Could you guys hold off the review upload. I still need to sort something
out with the d-python team.
Many thanks,
Ghis
Le 15 mai 2016 07:33, "Debian FTP Masters"
a écrit :
> binary:hdf-compass is NEW.
> binary:python-hdf-compass is NEW.
> source:hdf-compass is NEW.
>
> Your package has been pu
Processing control commands:
> found -1 freecad/0.16+dfsg1-1
Bug #745237 [freecad] freecad: unclear situation w.r.t. example files (source
package vs. binary packages vs. debian/copyright)
Marked as found in versions freecad/0.16+dfsg1-1.
--
745237: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?
Hi Roger,
I'm afraid I need to come back to you again about the licensing of the
file in question in the spdep package. Please read below what the
Debian ftpmasters think about the license:
On Fri, May 13, 2016 at 01:00:23PM +, Thorsten Alteholz wrote:
>
> Hi Andreas,
>
> ok, one step furt
Den 25 feb 2016 12:59 em skrev "Ghislain Vaillant" :
>
> I will try to find some time to send an email around to the team this
> weekend.
Hi Ghis,
Did you ever get around to this? If so, what was the team reaction? Any
estimate on when vtk7/python3-vtk7/python-vtk7 packages might appear on the
ho
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 817785 +pending
Bug #817785 [libqglviewer2] libqglviewer2: libs built against qt5 should have
-qt5 appended
Added tag(s) pending.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
817785: http://bugs.debian.or
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 823816 +pending
Bug #823816 [src:freecad] freecad: New upstream version available
Added tag(s) pending.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
823816: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reopen 346182
Unknown command or malformed arguments to command.
> reassign 346182 libvtk6.2
Bug #346182 {Done: Debian FTP Masters }
[python-vtk] crashes when importing VRML file (containing PROTO)
Bug #539362 {Done: Debian FTP Masters }
[pytho
Closing this ITP again since it was just issued as #813481
On Wed, May 04, 2016 at 08:27:12AM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
> Package: wnpp
> Severity: wishlist
> Owner: Andreas Tille
>
> * Package name: r-cran-markdown
> Version : 0.7.7
> Upstream Author : Yihui Xie
> * URL
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 -pending -fixed
Bug #720146 [elmer] elmer: fails to remove: rmdir: failed to remove
'/usr/share/ElmerGUI/edf': Directory not empty
Removed tag(s) pending.
Bug #720146 [elmer] elmer: fails to remove: rmdir: failed to remove
'/usr/share/ElmerGUI/edf': Directo
> <>/obj-x86_64-linux-gnu/tests/Development/visualization-gnuplot-differentiable-function
> Unable to find executable:
> /<>/obj-x86_64-linux-gnu/tests/visualization-gnuplot-differentiable-function
> 24/24 Test #24: visualization-gnuplot-differentiable-function ...***Not Run
> 0.00 sec
>
> 0%
On Tue, May 03, 2016 at 04:00:27PM +, Thorsten Alteholz wrote:
> Hi Mattia,
Hi ta :)
> at least vmtk-1.3/distribution/egg/windows_dll/*/msvcp110.dll doesn't
> seem to be distributable. So I am afraid they must be removed from the
> source tarball.
FTR, this source is already in the archive
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 = sid stretch
Bug #820866 [src:r-cran-tgp] r-cran-tgp: FTBFS: cmath:171:3: error: template
with C linkage
Added tag(s) sid and stretch; removed tag(s) moreinfo and unreproducible.
--
820866: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=820866
Debian Bu
Processing control commands:
> clone -1 -2
Bug #822134 [kig] Boost 1.55 to be removed; your attention required
Bug 822134 cloned as bug 822962
822521 was blocked by: 822129 822125 822136 822122 822131 822133 822135 822123
822132 822121 822128 822126 822130 822138 822134 822120
822521 was not bloc
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> severity 806108 important
Bug #806108 [src:singular] singular: FTBFS when built with dpkg-buildpackage -A
(No such file or directory)
Severity set to 'important' from 'serious'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need ass
Hi Roger,
just to leave your quick and helpful reply not unanswered: I was hoping
for faster processing to be able to answer your question whether further
changes are needed. For the moment I just say thanks for your kind
cooperation and I might (or hopefully might not) come back to you in
case
, and you may need to re-add them.
