fclib_3.0.0+dfsg-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

Hi Stephen, please also mention at least the LaTeX Project Public License in your debian/copyright. Thanks! Thorsten === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our concerns. --

spglib_1.10.3-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

Hi Andrius, according to the file header some files are licensed under GPL. Please mention them in your debian/copyright. Thanks! Thorsten === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our

r-cran-ei_1.3-3-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

Hi Andreas, please mention the LaTeX Project Public License of some styles in your debian/copyright. Thanks! Thorsten === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our concerns. --

Comments regarding ros-genmsg_0.5.10-2_amd64.changes

Hi Jochen, I marked your package for accept, but strictly speaking scripts/genmsg_check_deps.py needs an own license block as in clause 3 the name is differenet (Open Source Robotics Foundation, Inc) from "Willow Garage, Inc". Thanks! Thorsten -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list

Comments regarding r-cran-earth_4.6.2-1_amd64.changes

Hi Andreas, I marked the package for accept, but some files are even licensed under GPL-2+ Thorsten -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list debian-science-maintainers@alioth-lists.debian.net https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers

gismo_0.8.3-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

Hi Juergen, please mention the license of all files in your debian/copyright. At least GPL, LGPL, MIT and zlib are missing. Thanks! Thorsten === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our

harp_1.4-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

Hi Alastair, please mention the Apache and OFL license of some fonts in your debian/copyright. Thanks! Thorsten === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our concerns. --

netgen_6.2.1807+dfsg1-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

16:47 < kkremitzki> Hi, could I request someone reject netgen 6.2.1807+dfsg1-1 from NEW for me? I made a packaging mistake and will need to re-upload There was also a note attached: Library versioning everyone? There is no external user for this libs. === Please

Comments regarding apertium-pol_0.1.1-1_amd64.changes

Hi Kartik, I always fail to find a place where GPL-3+ is mentioned as license of apertium. All I find on github is GPL-3. So do you have a link at hand? Thanks! Thorsten -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list debian-science-maintainers@alioth-lists.debian.net

wannier90_3.0.0+ds-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

Hi Andrius, please mention all copyright holders in your debian/copyright. At least Quantum ESPRESSO and PWSCF are missing. It would be also nice if you could mention the complete names. Thanks! Thorsten === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files

Comments regarding dolfin_2019.1.0-1_amd64.changes

Hi Drew, I marked the package for accept, but our hardworking trainees found some issues: python\cmake\FindMPI4PY.cmake references a web address that 404s, presumably from which the file is sourced. We need to find that repo to confirm the file is available under a DFSG-compatible

mshr_2019.1.0+dfsg1~2018.1.0-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

same reason === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our concerns. -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list debian-science-maintainers@alioth-lists.debian.net

mshr_2019.1.0+dfsg1-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

Hi Drew, our hardworking trainees found some issues in your package: d/copyright mentions LGPL-3+, but is not attached to any files Link provided by "Source:" is not the package source - should be: https://bitbucket.org/fenics-project/mshr d/copyright only mentions 2015 for Benjamin,

Comments regarding opencv_4.1.1+dfsg-1_amd64.changes

Hi, I marked the package for accept, but strictly speaking there are different BSD-3 licenses in the package with differnt third clauses, that should appear in your debian/copyright. Thanks! Thorsten -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list

kim-models_20190331-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

"could you please remove this package from the NEW? It was decided to rename it to openkim-models, to be consistent with another distributions." === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our

pycollada_0.6-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

Hi Kurt, unfortunately the link to the SCEA license does not work anymore. Please add the complete text of this license to your debian/copyright. Please also mention the Boost license. Thanks! Thorsten === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files

vtkplotter_2019.1.2-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

Hi Drew, please also mention the BDS and LGPL-3 licenses in your debian/copyright. Thanks! Thorsten === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our concerns. -- debian-science-maintainers

spview_2.0.0~beta2-2_amd64.changes REJECTED

Hi Cyril, please also mention sources/org/spview/peakfinding/Peaks.java in your debian/copyright. Thanks! Thorsten === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our concerns. --

ifcplusplus_0~git20190402.13744d5+dfsg-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

