Re: Out of office replies

2009-01-17 Thread Dusty Wilson
On Sat, Jan 17, 2009 at 12:50 AM, Izak Burger isbur...@gmail.com wrote: Stephen Vaughan stephenvaug...@gmail.com wrote: When will people learn not to set auto replies Nothing wrong with a proper auto-reply (one that does some decent caching, only replies once a day, avoids mailing lists and

Re: Out of office replies

2009-01-17 Thread Jim Popovitch
On Sat, Jan 17, 2009 at 12:50 AM, Izak Burger isbur...@gmail.com wrote: our own auto-reply exim router (as requested by clients) checks for about 16 different headers On Sat, Jan 17, 2009 at 06:44, Dusty Wilson du...@hey.nu wrote: [snip] I understand that it takes both sides to fix the

Re: Out of office replies

2009-01-17 Thread Frank Lanitz
On Sat, 17 Jan 2009 07:15:30 -0500 Jim Popovitch ya...@jimpop.com wrote: On Sat, Jan 17, 2009 at 12:50 AM, Izak Burger isbur...@gmail.com wrote: our own auto-reply exim router (as requested by clients) checks for about 16 different headers On Sat, Jan 17, 2009 at 06:44, Dusty Wilson

Re: Out of office replies

2009-01-17 Thread Jim Popovitch
On Sat, Jan 17, 2009 at 07:29, Frank Lanitz fr...@frank.uvena.de wrote: On Sat, 17 Jan 2009 07:15:30 -0500 Jim Popovitch ya...@jimpop.com wrote: Bah!! Headers change over time. The simple and easy way to solve OoO problems is for vacation responders to only reply to From:/Sender: if (and

Re: Out of office replies

2009-01-17 Thread Dusty Wilson
On Sat, Jan 17, 2009 at 6:40 AM, Jim Popovitch ya...@jimpop.com wrote: On Sat, Jan 17, 2009 at 07:29, Frank Lanitz fr...@frank.uvena.de wrote: On Sat, 17 Jan 2009 07:15:30 -0500 Jim Popovitch ya...@jimpop.com wrote: Bah!! Headers change over time. The simple and easy way to solve OoO

Re: Out of office replies

2009-01-17 Thread Bernd Eckenfels
In article e2e2e5500901162250s61454d0bh76d73469bfaef...@mail.gmail.com you wrote: So first prize is not having to use an auto-reply at all. Second prize is one that checks for common headers at the very least. If you don't have enough control over this (for example you're running exchange)

Re: Out of office replies

2009-01-17 Thread Bernd Eckenfels
In article 42670320901170344i4a7eb397g5522af4b38375...@mail.gmail.com you wrote: Considering the wide number of installs of Exchange, you'd think they'd eventually fix that *in* Exchange Exchanged does the right thing. Gruss Bernd -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to

Re: Out of office replies

2009-01-17 Thread mouss
Jim Popovitch a écrit : On Sat, Jan 17, 2009 at 12:50 AM, Izak Burger isbur...@gmail.com wrote: our own auto-reply exim router (as requested by clients) checks for about 16 different headers On Sat, Jan 17, 2009 at 06:44, Dusty Wilson du...@hey.nu wrote: [snip] I understand that it takes

Out of office replies

2009-01-16 Thread Frank Lanitz
On Fri, 16 Jan 2009 11:10:09 +1100 Stephen Vaughan stephenvaug...@gmail.com wrote: returning 29/09/2008 ?? When will people learn not to set auto replies When other people understand, email is not a real time medium. Didn't you get my mail I've sent 2 minutes ago!?!?!?!?! Cheers,

Re: Out of office replies

2009-01-16 Thread Izak Burger
Stephen Vaughan stephenvaug...@gmail.com wrote: When will people learn not to set auto replies Nothing wrong with a proper auto-reply (one that does some decent caching, only replies once a day, avoids mailing lists and things with precedence: bulk, etc etc). The problem IMHO is that that is