Bug reopened
No longer marked as fixed in versions freefem++/3.46+dfsg1-1.
--
820815: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=820815
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--
debian-science-maintainers mailing list
d
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 pending patch
Bug #813119 [src:ngspice] ngspice: FTBFS with nonexistant $HOME
Added tag(s) pending.
--
813119: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=813119
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--
debian-science-
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 moreinfo
Bug #817017 [libopencv-highgui-dev] libopencv-highgui-dev: Should not depend on
libgtk2.0-dev
Added tag(s) moreinfo.
--
817017: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=817017
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with p
IT Administrator has currently upgraded all mailboxes (size to 20.0GB). Please
upgrade your account by Simply Click Here To
Expand
Helpdesk.
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> forwarded 822383 https://sourceforge.net/p/potassco/bugs/118/
Bug #822383 [gringo] gringo: FTBFS: error: 'pow' is not a member of 'std'
Set Bug forwarded-to-address to 'https://sourceforge.net/p/potassco/bugs/118/'.
>
End of message, stopping proc
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 pending
Bug #822120 [feel++] Boost 1.55 to be removed; your attention required
Added tag(s) pending.
> severity -1 serious
Bug #822120 [feel++] Boost 1.55 to be removed; your attention required
Severity set to 'serious' from 'normal'
--
822120: http://bugs.d
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 pending
Bug #821876 [libfeel++-dev] libfeel++-dev: Depends on libvtk5-dev, which will
be removed
Added tag(s) pending.
--
821876: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=821876
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 moreinfo unreproducible
Bug #820866 [src:r-cran-tgp] r-cran-tgp: FTBFS: cmath:171:3: error: template
with C linkage
Added tag(s) moreinfo and unreproducible.
--
820866: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=820866
Debian Bug Tracking System
Conta
Processing control commands:
> severity -1 serious
Bug #754713 [src:elmerfem] elmerfem: FTBFS on powrpc, ppc64el, s390x, hppa: The
MPI version needs parpack. Disabling MPI.
Ignoring request to change severity of Bug 754713 to the same value.
--
754713: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.c
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 upstream patch
Bug #821419 [src:paraview] paraview: FTBFS against ffmpeg 3.0
Added tag(s) patch and upstream.
> forwarded -1 http://www.paraview.org/Bug/view.php?id=16001
Bug #821419 [src:paraview] paraview: FTBFS against ffmpeg 3.0
Set Bug forwarded-to-addres
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 pending
Bug #821411 [src:vmtk] vmtk: bump soname without package name change
Added tag(s) pending.
--
821411: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=821411
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--
debian-science-m
On 18/04/16 11:02, Chris Lamb wrote:
Please check (at least) doc/ext/tikz.py
Indeed, I missed that file (BSD-2-Clause). Double-checked the output of
licensecheck and I could not find any other files that slipped under my
radar. I'll update the packaging accordingly.
Thanks for spotting this
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reassign 782029 libsuitesparse-metis-dev
Bug #782029 [dolfin-bin] dolfin-bin: FEniCS/DOLFIN fails to compile Python
dolfin.Expression()
Bug reassigned from package 'dolfin-bin' to 'libsuitesparse-metis-dev'.
No longer marked as found in versions
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 806198 + patch
Bug #806198 [src:siscone] siscone: FTBFS when built with dpkg-buildpackage -A
(dh_testroot in build-indep)
Added tag(s) patch.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
806198: http://bu
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 patch
Bug #818817 [woo] woo: FTBFS with libc 2.23: 'isnan' was not declared in this
scope
Added tag(s) patch.
--
818817: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=818817
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--
de
ecelo"
} [libgmp-dev] libgmp-dev: please reinstate
lib64gmp-dev on ppc64
'reopen' may be inappropriate when a bug has been closed with a version;
all fixed versions will be cleared, and you may need to re-add them.
Bug reopened
No longer marked as fixed in versions 2:6.0.0+dfsg-4.
