Re: Maven packages in Debian (was Re: Progress in preparing the Bazel Build System for Debian (COVID-19 Biohackathon follow-up))
On Sat, May 23, 2020 at 8:10 PM Thorsten Glaser wrote: > > On Sat, 23 May 2020, Sudip Mukherjee wrote: > > > I have now made a list with package name, the jar files that it > > provides and the list of class that the jar provides. > > This must be scripted/scriptable though… the list for stable is > pretty much fixed, but the one for unstable (which is the relevant > one for packaging) isn’t and needs to be redone every few weeks at > least… It was generated using a script. It will not be a problem to redo every week. > > > Not sure where to put that or if it is in an usable format. So, > > initial version is at: > > https://drive.google.com/open?id=1A0tnTNofdNFuMwzrxV_HQE6npfpUglcS > > Ouch, 33M… methinks this is more suited as a web application. > Not all that easy… due to sheer size, at least. Yes, I was thinking of making a Debian native package for it, the data will be in either sqlite or yaml and then an application to read from it. cmdline will accept either jar or class name and will list the package containing them. And if package name is given then it will list everything that the package contains. Just a thought for now. -- Regards Sudip
Re: Maven packages in Debian (was Re: Progress in preparing the Bazel Build System for Debian (COVID-19 Biohackathon follow-up))
On Sat, 23 May 2020, Sudip Mukherjee wrote: > I have now made a list with package name, the jar files that it > provides and the list of class that the jar provides. This must be scripted/scriptable though… the list for stable is pretty much fixed, but the one for unstable (which is the relevant one for packaging) isn’t and needs to be redone every few weeks at least… > Not sure where to put that or if it is in an usable format. So, > initial version is at: > https://drive.google.com/open?id=1A0tnTNofdNFuMwzrxV_HQE6npfpUglcS Ouch, 33M… methinks this is more suited as a web application. Not all that easy… due to sheer size, at least. bye, //mirabilos -- tarent solutions GmbH Rochusstraße 2-4, D-53123 Bonn • http://www.tarent.de/ Tel: +49 228 54881-393 • Fax: +49 228 54881-235 HRB 5168 (AG Bonn) • USt-ID (VAT): DE122264941 Geschäftsführer: Dr. Stefan Barth, Kai Ebenrett, Boris Esser, Alexander Steeg
Re: Maven packages in Debian (was Re: Progress in preparing the Bazel Build System for Debian (COVID-19 Biohackathon follow-up))
On Wed, May 13, 2020 at 7:33 PM Thorsten Glaser wrote: > > On Wed, 6 May 2020, Andreas Tille wrote: > > > > Or perhaps we need a webpage or wiki page generated by parsing the > > > Contents file and listing the matching Debian package for each class > > > or, at least, Java package (unless split across multiple packages)… > > > > I remember times when such a web page (actually some autogenerated text > > file) existed which was **extremely** helpful. I wished this would be > > back! > > > > > … I just volunteerd, didn’t I? > > Here you are: > > https://wiki.debian.org/Java/MavenPkgs > > Sponsored by ⮡ tarent, see below. > > This is step 1, the list of all Maven packages ⇒ Debian package name. > It doesn’t go as far as to map Java packages or even classes… yet. > For this I’d have to download all those packages, extract them and > look into the JARs. I’d prefer some central service to offer archive > contents if possible (diffoscope already extracts archives anyway). I have now made a list with package name, the jar files that it provides and the list of class that the jar provides. Not sure where to put that or if it is in an usable format. So, initial version is at: https://drive.google.com/open?id=1A0tnTNofdNFuMwzrxV_HQE6npfpUglcS I think, next I will make a sorted list so that it will be easy to make a diff of what has changed. -- Regards Sudip
Re: Maven packages in Debian (was Re: Progress in preparing the Bazel Build System for Debian (COVID-19 Biohackathon follow-up))
On Wed, May 13, 2020 at 08:33:07PM +0200, Thorsten Glaser wrote: > > I remember times when such a web page (actually some autogenerated text > > file) existed which was **extremely** helpful. I wished this would be > > back! > > > > > … I just volunteerd, didn’t I? > > Here you are: > > https://wiki.debian.org/Java/MavenPkgs Looks pretty helpful! > Sponsored by ⮡ tarent, see below. Thanks! > This is step 1, the list of all Maven packages ⇒ Debian package name. > It doesn’t go as far as to map Java packages or even classes… yet. > For this I’d have to download all those packages, extract them and > look into the JARs. I’d prefer some central service to offer archive > contents if possible (diffoscope already extracts archives anyway). Sounds very promising. Thanks a lot Andreas. -- http://fam-tille.de
Maven packages in Debian (was Re: Progress in preparing the Bazel Build System for Debian (COVID-19 Biohackathon follow-up))