Hi Matteo, please also mention Tobias Sargeant in your debian/coypright. Thanks! Thorsten === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our concerns. -- debian-science-maintainers mailing

Re: qutip_4.4.1-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

Hi Drew, On Tue, 12 Nov 2019, Drew Parsons wrote: On 2019-11-12 07:00, Thorsten Alteholz wrote: please also mention qutip-4.4.1/qutip/qip/circuit_latex.py in your debian/copyright. Confused. qutip/qip/circuit_latex.py is already mentioned: yes, sorry, I was a bit terse. Part

qutip_4.4.1-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

Hi Drew, please also mention qutip-4.4.1/qutip/qip/circuit_latex.py in your debian/copyright. Thanks! Thorsten === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our concerns. --

apertium-eval-translator_1.2.0-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

Hi Kartik, please also mention the files in your debian/copyright that are only licensed under GPL-3+. Thanks! Thorsten === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our concerns. --

kim-api_2.1.0-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

as requested ... > Dear FTP masters, > > please remove the deprecated version of kim-api_2.1.0-1 from the NEW > queue [1]. I will upload a newer version soon. > > [1] https://ftp-master.debian.org/new/kim-api_2.1.0-1.html > > Thank you > > Anton === Please feel free to respond to

fasttext_0.9.1-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

Hi, please also mentiom at least the CC license, the GPL ad several copyright holders in your debian/copyright. Thanks! Thorsten === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our concerns.

multiprocess_0.70.9-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

Hi Andreas, these statements seem to contradict themself: # Copyright (c) 2006-2008, R Oudkerk # Licensed to PSF under a Contributor Agreement. Please clarify with upstream. Thanks! Thorsten === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were

cuba_4.2-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

Hi Francesco, our hardworking trainees left a note on your package: src\common\Erf.c has a different copyright holder and its license does not appear, in fact, to be DFSG-free, as it does not permit distribution of modified versions. src/cuhre, src/divonne, src/suave have different

onnx_1.4.1-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

Hi, you got a note on your package: stubs\google\protobuf is arguably copyrightable, so to play it safe we need its licensing detailed in d/copyright. tools\protoc-gen-mypy.py is Apache-2.0 Could you confirm that the test data is in its preferred format for modification? I would

sagemath-database-cremona-elliptic-curves_20191029-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

Hi Julien, README.md says that some data are under an Artistic license!? Thorsten === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our concerns. -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list

Bug#955176: LGPL license missing

Package: syrthes Version: 4.3.5+20200129-dfsg1-1~exp1 Severity: serious thanks Dear Maintainer, please add the missing LGPL licenses of some header files to your debian/copyright. Thanks! Thorsten -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list

Re: apertium-cat-ita_0.2.1-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

by Francis Tyers for reference. Both Francis Tyers and myself are on the Apertium Project Management Committee ( http://wiki.apertium.org/wiki/PMC ). -- Tino Didriksen On Sat, 21 Mar 2020 at 20:00, Thorsten Alteholz wrote: Hi Kartik, COPYING says that the license is GPL-2 only. Please add a no

pspp_1.2.0-4_amd64.changes REJECTED

Hi Friedrich, please also mention at least the GFDL for the documentation and the CC license for the icons in your debian/copyright. Thanks! Thorsten === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which

lazyarray_0.3.3-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

Hi Andreas, there seem to be some copyright holder missing: Jol Chavas and Elodie Legoue' and while you are at it, the copyright years might be updated as well. Thorsten === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you

apertium-cat-ita_0.2.1-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

Hi Kartik, COPYING says that the license is GPL-2 only. Please add a note in your debian/copyright why it should be GPL-2+. Thanks! Thorsten === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our

colorcet_2.0.2-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

Hi Sebastien, shouldn't the license be "Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Public License" instead of BSD-3? Please also mention colorcet-2.0.2/colorcet/sineramp.py Thanks! Thorsten === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were

cvc4_1.8-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

Hi Fabian, as you refer to AUTHORS and THANKS in your debian/copyright please also add those files to the binary packages. Thanks! Thorsten === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our

dmlc-core_0.0~git20200410.5df8305-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

