libufsparse-dbg libufsparse-dev
Architecture: source all i386
Version: 1.2-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian Scientific Computing Team
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Christophe Prud'homme [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Description:
libufsparse - collection of libraries for computations
Rafael, Paul, All,
|
| A new Alioth project just for xmds is probably an overkill. We might add
| it to the existent pkg-scicomp group. I am Cc:ing this message to
| Christophe Prud'homme, the admin of the group. I think he will not object
| to it.
I won't object at all.
this is the purpose
[ Thursday 23 November 2006 18:31 ]
| * Christophe Prud'homme [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006-11-23 17:54]:
| Rafael, Paul, All,
|
| | A new Alioth project just for xmds is probably an overkill. We might
| | add it to the existent pkg-scicomp group. I am Cc:ing this message to
| | Christophe
[ jeudi 23 novembre 2006 21:11 Vanuxem Gregory ]
| Debian Developer - http://people.debian.org/~prudhomm/
| Scienfific computing packages maintainer
|
|
|
| Is it an error ? If not what is its definition ?
Of course it is scientific
thanks for noticing it is corrected now.
|
| Not
[ Thursday 24 January 2008 ]
| Hello,
|
| After a few discussions with Raphael and Adam, I would like to propose
| to create a pkg-science on alioth in order to create a dynamic around
| scientific software packaging.
| Adam created a package of Opencascade. To simplify the maintenance of
| this
[ Thursday 24 January 2008 ]
| Le jeudi 24 janvier 2008 à 20:31 +0100, Christophe Prud'homme a écrit :
| [ Thursday 24 January 2008 ]
|
| | Hello,
| |
| | After a few discussions with Raphael and Adam, I would like to propose
| | to create a pkg-science on alioth in order to create a dynamic
David,
Before we kill pkg-science, are people ok with pkg-scicomp including
e.g. graph theory? I.e. stuff outside the normal numerical idea
that some people have about scientific computing? I certainly don't
mind, but when I hear scientific computing, I think of numerics.
I guess you are
with occ for
example) .
Best regards
C.
On Jan 26, 2008 10:18 PM, David Bremner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Christophe == Christophe Prud'homme [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Christophe David,
Before we kill pkg-science, are people ok with pkg-scicomp
including e.g. graph theory? I.e
[ Sunday 16 March 2008 ]
| On 15/03/2008, Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
| I'm still having problems installing OpenFOAM. I get
|
| blockMesh: /usr/lib/libstdc++.so.6: version `GLIBCXX_3.4.9' not
| found (required by blockMesh)
|
| which looks like the binary was
Hi
I agree. Is it not the same idea as the pkg-science team started by
Sylvestre Ledru (package there what is not more suitable somewhere
else like in DebiChem, pkg-scicomp, Debian Med, etc.)?
I would suggest pkg-scicomp which seems more suite for the task.
Best regards
C.
--
To
[ Tuesday 06 May 2008 ]
| With respect to the packaging policy
| http://lists.debian.org/debian-science/2008/05/msg00029.html (for
| pkg-science or whatever it turns into), for the sake of simplicity, I
| would suggest to adopt and adapt the Debian Med existing policy:
|
Hello
| David Bremner [EMAIL PROTECTED] (2008-05-06 11:23:34) :
| Speaking as the maintainer of all packages in pkg-science ( all 3 :-)
| ), I don't mind any sort of merging plan. But I understood from
| previous mails from C. Prudhomme that he (and others?) preferred to
| keep pkg-scicomp a
[ Thursday 08 May 2008 ]
| So well, David, no answers from pkg-scicomp so far.
see my answer to Frederic.
| I do not really
| know what this means,
it means I am busy. Being a professor at a university is certainly a busy
job ;). Moreover it is holiday here in France.
| but I think we
freefem++ is packaged in pkg-scicomp but needs some license work before upload
svn+ssh://svn.debian.org/svn/pkg-scicomp/freefem++/trunk
Best regards
C.
On Sun, Jun 8, 2008 at 5:26 AM, Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 07/06/2008, Renato S. Yamane [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I
All,
In Laboratoire Jean Kuntzmann (LJK) [1] in Grenoble [2], we have an
opened research engineer position in scientific computing [3]. Below
you will find the translation of the job description.
The application deposit is open until July 9 2008 at 17h (French Time).
