Hi,
debian/unstable has gcc 4.7, and the C++ compiler enforces the C++11
norm. That means a few things which compiled well before just error out.
The sage project has a list of problems which could be of interest :
http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/12751
notice though that the patches
Hi,
I opened an ITP for eclib yesterday :
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=673143
John Cremona was nice enough to already accept a few of my patch
submissions and give me write access to the repository, so the upstream
sources are in pretty good shape for packaging.
I asked him
Hi,
Tim Abbott doesn't have the time to care about the palp package
anymore, and I was thinking I might help with it (I already discussed
it with him privately after I reported
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=672785 ).
I already repackaged it, but would like to wait a little
Le jeudi 17 mai, Julien Puydt a écrit:
I asked him to rename the lib from libjc to libec for more coherence,
but apart from that, I think I'll be able to publish a nice package
(well, a source package giving three binary ones) quite soon.
Upstream is very reactive, so here it is:
http
Hi,
I would like to see sage (http://www.sagemath) in debian ; which is a
nice but difficult goal. Some on that list might not know much about
it, so I'll start with generalities to get a clear big picture.
So let me remind that sage is both :
- a very useful mathematical software, which I would
Le jeudi 17 mai, Julien Puydt a écrit:
- in red, things which are either not in debian, or known bad in
debian.
In fact, cephes seems to be used in sage when the libc doesn't have a
complete C99 math implementation, which seems to be the case mostly on
freeBSD : so we might not need
Hi,
the version of fplll in debian is ancient, and should be upgraded. Sage
5.0 has version 3.0.12, but sage 5.1 targets version 4.0.0.
Those new versions aren't GPL anymore, but LGPL.
I'm willing to take care of it, if nobody else steps forth, as Tim
Abbott, the official maintainer, is busy.
Hi,
I think my packages of eclibpalp are in good shape, so I put them on
mentors.debian.net, asking for sponsoring :
http://mentors.debian.net/package/palp
http://mentors.debian.net/package/eclib
Snark on #debian-science
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-science-requ...@lists.debian.org
with
Le samedi 19 mai, Ólafur Jens Sigurðsson a écrit:
On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 06:48:30PM +0200, Michael Banck wrote:
I still think it makes sense to upload the latest version of abinit
before all (new) optional dependencies have been packaged, as there
is no guarantee this will happen before
Le samedi 19 mai, Julien Puydt a écrit:
I think my packages of eclibpalp are in good shape, so I put them on
mentors.debian.net, asking for sponsoring :
http://mentors.debian.net/package/palp
http://mentors.debian.net/package/eclib
After further reading of different packaging documents, I'm
Le samedi 19 mai, Kamaraju S Kusumanchi a écrit:
Just a suggestion. Can we have a simple page (something similar to
http://release.debian.org/transitions/html/octave.html ) which gives
a quick overview of what we currently have in Debian, what we don't?
That's a good idea ; perhaps a page
Le lundi 21 mai, Kamaraju S Kusumanchi a écrit:
Julien Puydt wrote:
Le samedi 19 mai, Kamaraju S Kusumanchi a écrit:
Just a suggestion. Can we have a simple page (something similar to
http://release.debian.org/transitions/html/octave.html ) which
gives a quick overview of what we
Le lundi 21 mai, Kamaraju S Kusumanchi a écrit:
But if you want it to be easily edited by others, you can try
http://wiki.debian.org/DebianScience/Sage .
I tried to update that page a little.
From the things I changed, I would say it is very outdated, but I still
let the things I'm not sure
Hi,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package fplll
* Package name : fplll
Version : 4.0.0-1
Upstream Authors : Damien Stehle, David Cade and Xavier Pujol
* URL : http://perso.ens-lyon.fr/xavier.pujol/fplll/
* License : LGPL-2.1
Section :
Le mercredi 23 mai, Julien Puydt a écrit:
Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this
command:
dget -x
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/e/eclib/eclib_2012-05-17-1.dsc
There was a new upstream version since then ; I updated my package and
added a manpage
Hi,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package palp
* Package name : palp
Version : 2.1-1
Upstream Authors : M. Kreuzer, E.Riegler, H.Skarke and N.-O. Walliser
* URL :
http://hep.itp.tuwien.ac.at/%7Ekreuzer/CY/CYpalp.html
* License : GPL
Section
Le vendredi 25 mai, Julien Puydt a écrit:
Notice that I'm in contact with Tim Abott, the official debian
maintainer of fplll, who lacks the time to care for his packages at
the moment, so I'm doing this with his approval, not behind his back.