Hi, please also mention Jeff Preshing and his zlib license in your debian/copyright. Thanks! Thorsten === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our concerns. --

mpsolve_3.1.8-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

Hi Doug, according to the file headers, Dipartimento di Matematica "L. Tonelli", Pisa. is a copyright holder. The other person you mentioned seem to be "just" the authors. Some files are even available under GPL-3+ and some icons are licensed under LGPL. Please mention them in your

dials-data_2.0.0-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

Hi Sebastien, please also mention the CC-BY 4.0 in your debian/copyright. Thanks! Thorsten === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our concerns. -- debian-science-maintainers mailing

symfit_0.5.2-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

Hi Stephan, according to setup.cfg the license is: symfit-0.5.2/setup.cfg:license = MIT According to LICENSE the license is: GPL-2.0 Other information does not seem to be available. Can you please ask upstream which license it shall be? Thanks! Thorsten === Please feel free to

Comments regarding python-pyclustering_0.9.3.1-1_amd64.changes

Hi Julien, I marked your package for accept, but the license seems to be even GPL-3+. Thorsten -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list debian-science-maintainers@alioth-lists.debian.net https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers

python-igor_0.3-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

Hi Sebastien, shouldn't the license in your debian/copyright be better LGPL-3+? Thorsten === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our concerns. -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list

tetgen_1.6.0+dfsg1-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

Hi Anton, according to the file header of tetgen.cxx: // TetGen is freely available through the website: http://www.tetgen.org. // // It may be copied, modified, and redistributed for non-commercial use. // // Please consult the file LICENSE for the detailed copyright notices.

libatomprobe_0+20210207-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

Hi, do you really want to include the .hg directory in the source package? Our hard working trainees also found: data\naturalAbundance.xml is badly spelled in d/copyright: Files: data/natualAbundance.xml Please ping me after uploading the package again. Thanks! Thorsten === Please

superlu-dist_7.0.0+dfsg1-1exp2_amd64.changes REJECTED

Hi Drew, please mention all copyright holders, for example the Univ of Florida, NVIDIA and Duane Merrill are missing in your debian/copyright. Thanks! Thorsten === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload new files

superlu-dist_7.0.0+dfsg1-1exp1_amd64.changes REJECTED

same reason as other version ... === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our concerns. -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list debian-science-maintainers@alioth-lists.debian.net

pynndescent_0.5.2-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

email: "Please remove pynndescent from NEW, I'll update the ITP #984796" === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our concerns. -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list

dmrgpp_6.00-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

Hi Neil, please mention Andrei Alexandrescu and Addison-Wesley in your debian/copyright. Thanks! Thorsten === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our concerns. --

toon_3.0+git20200328111944.14dde29-3_amd64.changes REJECTED

Hi Roland, please mention the GFDL of some file in doc/ in your debian/coypright. Thanks! Thorsten === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our concerns. -- debian-science-maintainers

toon_3.0+git20200328111944.14dde29-2_amd64.changes REJECTED

same reason as other version ... === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our concerns. -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list debian-science-maintainers@alioth-lists.debian.net

libcvd_0.0~git20211206190858.cbb6797-4_amd64.changes REJECTED

Hi Roland, can you please be a bit more careful when creating your packages? There is almost none of your packages that needs to be rejected after the first upload. Please also mention all files licensed under GPL and LPGL in your debian/copyright. Thanks! Thorsten === Please feel