You have some questions
=== Finite Element Analysis ===
proposed -- field::physics:fea
(it isn't clear to me that this should be in physics rather than
engineering, so maybe field::fea would be better)
agreed or field::engineering::fea if field::engineering exists
note that it could also fit in math / numerical
At the same time, I am wondering why abinit got uploaded to pkg-scicomp
without consulting the debichem team first?
simple and honest answer: we didn't know about debichem. the person
who brought abinit to pkg-scicomp, Ondrej Certik, does a superb job
and he is certainly very helpful in
Frederic,
I would volunteer to add information regarding pkg-scicomp.
On Fri, Aug 1, 2008 at 8:16 AM, Frederic Lehobey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Chris Walker [EMAIL PROTECTED] (2008-08-01 00:39:03) :
What I think would be useful is Bits from... mails from
debian-science etc. If nothing
Chris,
this is a good idea. Digesting and presenting what is going on in
Debian Science (I include pkg-scicomp)
would be indeed very good.
Indeed.
What I think would be useful is Bits from... mails from
debian-science etc. If nothing else, it would increase the profile of
science in Debian.
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
X-Debbugs-CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- Please fill out the fields below. ---
Package name: life
Version: 0.9.8
Upstream Author: Christophe Prud'homme [EMAIL PROTECTED]
URL: http://www.prudhomm.org/life
License: LGPL
Description
To follow Ondrej comment,
I have been in contact with some people close to the Salome project.
With almost the same ones we are going to
have a similar project to build a recently funded open platform
(OPUS) for uncertainty quantification in simulations possibly based on
openturns (in the NEW
openturns is)
2. http://buildd.debian.org/~jeroen/status/package.php?p=openturns
-- Forwarded message --
From: Christophe Prud'homme [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Wed, Oct 1, 2008 at 12:02 PM
Subject: Accepted openturns 0.12.1-4 (source all i386)
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP
Annecy - Grenoble
Scientific computing related software
--
Christophe Prud'homme
Université Joseph Fourier [EMAIL PROTECTED]
LJK - Room 55 Tel: +33476635497
51, rue des Mathématiques Fax: +33476631263
BP53X 38041 Grenoble Cedex 9
http://ljk.imag.fr/membres
Sylvestre
thanks for your support. By the way you will have both the scilab hat and
Debian hat. I will have the Mediator/OPUS hat and the Debian one.
Debian is officially declared as a project that should participate to the
discussion. My initial email purpose is to gather some facts and
people
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
X-Debbugs-CC:
debian-de...@lists.debian.org,pkg-scicomp-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org,debian-science@lists.debian.org
--- Please fill out the fields below. ---
Package name: madlib
Version: 1.2.2
Upstream Author: Jean-François Remacle
, 2009 at 01:47:03PM +0200, Francesco P. Lovergine wrote:
It is already so, isn't it?
No.
Maintainer: Debian Scientific Computing Team
pkg-scicomp-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Uploaders: Christophe Prud'homme prudh...@debian.org, Ondrej Certik
ond...@certik.cz
We have a historical
Johannes
sorry for having forgotten you . The ufl, dolfin are packaged on my
machine and will be uploaded today
Best regards
C.
On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 3:15 PM, Johannes Ring joha...@simula.no wrote:
Dear mentors, debian-science, pkg-scicomp,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package ufl.
FYI
I just uploaded life in Debian a library for finite element methods
that allows to build finite element applications(hence simulations)
and I agree with the fact that simulation is very/too generic
C.
2009/1/22 Jörg-Volker Peetz jvpe...@web.de:
I support this point of view. Simulation,
Adam,
I certainly missed some emails but the recent petsc3.1 upload compiled with
lam (and not the default openmi) provoked a massive breakage on my side:
slepc and life (which uses also slepc).
I managed to recompile life without slepc but I also use boost mpi compiled
(build-depending on)
Thanks Adam for your very quick answer !
I was quite worried in fact and now I am relieved :)
I'll upload a new slepc and life tomorrow
I am still angry at the PETSc guys, they made again very slight changes to
their interface
and it breaks slepc and life.
It is not big deal (at least from what
Hi Johannes
I am compiling it now.
I let you know when it is done
if all goes right I upload !
could I upload the package in Debian science too (svn-buildpackage) ?
Best regards
C.
On Fri, Jun 4, 2010 at 10:23 AM, Johannes Ring joha...@simula.no wrote:
Dear mentors, debian-science,
I am
Johannes
I just uploaded vmtk.
I removed vtm from DebianScience and svn-injected it (with
mergeWithUpstream)
Best regards
C.
