On Thu, 2012-04-12 at 13:06 +0200, Thibaut Paumard wrote:
Le 12/04/12 12:50, Gerber van der Graaf a écrit :
Hi, for packaging freefoam-user-doc I intend to include the static file
UsersGuide.pdf.gz as asymptote is currently broken.
(http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=668286)
On Wed, 2012-02-29 at 11:42 +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 15:05:00 -0500, Adam C Powell IV wrote:
Ready to transition: mumps, petsc, slepc, hdf5 -- not sure why these
didn't go into testing this past weekend, they should all be ready.
mumps and hdf5 have now
On Mon, 2012-03-05 at 22:40 +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 16:28:25 -0500, Adam C Powell IV wrote:
On Wed, 2012-02-29 at 11:42 +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 15:05:00 -0500, Adam C Powell IV wrote:
Ready to transition: mumps, petsc, slepc
On Mon, 2012-02-27 at 11:15 +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
On Sat, Feb 25, 2012 at 23:51:12 -0500, Adam C Powell IV wrote:
That said, the HDF5 transition seems a bit premature. There are some
fundamental changes which have broken a couple of its reverse-depends,
which is one reason so many
Hello Anton,
On Sat, 2012-02-25 at 15:41 +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
Hi,
Anton Gladky gladky.an...@gmail.com (25/02/2012):
is there a chance to get petsc in testing in a near future?
gmsh was removed from wheezy because of petsc.
as explained by Julien in [1], we had to remove it to
On Tue, 2012-02-14 at 12:15 +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
Adam C Powell IV hazel...@debian.org (13/02/2012):
Writing in with an update:
Thanks.
Ready to transition: mumps, petsc, slepc, hdf5 -- not sure why these
didn't go into testing this past weekend, they should all be ready
Writing in with an update:
On Thu, 2012-01-26 at 14:59 +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
Adam C Powell IV hazel...@debian.org (26/01/2012):
On Tue, 2012-01-24 at 00:51 +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
That means one “OK-able” package, one “oops-broken-for-a-long-while”
package, and several
On Tue, 2012-01-24 at 00:51 +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
Adam C Powell IV hazel...@debian.org (23/01/2012):
deal.II detects the PETSc version and acts accordingly, I believe 7.1.0
will work through 3.2. I need to work on upgrading from 7.0.0 to 7.1.0.
[…]
Illuminator has major
Hello Julian,
On Sat, 2012-01-21 at 16:49 +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
Hi,
it seems there's currently a move from petsc and slepc 3.1 to 3.2 in
sid. In addition to the library package names changing, presumably
because the new versions are not binary-compatible, the devel package
were
Hello Andrea,
On Wed, 2011-12-14 at 20:50 +, Andrea Palazzi wrote:
However, the package builds but the executable has a big
problems when reading MED files (containing mesh data and
results). I'm almost sure that this comes from the use of the
flag
On 07/29/2011 08:30 AM, Adam C Powell IV wrote:
Dear Nuno,
A git format patch set would make my life a *lot* easier. But it will
be enormous given the size of the repository. Can you post it somewhere
on the web for me to download?
Hi Adam,Christophe,
You can access
On Wed, 2011-06-29 at 23:19 +1000, Drew Parsons wrote:
On Wed, 2011-06-29 at 15:01 +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
Hi,
Your package is uninstallable on some archs:
mrbayes-mpi/mips unsatisfiable Depends: openmpi-bin
mrbayes-mpi/mipsel unsatisfiable Depends: openmpi-bin
On Mon, 2011-06-27 at 17:26 +0200, Sylvestre Ledru wrote:
Le mercredi 22 juin 2011 à 10:20 -0400, Adam C Powell IV a écrit :
On Tue, 2011-06-21 at 13:29 +1000, Drew Parsons wrote:
On Wed, 2011-06-15 at 08:33 -0400, Manjusha Joshi wrote:
On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 1:13 PM, Brett Viren b
On Tue, 2011-06-21 at 13:29 +1000, Drew Parsons wrote:
On Wed, 2011-06-15 at 08:33 -0400, Manjusha Joshi wrote:
On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 1:13 PM, Brett Viren b...@bnl.gov wrote:
Sylvestre Ledru sylves...@debian.org writes:
== Proposal ==
I
On Tue, 2011-06-14 at 09:21 +0200, Alain Leufroy wrote:
Andre, has upstream merged in your new versions of the patches, or do we
need to forward-port them all again to send in for merging?