libcvd_0.0~git20211206190858.cbb6797-3_amd64.changes REJECTED

same reason as other version... === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our concerns. -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list debian-science-maintainers@alioth-lists.debian.net

dyssol_1.0~alpha1-20211119.gitd7bc300-2_amd64.changes REJECTED

Hi Anton, please mention the MUSEN development team and Mark Borgerding in your debian/copyright. Thanks! Thorsten === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our concerns. --

dyssol_1.0~alpha1-20211119.gitd7bc300-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

same reason as other version ... === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our concerns. -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list debian-science-maintainers@alioth-lists.debian.net

lrcalc_2.1-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

Hi Andreas, upstream seems to have changed the license from GPL-2+ to GPL-3+. Please update your debian/copyright. Thanks! Thorsten === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our concerns.

alglib_3.18.0-1~exp1_amd64.changes REJECTED

Hi, please also mention at least Stephen L. Moshier in your debian/copyright. Thanks! Thorsten === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our concerns. -- debian-science-maintainers

Comments regarding alglib_3.18.0-1~exp1_amd64.changes

Hi Anton, you forgot the specialfunction.* Probably the license text for the files of Stephen L. Moshier is wrong, as he stated his wishes in [1]. Thorsten [1] https://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2004/12/msg00295.html -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list

navarp_1.0.0-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

Hi Neil, please also mention CELLS / ALBA Synchrotron in your debian/copyright. Thanks! Thorsten === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our concerns. -- debian-science-maintainers

opentsne_0.5.0-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

Hi Sebastien, please also mention Patrick W. Daly, Peter Wilson and Donald Arseneau in your debian/copyright. Thanks! Thorsten === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our concerns. --

nbsphinx-link_1.3.0-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

Hi Sebastien, according to LICENSE the copyright holder is Simula Research Laboratory. Who is Vidar Tonaas Fauske? Also, your BSD-3 license block does not really match the text from LICENSE. Please adapt it. Thanks! Thorsten === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't

gmsh_4.8.4+ds1-2_amd64.changes REJECTED

Hi Anton, I am afraid you need to rework your debian/copyright a bit. On a short glimpse several packages in contrib are added and should be mentioned (for example the MPL of Eigen). Thanks! Thorsten === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files

Re: geant4-data_11.0.0+ds-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

Hi Stephan, On Sat, 8 Jan 2022, Stephan Lachnit wrote: Let's just quickly ignore the separate user agreement thing and read G4SL #4 again: "You are under no obligation to provide anyone with any modifications of this software that you may develop, including but not limited to bug fixes,

python-cython-blis_0.7.5-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

Hi Andreas, please also mention at least IBM Dave Love Devin Matthews Southern Methodist University in your debian/coypright, Thanks! Thorsten === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address

libatomprobe_0+20210207-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

Hi, unfortunately I have to reject your package. Please also mention Bjoern Hoehrmann and softSurfer in your debian/copyright. While you are at it, data/naturalAbundance.xml ist still spelled wrongly in your debian/coypright. Thanks! Thorsten === Please feel free to respond to this

vecgeom_1.1.18+dfsg-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

Hi Stephan, please mention Martin Ankerl in your debian/copyright. Thanks! Thorsten === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our concerns. -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list

threeb_0.0~git20201126101008.c26b7e6-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

same reason as other version ... === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our concerns. -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list debian-science-maintainers@alioth-lists.debian.net

threeb_0.0~git20220106110332.a3144e0-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