On Fri, Jun 4, 2010 at 12:24 PM, Johannes Ring joha...@simula.no wrote:
Hi Christophe,
On Fri, Jun 4, 2010 at 12:09 PM, Christophe Prud'homme
prudh...@debian.org
Hi Johannes
I see that you didn't add the DM-Upload-Allowed flag in
debian/control. It would be great if I could upload after it is
accepted the first time. What do you think?
Fine by me!
you are the one maintaining.
Don't hesitate to remind me about that.
Best regards
C.
All,
for the last few weeks, I have life [1] failing to compile on sparc (see
below). Boost::MPI looks for
OpenMPI but I was told that that the MPI implementation on sparc is LAM (is
that right?)
Life and Boost::Mpi use mpi-default-dev in Build-Depends .
It seems like there is something fishy
1. http://packages.qa.debian.org/l/life.html
http://packages.qa.debian.org/l/life.html 2.
https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=life#fail-life-sparc
On Sun, Jun 6, 2010 at 9:36 AM, Christophe Prud'homme
prudh...@debian.orgwrote:
All,
for the last few weeks, I have life [1] failing
this in the mean time
Best regards
C.
On Sun, Jun 6, 2010 at 9:37 AM, Christophe Prud'homme
prudh...@debian.orgwrote:
1. http://packages.qa.debian.org/l/life.html
http://packages.qa.debian.org/l/life.html 2.
https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=life#fail-life-sparc
On Sun, Jun 6, 2010
Steve,
On Mon, Jun 7, 2010 at 5:43 AM, Steve M. Robbins st...@sumost.ca wrote:
The mpi-defaults control file specifies lam for sparc, check
the buildd log:
https://buildd.debian.org/fetch.cgi?pkg=mpi-defaultsarch=sparcver=0.6stamp=1246463638file=logas=raw
As far as I can tell, Boost is
. Robbins wrote:
On Mon, Jun 07, 2010 at 09:02:41AM +0200, Christophe Prud'homme wrote:
On my side life depends solely on mpi-default-dev, it seems that some
other
package don't (e.g. hdf5), isn't it a problem ?
Yes, something like that is likely the problem.
Note that libhdf5-mpi
30manual mode
2/usr/lib/mpich/include 10manual mode
3/usr/lib/openmpi/include 40manual mode
On Wed, Jun 9, 2010 at 8:53 PM, Christophe Prud'homme
prudh...@debian.orgwrote:
I tried, without success so far, to help cmake(FindMPI.cmake) find
Hi Adam,
thanks for your answer !
On Fri, Jun 11, 2010 at 8:05 PM, Adam C Powell IV hazel...@debian.orgwrote:
If mpi-default-dev points to lam, then why is OpenMPI installed in the
system? Just use mpi-default-dev and libhdf5-mpi-dev and they should be
consistent. If they're not, then HDF5
good job! thanks for taking this over
On Sun, Jul 4, 2010 at 11:46 AM, Mathieu Malaterre
mathieu.malate...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi there,
I believe the paraview package is now finally in good shape and
should finally go back to testing in a couple of days:
Dear Adam,
what are your plans regarding the build issue of petsc3.1 on hppa ?
at the moment this issue blocks slepc and life from reaching testing
Should I change the build-depends to petsc 3.0 on hppa ? or are you planning
an upload the next few days ?
Best regards
C.
Andreas,
On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 9:30 AM, Andreas Tille ti...@debian.org wrote:
Dear Christophe,
On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 08:52:25AM +0200, Christophe Prud'homme wrote:
I worked a little bit on the tasks but I don't have the permission to
write
on the svn server
Can't create directory
Andreas
On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 11:16 AM, Andreas Tille ti...@debian.org wrote:
Could you please try again to commit this just to verify whether it works
now?
Yup it is good now :)
thanks!
Will I receive -commits emails or is there a mailing list I should subscribe
to ?
Best regards
C.
--
Hi Johannes,
I nmoved the trilinos package from Debian pkg-scicomp to Debian Science and
updated accordingly the control fields
We are behind on the trilinos package, could you update the patch series for
the trilinos_ library prefix please ?
I think it is time that we send this patch to
On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 2:04 PM, Johannes Ring joha...@simula.no wrote:
BTW, the latest Trilinos release is 10.4.0 while in the Debian
changelog we have 10.2.0. I guess we should still go for 10.4.0,
right?
yes :)
thanks a lot !
again I moved trilinos to Debian science svn repo
--
Debian
right now but I
will try to do it later this weekend (if you don't beat me to it).