Let see the end of this mail, I've pasted the answer of the upstream
(in french).
Wow, thank you
On Wed, 2011-06-08 at 20:29 +0200, Andrea Palazzi wrote:
Il giorno mer, 08/06/2011 alle 19.59 +0200, Anton Gladky ha scritto:
Just a guess,
maybe we can contact metis upstream with the question of relicensing
it under distributable license?
Anton
Hi,
I've contacted metis upstream
to do something similar for
gmsh?
-Adam
On Tue, 2011-06-07 at 17:46 +0200, Anton Gladky wrote:
Thanks for answers, I have uploaded a new version with disabled metis.
Anton
On Mon, Jun 6, 2011 at 8:28 PM, Adam C Powell IV hazel...@debian.org wrote:
Hi Anton,
On Sun, 2011-06-05 at 07:29
Hi Anton,
On Sun, 2011-06-05 at 07:29 +0200, Anton Gladky wrote:
Hi, all!
I am trying to package gmsh 2.5.1~svn version and to fix lintian
errors and warnings. But I have a problem with linking against
packaged libscotchmetis. The following error appears:
Linking CXX executable gmsh
On Thu, 2011-05-19 at 16:32 +0200, Sylvestre Ledru wrote:
Le jeudi 19 mai 2011 à 10:16 -0400, Adam C Powell IV a écrit :
Dear Debian Scientists,
The question to Debian is: do we package OCC or OCE? If OCE, do we
change the name, or just trust that the changes are minor and fully
Hello Andrea,
On Tue, 2011-05-10 at 12:58 +0100, Andrea Palazzi wrote:
--- Mar 10/5/11, Adam C Powell IV hazel...@debian.org ha scritto:
Da: Adam C Powell IV hazel...@debian.org
Oggetto: Re: ITP: aster -- Finite Element Analysis (FEA) software for
engineering simulations
I would
Hi Anton,
On Tue, 2011-04-12 at 23:09 +0200, Anton Gladky wrote:
Hi, all
gmsh of 2.5.0.dfsg-6 version has the following line in control file[1]:
libhdf5-mpi-dev[alpha amd64 i386 ia64 kfreebsd-amd64 kfreebsd-i386
powerpc sparc],
As I understand, libhdf5-mpi-dev should be included only
Hi,
I'd like to do a binNMU for ScaLAPACK to get rid of bug 589763.
Specifically, whoever uploaded ScaLAPACK appears to have built it with
libatlas-base-dev or something similar installed, so libscalapack-mpi1
depends on libatlas3gf-base .
But libatlas3gf-base breaks my build of Elmer, which
On Mon, 2010-07-12 at 18:32 -0400, Adam C Powell IV wrote:
On Mon, 2010-07-12 at 23:11 +0200, Johannes Ring wrote:
Hi Adam,
On Wed, Jul 7, 2010 at 5:51 PM, Adam C Powell IV hazel...@debian.org
wrote:
Hello,
I'm having two problems with PETSc, and need some help.
Second, I
On Mon, 2010-07-12 at 23:11 +0200, Johannes Ring wrote:
Hi Adam,
On Wed, Jul 7, 2010 at 5:51 PM, Adam C Powell IV hazel...@debian.org wrote:
Hello,
I'm having two problems with PETSc, and need some help.
Second, I just uploaded a new version, and although the build process
reports
-opt/lib directory is PETSC_LIB_DIR, but it must be
empty, because the corresponding directory in the package is empty.
Can someone else try to build it, and let me know what's in the
linux-gnu-c-opt/lib directory at the end?