It is not an NMU anymore, since Tim confirmed
Le mardi 29 mai, Sylvestre Ledru a écrit:
On 27/05/2012 18:25, Julien Puydt wrote:
I am looking for a sponsor for my package palp
I am willing to sponsor it under the Debian Science umbrella. Would
you mind uploading it to the Debian Science VCS (git or svn) and
update the maintainers tag
Le mardi 29 mai, Yaroslav Halchenko a écrit:
Moreover, we all know, that even providing usable binaries accompanied
by FOSS code, without formalized build procedures and clearly
specified dependencies would complicate any extension of the code,
thus often significantly reducing the benefit of
Le mardi 29 mai, Julien Puydt a écrit:
- upload my fplll and palp packages to (lovely) git ;
There is already a palp.git, from Lifeng Sun!
Snark on #debian-science and #debian-mentors
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-science-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble
Le mercredi 30 mai, Martin Quinson a écrit:
On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 11:31:36AM +0200, Julien Puydt wrote:
Le mardi 29 mai, Yaroslav Halchenko a écrit:
Moreover, we all know, that even providing usable binaries
accompanied by FOSS code, without formalized build procedures and
clearly
Le dimanche 27 mai, Julien Puydt a écrit:
Hi,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package palp
* Package name : palp
Version : 2.1-1
Upstream Authors : M. Kreuzer, E.Riegler, H.Skarke and N.-O.
Walliser
* URL :
http://hep.itp.tuwien.ac.at/%7Ekreuzer
Le vendredi 25 mai, Julien Puydt a écrit:
Hi,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package fplll
* Package name : fplll
Version : 4.0.0-1
Upstream Authors : Damien Stehle, David Cade and Xavier Pujol
* URL : http://perso.ens-lyon.fr/xavier.pujol/fplll
Le mercredi 23 mai, Julien Puydt a écrit:
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist
Hi,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package eclib :
* Package name: eclib
Version : 2012-05-17-1
Upstream Author : John Cremona
* URL : http://code.google.com
Hi,
here is my last ITP (it seems I'll need directions on how to add a
proper X-debbugs-CC with icedove or claws-mail) :
* Package name: pynac
Version : 0.2.4
Upstream Author : Burcin Erocal bur...@erocal.org
* URL : http://pynac.sagemath.org
* License :
Le 21/06/2012 13:15, Sylvestre Ledru a écrit :
Le 18/06/2012 05:30, Lifeng Sun a écrit :
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package fflas-ffpack
Uploaded!
Lifeng, does that mean we can expect linbox 1.3.2 in debian very soon? ;-)
Snark on #debian-science
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE,
Hi,
I am still looking for a sponsor for my package eclib :
* Package name: eclib
Version : 2012-06-01-1
Upstream Author : John Cremona
* URL : http://code.google.com/p/eclib/
* License : GPL-3
Section : math
It builds those binary packages:
Hi,
I am still looking for a sponsor for my package palp
* Package name : palp
Version : 2.1-1
Upstream Authors : M. Kreuzer, E.Riegler, H.Skarke and N.-O. Walliser
* URL :
http://hep.itp.tuwien.ac.at/%7Ekreuzer/CY/CYpalp.html
* License : GPL
Hi,
I am still looking for a sponsor for my package fplll
* Package name : fplll
Version : 4.0.0-1
Upstream Authors : Damien Stehle, David Cade and Xavier Pujol
* URL : http://perso.ens-lyon.fr/xavier.pujol/fplll/
* License : LGPL-2.1
Section
Hi,
I updated my wiki package about the state of sage in debian (5.1 now):
http://wiki.debian.org/JulienPuydt
Most news are to Lifeng Sun's credit, since he managed to get a few
things in debian (with some more in the works).
