Hubert Chan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > "Olaf" == Olaf Meeuwissen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Olaf> On a really secure box I wouldn't want to have the build
> Olaf> environment needed to do this. Perhaps on another reasonably
> Olaf> secure box where I am the one and only normal user
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
> "Joseph" == Joseph Pingenot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Joseph> 0) Application calls, say, pgp with pgp syntax.
Joseph> 1) A pgp-xlat package (?), maintained by the PGP person, is used
Joseph> to translate the pgp commandline to the ge
Robert Mognet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Mailcrypt isn't part of Debian, so it's not the responciblity of the
> security team.
However, it *ought* to be part of Debian, and indeed, it now is IIUC.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Cont
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
> "Olaf" == Olaf Meeuwissen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Olaf> On a really secure box I wouldn't want to have the build
Olaf> environment needed to do this. Perhaps on another reasonably
Olaf> secure box where I am the one and only normal user, bu
Hubert Chan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > "Olaf" == Olaf Meeuwissen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Olaf> On a really secure box I wouldn't want to have the build
> Olaf> environment needed to do this. Perhaps on another reasonably
> Olaf> secure box where I am the one and only normal use
Tim Haynes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Olaf Meeuwissen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> [snip]
> > The reason is called 'stable' ;-)
> >
> > Debian does not put new versions into stable. It just allows security
> > fixes to be made to it. Okay, ocassionally a new upgrade (e.g. 2.2r1 to
> > 2.2r
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
> "Joseph" == Joseph Pingenot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Joseph> 0) Application calls, say, pgp with pgp syntax.
Joseph> 1) A pgp-xlat package (?), maintained by the PGP person, is used
Joseph> to translate the pgp commandline to the g
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
> "Olaf" == Olaf Meeuwissen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Olaf> On a really secure box I wouldn't want to have the build
Olaf> environment needed to do this. Perhaps on another reasonably
Olaf> secure box where I am the one and only normal user, b
Olaf Meeuwissen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
[snip]
> The reason is called 'stable' ;-)
>
> Debian does not put new versions into stable. It just allows security
> fixes to be made to it. Okay, ocassionally a new upgrade (e.g. 2.2r1 to
> 2.2r2) may fix some serious breakage as well, but that's abo
Gregoire Welraeds <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I have recently installed a basic potato on a PII. While playing a little bit
> around a find that the provided nmap was only a 2.12 version. It is a rather
> old version of nmap (I have a 2.53 installed on a SuSE 6.3).
>
> Is there any known reason
On Sun, Jun 17, 2001 at 09:52:50PM +0200, Gregoire Welraeds wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have recently installed a basic potato on a PII. While playing a little bit
> around a find that the provided nmap was only a 2.12 version. It is a rather
> old version of nmap (I have a 2.53 installed on a SuSE 6.3)
Tim Haynes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Olaf Meeuwissen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> [snip]
> > The reason is called 'stable' ;-)
> >
> > Debian does not put new versions into stable. It just allows security
> > fixes to be made to it. Okay, ocassionally a new upgrade (e.g. 2.2r1 to
> > 2.2
Hello,
I have recently installed a basic potato on a PII. While playing a little bit
around a find that the provided nmap was only a 2.12 version. It is a rather
old version of nmap (I have a 2.53 installed on a SuSE 6.3).
Is there any known reason for this choice ?
Grégoire Welraeds
Olaf Meeuwissen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
[snip]
> The reason is called 'stable' ;-)
>
> Debian does not put new versions into stable. It just allows security
> fixes to be made to it. Okay, ocassionally a new upgrade (e.g. 2.2r1 to
> 2.2r2) may fix some serious breakage as well, but that's ab
Gregoire Welraeds <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I have recently installed a basic potato on a PII. While playing a little bit
> around a find that the provided nmap was only a 2.12 version. It is a rather
> old version of nmap (I have a 2.53 installed on a SuSE 6.3).
>
> Is there any known reaso
On Sun, Jun 17, 2001 at 09:52:50PM +0200, Gregoire Welraeds wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have recently installed a basic potato on a PII. While playing a little bit
> around a find that the provided nmap was only a 2.12 version. It is a rather
> old version of nmap (I have a 2.53 installed on a SuSE 6.3
>From Hubert Chan on Thursday, 21 June, 2001:
>> "Joseph" == Joseph Pingenot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>below). Although if you volunteer to make it happen... :-)
>Hubert> Changing all the packages to work properly wouldn't be a simple
>Hubert> task. (Not saying that it's a bad idea, though
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
> "Joseph" == Joseph Pingenot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Joseph> Hrm. I'll look at pgpgpg when I can. Thanks for the info. :)
Joseph> The basic idea would be that, if you just need a generic pgp
Joseph> implementation, use dpgpw and its unifie
Hello,
I have recently installed a basic potato on a PII. While playing a little bit
around a find that the provided nmap was only a 2.12 version. It is a rather
old version of nmap (I have a 2.53 installed on a SuSE 6.3).
Is there any known reason for this choice ?