Thanks,
Adam
On Tue, 2010-07-06 at 08:46 -0400, Adam C Powell IV wrote
Hi Christophe,
On Mon, 2010-07-05 at 20:24 +0200, Christophe Prud'homme wrote:
what are your plans regarding the build issue of petsc3.1 on hppa ?
I have no idea on how to resolve this issue. It seems to be a low-level
problem with python, and there was a suggestion that certain kernels
worked
On Thu, 2010-06-17 at 13:04 -0400, Lennart Sorensen wrote:
On Thu, Jun 17, 2010 at 06:05:05PM +0200, Francesco Pietra wrote:
Hello:
For computational chemistry on the stable amd64 I needed yesterday
MPICH2. As the deb package is only in testing, I compiled MPICH2 for
stable, but the
regards
C.
On Wed, Jun 9, 2010 at 12:08 PM, Adam C Powell IV
hazel...@debian.org wrote:
On Mon, 2010-06-07 at 02:25 -0500, Steve M. Robbins
wrote:
On Mon, Jun 07, 2010 at 09:02:41AM +0200, Christophe
Hi Christophe,
On Fri, 2010-06-11 at 23:48 +0200, Christophe Prud'homme wrote:
Hi Adam,
thanks for your answer !
On Fri, Jun 11, 2010 at 8:05 PM, Adam C Powell IV
hazel...@debian.org wrote:
If mpi-default-dev points to lam, then why is OpenMPI
installed
On Mon, 2010-06-07 at 02:25 -0500, Steve M. Robbins wrote:
On Mon, Jun 07, 2010 at 09:02:41AM +0200, Christophe Prud'homme wrote:
On my side life depends solely on mpi-default-dev, it seems that some other
package don't (e.g. hdf5), isn't it a problem ?
Yes, something like that is likely
Hi Christophe,
On Thu, 2010-05-27 at 12:35 +0200, Christophe Prud'homme wrote:
Adam,
I certainly missed some emails but the recent petsc3.1 upload compiled
with
lam (and not the default openmi) provoked a massive breakage on my
side:
slepc and life (which uses also slepc).
Oh no!
On Thu, 2010-05-27 at 08:31 -0400, Adam C Powell IV wrote:
Hi Christophe,
On Thu, 2010-05-27 at 12:35 +0200, Christophe Prud'homme wrote:
I managed to recompile life without slepc but I also use boost mpi
compiled (build-depending on) with mpi-default-dev (as well as life)
and combining
Hi Stefano,
On Thu, 2010-05-27 at 14:27 +0200, Carsten Aulbert wrote:
On Thursday 27 May 2010 14:12:09 Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
The post is at
http://upsilon.cc/~zack/blog/posts/2010/05/Debian-based_scientific_computin
g_at_EDF/ and kudos your work, so it's probably appropriate to mention
On Fri, 2010-04-30 at 14:18 +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
I can confirm that this is actually the reason why at Sanger Institute
(even if there are three DDs working) plain Debian (and specifically the
Debian Med packages) is not used.
FYI, I uploaded a new version of the Med packages on Monday
On Tue, 2010-04-27 at 09:36 +0200, Nicolas Chauvat wrote:
On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 11:07:18PM +0200, Sylvestre Ledru wrote:
Well done for this packaging!
Yep, nice job.
Thanks.
One more argument: we could plug Aster into Salome thanks to pylotage.
If we are lucky, it could even make
, Adam C Powell IV wrote:
Hello André and list,
On Thu, 2010-04-22 at 15:04 +0200, Andre Espaze wrote:
Dear list,
Now that salome-5.1.3-5 is running, I started a documentation on its
content and finally found a question on Debian package organization.
...
The current package
tags 563705 +patch
thanks
Hi and apologies for the long delay...