I personally have three packages still waiting for sponsorship (or
Le Tue, 31 Jul 2012 22:00:47 +0200,
Andrés Goens and...@goens.org a écrit :
Seeing this email, I also want to use the opportunity and offer my
help. I'm actually working on a project on flint (upstream), so I
know myself around the code to some extent. I would like to help
getting flint into
Le 06/08/2012 01:11, Andrés Goens a écrit :
I've looked at the git repo, but I'm afraid you are right. Are you guys
trying to get sage 4.7 into debian first, or is it just that one because
it was the release at the time you did that?
The current sage (5.2) also uses a flint 1.*, but work is
Hi,
I updated my wiki page about the state of sage in debian (5.2 now):
http://wiki.debian.org/JulienPuydt
The news are :
- B.R.Link sponsored my eclib package (sage is outdated but I provided a
new spkg to cover that, which I hope will be in 5.3) ;
- sage 5.2 doesn't depend on twisted
Le 07/08/2012 09:16, Bernhard R. Link a écrit :
* Julien Puydtjulien.pu...@laposte.net [120806 18:25]:
After B.R.L.'s upload, I now have two packages waiting for
sponsorphip (or comments) :
http://mentors.debian.net/packages/uploader/julien.puydt%40laposte.net
Due to the freeze and as those
(The following discussion started because the current fplll has the same
soname as the one currently finding its way into wheezy, while being
probably incompatible.)
Le 07/08/2012 15:43, Bernhard R. Link a écrit :
* Julien Puydtjulien.pu...@laposte.net [120807 12:41]:
I don't know what
Le 10/08/2012 17:38, Tim Abbott a écrit :
The reason fplll is in Debian is as part of the effort to package Sage
(sagemath.org) for Debian. So while it has no rdepends, removing it from
Debian would be counterproductive towards that effort (which as I
understand it, there are people working on
Package: ftp.debian.org
Hi, the fplll package :
- is five year olds so is several stable versions behind upstream, hence
unmaintained upstream ;
- doesn't have any rdepends in the archive ;
- is a research-level mathematical software so outdated to be useless ;
- has a maintainer, T.Abbott
Le 27/08/2012 08:53, Julien Puydt a écrit :
Package: ftp.debian.org
Hi, the fplll package :
- is five year olds so is several stable versions behind upstream, hence
unmaintained upstream ;
- doesn't have any rdepends in the archive ;
- is a research-level mathematical software so outdated
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Julien Puydt julien.pu...@laposte.net
* Package name: fplll
Version : 4.0.1
Upstream Author : Xavier Pujol xavier.pu...@ens-lyon.fr
* URL : http://perso.ens-lyon.fr/xavier.pujol/fplll/
* License : LGPL-2.1+
Programming
I forgot to forward it to the list too...
Snark
Message original
Sujet: Re: SAGE in Debian status page
Date : Sat, 15 Dec 2012 13:37:30 +0100
De : Julien Puydt julien.pu...@laposte.net
Pour : Tobias Hansen than...@debian.org
Le 15/12/2012 12:34, Tobias Hansen a écrit :
I
Hi,
there are three packages in sage which are basically databases:
elliptic_curves, graphs and polytopes_db.
Those don't have really upstream sources: to get them, you mostly need
to unpack their sage spkg files and copy the relevant files.
Perhaps a single package would do the trick
Le 02/01/2013 15:20, Jan Groenewald a écrit :
It is fairly trivial to make a metapackage sagemath-data which depends
on all the sagemath-data-* sub-packages.
Yes ; TH's name propositions are good.
I have some idea how to make binary packages, e.g. I repackage
sagemath into a PPA by simply
Le 12/01/2013 23:57, Cédric Boutillier a écrit :
Please let me know if anything does not work as expected.
I saw that yesterday on the irc channel and found it nice: thanks!