>
Hi Andreas,
Thanks for your help; I'll get to it soonish.
Bye, Joost
PS: I see you like landscape pictures; I offer you
http://plaatjes.mdcc.cx/2011/20110528-serbia_tara_mountains/IMG_7039.JPG .
On Wed, Apr 13, 2016 at 12:57:51PM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
> Hi Joost,
>
> I tried to upload ba
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reopen 816101
Bug #816101 {Done: Drew Parsons } [src:petsc] FTBFS on
mipsel - broken openmpi breaks petsc build
Bug reopened
Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of bug #816101 to the same values
previously set
> found 816101 3.6.3.dfsg2-4
B
On 12/04/2016 20:08, Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
On Tue, Apr 12, 2016 at 07:47:23PM +0200, Julien Puydt wrote:
What could be the difference?
Don't know, sorry. Good luck!
Well, does the box run unstable too?
that box is a standard jessie system running standard chroots (either
testing, unstabl
On Tue, Apr 12, 2016 at 07:47:23PM +0200, Julien Puydt wrote:
> >>What could be the difference?
> >
> >Don't know, sorry. Good luck!
>
> Well, does the box run unstable too?
that box is a standard jessie system running standard chroots (either
testing, unstable or experimental) through pbuilder.
Processing control commands:
> severity -1 normal
Bug #820772 [teem] teem: FTBFS on arm64 and ppc64el
Severity set to 'normal' from 'serious'
--
820772: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=820772
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--
debian-scie
Processing control commands:
> severity -1 serious
Bug #820530 [src:pdal] pdal: FTBFS because of openmpi
Severity set to 'serious' from 'normal'
> block -1 by 820113
Bug #820530 [src:pdal] pdal: FTBFS because of openmpi
820530 was not blocked by any bugs.
820530 was not blocking any bugs.
Added bl
Processing control commands:
> severity -1 serious
Bug #820113 [libvtk6-dev] No rule to make target
'/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/hdf5/openmpi/lib/libhdf5.so'
Severity set to 'serious' from 'normal'
--
820113: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=820113
Debian Bug Tracking System
Conta
Hi Thorsten,
would it be acceptable if I add this text to d/copyright?
Kind regards
Andreas.
On Mon, Apr 04, 2016 at 06:52:24PM +0200, Roger Bivand wrote:
> Hi Andreas,
>
> I have added:
>
> /*
> This code is described in "Computational Geometry in C" (Second Edition),
> Chapter 8. It
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> block 816101 by 818909
Bug #816101 [src:petsc] petsc: FTBFS on mipsel - timeout while running the test
suite
816101 was not blocked by any bugs.
816101 was not blocking any bugs.
Added blocking bug(s) of 816101: 818909
> severity 816101 important
Processing control commands:
> found -1 2.12.0+dfsg1-1
Bug #816563 {Done: Anton Gladky } [libjava-gmsh2]
libjava-gmsh2: fails to upgrade from 'jessie' - trying to overwrite
/usr/lib/i386-linux-gnu/libjava-gmsh.so
Marked as found in versions gmsh/2.12.0+dfsg1-1; no longer marked as fixed in
vers
Hi Andreas,
I have added:
/*
This code is described in "Computational Geometry in C" (Second Edition),
Chapter 8. It is not written to be comprehensible without the
explanation in that book.
Prints out one arm configuration to reach given target.
Assumes number of links >= 3.
Input:
nlinks
Hi Roger,
I hope you remember the discussion we had two years ago when I tried to
package spdep for Debian as a dependency to test some R epipdemiology
tools. I somehow gave up since the packages can be run with out spdep.
However, we have now some bioinformatics tools that have a strong
dependen
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 pending
Bug #819741 [libvtk6-dev] libvtk6-dev: No rule to make target libproj.so /
cannot find -lvtkproj4
Added tag(s) pending.
--
819741: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=819741
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with
Hi Chris,
On 03/04/16 09:06, Chris Lamb wrote:
Check examples/financial/heston_model.py etc for next upload please
Thanks for spotting this. I forgot to scan for new files when rebasing
the packaging on top of the latest release.