Grégoire Welraeds
Joseph Pingenot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> So why not create in the virtual package an actual wrapper script (e.g.
> dpgpw for 'Debian PGP Wrapper') that detects the version of pgp or gpg
> or whatever is installed on the system (or chooses which one to
> use if multiple pgp implementat
Hubert Chan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> And if I can add, packages that provide the virtual packages such as
> info-browser or mail-reader don't have a consistent command-line
> interface, but this isn't the interface that matters.
>
> If we talk about a pgp front end, the interface that matter
You can take a look at this AUP, and you might even want to take a look at
*spits* AOL's *spits* AUP as well. I haven't looked at theirs, but I've read
over ours several times.
http://www.earthlink.net/about/policies/use/index.html
and up one level has several different public policies we have th
>From Hubert Chan on Thursday, 21 June, 2001:
>-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>Hash: SHA1
>> "Joseph" == Joseph Pingenot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>Joseph> So why not create in the virtual package an actual wrapper
>(well, because then it wouldn't be a _virtual_ package, but ignoring
>tha
Good, good, good. I know, thank you.
--
yoros
pgplZOSySvKRS.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
> "Joseph" == Joseph Pingenot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Joseph> So why not create in the virtual package an actual wrapper
(well, because then it wouldn't be a _virtual_ package, but ignoring
that...)
Joseph> script (e.g. dpgpw for 'Debian PGP
>From Hubert Chan on Thursday, 21 June, 2001:
>> "Joseph" == Joseph Pingenot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>below). Although if you volunteer to make it happen... :-)
>Hubert> Changing all the packages to work properly wouldn't be a simple
>Hubert> task. (Not saying that it's a bad idea, thoug
On Tue, 19 Jun 2001 09:29:13 +0100
Brett Parker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Why not use XEmacs instead of Emacs and kill the need for this
> package?
Unfortunately there's a lot of elisp that just won't work under one
of the two. I finally gave up and evicted all the GNU/Emacs crap
from my .
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
> "Joseph" == Joseph Pingenot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Joseph> Hrm. I'll look at pgpgpg when I can. Thanks for the info. :)
Joseph> The basic idea would be that, if you just need a generic pgp
Joseph> implementation, use dpgpw and its unifi
>From Florian Weimer on Thursday, 21 June, 2001:
>[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Thomas Bushnell, BSG) writes:
>> Florian Weimer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Thomas Bushnell, BSG) writes:
>> > > It's clear to me we need a virtual package for "pgp implementation"
>> > > that both pgp and
Joseph Pingenot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> So why not create in the virtual package an actual wrapper script (e.g.
> dpgpw for 'Debian PGP Wrapper') that detects the version of pgp or gpg
> or whatever is installed on the system (or chooses which one to
> use if multiple pgp implementa
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
> "yoros" == yoros <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
yoros> Ok guys, thanks for all. I like english and I'm trying to learn
yoros> it.
You *like* English? (By the way, in English, language names are
capitalized.) What are you, some kind of masochist
* Tim Haynes ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [010621 16:39]:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>
> > Ok guys, thanks for all. I like english and I'm trying to learn it. Ah,
> > one thing, I use "vim" and "mutt", how could I wrap the lines at 72
> > characters? Thank you.
>
> :set wm=8
> :set ai
>
> that normally
Hubert Chan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> And if I can add, packages that provide the virtual packages such as
> info-browser or mail-reader don't have a consistent command-line
> interface, but this isn't the interface that matters.
>
> If we talk about a pgp front end, the interface that matte
You can take a look at this AUP, and you might even want to take a look at
*spits* AOL's *spits* AUP as well. I haven't looked at theirs, but I've read
over ours several times.
http://www.earthlink.net/about/policies/use/index.html
and up one level has several different public policies we have t
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
> "Thomas" == Thomas Bushnell, BSG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Thomas> No, you're wrong. The mailcrypt front end, for example, works
Thomas> with both. And that's the case we are talking about.
OK, so it'll work for now. But you run the (unnec
>From Hubert Chan on Thursday, 21 June, 2001:
>-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>Hash: SHA1
>> "Joseph" == Joseph Pingenot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>Joseph> So why not create in the virtual package an actual wrapper
>(well, because then it wouldn't be a _virtual_ package, but ignoring
>th
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
> "Florian" == Florian Weimer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Florian> Eh, software which provides the 'editor' virtual package *has*
Florian> a consistent command line interface. The user interfaces are
(If I may add my own clarification) a somewha
Yoros,
I pulled this off of the Mutt list [http://www.mutt.org]
Put this in your .muttrc config file
set editor="vim -c 'set textwidth=72'"
OR add the following to your .vimrc config file:
" set the textwidth to 72 characters for replies (email&usenet)
au BufRead
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> Ok guys, thanks for all. I like english and I'm trying to learn it. Ah,
> one thing, I use "vim" and "mutt", how could I wrap the lines at 72
> characters? Thank you.
:set wm=8
:set ai
that normally does it for me.
~Tim
--
17:36:33 up 6 days, 21:40, 13 users, lo
Good, good, good. I know, thank you.