Johannes
On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 2:49 PM, Christophe Prud'homme
prudh...@debian.org wrote:
On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 2:04 PM, Johannes Ring joha...@simula.no
wrote:
BTW, the latest Trilinos release
Hi All,
for some time now I have my package Feel++(a library and language for
pde solving) that has issues on some platforms with (pdf)latex and the
generation of fonts
I get this message while building the documentation of the software
kpathsea: Running mktexpk --mfmode / --bdpi 600 --mag
.
You might be able to work around the problem by
using the chmod or chown command on the
appropriate directory.
I hope that helps,
Kingsley
On 04/24/11 23:09, Christophe Prud'homme wrote:
Hi All,
for some time now I have my package Feel++(a library and language for
pde solving) that has
David,
I tried on the porter sparc machine (smetana or zelanka) and it worked fine
I guess I will fill a bug report on texlive
Best regards
C.
On Mon, Apr 25, 2011 at 12:19 PM, David Bremner brem...@debian.org wrote:
On Mon, 25 Apr 2011 11:18:48 +0200, Christophe Prud'homme
prudh
Hi Ólafur,
Thanks for the email.
I helped with abinit some years ago when some people from CEA Grenoble
approached me to put abinit in Debian.
I have personnally no use of abinit and I haven't the time to look
into it. I CC the debian science list to see if someone there would be
able to help
good point. It should indeed be removed
must have been there for a long time before I learned about the -o option
from svn-buildpackage
On Wed, Apr 4, 2012 at 12:04 PM, Andreas Tille andr...@an3as.eu wrote:
Hi,
I stumbled upon
svn+ssh://
Andreas,
I am for this cleanup.
Best regards
C.
On Wed, Apr 4, 2012 at 1:40 PM, Andreas Tille andr...@an3as.eu wrote:
thanks for the clarification. However, my question had a more general
part: Is it OK to simply delete upstream code of *any* package I might
stumble upon from our SVN in
, Christophe Prud'homme wrote:
Hi Ólafur,
Thanks for the email.
I helped with abinit some years ago when some people from CEA Grenoble
approached me to put abinit in Debian.
I have personnally no use of abinit and I haven't the time to look
into it. I CC the debian science list to see if someone
Anton,
It seems like the recent upload of Gmsh is broken. The Gmsh dynamic library
cannot find the
symbols of the libraries Gmsh depends upon.
Could you fix this please ? At the moment it breaks the Feel++ build and I
would like to upload -4
so that Feel++ work on Debian as well as Ubuntu.
. April 2012 10:18 schrieb Sylvestre Ledru sylves...@debian.org:
Le samedi 07 avril 2012 à 08:04 +0200, Christophe Prud'homme a écrit :
Anton,
Could you fix this please ? At the moment it breaks the Feel++ build
and I would like to upload -4
so that Feel++ work on Debian as well as Ubuntu
Anton
great that you found the solution. I never had to use -shared. This is a
bit strange but if this work then that's all good for me.
On Sun, Apr 8, 2012 at 7:58 AM, Anton Gladky gladky.an...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks all for discussion.
a
The problem was fixed by adding -shared to
All,
buildd failed on ia64 for feel++ (-4) due to lack of disk space.
Is there another way than uploading -5 ?
Best regards
C.
Jerome,
This is excellent news !
Grenoble is a place where Debian has a strong presence. I am a professor at
the Université Joseph Fourier
in applied mathematics and Debian is both used in research and teaching. I
am a strong advocate of Debian there
but not the only. Once you've tested its
I fully agree wit this proposal. Debian and Debian Science deserve being
recognized in the field of scientific computing.
I would be happy to help in this endeavor.
As to my research all the numerical results we display are done on Debian
machines. I haven't found anything else as rich and
Hello
gmsh crashes on my debian boxes
here is the backtrace
gdb gmsh
GNU gdb (GDB) 7.4.1-debian
Copyright (C) 2012 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
License GPLv3+: GNU GPL version 3 or later http://gnu.org/licenses/gpl.html
This is free software: you are free to change and redistribute it.
There
Hello,
I have looking around the Debian pages using google for the following
question:
is that possible to specify a buildd machine for an architecture when
uploading a package ?
The problem is the following, I am uploading feel++ which requires a little
bit of memory and typically 2Gb of RAM is
+0200, Christophe Prud'homme wrote:
is that possible to specify a buildd machine for an architecture when
uploading a package ?
No, it's not. You can however talk to the buildd admins
($arch@buildd.d.o) about blacklisting a package on some buildds.
Cheers,
Julien
--
Julien Cristau
63 matches
Mail list logo
