Hello,
On Mon, Oct 30, 2017 at 8:28 PM, Ghislain Vaillant wrote:
> Would that time be better spent on the Tensorflow / Keras combo, which is
> arguably significantly more popular in research? I am afraid we are already
> spreading our packaging efforts thin on the machine
On Tue, Oct 31, 2017 at 1:42 PM, Ghislain Vaillant wrote:
>
>
> On 31/10/17 16:11, Stephen Sinclair wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, Oct 31, 2017 at 12:50 PM, Ghislain Vaillant
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> On 31/10/17 13:15, Stephen Sinclair wrote:
Hello,
On 31/10/17 16:11, Stephen Sinclair wrote:
On Tue, Oct 31, 2017 at 12:50 PM, Ghislain Vaillant wrote:
On 31/10/17 13:15, Stephen Sinclair wrote:
Hello,
On Mon, Oct 30, 2017 at 8:28 PM, Ghislain Vaillant
wrote:
Would that time be better spent on
On Tue, Oct 31, 2017 at 12:50 PM, Ghislain Vaillant wrote:
> On 31/10/17 13:15, Stephen Sinclair wrote:
>>
>> Hello,
>>
>> On Mon, Oct 30, 2017 at 8:28 PM, Ghislain Vaillant
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Would that time be better spent on the Tensorflow / Keras combo,
On 31/10/17 13:15, Stephen Sinclair wrote:
Hello,
On Mon, Oct 30, 2017 at 8:28 PM, Ghislain Vaillant wrote:
Would that time be better spent on the Tensorflow / Keras combo, which is
arguably significantly more popular in research? I am afraid we are already
spreading our
5 matches
Mail list logo