Sudah waktunya, jangan tunda Qurbanya... Udah tau belum sekarang ada SGQ?

**Program Super Gizi Qurban (SGQ)**  **Untuk anda yang kerepotan dalam menyiapkan hewan kurban secara langsung?** Tenang kami memberikan solusi kemudahan bagi anda yang ingin menyalurkan kurban anda melalui uang tunai. Bahkan bisa transfer melalui rekening

Processing of libvigraimpex_1.10.0+git20160211.167be93+dfsg-3_multi.changes

libvigraimpex_1.10.0+git20160211.167be93+dfsg-3_multi.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: libvigraimpex_1.10.0+git20160211.167be93+dfsg-3.dsc libvigraimpex_1.10.0+git20160211.167be93+dfsg.orig.tar.xz libvigraimpex_1.10.0+git20160211.167be93+dfsg-3.debian.tar.xz

Bug#853513: libvigraimpex: ftbfs with GCC-7

The particular testblock has been disabled temporarily with 1.10.0+git20160211.167be93+dfsg-3. DS -- 4096R/DF5182C8 (sten...@debian.org) http://www.danielstender.com/ -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org

libvigraimpex_1.10.0+git20160211.167be93+dfsg-3_multi.changes ACCEPTED into unstable

Accepted: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Format: 1.8 Date: Wed, 09 Aug 2017 00:41:15 +0200 Source: libvigraimpex Binary: libvigraimpex-dev libvigraimpex6 libvigraimpex-doc python-vigra python-vigra-doc Architecture: all source Version: 1.10.0+git20160211.167be93+dfsg-3

Processed: retitle 85353

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > retitle 853513 libvigraimpex: BlockwiseWatershedTest not fit for gcc7 Bug #853513 [src:libvigraimpex] libvigraimpex: ftbfs with GCC-7 Changed Bug title to 'libvigraimpex: BlockwiseWatershedTest not fit for gcc7' from 'libvigraimpex: ftbfs with

Processed: Bug#871169 marked as pending

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tag 871169 pending Bug #871169 [src:libvigraimpex] saga: FTBFS: imagecontainer.hxx:769:51: error: no matching function for call to 'swap(int&, const int&)' Bug #853650 [src:libvigraimpex] saga: ftbfs with GCC-7 Added tag(s) pending. Added tag(s)

Bug#865151: patch

Control: tags -1 patch -- Eric Dorland 43CF 1228 F726 FD5B 474C E962 C256 FBD5 0022 1E93 diff -ruN aweather-0.8.1.old/debian/control aweather-0.8.1/debian/control --- aweather-0.8.1.old/debian/control 2017-08-08 17:17:06.713891445 -0400 +++ aweather-0.8.1/debian/control

Processed: patch

Processing control commands: > tags -1 patch Bug #865151 [src:aweather] aweather: please build-depend on automake, not obsolete automake1.11 Added tag(s) patch. -- 865151: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=865151 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with

E' il momento di investire

E' il momento giusto per INVESTIRE IN COSTA RICA E' notizia di questi giorni che partiranno i lavori per un grandeparco a tema firmato Discovery.Ecco perche' e' il momento giusto per investire in Costa Rica. Il parco sorgera' a Liberia su una superficie

Bug#823379: Found Maintainer for Elmer

على الثلاثاء 8 آب 2017 ‫16:24، كتب Tobias Frost: >> >> This happened over a year ago, let's go ahead with the removal? > > I thinks yes. There was plenty of time to follow up. > CC'ing Juhani for a last chance. > (IMHO Otherwise the pacakge can still be ITP at a later time) > The last I

Processed: [PATCH] Use automake instead of automake1.11

Processing control commands: > tags -1 patch Bug #865148 [src:ann] ann: please build-depend on automake, not obsolete automake1.11 Added tag(s) patch. -- 865148: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=865148 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --

Bug#865148: [PATCH] Use automake instead of automake1.11

Control: tags -1 patch --- debian/control | 2 +- debian/rules | 8 2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) diff --git a/debian/control b/debian/control index 7c2c36d..690cbea 100644 --- a/debian/control +++ b/debian/control @@ -3,7 +3,7 @@ Section: libs Priority: optional

Processed: Re: Bug#823379: Found Maintainer for Elmer

Processing control commands: > tags -1 -moreinfo Bug #823379 [elmerfem] RM: elemerfem -- RoQA; unmaintained, RC-Buggy, FTBFS Removed tag(s) moreinfo. -- 823379: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=823379 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --

Bug#823379: Found Maintainer for Elmer

Control: tags -1 -moreinfo On Tue, Aug 08, 2017 at 10:19:21PM +0200, Moritz Mühlenhoff wrote: > On Sat, Jul 23, 2016 at 05:07:37PM +0200, Tobias Frost wrote: > > Control: tags -1 moreinfo > > > > Setting moreinfo to hold this rm > > > > Am 23. Juli 2016 08:54:18 MESZ, schrieb Afif Elghraoui

Bug#823379: Found Maintainer for Elmer

On Sat, Jul 23, 2016 at 05:07:37PM +0200, Tobias Frost wrote: > Control: tags -1 moreinfo > > Setting moreinfo to hold this rm > > Am 23. Juli 2016 08:54:18 MESZ, schrieb Afif Elghraoui : > >Hello, > > > >Juhani, maintainer of the Elmer Ubuntu PPA, responded positively to my >

Re: O: bibus - bibliographic database

Hi Jan, thanks for your work on this package. It seems bibus is in a good shape, at least there are no RC bugs for years! And also package is team-maintained, so it has an advantage to be fixed by any Debian science team member. I think you do not need to request package removal. Just file a bug