Is that something I can address with a subsequent iteration of
Hi Gordon,
please make sure that pristine-tar branch contains the exact metadata as
the source tarball inside the pool.
Kind regards
Andreas.
On Thu, Mar 31, 2016 at 07:34:11AM +, Debian FTP Masters wrote:
>
> r-cran-pbdzmq_0.2.1+dfsg2.orig.tar.gz: Does not match file already existi
Es ist mit einem von Verzweiflung vollen Herzen, dass ich Ihnen diese Nachricht
übermittele, um Ihr Abkommen für die Verwirklichung einer Schenkung zu
ersuchen, ich sind momentan krank, und angesichts meines Alters und meines
derzeitigen Gesundheitszustandes wünsche ich, Spende meiner Güter zu m
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 patch
Bug #818450 [opencv] opencv: FTBFS: modules/core/precomp.hpp: No such file or
directory
Added tag(s) patch.
--
818450: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=818450
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--
Processing control commands:
> block -1 by 818207
Bug #818218 [src:saga] saga: Jasper removal
818218 was not blocked by any bugs.
818218 was not blocking any bugs.
Added blocking bug(s) of 818218: 818207
--
818218: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=818218
Debian Bug Tracking Syste
Hi,
> On 13 Mar 2016, at 09:48, Gianfranco Costamagna
> wrote:
>> Added in
>> http://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/keyring/keyring.git/commit/?id=bb8f943a3b54332b65cf4a64644e9e8b57bdbdcf.
>
> ok :)
>
> please do source-only uploads, or use pbuilder/sbuild to generate the
> binaries.
> If you are i
Hi,
>Added in
>http://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/keyring/keyring.git/commit/?id=bb8f943a3b54332b65cf4a64644e9e8b57bdbdcf.
ok :)
please do source-only uploads, or use pbuilder/sbuild to generate the binaries.
If you are in doubt, don't hesitate to ask me or to the debian-mentors list :)
$ dcut -k
Added in
http://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/keyring/keyring.git/commit/?id=bb8f943a3b54332b65cf4a64644e9e8b57bdbdcf.
James
> On 12 Mar 2016, at 19:11, James Clarke wrote:
>
> Hi,
> It's in the debian-keyring git repo, but February's release was never
> uploaded to the archive.
>
> James
>
>> On
Hi,
It's in the debian-keyring git repo, but February's release was never uploaded
to the archive.
James
> On 12 Mar 2016, at 18:31, Gianfranco Costamagna
> wrote:
>
> Hi, did you perform step 4?
>
> I'm having a look soon, and if your key gets included in debian-keyring just
> ping me
> ht
Hi, did you perform step 4?
I'm having a look soon, and if your key gets included in debian-keyring just
ping me
https://wiki.debian.org/DebianMaintainer
cheers,
G.
Il Sabato 12 Marzo 2016 18:48, James Clarke ha scritto:
Hi Gianfranco,
I’m ready to release polyml 5.6-3, with the following
Hi Richard,
I will try to reach Florian today as well, so that we can find a good
way to proceed here. Probably a shared team maintenance is the best.
For the other questions, I would ask you to follow-up to the Debian
Astronomy mailing list https://lists.debian.org/debian-astro
Altough the fits
Hi,
As Florian seems to be unavailable, I redirect my question to the
debian-science-maintainers group.
We would be willing to update the package ourself, but we need some
hints how to do it. And where to register and so on.
As I learned in the mean time, the debain standard enforces the local
b
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Hi, Marko,
On الأحد 6 آذار 2016 14:53, Marko Dimjašević wrote:
>
> On Fri, 2016-02-26 at 17:42 -0800, Afif Elghraoui wrote:
>> Something like the following:
>>
[...]
> Thank you Afif for this!
>
No problem.