On Fri, 2010-02-26 at 14:55 -0500, Adam C Powell IV wrote:
On Fri, 2010-02-26 at 20:22 +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
On 26/02/10 at 10:46 -0500, Adam C Powell IV wrote:
On Thu, 2010-02-25 at 20:49 +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote
On Thu, 2010-02-25 at 20:49 +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
On 25/02/10 at 14:22 -0500, Adam C Powell IV wrote:
On Thu, 2010-02-25 at 18:10 +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
There is not much progress so far with respect to changing
mpi-defaults
to use MPICH2 instead of LAM
On Fri, 2010-02-26 at 11:21 +0100, Sylvestre Ledru wrote:
Le vendredi 26 février 2010 à 09:54 +, Alastair McKinstry a écrit :
Perhaps using pkg-config (an mpi.pc file) would be a better solution to
this; it is more
standard: the mpicc, etc. approach isn't very scalable, you can't
On Thu, 2010-02-25 at 18:10 +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
There is not much progress so far with respect to changing mpi-defaults
to use MPICH2 instead of LAM on the architectures where Open MPI is not
available yet. This needs a round of binNMUs. Marc Brockschmidt said he
will look at
Hi,
I've been beating my head on $(wildcard...) in a rules file for nearly a
week now, and can't make any sense of it. The rules file is attached,
and lines 192-193 both have identical $(wildcard...) in them (copied
roughly from my babel package, where it works). When I run
git-buildpackage, it
On Wed, 2010-02-10 at 10:56 -0600, Steve M. Robbins wrote:
On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 09:14:05AM +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:
I think it is rather the workflow you have to change which is sometimes
much harder. You have to remember to change the Vcs fields in the
control files of your
On Mon, 2010-02-08 at 14:44 +0100, Sylvestre Ledru wrote:
Hello Adam,
Le lundi 08 février 2010 à 08:39 -0500, Adam C Powell IV a écrit :
Hello,
Some time ago, the netlib and ATLAS implementations of BLAS and LAPACK
were ABI-compatible, and used alternatives symlinks to access
days ago, but that machine doesn't have enough disk
space to build the whole thing.)
On Mon, 2010-01-25 at 11:45 -0500, Adam C Powell IV wrote:
Now for one problem. The VISU module doesn't completely compile,
because of a symbol/prototype incompatibility within its CONVERTER
library. I don't
-0500, Adam C Powell IV wrote:
On Sun, 2010-01-10 at 23:28 +0100, Nicolas Chauvat wrote:
Hi,
As part of the OpenHPC project[1], Logilab commited itself to package
Salomé for Debian. We had seen the great work you have done and are
glad that you are resuming it.
Wow, thank you
Greetings,
For those interested, I'm re-doing the Salomé .deb I started three years
ago. Salomé is a finite element pre-post processing framework, with a
lot of other things in there as well.
Though some things have improved between version 3.2.6 and 5.1.3, many
have not, so although this
On Sun, 2010-01-10 at 23:28 +0100, Nicolas Chauvat wrote:
Hi,
On Sun, Jan 10, 2010 at 02:29:03PM -0500, Adam C Powell IV wrote:
For those interested, I'm re-doing the Salomé .deb I started three years
...
Because I can't do the whole package, I'm putting up the progress I've
On Tue, 2009-11-10 at 16:27 +0100, Michael Banck wrote:
On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 09:19:11AM -0500, Adam C Powell IV wrote:
On Mon, 2009-11-09 at 16:47 -0800, Nicholas Breen wrote:
* is it too late in the release cycle to propose this as a release goal?
should squeeze+1 be the target
I generally agree, just a quick nit-pick/clarification:
On Tue, 2009-11-10 at 20:56 +0100, Manuel Prinz wrote:
* Alternatives need to be fixed. Besides what the bugs that
Nicholas referenced say, there are two other issues with those:
First, the priorities do not match
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-de...@lists.debian.org, debian-science@lists.debian.org
Package name: elmer-doc
Version: 2009.09.22
Author: CSC – IT Center for Science, Finland
License: CC-BY-ND 3.0
URL: http://www.csc.fi/elmer/
Description: Documentation for Elmer finite
On Mon, 2009-06-01 at 19:00 -0400, Adam C Powell IV wrote:
Hi,
Last week OpenMPI transitioned to a new shared library package,
reflecting an ABI change to version 1.3.x (which wasn't reflected in the
shared lib package name of 1.3-2).
