Anton Gladky wrote:
Torquil, some suggestions on packaging:
I think it is better:
1) to use compat-level 9
2) dh instead of cdbs, debian/rules will be shorter and more clear in this
case;
3) copyright-file in DEP-5 format;
4) DEP-3 for patches
5) postinst and prerm scripts should
Hi Sylvestre,
2013/5/28 Sylvestre Ledru sylves...@debian.org:
[...]
By the way, while we are talking about MPI, I am planning to upload
openmpi 1.6 [1] over the openmpi package [1].
The 1.6 release have been uploaded in Debian for Ubuntu users (it missed
the wheezy release).
The openmpi1.6
2013/5/28 Torquil Macdonald Sørensen torq...@gmail.com:
Btw, your second point (regarding dh) is something we had planned. But even
though the package has potential for improvement in several places, my
personal plan was to not do everything at once, in order to prevent several
problems
Ho Torquil,
I think it OK, to use mpich as the source package name for mpich version
3. But it is my personal point of view.
We just need to coordinate a transition (if it is necessary). Do you
have already done some packaging on mpich 3?
Thanks for contribution,
Anton
On 05/26/2013 08:24
Hi Yvan,
2013/5/26 Yvan Fournier yvan.fourn...@free.fr:
[..]
Finally, using the same naming policy as the MPICH developpers
themselves (referring to the old MPICH as MPICH1, and renaming MPICH2 to
MPICH when they upgraded to version 3) seems like a sane thing to do,
and again, the best way to
Hi Jakub,
On 04/26/2013 11:50 PM, Jakub Wilk wrote:
I don't feel comfortable with sponsoring a package that is maintainer
within a team I'm not memeber of; and I have no intention to join
debian-science any time soon.
you have done a great job on reviewing/fixing this package.
Hi Julien,
thanks for working on sage. It seems, that packages are ok, but from my
point of view all orig.tar.gz should be repacked without .hg-directory,
as there are some binaries inside.
sagemath-database-graphs has also a binary-database:
src/graphs.db. It is not allowed.
Best,
Anton
On
uydt julien.pu...@laposte.net:
So how should I proceed? Do I take the upstream sources, untar, rm -r .hg,
retar and use that for git-import-orig? If so, I guess I should document
that somewhere!
I think yes. But you should also add dfsg into the version number,
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
2013/3/18 Julien Puydt julien.pu...@laposte.net:
We loose history, but there's not much in it.
Is that ok?
There are just several commits. No big deal.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-science-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
2013/3/18 Julien Puydt jpu...@free.fr:
I don't see what I can do for that :-/
Just a proposal for dfsg-packing script:
sqlite3 graphs.db .dump graphs.dump
And then, in dh_auto_configure, for example:
cat graphs.dump | sqlite3 graphs.db
Anton
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
Hello Dimitris,
as your key is already in dm.txt [1], you should be probably
allowed to do even new uploads for mathgl. At least, just try.
Cheers,
Anton
[1] https://ftp-master.debian.org/dm.txt
2012/11/14 Dimitrios Eftaxiopoulos eftax...@otenet.gr:
Hello,
could a DD have a look and upload
Hi,
it seems, your package looks fine. Some minor suggestions:
- New upload should close ITP bug. Just add Close at the end of
changelog-line:
* debian packaging cleanup. (Closes: #686413)
- Line 8 in copyright-file is empty. You should add there the license type.
- It is not
Hello,
it seems, it is an interesting package. You can fill an RFP-bug [1]
not to forget about it, or (better) prepare a package, which can
be sponsored and taken under debian-science umbrella.
[1] http://wiki.debian.org/RFP
Anton
PS Es ist notwendig hier Englisch zu benutzen, weil nicht alle
Hello all,
I will try to notify gmsh and freecad upstreams.
Anton
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-science-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
Hi,
you can have a look at debian science policy [1].
Also there are a lot of packages, where you can get necessary tags [2]
Cheers,
Anton
[1] http://debian-science.alioth.debian.org/debian-science-policy.html
[2]
2012/5/12 Andreas Tille andr...@an3as.eu:
This is no reasonable goal. We discussed this several times here: Tasks
are not exclusive categories. You can use the same package under very
different circumstances. A very simple example is that octave is part
of the tasks: mathematics,
2012/5/13 Andreas Tille andr...@an3as.eu:
$ git branch
* master
However, a proper repository which should work with git-buildpackage
should look like:
$ git branch
* master
pristine-tar
upstream
Ah, ok, you should add 2 branches manually:
git branch upstream origin/upstream
git
2012/5/12 Andreas Tille andr...@an3as.eu:
Task: Simulations
# IMHO the Scientific is redundant
Description: Debian Science Simulation packages
This metapackage will install Debian Science packages that are
used to do simulations in different fields of science.
Depends: sumo
Depends:
, Apr 18, 2012 at 11:12:38PM +0200, Anton Gladky wrote:
it will be under debian-science umbrella.