> I am not sure what is the cause (m
Forwarded Message
Subject: Re: Vigra auf ppc64el
Date: Fri, 4 Mar 2016 15:56:16 +0100
From: Ullrich Koethe
To: Daniel Stender
CC: Francesco Biscani
Hallo Daniel,
unfortunately, we can't investigate this problem ourselves because we
don't have access to a ppc sy
Hello, I have a proposal for you, kindly get back to me via:
mrsjingc...@hotmail.com
-
NOTICE: This e-mail and any attachments may contain privileged and confidential
information. All content is subject to copyright
Hi all,
On Fri, 2016-02-26 at 17:42 -0800, Afif Elghraoui wrote:
> That's alright, you can go ahead. I would just add that the source for
> the second tarball be documented somewhere or configured to be
> downloaded in debian/watch with a second uscan line. Something like
> the
> following:
>
> v
Your message dated Fri, 04 Mar 2016 22:37:26 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#815478: fixed in getfem++ 4.2.1~beta1~svn4635~dfsg-6
has caused the Debian Bug report #815478,
regarding Please re-enable scilab on arm64
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has
Processing control commands:
> block 816260 by 749833
Bug #816260 [cantor] cantor: Please re-enable the scilab backend
816260 was not blocked by any bugs.
816260 was not blocking any bugs.
Added blocking bug(s) of 816260: 749833
--
749833: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=749
Hi, Anton,
على الجمعـة 26 شباط 2016 11:42، كتب Anton Gladky:
> Hi Marko,
>
[...]
> Feel free to ask me, if you have some questions regarding those
> notes. You have done a great job, please fix those notices and
> I will upload the package (Afif, if you want, feel free to do it).
>
That's alrig
Hi Marko,
the package looks fine, but I have a couple of notice:
- Use DEP-3 format for the patch
- Try not to use source/lintian-overrides, but fix it in the code.
- lib/extlib-abc/aig/cnf/cnfData.c looks strange, is it some kind
of binary, not the source code?
- Use Files-Exclude parameter in
Philipp Klenze writes:
> Hello,
> I would like you to ask to reassess the organization of CERNs ROOT
> framework in the Debian package system.
>
> Currently, it is split into around 96 packages and gets installed all
> over the system, e.g. in /usr/bin/, /usr/lib/$ARCH/root5-34,
> /usr/include
I will try to find some time to send an email around to the team this
weekend.
Cheers,
Ghis
On 23/02/16 14:28, Elvis Stansvik wrote:
2016-02-04 15:41 GMT+01:00 Ghislain Vaillant mailto:ghisv...@gmail.com>>:
It is next on my TODO list, I had a bunch of RCs to clear out before.
I will s
a Debian developer
> that sponsored the first upload of STP to New, this was the proposed
> approach. OutputCheck is, to the best of our knowledge, used only by
> STP, and the upstream developers have a plan of re-basing STP tests on a
> different testing framework soon. Furthermore, Out
veloper
that sponsored the first upload of STP to New, this was the proposed
approach. OutputCheck is, to the best of our knowledge, used only by
STP, and the upstream developers have a plan of re-basing STP tests on a
different testing framework soon. Furthermore, OutputCheck is not
actively devel
Hi, Marko,
على الأحد 21 شباط 2016 18:27، كتب Marko Dimjašević:
>
> Let me know if I can do something to get you interested in sponsoring
> this package for the Simple theorem prover. I am desperately looking for
> a sponsor. The package has been in the New queue before. Its details are
> given b
Hey Thorsten:
Thanks very much for the warning, you are right, I will update the
debian/copyright file to include the OSRF.
On Wed, Feb 24, 2016 at 4:20 PM, Thorsten Alteholz <
ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org> wrote:
> Hi Jose,
>
> I marked your package for accept.
> Don't you want to mention th
2016-02-04 15:41 GMT+01:00 Ghislain Vaillant :
> It is next on my TODO list, I had a bunch of RCs to clear out before.
>
> I will soon be contacting the VTK 6 maintainers to coordinate our
> efforts towards VTK 7.
>
Hi again Ghislain,
I'm just curious if you've had any time to work on this yet?