Hi Roland, according to README.md the license is GPL-3 only, so please remove the term " or (at your option) any later version." from your debian/copyright. pstreams/pstream.h doesn't seem to exist anymore Thorsten === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand

hfst_3.15.4-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

Hi, our hardworking trainees added a note to your package: - back-ends/foma/cpp-version/apply.cc mentions GNU General Public License version 2 but d/c mentions License: Apache-2.0 same for coaccessible.cc and many other. See Comment in the matching d/c stanza. I went to that page and

freeart_3.3.0+ds1-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

Hi, please mention freeart-v3.3.0/freeart/core/include/* in your debian/copyright. Thanks! Thorsten === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our concerns. -- debian-science-maintainers

dyssol_1.0.0+ds1-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

Hi Anton, please also mention at least Mark Borgerding and MUSEN Development Team in your debian/copyright. Thanks! Thorsten === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our concerns. --

gvars3_0.0~git20170608085742.55c3f04-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

same reason as other version === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our concerns. -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list debian-science-maintainers@alioth-lists.debian.net

gvars3_0.0~git20170608085742.55c3f04-2_amd64.changes REJECTED

same reason as other version === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our concerns. -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list debian-science-maintainers@alioth-lists.debian.net

gvars3_0.0~git20220105194034.62f5a78-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

Hi Roland, please add all people mentioned in LICENSE to your debian/copyright. Thanks! Thorsten === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our concerns. -- debian-science-maintainers

libcvd_0.0~git20211206190858.cbb6797-6_amd64.changes REJECTED

Hi Roland, according to the file header of libcvd-0.0~git20211206190858.cbb6797/progs/video_iOS/video/EAGLView.* Apple is mentioned as copyright holder but no license is given. Please clarify with upstream what license might be applicable. Thanks! Thorsten === Please feel free to

libcvd_0.0~git20211206190858.cbb6797-5_amd64.changes REJECTED

same reason as other version === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our concerns. -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list debian-science-maintainers@alioth-lists.debian.net

Re: hfst_3.15.4-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

Hi, On 05.02.22 11:14, Tino Didriksen wrote: This was resolved a year ago: https://alioth-lists.debian.net/pipermail/debian-science-maintainers/2021-February/090093.html Did an incorrect tarball get analyzed/uploaded or something? 'cause https://salsa.debian.org/science-team/hfst has the

geant4-data_11.0.0+ds-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

Hi Stephan, according to 4), in case I modify the software and want to distribute my patches under a different license, I need a written agreement with all users so that my patches don't fall under the default license. No, I don't think this package can be part of Debian main. Thorsten

Re: geant4-data_11.0.0+ds-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

Hi Stephan, On 08.01.22 09:46, Stephan Lachnit wrote: From 4.: > [...] However, if you publish or distribute your modifications without contemporaneously requiring users to enter into a separate written license agreement, then you are deemed to have granted all Members and all Copyright

Re: opm-upscaling_2021.10-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

On 22.01.22 21:42, Anton Gladky wrote: I would propose to put those two names with a small comment to make it traceable and transparent. yes, adding comments to your debian/coypright would be the best way to avoid confusion in such cases.   Thorsten -- debian-science-maintainers mailing

opm-simulators_2021.10-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

Hi Markus, please also mention at least Statoil ASA in your debian/copyright. Thanks! Thorsten === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our concerns. -- debian-science-maintainers

opm-grid_2021.10-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

Hi Markus, please also mention at least Statoil ASA and Uni Research AS in your debian/copyright. Thanks! Thorsten === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our concerns. --

epics-base_7.0.3.1-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

Hi, please also mention at least all licenses from modules/*/LICENSE in your debian/copyright. Thanks! Thorsten === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our concerns. --

opm-upscaling_2021.10-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

Hi Markus, please also mention at least Statoil ASA in your debian/copyright. Thanks! Thorsten === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our concerns. -- debian-science-maintainers

mrcal_2.1-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

Hi Dima, please also mention mrcal-2.1/minimath in your debian/copyright. Thanks! Thorsten === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our concerns. -- debian-science-maintainers mailing

clhep_2.4.5.1-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

Hi Andreas, our hardworking trainess left a note: Each subdirectory of the source directory has two licences : LGPL3 and GPL3. In d/copyright, only the LGPL is mentioned. Further the term "or (at your option) any later version." does not seem to be correct. Last but not least, several

ros-image-transport-plugins_1.15.0-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

