Bug#838620: coinor-libcoinutils-dev: missing Depends: on libbz2-dev/zlib1g-dev?

Package: coinor-libcoinutils-dev Version: 2.9.15-4 Severity: important Dear Maintainer, # pkg-config --libs coinutils -lCoinUtils -lbz2 -lz -llapack -lblas -lm and # grep Libs: coinutils.pc Libs: -L${libdir} -lCoinUtils -lbz2 -lz -llapack -lblas -lm # apt-cache show

arachne-pnr_0.1+20160813git52e69ed-1_source.changes ACCEPTED into unstable

Accepted: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Format: 1.8 Date: Fri, 23 Sep 2016 06:59:03 +0200 Source: arachne-pnr Binary: arachne-pnr-chipdb arachne-pnr Architecture: source Version: 0.1+20160813git52e69ed-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Debian Science

hypre is marked for autoremoval from testing

hypre 2.8.0b-4 is marked for autoremoval from testing on 2016-10-22 It is affected by these RC bugs: 837109: hypre: -dev package library dependency not binNMU safe -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org

dolfin is marked for autoremoval from testing

dolfin 2016.1.0-5 is marked for autoremoval from testing on 2016-10-22 It (build-)depends on packages with these RC bugs: 837109: hypre: -dev package library dependency not binNMU safe -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org

slepc is marked for autoremoval from testing

slepc 3.7.2+dfsg1-3 is marked for autoremoval from testing on 2016-10-22 It (build-)depends on packages with these RC bugs: 837109: hypre: -dev package library dependency not binNMU safe -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org

fftw is marked for autoremoval from testing

fftw 2.1.5-4.1 is marked for autoremoval from testing on 2016-10-22 It is affected by these RC bugs: 837055: fftw: FTBFS due to bfnnconv.pl failing to execute m-ascii.pl (. removed from @INC in perl) -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org

theano is marked for autoremoval from testing

theano 0.8.2-3 is marked for autoremoval from testing on 2016-10-09 It is affected by these RC bugs: 835531: theano: FTBFS on amd64 (fail of test_csr_correct_output_faster_than_scipy) -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org

code-saturne_4.3.0+repack-1_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into unstable

Accepted: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Format: 1.8 Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2016 22:09:51 +0200 Source: code-saturne Binary: code-saturne code-saturne-bin code-saturne-data code-saturne-include code-saturne-doc Architecture: source amd64 all Version: 4.3.0+repack-1 Distribution:

Processing of code-saturne_4.3.0+repack-1_amd64.changes

code-saturne_4.3.0+repack-1_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: code-saturne_4.3.0+repack-1.dsc code-saturne_4.3.0+repack.orig.tar.gz code-saturne_4.3.0+repack-1.debian.tar.xz code-saturne-bin-dbgsym_4.3.0+repack-1_amd64.deb

Bug#836677: pysparse: still worth maintaining?

Hi Ghis, thanks for working on the package! Even it is abandoned by upstream, we have to support it in Debian, because it has reverse-dependency. Feel free to ping me, if one need the package sponsoring. Best regards Anton 2016-09-22 9:33 GMT+02:00 Ghislain Vaillant : > I

Bug#835678: marked as done (yosys: FTBFS: latex errors)

Your message dated Thu, 22 Sep 2016 17:55:45 + with message-id and subject line Bug#835678: fixed in yosys 0.6-7 has caused the Debian Bug report #835678, regarding yosys: FTBFS: latex errors to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the

yosys_0.6-7_source.changes ACCEPTED into unstable

Accepted: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Format: 1.8 Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2016 19:30:37 +0200 Source: yosys Binary: yosys yosys-dev yosys-doc Architecture: source Version: 0.6-7 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Debian Science Maintainers

Processing of yosys_0.6-7_source.changes

yosys_0.6-7_source.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: yosys_0.6-7.dsc yosys_0.6-7.debian.tar.xz Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon (running on host franck.debian.org) -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list

p4est REMOVED from testing

FYI: The status of the p4est source package in Debian's testing distribution has changed. Previous version: 1.1-2 Current version: (not in testing) Hint: # openmpi transition The script that generates this mail tries to extract removal

deal.ii REMOVED from testing

FYI: The status of the deal.ii source package in Debian's testing distribution has changed. Previous version: 8.4.1-2 Current version: (not in testing) Hint: # openmpi transition The script that generates this mail tries to extract

python-arrayfire 3.3.20160624-2 MIGRATED to testing

FYI: The status of the python-arrayfire source package in Debian's testing distribution has changed. Previous version: 3.3.20160516-1 Current version: 3.3.20160624-2 -- This email is automatically generated once a day. As the installation of new packages into testing happens multiple

libgap-sage_4.8.3+g69a66f0+dsx-1_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into experimental, experimental

Accepted: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Format: 1.8 Date: Wed, 17 Aug 2016 00:27:15 + Source: libgap-sage Binary: libgap-sage-4 libgap-sage-dev libgap-sage-doc Architecture: source amd64 all Version: 4.8.3+g69a66f0+dsx-1 Distribution: experimental Urgency: medium

meta-torch-core-free_1~exp1_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into experimental, experimental

Accepted: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Format: 1.8 Date: Sun, 28 Aug 2016 04:57:33 + Source: meta-torch-core-free Binary: torch-core-free Architecture: source amd64 Version: 1~exp1 Distribution: experimental Urgency: low Maintainer: Debian Science Maintainers

Bug#834396: (no subject)

-- debian-science-maintainers mailing list debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers

Bug#836677: pysparse: still worth maintaining?

I have had a look at updating the package to the newest upstream release and fixing this FTBFS. However, I have got strong concerns as to whether it is worth keeping this package maintained in the archive: - The latest release on PyPI [1] is busted (missing files). The issue was reported [2] but