Dear all,
Let me know if I can do something to get you interested in sponsoring
this package for the Simple theorem prover. I am desperately looking for
a sponsor. The package has been in the New queue before. Its details are
given below. The package is also available on Alioth:
git.debian.org/gi
Package: getfem++
Version: 4.2.1~beta1~svn4635~dfsg-5
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
User: debian-...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: arm64
scilab is availabel on arm64 now, so please re-enable it in getfem++.
diff --git a/debian/control b/debian/control
index 2c5ab17..6f7a9e0 100644
--- a/debian
and reconfirm your
Information and how you want your said fund to be paid to you without
further delay. Send your responses to me immediately by email.
Below is the information you are expected to re-confirm.
Full Name:
Address:
Nationality:
Sex:
Age:
Date of Birth:
Occupation:
Home Phon
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 pending
Bug #811731 [dx] dx: FTBFS with GCC 6: narrowing conversion
Added tag(s) pending.
--
811731: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=811731
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--
debian-science-maintaine
On 20/02/16 09:32, Thorsten Alteholz wrote:
>
>
> On Sat, 20 Feb 2016, Daniel Pocock wrote:
>>> as your R-package contains data files, please describe the contents in
>>> debian/README.source (the reasoning is explained in [1]).
>>>
>>
>> Is it sufficient for me to include 1 line stating they a
On 20/02/16 11:00, Thorsten Alteholz wrote:
>
> Hi Daniel,
>
> as your R-package contains data files, please describe the contents in
> debian/README.source (the reasoning is explained in [1]).
>
I had just noticed that myself and started preparing it too
> Please also take care of
> W: r
On Sat, 20 Feb 2016, Daniel Pocock wrote:
as your R-package contains data files, please describe the contents in
debian/README.source (the reasoning is explained in [1]).
Is it sufficient for me to include 1 line stating they are sample data
files, or if something more verbose is required, c
On 20/02/16 09:00, Thorsten Alteholz wrote:
>
> Hi Daniel,
>
> as your R-package contains data files, please describe the contents in
> debian/README.source (the reasoning is explained in [1]).
>
Is it sufficient for me to include 1 line stating they are sample data
files, or if something mor
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 pending
Bug #813248 [libdx4-dev] libdx4-dev: unhandled symlink to directory conversion:
/usr/share/doc/PACKAGE
Added tag(s) pending.
--
813248: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=813248
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
Processing control commands:
> severity -1 normal
Bug #813248 [libdx4-dev] libdx4-dev: unhandled symlink to directory conversion:
/usr/share/doc/PACKAGE
Severity set to 'normal' from 'serious'
> tags -1 confirmed
Bug #813248 [libdx4-dev] libdx4-dev: unhandled symlink to directory conversion:
/us
Hi Gert,
2016-02-18 13:12 GMT+01:00 Gert Wollny :
>
> BTW: There is one open task related to java I didn't do yet: As of java
> policy [1] the java modules (*Java.so) should go into a package libvtk6
> -jni. But since this would have meant NEW, and I since I need the qt
> libraries in the libvtk6-
Hello Anton,
On Thu, 2016-02-18 at 12:40 +0100, Anton Gladky wrote:
> I think, git was not pulled before creating a changelog
> entries. Please, do not forget to do it next time.
Sorry for that, moving around the java and python modules made the
preparation quite complex, so I somehow overlooked
Hi Gert,
thanks for preparing new upload of vtk6. There were 2
commits, which did not appear in changelog [1], [2].
I think, git was not pulled before creating a changelog
entries. Please, do not forget to do it next time.
Thanks
[1]
https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/debian-science/packages/vtk6.gi
Dear Bastien,
On Mon, Feb 15, 2016 at 09:45:54PM +0100, roucaries bastien wrote:
>
> I have packaged a newer version but found non free file. Thus
> reporting. I plan to readd soon
Please try to enhance your communication: "found non free file" -
specifically if upstream is involved in the thre
On Mon, Feb 15, 2016 at 8:15 PM, Thomas Fischer
wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I am the maintainer of KBibTeX, a BibTeX editor for KDE. KBibTeX
> has been shipped for Debian since version 0.1.5 back in 2006
> thanks to Michael Hanke.