That's fine and I know tzhat you are a very active Debian Science member
(BTW, thanks for your great effort into gnuplot!). However, I'm just
wondering whether we could create a new task[1] where
?
Kind regards
Andreas.
On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 10:30:23PM +0200, Anton Gladky wrote:
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Anton Gladky gladky.an...@gmail.com
* Package name : sumo
Version : 0.15.0
Upstream Author : Institute of Transportation Systems at the German
Hi all,
the only significant change in the last upload is the commenting out
the following line [1] in CMakelists.txt:
target_link_libraries(shared ${LINK_LIBRARIES})
With this one, gmsh FTBFS...
I would appreciate the comments and proposals for fixing that.
Thanks.
[1]
Thanks all for discussion.
The problem was fixed by adding -shared to target_link_libraries.
target_link_libraries(shared ${LINK_LIBRARIES} -shared)
Anton
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-science-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
I have similar problem on liggghts/lammps packages, which are running
under openmpi [1] and [2].
It would be good to try a patch from LP-bug [3].
[1] https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=liggghts
[2] https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=lammps
[3]
Is there some tool for checking files on licence automatically?
You can try this:
licensecheck --copyright -r . | /usr/lib/cdbs/licensecheck2dep5
debian/copyright_
Anton
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-science-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
Thanks, Johannes for the hint!
I had a similar problems almost on all packages under chroot, using OpenMPI.
Anton
2012/3/2 Gerber van der Graaf gerber.vdgr...@gmail.com:
Hi Johannes,
This turns out to work fine for me as well under chroot. I will include
it in debian/rules. Thanks a lot!
Hello,
is there a chance to get petsc in testing in a near future?
gmsh was removed from wheezy because of petsc.
Thanks.
Anton
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-science-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
A new gmsh was just uploaded, not sure how it will affect things...
petsc is not in BD of the last 2 uploads of gmsh.
There is a FTBFS, requires fixing.
By the way, gmsh is now using oce instead of opencascade.
Anton
2012/2/13 Adam C Powell IV hazel...@debian.org:
Writing in with an
I can confirm, that the package builds well.
Anton
On Sun, Jan 22, 2012 at 6:29 PM, D Haley my...@yahoo.com wrote:
Dear List,
I have a package (3depict), that is in the archive [1] that I would like to
get a new version uploaded, and am thus looking for some help. Normally I am
helped
with no problems:
ssh svn.debian.org
Andreas, could you, please, apply an attached patch?
Thanks.
Anton
On Sun, Nov 6, 2011 at 10:03 PM, Andreas Tille andr...@an3as.eu wrote:
On Sat, Nov 05, 2011 at 09:51:28PM +0100, Anton Gladky wrote:
I would like to add yade-package
It works now,
thanks!
Anton
On Wed, Nov 9, 2011 at 10:14 PM, Andreas Tille andr...@an3as.eu wrote:
On Wed, Nov 09, 2011 at 09:21:35PM +0100, Anton Gladky wrote:
Thanks, Aaron,
I have got it, but during commit I get the following:
Can't create directory '/svn/blends/db/transactions/3039
Hi all,
I would like to add yade-package into the numericalcomputation section.
May I just commit into the svn?
Thanks
Anton
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-science-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
Dear Mathieu,
Could you please confirm, this is the first time you hear about
640488
Yes, I can confirm that. Please, indicate it next time.
1. paraview versus convenient copy of VTK. Since you are running to
get paraview in testing, you must have solved the very difficult issue
of
Paraview is really not an easy source to package.
Now the debian-directory is rewritten almost completely to make the
packaging as simple as possible. I prefer to escape overpatching,
because it complicates a maintainance.
I am afraid, that replacing the vtk is not an easy work. It can
produce
Hi Michael,
have you decided, whether your package will be in main or contribs?
Anton
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-science-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
/packages/viennacl.git
I would be glad if someone reviewed and uploaded this package for me.
Michael
On 04/08/2011 07:43 AM, Anton Gladky wrote:
Hi, Michael,
I am not a DD, but maybe my 2 cents will help you to make your package
better:
1. Why is it experimental-oriented? I have built
I agree with suggestions.
Anton
On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 9:46 PM, Ross Boylan r...@biostat.ucsf.edu wrote:
On Wed, 2011-06-08 at 10:06 +0200, Sylvestre Ledru wrote:
I would like to propose the following:
* move all packaging related discussions to
something similar for
gmsh?
-Adam
On Tue, 2011-06-07 at 17:46 +0200, Anton Gladky wrote:
Thanks for answers, I have uploaded a new version with disabled metis.
Anton
On Mon, Jun 6, 2011 at 8:28 PM, Adam C Powell IV hazel...@debian.org wrote:
Hi Anton,
On Sun, 2011-06-05 at 07:29 +0200
Just a guess,
maybe we can contact metis upstream with the question of relicensing
it under distributable license?