From what I can see, it looks like there are at least
On Tue, 2009-06-16 at 20:10 +0200, Luk Claes wrote:
Adam C Powell IV wrote:
On Mon, 2009-06-01 at 19:00 -0400, Adam C Powell IV wrote:
Hi,
Last week OpenMPI transitioned to a new shared library package,
reflecting an ABI change to version 1.3.x (which wasn't reflected in the
shared
On Sat, 2009-06-06 at 21:35 -0400, Christopher Olah wrote:
Thanks for your responses!
David Joyner Wrote:
http://www.sagemath.org/doc/reference/sage/plot/plot3d/implicit_plot3d.html
sage's implicit plots seem perfect. Thanks!
Kapil Hari Paranjape Wrote:
Such plots are (in general)
Hi,
Last week OpenMPI transitioned to a new shared library package,
reflecting an ABI change to version 1.3.x (which wasn't reflected in the
shared lib package name of 1.3-2).
I went to rebuild my spooles package, only to find that there is already
a rebuild versioned 2.2-6+b1.
However, superlu
On Tue, 2009-06-02 at 09:52 +0200, Manuel Prinz wrote:
Am Montag, den 01.06.2009, 19:00 -0400 schrieb Adam C Powell IV:
Last week OpenMPI transitioned to a new shared library package,
reflecting an ABI change to version 1.3.x (which wasn't reflected in the
shared lib package name of 1.3-2
Hello,
I've just finished re-doing the blacs and scalapack packages using
mpi-defaults. The results are in http://lyre.mit.edu/~powell/mumps/
(since I'm using them for my not-yet-finished MUMPS package). They are
NMUs approved by the maintainer to close bugs 491028 and 491105.
If you maintain
On Sun, 2008-11-23 at 16:24 +0100, Daniel Leidert wrote:
Hi Adam,
I CCed you, because this information might be of some importance to you.
Am Donnerstag, den 06.11.2008, 19:30 -0500 schrieb Adam C Powell IV:
Where can I get a recent ARPACK package? I know it's been removed from
main
Hi again, and sorry for causing accidental posts to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- I don't know how to do X-Debbugs-CC in
Evolution.
On Thu, 2008-11-20 at 12:35 +0100, Ondrej Certik wrote:
On Thu, Nov 20, 2008 at 11:14 AM, Manuel Prinz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Am Mittwoch, den 19.11.2008, 09:05 -0600
On Thu, 2008-11-20 at 16:48 +0100, Manuel Prinz wrote:
Am Donnerstag, den 20.11.2008, 09:45 -0500 schrieb Adam C Powell IV:
Feedback anyone?
I was just wondering why you depend on debhelper = 3, while compat is
set to 5. Souldn't you depend on = 5 then?
Not sure. My reasoning
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Package name: mpi-defaults
Version: 0.1
Author: Debian Science Team [EMAIL PROTECTED]
License: Undetermined
This new source package will produce two binary meta-packages:
default-mpi-dev and default-mpi-bin which depend on libopenmpi-dev and
openmpi-bin
On Tue, 2008-11-18 at 23:06 +0100, Manuel Prinz wrote:
[ Sorry for the long email! I wanted to express my view and as a
non-native speaker, it's not always easy to be precise. Hope you don't
mind. ]
No problem at all!
Am Dienstag, den 18.11.2008, 08:05 -0500 schrieb Adam C Powell IV
Hello again,
On Thu, 2008-11-13 at 15:10 -0500, Adam C Powell IV wrote:
On Thu, 2008-11-13 at 08:05 -0500, Adam C Powell IV wrote:
[snip]
Thank you. I'm afraid I'm already well-enough along that the only issue
remaining is finding Scotch functions corresponding to
METIS_MeshPartNodes
On Fri, 2008-11-14 at 23:12 -0600, Steve M. Robbins wrote:
Howdy,
On Thu, Oct 30, 2008 at 07:48:19PM -0400, Adam C Powell IV wrote:
[Copying -beowulf as there's likely some interest there as well.]