Snark on #debian-science
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-science-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of
Le 22/02/2013 11:15, Tobias Hansen a écrit :
As you can see on the Wiki page, the most obvious open tasks are now
updating flint and singular, and packaging libgap and lrcalc. And of
course, starting to package Sage itself. If someone is up for this, now
would already be a good time to start
Le 23/02/2013 13:25, Tobias Hansen a écrit :
Am 22.02.2013 13:29, schrieb Julien Puydt:
I have scripts to (try to...) build sage against what is in debian, see
attached. Notice:
- the comments in spkg_to_dpkg are not all up to date
- feedback on them is welcome
- to use them (1) edit
Le 03/03/2013 01:11, Tobias Hansen a écrit :
Am 02.03.2013 11:43, schrieb Julien Puydt:
Le 23/02/2013 13:25, Tobias Hansen a écrit :
Am 22.02.2013 13:29, schrieb Julien Puydt:
I have scripts to (try to...) build sage against what is in debian, see
attached. Notice:
- the comments
Le 09/03/2013 11:09, Sylvestre Ledru a écrit :
On 09/03/2013 10:14, Julien Puydt wrote:
Package: maxima
Version: 5.29.1-1
The maxima used in sage is built with ecl, while the sage in debian
isn't. That will of course be a problem to package sage ; a very simple
fix would be to just compile
Le 10/03/2013 09:10, Julien Puydt a écrit :
How easy is it to make the same maxima to run on several common-lisps?
Considering:
jpuydt@newton:~$ dpkg -L maxima |grep lib
/usr/lib
/usr/lib/maxima
/usr/lib/maxima/5.29.1
/usr/lib/maxima/5.29.1/binary-gcl
/usr/lib/maxima/5.29.1/binary-gcl/maxima
Hi,
a few days ago, bug #702898 asked to add the static libraries to the
libfplll-dev package. Yesterday, I committed a fix to the git repository
for the package.
It would be nice if someone could check I did a good job and upload the
result.
Thanks,
Snark on #debian-science
--
To
Le 16/03/2013 13:11, Tobias Hansen a écrit :
Am 16.03.2013 12:55, schrieb Sylvestre Ledru:
I share your opinion. I prefer when packages are using shared
libraries. Therefor, when a changed is done on the library, the other
packages using it immediately get the changes.
Otherwise, they have to
Le 16/03/2013 17:12, Sylvestre Ledru a écrit :
On 16/03/2013 13:16, Julien Puydt wrote:
Le 16/03/2013 13:11, Tobias Hansen a écrit :
Am 16.03.2013 12:55, schrieb Sylvestre Ledru:
I share your opinion. I prefer when packages are using shared
libraries. Therefor, when a changed is done
Le 16/03/2013 16:57, Tobias Hansen a écrit :
== Desirable skills: ==
familiarity with shell scripts, makefiles and C libraries
You forgot python.
Snark on #debian-science and #sagemath
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-science-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe.
Le 16/03/2013 18:36, leif a écrit :
Julien Puydt wrote:
Le 16/03/2013 16:57, Tobias Hansen a écrit :
== Desirable skills: ==
familiarity with shell scripts, makefiles and C libraries
You forgot python.
Autotools, C++, Common Lisp / ECL, Cython, Perl, ... ? ;-)
Do they know about Sage
Hi,
Le 21/06/2012 08:37, Julien Puydt a écrit :
here is my last ITP (it seems I'll need directions on how to add a
proper X-debbugs-CC with icedove or claws-mail) :
* Package name : pynac
Version : 0.2.4
Upstream Author : Burcin Erocal bur...@erocal.org
* URL : http://pynac.sagemath.org
Hi,
I was horrified this morning to discover that fplll 4.0.1-2, which was
supposed to close bug #702898 (on fplll) was really closing bug #702056
(on polybori) : I put the wrong bug number in the changelog entry! :-(
What can I do to reopen the bug which was erroneously closed and close
Le 17/03/2013 00:36, than...@debian.org a écrit :
Is splitting the vanilla upstream sources off planned? That would be
very helpful for distributions. Another helpful thing would be a clear
distinction between fixes/adjustment to the library and Sage glue,
because we need all the Sage glue, but
Le 17/03/2013 09:29, Tobias Hansen a écrit :
Don't worry, nothing a mail to cont...@bugs.debian.org can't fix. See
http://www.debian.org/Bugs/server-control
That is what I did to reopen the bug ; but for closing the real one, is
it the best course of action? I still have a bad changelog entry
Le 17/03/2013 10:10, Ansgar Burchardt a écrit :
Sylvestre Ledrusylves...@debian.org writes:
On 17/03/2013 09:56, Julien Puydt wrote:
That is what I did to reopen the bug ; but for closing the real one, is
it the best course of action?
you can do:
702898-d...@bugs.debian.org
Ideally
Le 17/03/2013 12:42, Tobias Hansen a écrit :
The package looks good. Good to see a library that properly uses libtool
in Sage. :)
Using standard tools in a standard way is definitely helpful.