O: bibus - bibliographic database

Dear Debian Science maintainers, I am herewith looking for somebody to take over the bibus Debian package. Bibus is a bibliography database written in Python 2.7 and used to work stand-alone but also together with OpenOffice.org/LibreOffice and LyX. It is no longer maintained upstream since 2013

Processed: Latest failures are caused/triggered by gcc 7

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 776567 buster sid Bug #776567 [src:mclibs] mclibs: FTBFS - segfault in testsuite Added tag(s) buster and sid. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 776567:

Processed: found and fixed in different source packages confuses the BTS

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > reassign 853345 gfortran-7 Bug #853345 {Done: Matthias Klose } [src:cernlib] cernlib: ftbfs with GCC-7 Bug reassigned from package 'src:cernlib' to 'gfortran-7'. No longer marked as found in versions cernlib/20061220+dfsg3-4.3.

hfst_3.12.2~r3289-1_amd64.changes is NEW

binary:libhfst49 is NEW. binary:libhfst49-dev is NEW. binary:libhfst49 is NEW. binary:libhfst49-dev is NEW. Your package has been put into the NEW queue, which requires manual action from the ftpteam to process. The upload was otherwise valid (it had a good OpenPGP signature and file hashes are

Processed: Re: Bug#853324: bagel: ftbfs with GCC-7

Processing control commands: > reassign -1 libmpich-dev Bug #853324 [src:bagel] bagel: ftbfs with GCC-7 Bug reassigned from package 'src:bagel' to 'libmpich-dev'. No longer marked as found in versions bagel/0.0~git20170109-1. Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of bug #853324 to the same

Processing of hfst_3.12.2~r3289-1_amd64.changes

hfst_3.12.2~r3289-1_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: hfst_3.12.2~r3289-1.dsc hfst_3.12.2~r3289.orig.tar.bz2 hfst_3.12.2~r3289-1.debian.tar.xz hfst-dbgsym_3.12.2~r3289-1_amd64.deb hfst_3.12.2~r3289-1_amd64.buildinfo hfst_3.12.2~r3289-1_amd64.deb

Bug#871505: openturns: testsuite failure on i386

Package: src:openturns Version: 1.7-3 Severity: serious Tags: sid buster 417/417 Test #371: cppcheck_FunctionalChaos_gsobol .. Passed 77.75 sec 99% tests passed, 1 tests failed out of 417 Total Test time (real) = 198.44 sec The following tests FAILED:

Bug#853345: marked as done (cernlib: ftbfs with GCC-7)

Your message dated Tue, 08 Aug 2017 15:34:02 + with message-id and subject line Bug#853345: fixed in gcc-7 7.1.0-13 has caused the Debian Bug report #853345, regarding cernlib: ftbfs with GCC-7 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the

Bug#853545: marked as done (meshlab: ftbfs with GCC-7)

Your message dated Tue, 08 Aug 2017 13:49:44 + with message-id and subject line Bug#853545: fixed in meshlab 1.3.2+dfsg1-4 has caused the Debian Bug report #853545, regarding meshlab: ftbfs with GCC-7 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that

Bug#853513: libvigraimpex: ftbfs with GCC-7

On 08.08.2017 07:51, Andreas Metzler wrote: > On 2017-08-07 Matthias Klose wrote: >> Control: tags -1 + patch > >> patch at >> http://launchpadlibrarian.net/332312910/libvigraimpex_1.10.0+git20160211.167be93+dfsg-2build3_1.10.0+git20160211.167be93+dfsg-2ubuntu1.diff.gz > >

Votre boîte aux lettres est remplie

Votre boîte aux lettres est remplie et doit être validée pour éviter la désactivation. Veuillez cliquer ou le lien ci-dessous pour éviter que votre compte ne soit désactivé. CLIQUEZ ICI Prise en charge ADMIN. ADVERTENCIA DE CONFIDENCIALIDAD La informaci��n contenida en este mensaje es

Bug#853513: libvigraimpex: ftbfs with GCC-7

On 2017-08-07 Matthias Klose wrote: > Control: tags -1 + patch > patch at > http://launchpadlibrarian.net/332312910/libvigraimpex_1.10.0+git20160211.167be93+dfsg-2build3_1.10.0+git20160211.167be93+dfsg-2ubuntu1.diff.gz Hello, For me that one only fixes the FTBFS of vigra rdeps

Bug#871483: mpich FTBFS on ppc64el: FAIL test_primitives

Source: mpich Version: 3.2-7 Severity: serious Tags: buster sid https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=mpich=ppc64el=3.2-7%2Bb2=1502178769=0 ... FAIL: test_primitives = Testing simple integer load/store functionalityPASSED Testing simple

Bug#853624: marked as done (pytango: ftbfs with GCC-7)

Your message dated Tue, 08 Aug 2017 08:55:13 + with message-id and subject line Bug#853624: fixed in pytango 9.2.1-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #853624, regarding pytango: ftbfs with GCC-7 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the

pytango_9.2.1-1_source.changes ACCEPTED into unstable

Accepted: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Format: 1.8 Date: Mon, 07 Aug 2017 18:27:13 +0200 Source: pytango Binary: python-pytango python-tango python3-pytango python3-tango python-tango-doc Architecture: source Version: 9.2.1-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium

Bug#870688: [Debian-science-sagemath] Sage 8.0 status (was Re: Sage 7.6 upload for RC bugfix and GAP 4.8.7 in unstable)

Ximin Luo: > -#869778 > > Ximin Luo: >> [..] >> >> Hi, I see that libgsl23 was uploaded but who is taking care of the library >> transition? It seems that this process was not followed: >> https://wiki.debian.org/Teams/ReleaseTeam/Transitions >> >> The transition tracker detected the library