On Thu, 2008-10-30 at 15:21 +0100, Manuel Prinz wrote:
When building against
On Fri, 2008-11-14 at 21:50 +0100, Francesco Poli wrote:
On Fri, 14 Nov 2008 08:57:40 -0500 Adam C Powell IV wrote:
[...]
On Thu, 2008-11-13 at 23:49 +0200, Mikko Lyly wrote:
[...]
Indeed, you're fine as far as your distribution is concerned; as far as
I can tell no GPL code in the fem
On Thu, 2008-11-13 at 08:05 -0500, Adam C Powell IV wrote:
On Thu, 2008-11-13 at 09:55 +, Antonio Amorim wrote:
Dear Colleagues,
I have previously created a debian package for Elmer that does not
claim to fulfill the official debian policies but might be useful to
trigger
On Mon, 2008-11-10 at 18:10 +0100, Daniel Leidert wrote:
Am Montag, den 10.11.2008, 10:05 -0500 schrieb Adam C Powell IV:
On Thu, 2008-11-06 at 22:21 -0500, Adam C Powell IV wrote:
On Fri, 2008-11-07 at 03:29 +0100, Daniel Leidert wrote:
Am Donnerstag, den 06.11.2008, 19:30 -0500 schrieb
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Package name: elmerfem
Version: 5.4.1
Author: CSC -- IT Center for Science Ltd (Finnish Ministry of Education)
License: GPL
URL: http://www.csc.fi/elmer/
Elmer is an open source mutiphysics simulation package developed by CSC
in collaboration with Finnish
On Mon, 2008-11-10 at 22:18 +0100, Thomas Weber wrote:
Hi,
I don't have anything to say about Elmer, but ...
On Mon, Nov 10, 2008 at 02:01:52PM -0500, Adam C Powell IV wrote:
Elmer uses METIS (or its free counterpart Scotch) for mesh partitioning,
do you have some experience
On Mon, 2008-11-10 at 22:10 +0100, Daniel Leidert wrote:
Am Montag, den 10.11.2008, 13:03 -0500 schrieb Adam C Powell IV:
On Mon, 2008-11-10 at 18:10 +0100, Daniel Leidert wrote:
Am Montag, den 10.11.2008, 10:05 -0500 schrieb Adam C Powell IV:
[..]
One other thing: why is the ARPACK
Hello,
Where can I get a recent ARPACK package? I know it's been removed from
main, but thought it should go into non-free soon, as it's been about
three months.
Thanks,
-Adam
--
GPG fingerprint: D54D 1AEE B11C CE9B A02B C5DD 526F 01E8 564E E4B6
Engineering consulting with open source tools
Hi Andreas,
You replied to a message more than a week old, and missed an option
which came up last week, see below.
On Sat, 2008-10-18 at 16:33 +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
On Fri, 10 Oct 2008, Manuel Prinz wrote:
Sure. So, to summarize, we have the following options:
1. The
On Thu, 2008-10-16 at 15:17 +0200, Michael Banck wrote:
On Thu, Oct 16, 2008 at 10:40:26AM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
- Prepare files named 'reference' of 'citation' in the source package.
Did you mean 'reference' *or* 'citation'? As I argued elsewhere, I
think both are quite different,
On Thu, 2008-10-16 at 21:36 +0200, Manuel Prinz wrote:
Am Donnerstag, den 16.10.2008, 17:41 +0200 schrieb Michael Banck:
The problem I have with doc-base is that it is underused and not very
accessible. At least that is my impression of it as somebody who
doesn't care a lot about it from a
On Thu, 2008-10-16 at 22:52 +0200, Michael Banck wrote:
On Thu, Oct 16, 2008 at 04:41:45PM -0400, Adam C Powell IV wrote:
My idea was actually to have the citations.bib and/or references.bib
in /usr/share/doc/package as you say, and have the .doc-base file
include something like
On Sun, 2008-10-12 at 14:20 +0200, Michael Banck wrote:
On Wed, Oct 08, 2008 at 08:19:25AM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
The format of /usr/doc/package/references could be a popular one, for
instance BibTeX, if it allows cross references to other systems like
DOI, PubMed, ...)
