Hallo,
On Fri, 16 Sep 2005 15:21:45 +0200 (CEST)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Martin Schulze) wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
-
-
- Debian Security Advisory DSA 815-1
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Mon, 19 Sep 2005 08:44:21 +0200
Christoph Pleger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hallo,
On Fri, 16 Sep 2005 15:21:45 +0200 (CEST)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Martin Schulze) wrote:
Package: kdebase
Vulnerability : programming error
Problem type : local
Debian-specific: no
CVE ID
On Fri, Sep 16, 2005 at 06:06:13PM +0200, Horst Pflugstaedt wrote:
On Fri, Sep 16, 2005 at 05:38:00PM +0200, Evgeni Golov wrote:
On Fri, 16 Sep 2005 17:19:37 +0200
Peer Janssen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Isn't sending such mails a security risk?
Not only this. It's also quite
On Mon, Sep 19, 2005 at 01:23:13PM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote:
Is there a reason not to simply read the Precedence: list header
and simply not respond at all ?
Precedence: list is non-standard. Technically speaking,
RFC-compliant software should not use it. 8-/
I'm surprised.
Do you
On Mon, 19 Sep 2005, Florian Weimer wrote:
Is there a reason not to simply read the Precedence: list header
and simply not respond at all ?
Precedence: list is non-standard. Technically speaking,
RFC-compliant software should not use it. 8-/
That's not quite correct, software MAY use
* Peter Palfrader:
On Mon, 19 Sep 2005, Florian Weimer wrote:
Is there a reason not to simply read the Precedence: list header
and simply not respond at all ?
Precedence: list is non-standard. Technically speaking,
RFC-compliant software should not use it. 8-/
That's not quite
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED] you wrote:
Is there a reason not to simply read the Precedence: list header
and simply not respond at all ?
BTW: Exchnage Server does this.
Gruss
Bernd
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL
Hello,
anybody knows what's the problem with klecker/security.d.o?
The whole day I get timeouts but I could update xfree(woody)/xorg(sarge)
on some machine but I didn't find the DSA for it.
Any information about this?
thx.
--
Noèl Köthe noel debian.org
signature.asc
Description: This is a
* Noèl Köthe ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [050919 21:19]:
anybody knows what's the problem with klecker/security.d.o?
The link to the outside world is fully saturated currently.
There are ideas discussed how we can add more machines / bandwith, but
that's not a short-term solution.
The whole day I get
On Mon, Sep 19, 2005 at 09:18:29PM +0200, No?l K?the wrote:
anybody knows what's the problem with klecker/security.d.o?
The whole day I get timeouts but I could update xfree(woody)/xorg(sarge)
on some machine but I didn't find the DSA for it.
Any information about this?
See
Am Montag, den 19.09.2005, 15:24 -0400 schrieb Noah Meyerhans:
On Mon, Sep 19, 2005 at 09:18:29PM +0200, No?l K?the wrote:
anybody knows what's the problem with klecker/security.d.o?
The whole day I get timeouts but I could update xfree(woody)/xorg(sarge)
on some machine but I didn't find
On Mon, Sep 19, 2005 at 09:18:29PM +0200, No?l K?the wrote:
anybody knows what's the problem with klecker/security.d.o?
http://lists.debian.org/debian-curiosa/2005/09/msg00018.html
There is an advisory pending ...
Steve
--
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a
* Steve Kemp:
On Mon, Sep 19, 2005 at 09:18:29PM +0200, No?l K?the wrote:
anybody knows what's the problem with klecker/security.d.o?
http://lists.debian.org/debian-curiosa/2005/09/msg00018.html
The MRTG output is broken (as suggested by the straight line). Real
port utilization is
On Mon, Sep 19, 2005 at 10:04:14PM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote:
BTW, I don't understand why this was posted to debian-curiosa, either.
I got into the habit of reading important announcements for the users
on http://planet.debian.net. Now it seems debian-curiosa is another place
for them.
I
* Bartosz Fenski aka fEnIo ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [050919 22:46]:
On Mon, Sep 19, 2005 at 10:04:14PM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote:
BTW, I don't understand why this was posted to debian-curiosa, either.
I got into the habit of reading important announcements for the users
on
On Mon, Sep 19, 2005 at 10:45:37PM +0200, Bartosz Fenski aka fEnIo wrote:
I wonder what else should I read to keep in touch with such important
information?
slashdot? ;)
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Mon, Sep 19, 2005 at 09:22:18PM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
The link to the outside world is fully saturated currently.
There are ideas discussed how we can add more machines / bandwith, but
that's not a short-term solution.
The current problem isn't a bandwidth problem, but it is related
* Michael Stone:
The current problem isn't a bandwidth problem, but it is related to
people downloading the X update.
The available bandwidth is not sufficient for dealing with an X11
update, at least in the usual way (pushing everything that's built by
the source packages, and not just the
On Mon, Sep 19, 2005 at 10:48:15PM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
BTW, I don't understand why this was posted to debian-curiosa, either.
I got into the habit of reading important announcements for the users
on http://planet.debian.net. Now it seems debian-curiosa is another place
for
20 matches
Mail list logo