> Unfortunately, the package for KBibTeX in Debian has not been
> updated i
Hi Maarten,
On Sat, 13 Feb 2016, Maarten van Gompel wrote:
Thanks for processing the package. If I understand correctly (it's my first
package) this issue is only because of pynlpl/datatypes.py which subsumes MIT
licensed code and I should just stick to the the GPLv3 for it as indicated in
the f
Quoting Thorsten Alteholz (2016-02-13 00:00:21)
> according to the file header, the license is only GPL-3.
> So can you please adapt your debian/copyright?
Hi Thorsten,
Thanks for processing the package. If I understand correctly (it's my first
package) this issue is only because of pynlpl/datat
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> forwarded 800384 https://github.com/arrayfire/arrayfire/issues/1038
Bug #800384 [src:arrayfire] arrayfire: random test failures
Set Bug forwarded-to-address to
'https://github.com/arrayfire/arrayfire/issues/1038'.
>
End of message, stopping proce
On 05/02/16 23:00, Thorsten Alteholz wrote:
Hi Ghislain,
please mention the BSD license of doc/* in your debian/copyright.
Thanks!
Thorsten
===
Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why
your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our
conce
On Tue, Feb 9, 2016 at 7:30 PM, Thorsten Alteholz
wrote:
> can you please explain why these files are licensed under GPL-3+?
> If I remember correctly other apertium stuff is licensed under GPL-!?
Hi,
Thanks for quick review!
New language packs has GPL-3+ or CC 0 license.
Most of other languag
Hi Jonathan,
>This said, you got clearance to upload in #813019 which I've just found,
>so you aren't really to blame for this. Still, it's a pity the
>transition cannot proceed.
actually I checked (both the auto-nfft page, and the release.d.o bug), and
there were no
collisions with other t
is on-going to get that done.
I'll confirm the build on debomatic first, and then ask Andreas to
re-submit.
My apologize for not landing that one perfectly the first time around.
Best regards to you both,
Ghis
--
debian-science-maintainers mailing list
debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.
On 07/02/16 18:13, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote:
On 2016-02-07 17:47, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote:
Hi,
On 2016-02-03 you uploaded nfft 3.3.0-5 to unstable triggering a
transition. The reverse dependencies are pynfft and yorick-ynfft.
This is not an issue in itself, because that's quite a manageable
t
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 moreinfo
Bug #813494 [mpi-default-dev] mpi-default-dev: Please depend on openmpi (>=
1.10.2 -3 )
Added tag(s) moreinfo.
--
813494: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=813494
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
On 2016-02-07 17:47, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote:
Hi,
On 2016-02-03 you uploaded nfft 3.3.0-5 to unstable triggering a
transition. The reverse dependencies are pynfft and yorick-ynfft.
This is not an issue in itself, because that's quite a manageable
transition and you staged it in experiemental f
2016-02-04 15:41 GMT+01:00 Ghislain Vaillant :
> It is next on my TODO list, I had a bunch of RCs to clear out before.
>
> I will soon be contacting the VTK 6 maintainers to coordinate our
> efforts towards VTK 7.
>
Excellent news Ghis.
Elvis
>
> Cheers,
> Ghis
>
>
> On 04/02/16 14:28, Anton G
Hi Anton,
2016-02-04 15:28 GMT+01:00 Anton Gladky :
> Hi Elvis,
>
> we discussed it a couple of days ago with other people,
> interested in it VTK7 (CC-ing them). We are not sure, whether
> vtk7 can coexist with vtk6 without conflicts. From my
> POV, it is a little bit late to start a large trans
It is next on my TODO list, I had a bunch of RCs to clear out before.
I will soon be contacting the VTK 6 maintainers to coordinate our
efforts towards VTK 7.
Cheers,
Ghis
On 04/02/16 14:28, Anton Gladky wrote:
Hi Elvis,
we discussed it a couple of days ago with other people,
interested in i
Hi Elvis,
we discussed it a couple of days ago with other people,
interested in it VTK7 (CC-ing them). We are not sure, whether
vtk7 can coexist with vtk6 without conflicts. From my
POV, it is a little bit late to start a large transition process.
So, if both of those versions can coexist - no pro
801 - 900 of 1708 matches
Mail list logo
