Am Dienstag, den 07.10.2008, 08:44 +0200 schrieb Andreas Tille:
On Tue, 7 Oct 2008, Chris Walker wrote:
[..]
So if you ask me we should follow a clear path:
1. Create tasks files and cdd-dev stuff under
svn://svn.debian.org/cdd/projects/debichem/trunk/debichem/
(or whatever
Andreas Tille [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Tue, 7 Oct 2008, Chris Walker wrote:
apbs Adaptive Poisson Boltzmann Solver in particular I don't know how
to categorise.
I have also included the abinitio package abinit and OpenMX - from the
physics task, and the v-sim structure viewer
On Tue, 7 Oct 2008, Chris Walker wrote:
No. I think they should be included in the task package, but I'm a
physicist and don't want to force my opinion on chemists.
Ah, OK.
In addition to the task packages, I'd like to see a categorised list
something like
On Tue, Oct 07, 2008 at 12:10:14AM +0100, Chris Walker wrote:
I have added almost all[1] the science-chemistry packages to the
http://wiki.debian.org/DebianScience/Chemistry page. I have done some
categorisation of them, but mainly from their descriptions - so
corrections welcome.
Thanks,
Hey, this is kinda cool. I've been using Octaviz for plotting, but
this looks cleaner, and I may consider switching:
http://mathgl.sourceforge.net
Getting it into Debian would be nice. :-)
- Jordi G. H.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe.
On Tue, 7 Oct 2008, Daniel Leidert wrote:
1. Create tasks files and cdd-dev stuff under
svn://svn.debian.org/cdd/projects/debichem/trunk/debichem/
(or whatever name you prefer)
-- I volunteer to do this provided somebody takes over the
categorisation work
2.
On Tue, 7 Oct 2008, Michael Banck wrote:
Thanks, I've now extended it a bit and shuffled things around.
Fine. I might turn this into tasks files at end of October.
(I'm offline next week and at OSWC the week after with less
chances to do such work.)
My previous opinion still holds - some
Hi!
I like the idea. It makes software look more seriouse. Could happen that your
software gets citations on sites like citeseerx.ist.psu.edu if used
consequently :-)
Nik
Am Dienstag, 7. Oktober 2008 schrieb Michael Banck:
Hi,
One thing I'd like to have added to the nice package
Michael Banck wrote:
One thing I'd like to have added to the nice package overviews at
http://cdd.alioth.debian.org/science/tasks/chemistry.html etc. is a
canonical reference which should be given in scientific papers using
that package.
I agree. Many placed respective indications in the
On Tue, Oct 07, 2008 at 11:55:34PM +0200, Bernhard R. Link wrote:
* Michael Banck [EMAIL PROTECTED] [081007 22:53]:
Also, having this would sense a clear signal to upstream authors that we
consider proper citing important and that enforcing citations in
copyright licensing is not the best
Hi Michael,
I fully support the idea of providing a proper reference to the software
we distribute. In Debian-Med, I put one in the packages's description,
but I am not completely satisfied with this because:
- In some case, more than one would be necessary, and it would overload
the
There might be things where software can actually be used as academical
contribution to some paper, but all examples I've yet seen were just
ridicilously broad.
FWIW, it's not uncommon in my field (discrete mathematics). In particular,
there are proofs that rely on very large but finite case
Most of my peer reviewed published research papers involve the software in the
complearn package. I (and some others) do wind up citing it fairly often FWIW.
Best regards,
Rudi
On Tue, Oct 7, 2008 at 7:32 PM, Ben Burton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There might be things where software can
13 matches
Mail list logo
