> A new gmsh was just uploaded, not sure how it will affect things... petsc is not in BD of the last 2 uploads of gmsh. There is a FTBFS, requires fixing.
By the way, gmsh is now using oce instead of opencascade. Anton 2012/2/13 Adam C Powell IV <[email protected]>: > Writing in with an update: > > On Thu, 2012-01-26 at 14:59 +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote: >> Adam C Powell IV <[email protected]> (26/01/2012): >> > On Tue, 2012-01-24 at 00:51 +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote: >> > > That means one “OK-able” package, one “oops-broken-for-a-long-while” >> > > package, and several “unknown-status” packages. To keep everyone as >> > > testing candidates until this transition is ready, maybe re-uploading >> > > petsc 3.1 would do the trick? (Either with an epoch or with the >> > > 3.2-is-really-3.1-like dirty version.) This way, all packages can stay >> > > in testing and be updated through unstable w/o having to be entangled? >> > >> > I think we're closer than that, we've been active for the past couple of >> > weeks to make this happen. The only unknown at this point is feel++. >> > Stuff to do looks like: >> > * Upload a new petsc to fix some bugs (me, probably today) >> > * Upload a new slepc with a tiny patch to add a header file (me, >> > probably today) >> > * Upload mpich2 from alioth to fix an RC bug (me, today or >> > tomorrow) >> > * Update to deal.II 7.1.0 (me, within a week) >> > * Patch gmsh to work with petsc/slepc 3.2 (Christophe Trophime >> > with my help, probably within a week) >> > * Update DOLFIN (Johannes Ring, within a week) >> > * Test/update feel++ (?? If nobody else I'll take a stab at it) >> >> Only in unstable anyway, so it can migrate later AFAICT. >> >> > * Remove illuminator from testing (release team) >> >> dak rm seems happy with it, so it can be hinted out when the rest is >> ready. >> >> > * Close the RC bug against mpi-defaults (which is pointless anyway >> > because it transitioned just before I filed it, I'll do this >> > today) >> > >> > It looks like there's a clear path to success, and this can all happen >> > within a week or two, then we can transition a bunch of stuff at once >> > including HDF5. Otherwise we're stuck trying to do two transitions >> > which will take at least 4 weeks... >> >> This looks much better than my previous summary. :) And thanks for the >> details. > > Of these packages (and some of their dependencies), hypre transitioned > this past weekend. > > Ready to transition: mumps, petsc, slepc, hdf5 -- not sure why these > didn't go into testing this past weekend, they should all be ready. > > Following later: elmerfem, deal.ii, feel++, dolfin, none of which is in > testing now anyway, all are currently broken in some way. > > A new gmsh was just uploaded, not sure how it will affect things... > > Needs removal from testing: illuminator > > I think we're near the finish line... > > -Adam > -- > GPG fingerprint: D54D 1AEE B11C CE9B A02B C5DD 526F 01E8 564E E4B6 > > Engineering consulting with open source tools > http://www.opennovation.com/ > > -- > debian-science-maintainers mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/CALF6qJnStCOmg5Da=eowiprncnvb9youkje9zhnzhxbkult...@mail.gmail.com