Here are my comments:
- I'm not satisfied with the reason for the lintian override of
Le 17/03/2013 15:22, leif a écrit :
than...@debian.org wrote:
Am Samstag, 16. März 2013 20:57:13 UTC+1 schrieb leif:
But if we switch to git, improve Sage's package management (as a first
step, split vanilla upstream sources off the spkgs :P ), ...
Is splitting the vanilla upstream sources off
Le 17/03/2013 17:28, Tobias Hansen a écrit :
Am 17.03.2013 16:58, schrieb Julien Puydt:
Le 17/03/2013 12:42, Tobias Hansen a écrit :
- Tip for debian/copyright: you don't need to repeat the GPL2+ in every
file paragraph, one License:GPL2+ paragraph at the end would also do the
trick.
Lintian
Le 17/03/2013 12:42, Tobias Hansen a écrit :
- I'm not satisfied with the reason for the lintian override of
hardening-no-fortify-functions that hardening makes no sense. Since
-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 is passed, this may be a false positive from
lintian, so that may be a better comment.
Done.
-
Le 17/03/2013 20:53, Steve M. Robbins a écrit :
On March 16, 2013 06:55:36 AM Tobias Hansen wrote:
Am 15.03.2013 13:56, schrieb Julien Puydt:
a few days ago, bug #702898 asked to add the static libraries to the
libfplll-dev package. Yesterday, I committed a fix to the git repository
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Julien Puydt julien.pu...@laposte.net
* Package name: sagemath-database-elliptic-curves
Version : 0.7
Upstream Author : R. Andrew Ohana andrew.oh...@gmail.com
* URL : http://www.sagemath.org/packages/standard/
* License
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Julien Puydt julien.pu...@laposte.net
* Package name: sagemath-database-graphs
Version : 20120404.p4
Upstream Author : R. Andrew Ohana andrew.oh...@gmail.com
* URL : http://www.sagemath.org/packages/standard/
* License
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Julien Puydt julien.pu...@laposte.net
* Package name: sagemath-database-polytopes
Version : 20100210.p2
Upstream Author : Andrey Novoseltsev novos...@gmail.com
* URL : http://www.sagemath.org/packages/standard/
* License
Le 18/03/2013 08:49, Julien Puydt a écrit :
This is part of the effort to package sage in debian, and corresponds to
the elliptic_curves spkg, of which it is a repackaging.
It corresponds to the graphs spkg, of course!
Snark on #debian-science
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-science-requ
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Julien Puydt julien.pu...@laposte.net
* Package name: sagemath-database-conway-polynomials
Version : 20100210.p2
Upstream Author : R. Andrew Ohana andrew.oh...@gmail.com
* URL : http://www.sagemath.org/packages/standard
Hi,
I'm looking for sponshorship (or at least comments) on five sage-related
packages:
pynac
sagemath-database-conway-polynomials
sagemath-database-elliptic-curves
sagemath-database-graphs
sagemath-database-polytopes
They are packaged in debian-science's git and conveniently listed here:
Le 18/03/2013 19:06, Anton Gladky a écrit :
thanks for working on sage. It seems, that packages are ok, but from my
point of view all orig.tar.gz should be repacked without .hg-directory,
as there are some binaries inside.
H... that is the case of all the sagemath-database-* packages, as
Le 18/03/2013 20:54, Anton Gladky a écrit :
uydtjulien.pu...@laposte.net:
So how should I proceed? Do I take the upstream sources, untar, rm -r .hg,
retar and use that for git-import-orig? If so, I guess I should document
that somewhere!