On Wed, 6 May 2020, Andreas Tille wrote: > > Or perhaps we need a webpage or wiki page generated by parsing the > > Contents file and listing the matching Debian package for each class > > or, at least, Java package (unless split across multiple packages)… > > I remember times when such a web page (actually some autogenerated text > file) existed which was **extremely** helpful. I wished this would be > back! > > > … I just volunteerd, didn’t I? Here you are: https://wiki.debian.org/Java/MavenPkgs Sponsored by ⮡ tarent, see below. This is step 1, the list of all Maven packages ⇒ Debian package name. It doesn’t go as far as to map Java packages or even classes… yet. For this I’d have to download all those packages, extract them and look into the JARs. I’d prefer some central service to offer archive contents if possible (diffoscope already extracts archives anyway). bye, //mirabilos -- tarent solutions GmbH Rochusstraße 2-4, D-53123 Bonn • http://www.tarent.de/ Tel: +49 228 54881-393 • Fax: +49 228 54881-235 HRB 5168 (AG Bonn) • USt-ID (VAT): DE122264941 Geschäftsführer: Dr. Stefan Barth, Kai Ebenrett, Boris Esser, Alexander Steeg
Re: Progress in preparing the Bazel Build System for Debian (COVID-19 Biohackathon follow-up)
Hi Thorsten, On Wed, May 06, 2020 at 05:15:04PM +0200, Thorsten Glaser wrote: > > Provides or something to make it clear? I saw changes to packages adding > > Or perhaps we need a webpage or wiki page generated by parsing the > Contents file and listing the matching Debian package for each class > or, at least, Java package (unless split across multiple packages)… I remember times when such a web page (actually some autogenerated text file) existed which was **extremely** helpful. I wished this would be back! > … I just volunteerd, didn’t I? :-) Kind regards Andreas. -- http://fam-tille.de
Re: Progress in preparing the Bazel Build System for Debian (COVID-19 Biohackathon follow-up)
On Wed, May 6, 2020 at 6:43 AM Olek Wojnar wrote: > > Fellow Developers, Maintainers, and Contributors, > > This is a quick update on recent progress with packaging the Bazel Build > System [1] for Debian. My involvement grew out of an urgent need for > TensorFlow that was identified during the recent COVID-19 Biohackathon > [2]. Upstream has been very supportive of our efforts and we have had > many positive interactions with them. > > However, we've now reached a point where we need more help in order to > get these important tools packaged in a timely manner. There are > currently 10 Java package dependencies that are not available in Debian. > These are: > google-api-client > google-auth > google-auto > checker-framework > diffutils As mentioned in #959834, diffutils was pretty straight forward and I can take care of it under Java-Team. -- Regards Sudip
Re: Progress in preparing the Bazel Build System for Debian (COVID-19 Biohackathon follow-up)
On Wed, May 6, 2020 at 11:23 AM Thorsten Glaser wrote: > Or perhaps we need a webpage or wiki page generated by parsing the > Contents file and listing the matching Debian package for each class > or, at least, Java package (unless split across multiple packages)… > > … > > … > > … I just volunteerd, didn’t I? > Sure sounds like it! Ha, ha! :)
Re: Progress in preparing the Bazel Build System for Debian (COVID-19 Biohackathon follow-up)
Hi Emmanuel, On Wed, May 6, 2020 at 10:03 AM Emmanuel Bourg wrote: > > You can remove javax-annotation from the list, it's already packaged as > libgeronimo-annotation-1.3-spec-java. Also error-prone and > checker-framework provide annotations that are not required at runtime, > patching them out is an option. > Excellent, thanks for the info! That's great news. Yes, I was considering that if we couldn't get those packaged quickly. Those two are my lowest priority for that reason. I already did something similar in a patch for libprotobuf-java and it was reasonably painless. Regarding the other generic dependencies, it would be nice to package > them under the Java Team umbrella. > I absolutely agree but I didn't want to speak for the Java Team. :) I'll pass that request on to any contributors I interact with. -Olek
Re: Progress in preparing the Bazel Build System for Debian (COVID-19 Biohackathon follow-up)
On Wed, 6 May 2020, Andrej Shadura wrote: > I wonder could we improve the package description and maybe add some YES please, me either. Why even Geronimo, why not Jakarta’s, which is the most latest? > Provides or something to make it clear? I saw changes to packages adding Or perhaps we need a webpage or wiki page generated by parsing the Contents file and listing the matching Debian package for each class or, at least, Java package (unless split across multiple packages)… … … … I just volunteerd, didn’t I? Mraw, //mirabilos -- tarent solutions GmbH Rochusstraße 2-4, D-53123 Bonn • http://www.tarent.de/ Tel: +49 228 54881-393 • Fax: +49 228 54881-235 HRB 5168 (AG Bonn) • USt-ID (VAT): DE122264941 Geschäftsführer: Dr. Stefan Barth, Kai Ebenrett, Boris Esser, Alexander Steeg
Re: Progress in preparing the Bazel Build System for Debian (COVID-19 Biohackathon follow-up)
Hi Olek, Le 06/05/2020 à 07:42, Olek Wojnar a écrit : > We have more information available, including links to RFP bugs, on our > Workplan wiki [3]. If you have Java experience and are willing to assist > in this effort, even packaging one of these would be a great help. If > you also want to help with the main Bazel-packaging effort, please feel > free to join the team! You can remove javax-annotation from the list, it's already packaged as libgeronimo-annotation-1.3-spec-java. Also error-prone and checker-framework provide annotations that are not required at runtime, patching them out is an option. Regarding the other generic dependencies, it would be nice to package them under the Java Team umbrella. Emmanuel Bourg