I would
On Wed, 2008-10-15 at 09:27 +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
Le Tue, Oct 14, 2008 at 09:47:40AM -0400, Adam C Powell IV a écrit :
why not just adapt the existing doc-base format, adding a new BibTeX
files field? The description of which citation to use when (canonical
article(s
On Tue, 2008-10-07 at 23:55 +0200, Bernhard R. Link wrote:
* Michael Banck [EMAIL PROTECTED] [081007 22:53]:
Also, having this would sense a clear signal to upstream authors that we
consider proper citing important and that enforcing citations in
copyright licensing is not the best thing to
Hi,
I'm in the process of adding a libmesh-doc binary package to libmesh,
but doxygen generates all of its docs in .php files. file:// links fail
to open these because the browser (Iceweasel) doesn't know what .php is.
I know nothing about PHP, so I figured Suggesting dwww and
Hi Christophe,
Sorry I didn't reply sooner, didn't read down far enough...
Let me first say I really appreciate your efforts to work with EDF to
open their software -- and perhaps the process for writing it. The
crown jewels of Code_Aster, Code_Saturne and Salomé with the MECA
modules are truly
On Thu, 2008-08-21 at 22:28 +0200, Christophe Prud'homme wrote:
To follow Ondrej comment,
I have been in contact with some people close to the Salome project.
With almost the same ones we are going to
have a similar project to build a recently funded open platform
(OPUS) for uncertainty
On Sat, 2008-08-02 at 19:28 +0100, Chris Walker wrote:
Adam C Powell IV [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Fri, 2008-08-01 at 11:02 +0100, Chris Walker wrote:
And http://www.opennovation.org/ provides a much better categorisation
of engineering type packages than I did.
Categories
On Fri, 2008-08-01 at 11:02 +0100, Chris Walker wrote:
Adam C Powell IV [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Thu, 2008-07-24 at 13:44 +0100, Chris Walker wrote:
Christophe Prud'homme [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Salome
to my knowledge Salome does not provide a fe code !
AFAICT
On Thu, 2008-07-24 at 13:44 +0100, Chris Walker wrote:
Christophe Prud'homme [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Salome
to my knowledge Salome does not provide a fe code !
AFAICT from http://www.salome-platform.org/home/presentation/overview/
while salome doesn't perform FEA calculations, it
On Sun, 2008-06-29 at 13:55 +0100, Chris Walker wrote:
It would be nice to see science packages better categorised. I guess
this is ultimately best done using debtags.
For example http://cdd.alioth.debian.org/science/tasks/physics.php lists
packages to do Finite element analysis, optical
On Mon, 2008-06-09 at 15:29 +, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
This is a debian-user question. Learn to use 'apt-cache search' --
there must be at least a hundred packages in Debian for what you
describe, from note taking to mind mappming to personal wikis.
Don't abuse debian-science because
On Tue, 2008-05-13 at 14:57 -0400, Adam C Powell IV wrote:
On Mon, 2008-05-12 at 16:51 -0400, Adam C Powell IV wrote:
On Mon, 2008-05-12 at 22:11 +0200, Denis Barbier wrote:
On Wed, 07 May 2008 12:27:08 -0400, Adam C Powell IV [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Greetings,
I've
On Mon, 2008-06-09 at 19:01 -0500, Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso wrote:
On 09/06/2008, Adam C Powell IV [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
And after three weeks in the NEW queue, OpenCASCADE was ACCEPTED this
morning into unstable! Yay!