I think yes. But you should also add dfsg into the
Le 18/03/2013 21:10, Tobias Hansen a écrit :
Am 18.03.2013 20:54, schrieb Anton Gladky:
uydtjulien.pu...@laposte.net:
So how should I proceed? Do I take the upstream sources, untar, rm -r .hg,
retar and use that for git-import-orig? If so, I guess I should document
that somewhere!
I think
Le 18/03/2013 21:12, Julien Puydt a écrit :
We loose history,
Should be lose.
I saw too many native-speakers make the mistake :-P
Snark on #debian-science
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-science-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas
Le 18/03/2013 19:06, Anton Gladky a écrit :
thanks for working on sage. It seems, that packages are ok, but from my
point of view all orig.tar.gz should be repacked without .hg-directory,
as there are some binaries inside.
I did the modification to the four sagemath-database-* packages.
Le 18/03/2013 19:06, Anton Gladky a écrit :
sagemath-database-graphs has also a binary-database:
src/graphs.db. It is not allowed.
I don't see what I can do for that :-/
Snark on #debian-science
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-science-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of
Le 19/03/2013 07:38, Tobias Hansen a écrit :
Am 17.03.2013 19:14, schrieb Julien Puydt:
I can't help but notice that my debian/rules has:
DEB_CONFIGURE_EXTRA_FLAGS += --libdir=\$${prefix}/lib/$(DEB_HOST_MULTIARCH)
and later on:
override_dh_auto_configure:
dh_auto_configure -- --enable
Le 18/03/2013 23:42, Anton Gladky a écrit :
2013/3/18 Julien Puydtjpu...@free.fr:
I don't see what I can do for that :-/
Just a proposal for dfsg-packing script:
sqlite3 graphs.db .dump graphs.dump
Done.
And then, in dh_auto_configure, for example:
cat graphs.dump | sqlite3 graphs.db
Hi,
on a debian box:
- install all packages mentioned in spkg_to_dpkg.py with the right
version -- some are available from unstable or experimental but others
require building them from the debian git repositories (and see what is
left to do)
- unpack sage-5.9.tar.gz somewhere
- change
Le 27/03/2013 20:34, Julien Puydt a écrit :
- change debian_pruner.py's sagedir= line to point to where you
unpacked sage sources
- run debian_pruner.py to do magic symlinking
To be more explicit about what the sage pruner does: you have to know
that the sage build process knows if a spkg
Hi,
now that wheezy is out, I'm looking again for a sponsor to my package of
a more recent palp (one of the things we need for the sagemath packaging
effort):
* Package name : palp
Version : 2.1-1
Upstream Authors : M. Kreuzer, E.Riegler, H.Skarke and N.-O. Walliser
*
Le 07/05/2013 22:20, Andreas Tille a écrit :
Hi Julien,
thanks for your work on palp as sagemath precondition. As you might
have read on debian-devel-announce[1] (subscribing this list is
mandatory and I personally would expect reading Debian Science members
to read Blends related postings) I
Le 08/05/2013 10:57, Andreas Tille a écrit :
Hi Julien,
On Tue, May 07, 2013 at 11:15:39PM +0200, Julien Puydt wrote:
It is a bit sad that nobody has given a hint to palp when I was calling
for help for the metapackage creation[2].
Well, there is already a palp in debian, outdated
Le 08/05/2013 17:24, Andreas Tille a écrit :
list of things done for a better package
Great! I take this and your ack for the Blends issues I deleted from
this mail as understood the Blends principle.
I'm not sure I understood them that well, but at least I'm willing to
make my packages as
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Julien Puydt julien.pu...@laposte.net
* Package name: mpir
Version : 2.6.0
Upstream Author : Torbjorn Granlund
* URL : http://www.mpir.org/
* License : LGPLv3+
Programming Lang: C
Description : Multiple Precision
Le 15/05/2013 16:46, Felix Salfelder a écrit :
On Wed, May 15, 2013 at 03:29:04PM +0200, Julien Puydt wrote:
- it is for an older version of mpir ;
it's an import of an ancient svn repo. upstream has switched to git.