Anton
On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 7:51 PM, Christophe Trophime
christophe.troph...@lncmi.cnrs.fr wrote:
On Jun 8, 2011, at 7:16 PM, Anton Gladky wrote:
Hi, Adam!
Sounds good
Thanks for answers, I have uploaded a new version with disabled metis.
Anton
On Mon, Jun 6, 2011 at 8:28 PM, Adam C Powell IV hazel...@debian.org wrote:
Hi Anton,
On Sun, 2011-06-05 at 07:29 +0200, Anton Gladky wrote:
Hi, all!
I am trying to package gmsh 2.5.1~svn version and to fix
Hi, all!
I am trying to package gmsh 2.5.1~svn version and to fix lintian
errors and warnings. But I have a problem with linking against
packaged libscotchmetis. The following error appears:
Linking CXX executable gmsh
/home/dk/gmsh/nv/upl_metis/gmsh-2.5.1~svn9373/Mesh/meshPartition.cpp:527:
Thanks all for opinions. I will create a git-repo for eigen3 in
debian-science and ask
KDE-team for reassigning eigen2 to debian-science.
Anton
On Mon, May 2, 2011 at 8:29 AM, Christophe Prud'homme
prudh...@debian.org wrote:
eigen3 is a dependency for PCL (itp #624178). This would be great
Dear kde users and maintainers,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package eigen3.
* Package name: eigen3
Version : 3.0.0-1
* URL : http://eigen.tuxfamily.org/
* License : GPL-2+ or LGPL-3.0+
Section : libdevel
It builds these binary packages:
Hi, all
sorry for the spam this morning, I am trying to mark the bug 621003 as done.
Also I need to close false bug 622949.
I am sending to cont...@bugs.debian.org the following message:
===
Package: src:gmsh
fixed 621003-done 2.5.0.dfsg-6
notfound 622949 2.5.0.dfsg-6
Thanks, Adam!
Anton
On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 2:49 PM, Adam C Powell IV hazel...@debian.org wrote:
Hi Anton,
On Tue, 2011-04-12 at 23:09 +0200, Anton Gladky wrote:
Hi, all
gmsh of 2.5.0.dfsg-6 version has the following line in control file[1]:
libhdf5-mpi-dev[alpha amd64 i386 ia64
Hi, all
gmsh of 2.5.0.dfsg-6 version has the following line in control file[1]:
libhdf5-mpi-dev[alpha amd64 i386 ia64 kfreebsd-amd64 kfreebsd-i386
powerpc sparc],
As I understand, libhdf5-mpi-dev should be included only on platforms,
listed above.
But builldd includes this package for all
Hi, Michael,
I am not a DD, but maybe my 2 cents will help you to make your package better:
1. Why is it experimental-oriented? I have built your package with
sid, and it builds normally.
2. It would be good if you add a check section to your package, if
it is possible. Please, see eigen2 [1]
Hi, Bastien,
I am not a DD, but I can try to give you some tips:
1) lintian -IE --pedantic over .dsc gives you 2 warnings:
P: adms source: debian-control-has-unusual-field-spacing line 18
E: adms source: unknown-file-in-debian-source git-patches
2) patch should correspond to dep-3[1], and it
...@gmx.net wrote:
Am Samstag, den 26.03.2011, 20:15 +0100 schrieb Anton Gladky:
Thanks for the quick reaction on my question.
I built this package on virtualbox i386 without any problems. And on
clean pbuilder-environment as well.
There is in the control file the following line
Hi, all
recently my package yade has been accepted into the experimental
branch and built on amd64-platform.
But it seems there are some problems with other 3 platforms: i386,
powerpc and sparc.
https://buildd.debian.org/build.cgi?pkg=yade
For example, for i386 platform there is the following
unmet dependencies:
sbuild-build-depends-yade-dummy: Depends: liblog4cxx9-dev which is a virtual
package.
Depends: python-sphinx (= 0.99) but it is
not going to be installed.
--- On Sun, 3/27/11, Anton Gladky gladky.an...@gmail.com wrote:
From: Anton Gladky
Thank you,
I have sent a request on joining in alioth.debian.org/projects/debian-science/
Anton
On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 5:04 PM, Sylvestre Ledru sylves...@debian.org wrote:
On Mon, 2011-01-24 at 11:29 +0100, Anton Gladky wrote:
Dear mentors,
* Package name : yade-0.60
Version
.
Thanks
Anton
On Thu, Jan 6, 2011 at 1:48 PM, Anton Gladky gladky.an...@gmail.com wrote:
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package yade-0.60.
* Package name : yade-0.60
Version : 0.60-1
Upstream Author : https://launchpad.net/~yade-dev
* URL : https
-0.60_0.60-1.dsc
I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me.
Kind regards
Anton Gladky
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-science-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
http://lists.debian.org/aanlktinh48pusa8c7s
301 - 355 of 355 matches
Mail list logo