Awesome! Good job! This means it will make it into lenny? Very
On Mon, 2008-06-09 at 20:46 -0500, Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso wrote:
On 09/06/2008, Adam C Powell IV [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The second reason is that although the OCTPL seems to be a free license,
upstream's interpretation of it is not. The paragraph starting with In
short on http
On Mon, 2008-05-12 at 16:51 -0400, Adam C Powell IV wrote:
On Mon, 2008-05-12 at 22:11 +0200, Denis Barbier wrote:
On Wed, 07 May 2008 12:27:08 -0400, Adam C Powell IV [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Greetings,
I've (finally) begun the arduous task of auditing the copyright(s)/
license
On Mon, 2008-05-12 at 22:11 +0200, Denis Barbier wrote:
On Wed, 07 May 2008 12:27:08 -0400, Adam C Powell IV [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Greetings,
I've (finally) begun the arduous task of auditing the copyright(s)/
license(s) in OpenCASCADE. Based on the number of files
On Thu, 2008-05-08 at 15:35 +0200, Teemu Ikonen wrote:
On Wed, May 7, 2008 at 6:27 PM, Adam C Powell IV [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've put a brief start (6 of the 536 directories in ros/src) in:
http://www.opennovation.org/audits/opencascade-6.2.txt and will update
it as I and others work
Greetings,
I've (finally) begun the arduous task of auditing the copyright(s)/
license(s) in OpenCASCADE. Based on the number of files and
directories, this is bound to take a ton of time, so I'd appreciate some
help! I've also solicited help on the OpenCASCADE forum, where I've
been discussing
On Tue, 2008-04-22 at 18:47 +0200, Rafa Rodríguez Galván wrote:
Hello.
I agree with the previous e-mails and I think that the combination of
LaTeX + emacs is, in the long term, the best choice.
1. Formula editing is very efficient, I can even carry out my
deduction lively (and
On Mon, 2008-04-21 at 15:09 +0200, Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda wrote:
A Dilluns 21 Abril 2008, Adam C Powell IV va escriure:
On Fri, 2008-04-18 at 21:25 +0200, Teemu Ikonen wrote:
On Thu, Apr 17, 2008 at 8:23 PM, Adam C Powell IV [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I haven't had much time
On Mon, 2008-04-21 at 19:43 +0200, Leopold Palomo Avellaneda wrote:
A Dilluns 21 Abril 2008, Adam C Powell IV va escriure:
On Mon, 2008-04-21 at 15:09 +0200, Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda wrote:
A Dilluns 21 Abril 2008, Adam C Powell IV va escriure:
On Fri, 2008-04-18 at 21:25 +0200, Teemu
On Fri, 2008-04-18 at 21:25 +0200, Teemu Ikonen wrote:
On Thu, Apr 17, 2008 at 8:23 PM, Adam C Powell IV [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I haven't had much time for this recently, but my todo list consists of:
* Switch to the tarball used by FreeBSD (and soon Gentoo) at:
ftp
On Thu, 2008-04-17 at 18:56 +0200, Teemu Ikonen wrote:
Adam C Powell IV [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am packaging OpenCASCADE, a powerful computer-aided engineering (CAE)
...
The current package is at http://lyre.mit.edu/~powell/opencascade/ .
Hi,
Has there been any progress on getting
-lSMESHimpl). How is the
workaround?
As it seemes, you proceeded further.
Thanks and best regards, Dan
Adam C Powell IV wrote:
I am willing to help you with this, and tried to compile Salomé on my
system but got blocked before the step you reached. When compiling
On Thu, 2008-03-06 at 09:28 -0500, Adam C Powell IV wrote:
Okay, I've made it build as far as I can, into a number of similar
corrections in the SUPERV module. However, there's a sip/Qt error in
the GUI module:
/usr/bin/sip -t WS_X11 -t Qt_3_3_8b -x Qt_STYLE_INTERLACE -x
Qt_STYLE_WINDOWSXP
On Fri, 2008-03-07 at 09:08 -0500, Adam C Powell IV wrote:
On Thu, 2008-03-06 at 09:28 -0500, Adam C Powell IV wrote:
Okay, I've made it build as far as I can, into a number of similar
corrections in the SUPERV module. However, there's a sip/Qt error in
the GUI module:
/usr/bin/sip -t
1 - 100 of 120 matches
Mail list logo