- as far as I know it doesn't follow the packaging guidelines (the
debian
On Wed, 15 May 2013 23:05:59 +0200
Tobias Hansen than...@debian.org wrote:
Uh... I saw the packaging commits and the upstream commits in the same
branch :-/
If the upstream branch tracks the upstream repository (which is not a
bad thing), then all the upstream commits also appear in the
Le 10/06/2013 10:57, Julien Puydt a écrit :
You can review this here:
ssh://git.debian.org/git/debian-science/packages/fplll.git
Please?
Snark on #debian-science
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-science-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas
Le 19/07/2013 10:34, Tobias Hansen a écrit :
I should mention that fixing the bug probably just means incorporating
patches from the Sage spkg, see my mail about packaging flintqs for what
that means.
I think repackaging it from scratch using sage as upstream is the most
sensible solution.
Le 12/08/2013 18:30, Yaroslav Halchenko a écrit :
I would not call the helper dh_science though since it is not
science-specific... if bibliographies to come solely from debian/upstream,
should be dh_upstream I guess ;)
dh_citations?
Snark on #debian-science
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
+0200
De : Julien Puydt julien.pu...@laposte.net
Pour : Debian Bug Tracking System sub...@bugs.debian.org
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Julien Puydt julien.pu...@laposte.net
C-Debbugs-Cc: debian-science@lists.debian.org
* Package name: gf2x
Version : 1.1
Upstream Author
Hi,
Le 12/12/2013 22:36, Andreas Tille a écrit :
eclib
fplll
gf2x
pynac
sagemath-database-conway-polynomials
sagemath-database-elliptic-curves
sagemath-database-graphs
sagemath-database-polytopes
Those are all about mathematics.
Snark on #debian-science
(well, haven't been on that
Hi,
the git side of the pynac package is up to the latest upstream, and a
few problems have been settled along the way, so I need the help of a
sponsor, please.
One of the problems means that the soname of the library goes down from
5 to 0, so as far as I know sponsoring will also mean
Hi,
the fplll package was using build-deps which mentioned a specific stdc++
version: that meant it was using a non-standard compiler. That is an
important-high bug.
I pushed a fix to git today, and would need a sponsor for the new
package, please.
I hope that helps,
Snark on
Hi,
eclib-2014-05-14a-1 is already in debian ; I need a sponsor for -2,
which only adds a patch to the previous version (to fix clang
compilation), so should be quite straightforward to review.
The repository is in debian-science's git:
ssh://git.debian.org/git/debian-science/packages/eclib
Hi,
Le 03/08/2014 11:30, Tobias Hansen a écrit :
please set the targeted distribution in the changelog to unstable, then
I'll sponsor it. (It's always a good idea to do that before asking for a
sponsor.)
I've updated it (and modified urgency to low).
Snark on #debian-science
--
To
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: flintqs
Version: 20070817
Upstream author: William Hart
* URL: http://www.sagemath.org/packages/upstream/flintqs/index.html
* License: GPL-2+
Description: Program using quadratic sieve to factor integers
This small program attempts to find
Hi,
flint stands for Fast Library for Integer Number Theory, is already used
quite heavily in sagemath, and will likely be used by a few other
mathematical programs in the near future.
Tim Abbott packaged it years ago ; Felix Salfelder prepared it anew and
I made a few small changes to try
Hi,
Le 07/08/2014 14:18, Tobias Hansen a écrit :
Do you also plan to get the updated flint package uploaded? I would give
that a slightly higher priority, since it has more potential users. For
example the flint homepage says there's ongoing work to use it in
Macauley2 and Singular, so a Debian
Hi,
Le 07/08/2014 23:17, Tobias Hansen a écrit :
Hi Julien,
here are my comments:
- Check if the patches from the two NMU's are still needed,
if not keep at least the changelog entries and write in the
new entry that they are no longer needed.
Sorry, which NMUs?
- Build and install
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: sagemath-database-combinatorial-designs
Version: 20140630
Upstream author: Nathann Cohen
* URL:
http://www.sagemath.org/packages/upstream/combinatorial_designs/index.html
* License: GPL-2+
Description: Databases of combinatorial designs
1 - 100 of 219 matches
Mail list logo
