On Tue, 19 Jun 2001 09:29:13 +0100
Brett Parker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Why not use XEmacs instead of Emacs and kill the need for this
> package?
Unfortunately there's a lot of elisp that just won't work under one
of the two. I finally gave up and evicted all the GNU/Emacs crap
from my .xemacs, and now, amazingly, finally have the damn thing
under 250K.
> better still, use mutt which has all the support in
> there.
Mutt can't handle MH folders properly (named sequence support to
name but one). No thanks.
--
J C Lawrence [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------(*) http://www.kanga.nu/~claw/
The pressure to survive and rhetoric may make strange bedfellows
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
