shiny-server has been mentioned as a potential covid-19 related package
[0], though it isn't on the current hackathon list [4].
There is a packaging attempt in science-team Salsa (but no formal ITP)
from early 2018. Discussion at the time suggests it builds but possibly
doesn't work [1], and
On Mon, Sep 17, 2018 at 09:17:59PM +0200, Philip Rinn wrote:
> Hi Andreas,
>
> On Mon, Sep 17, 2018 at 20:49:47 +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
> > On Mon, Sep 17, 2018 at 05:25:41PM +0200, Philip Rinn wrote:
> >> > personally I can add myself as Uploaders and take over ownership of the
> >> >
Hi Andreas,
On Mon, Sep 17, 2018 at 20:49:47 +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 17, 2018 at 05:25:41PM +0200, Philip Rinn wrote:
>> > Please do not RM existing stuff. If you want to get rid of that package
>> > personally I can add myself as Uploaders and take over ownership of the
>> >
Hi Philip,
On Mon, Sep 17, 2018 at 05:25:41PM +0200, Philip Rinn wrote:
> > Please do not RM existing stuff. If you want to get rid of that package
> > personally I can add myself as Uploaders and take over ownership of the
> > ITP/RFPs. I think the latter will be automagically turned into RFPs
Hi Andreas,
On Mon, Sep 17, 2018 at 11:52:10 +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
> Hi Philip,
>
> On Sun, Sep 16, 2018 at 06:57:22PM +0200, Philip Rinn wrote:
>> the packaging effort for shiny-server stalled some month ago. I totally lost
>> interest in packaging it as I now use shinyproxy[1] at $work.
Hi Philip,
On Sun, Sep 16, 2018 at 06:57:22PM +0200, Philip Rinn wrote:
> the packaging effort for shiny-server stalled some month ago. I totally lost
> interest in packaging it as I now use shinyproxy[1] at $work.
There is interest remaining here (local users and I was asked by Debian
friends).
On 16.09.18 at 20:31, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
> [...]
> Yes. Not everything that exists in open source land needs to be in Debian.
>
> Some things are simply hard to package. Just how Tobias et al bundled Shiny
> in their (competing, but also both free-as-in-beer + commercially supported)
>
On 16 September 2018 at 18:57, Philip Rinn wrote:
| the packaging effort for shiny-server stalled some month ago. I totally lost
| interest in packaging it as I now use shinyproxy[1] at $work.
|
| As we are heading towards the freeze, I think it's time to discuss how to
proceed.
| Getting
Hi,
the packaging effort for shiny-server stalled some month ago. I totally lost
interest in packaging it as I now use shinyproxy[1] at $work.
As we are heading towards the freeze, I think it's time to discuss how to
proceed.
Getting shiny-server into Debian is still a lot of work, see [2].
9 matches
Mail list logo