--
yoros
PGP signature
Ok guys, thanks for all. I like english and I'm trying to learn it.
Ah, one thing, I use "vim" and "mutt", how could I wrap the lines at 72
characters?
Thank you.
Bien tios, gracias por todo. Me gusta el ingles y estoy intentando aprenderlo.
Ah, una cosa, uso "vim" y "mutt", ¿como podría cortar l
You might want to have a look at a few other big network's AUP's
here are 2 of the big ISP's in .au
http://www.bigpond.com/broadband/support/aupindex.asp
http://www.optushome.com.au/aup.html
They might help you out a bit, but everything is different. AUP's can
take -months- to make.
- Origina
What's the best way to go about writing an Acceptable Use Policy for
networks?
My searches for information have come up empty so if anyone has any links,
they would be greatly appreciated.
Thanks in advance,
Leonard Leblanc
Vice-president - Technology
www.emergeknowledge.com
On Tue, 19 Jun 2001 09:29:13 +0100
Brett Parker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Why not use XEmacs instead of Emacs and kill the need for this
> package?
Unfortunately there's a lot of elisp that just won't work under one
of the two. I finally gave up and evicted all the GNU/Emacs crap
from my
>From Florian Weimer on Thursday, 21 June, 2001:
>[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Thomas Bushnell, BSG) writes:
>> Florian Weimer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Thomas Bushnell, BSG) writes:
>> > > It's clear to me we need a virtual package for "pgp implementation"
>> > > that both pgp and
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
> "yoros" == yoros <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
yoros> Ok guys, thanks for all. I like english and I'm trying to learn
yoros> it.
You *like* English? (By the way, in English, language names are
capitalized.) What are you, some kind of masochis
* Tim Haynes ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [010621 16:39]:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>
> > Ok guys, thanks for all. I like english and I'm trying to learn it. Ah,
> > one thing, I use "vim" and "mutt", how could I wrap the lines at 72
> > characters? Thank you.
>
> :set wm=8
> :set ai
>
> that normally
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
> "Thomas" == Thomas Bushnell, BSG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Thomas> No, you're wrong. The mailcrypt front end, for example, works
Thomas> with both. And that's the case we are talking about.
OK, so it'll work for now. But you run the (unne
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
> "Florian" == Florian Weimer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Florian> Eh, software which provides the 'editor' virtual package *has*
Florian> a consistent command line interface. The user interfaces are
(If I may add my own clarification) a somewh
Yoros,
I pulled this off of the Mutt list [http://www.mutt.org]
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Put this in your .muttrc config file
set editor="vim -c 'set textwidth=72'"
OR add the following to your .vimrc config file:
" set the textwidth to 72 characters for replies (email&us
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> Ok guys, thanks for all. I like english and I'm trying to learn it. Ah,
> one thing, I use "vim" and "mutt", how could I wrap the lines at 72
> characters? Thank you.
:set wm=8
:set ai
that normally does it for me.
~Tim
--
17:36:33 up 6 days, 21:40, 13 users, l
Ok guys, thanks for all. I like english and I'm trying to learn it.
Ah, one thing, I use "vim" and "mutt", how could I wrap the lines at 72 characters?
Thank you.
Bien tios, gracias por todo. Me gusta el ingles y estoy intentando aprenderlo.
Ah, una cosa, uso "vim" y "mutt", ¿como podría cortar l
You might want to have a look at a few other big network's AUP's
here are 2 of the big ISP's in .au
http://www.bigpond.com/broadband/support/aupindex.asp
http://www.optushome.com.au/aup.html
They might help you out a bit, but everything is different. AUP's can
take -months- to make.
- Origin
What's the best way to go about writing an Acceptable Use Policy for
networks?
My searches for information have come up empty so if anyone has any links,
they would be greatly appreciated.
Thanks in advance,
Leonard Leblanc
Vice-president - Technology
www.emergeknowledge.com
--
To UNSUBSCR
Colin Phipps <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > No, you're wrong. The mailcrypt front end, for example, works with
> > both. And that's the case we are talking about.
>
> It depends how the compatibility works. If it's mailcrypt providing
> the compatibility, then it's mailcrypt that should list t
On Wed, Jun 20, 2001 at 07:13:26PM -0700, Thomas Bushnell, BSG wrote:
> Hubert Chan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > But for the situation we are talking about, they would need to have the
> > same interface, since a PGP front end needs to interact with the PGP
> > program. So in the PGP front e
Colin Phipps <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > No, you're wrong. The mailcrypt front end, for example, works with
> > both. And that's the case we are talking about.
>
> It depends how the compatibility works. If it's mailcrypt providing
> the compatibility, then it's mailcrypt that should list
On Wed, Jun 20, 2001 at 07:13:26PM -0700, Thomas Bushnell, BSG wrote:
> Hubert Chan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > But for the situation we are talking about, they would need to have the
> > same interface, since a PGP front end needs to interact with the PGP
> > program. So in the PGP front
58 matches
Mail list logo