HI Dima, please also mention image_transport_plugins-1.15.0/compressed_depth_image_transport/src/rvl_codec.cpp in your debian/copyright. Thanks! Thorsten === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which

onnxruntime_1.12.1+dfsg-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

Hi, can you please explain why onnxruntime/test/testdata/* is licensed under MIT? Thanks! Thorsten === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our concerns. -- debian-science-maintainers

ros-class-loader_2.3.0-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

20:36 < jochensp> hi, could you please drop ros-class-loader_2.3.0-1 from NEW? (should go to experimental) === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our concerns. --

opengv_1.0+1git91f4b1-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

Hi Dima, please also mention opengv/matlab/helpers/rodrigues.m in your debian/copyright. Unfortunately the license of this file does not seem to be mentioned. Thanks! Thorsten === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you

bioxtasraw_2.1.1-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

Hi Neil, please also mention: bioxtasraw/SASFileIO.py:__license__ = "MIT" bioxtasraw/SASUtils.py:Used with permission under MIT license in your debian/copyright. Thanks! Thorsten === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected,

lttoolbox_3.7.0-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

Hi, according to python/setup.py, the license of this part is GPL-3+. Please mention this in your debian/copyright. While you are at it, as you refer to AUTHORS in your debian/copyright, please add this file to all binary packages. Thanks! Thorsten === Please feel free to respond to

sasdata_0.8.1-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

Hi Stuart, please also mention "Copyright (c) 2013, UChicago Argonne, LLC" in your debian/copyright. Thanks! Thorsten === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our concerns. --

python-pymbar_3.1.0-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

Hi, please also mention at least: The Regents of the University of California Stanford University and Columbia University University of Virginia University of Colorado Boulder, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center in your debian/copyright. Thanks! Thorsten === Please feel free to

spnavcfg_1.0-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

Hi Steffen, please mention icons/* in your debian/copyright. Thanks! Thorsten === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our concerns. -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list

amgcl_1.4.3-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

Hi, please also mention the BSD license of the original authors, for example in: amgcl-1.4.3/amgcl/solver/skyline_lu.hpp You depend on libparmetis-dev, which is in non-free. So your package does not belong to main. Thanks! Thorsten === Please feel free to respond to this email if you

nfft_3.5.3-2_amd64.changes REJECTED

Hi, can you please explain why you put a shared library in the -dev package? According to policy § this should not happen. Thanks! Thorsten === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our

nfft_3.5.3-2_amd64.changes REJECTED

Hi Andreas, please also mention nfft-3.5.3/matlab/nfsoft/wignerD.m in your debian/copyright. While you are at it, please also upload to experimental. Thanks! Thorsten [1] https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2023/01/msg00040.html [2] https://wiki.debian.org/Teams/ReleaseTeam/Transitions

gle-graphics-library_0~20221105-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

Hi Christian, please also mention at least GLE and Andrey Grozin in your debian/copyright. Thanks! Thorsten === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our concerns. --

geant4-data_11.0.1+ds-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

Hi Stephan, the license you mentioned is only for the Geant software. Where did you find the information that it is also valid for the data? Anyway, I don't think the archive is already able to handle big data files. For example please have a look at [1]. Did you already ask the mirror team

parallel-hashmap_1.3.8+ds-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

Hi, please also mention Daniel James and the Boost license in your debian/copyright. Thanks! Thorsten === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our concerns. -- debian-science-maintainers

bluebrain-hpc-coding-conventions_1.0.0+git20221201-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

Hi Matthias, please also mention bluebrain-hpc-coding-conventions-1.0.0+git20221201/cpp/formatting/github-pandoc.css in your debian/copyright. Thanks! Thorsten === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload new files

  1   2   >