On Thu, Sep 21, 2006 at 03:37:56PM -0400, Morgan Walker wrote:
Thanks Michelle that worked perfect. Is there an easy variable I could
throw in there that you know off hand which would include the time
(MM/DD/) as well?
Apart from the suggestions to use ${ date }, does the date of the
On Thu, Mar 30, 2006 at 12:03:59PM +0300, Cataract wrote:
Hello there.
i have a problem with the security packages. i can not download them
from debian.org.
i use synaptic and after the reload some packages says me fail to
download them.
what can i do about it?
What does your sources.list
On Thu, Mar 02, 2006 at 10:36:16PM +0100, Marc Haber wrote:
On Thu, Mar 02, 2006 at 08:06:48PM +0100, Florian Weimer wrote:
* Geoff Crompton:
I'm also wondering if security.debian.org has enough resources for every
single debian box on the planet checking it every X minutes.
You can
On Sun, Feb 26, 2006 at 10:11:44PM +0100, Mario Ohnewald wrote:
Hello security list!
I would like to secure the harddrive/partitions of linux box.
The whole setup must fulfill the following requirements:
a) it must be able to boot (remotely) without userinput/passphrase
b) the
On Sun, Feb 26, 2006 at 11:17:56PM +0100, Florian Weimer wrote:
* Horst Pflugstaedt:
I just ask myself why you bother encrypting a filesystem that will be
accessible to anyone having access to the machine since it boots without
password?
You can return hard disks to the vendor
On Fri, Nov 25, 2005 at 04:53:45PM -0500, Barry Hawkins wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Alexandr Rappoport wrote:
Hi
I have a client in Moscow who's looking to purchase two armored vehicles:
Merceds G500
and
Mercedes S500 or S600
Please give me some
On Mon, Oct 10, 2005 at 04:44:13PM +0200, Nicolai Ehemann wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello!
I just (err, over the last 4 or 5 days) created a (hopefully
standards-compliant) package for the pam_abl PAM module.
The pam_abl module provides a fully configurable
On Fri, Sep 16, 2005 at 05:38:00PM +0200, Evgeni Golov wrote:
On Fri, 16 Sep 2005 17:19:37 +0200
Peer Janssen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Isn't sending such mails a security risk?
Not only this. It's also quite annoying for the ML readers... I don't
like this vacancy announcers.
Think bout
On Sat, Aug 20, 2005 at 06:15:57PM -0700, Alvin Oga wrote:
--- i'd like to see various providers of apps ( *.deb ) and upgrades
be listed on a single page http://updates.debian.org/Updates instead
of hunting for it in yahoo/google
you know apt-get.org?
Whoever wants to maintain a list
On Sun, Jul 31, 2005 at 10:29:46PM +0400, Nikita V. Youshchenko wrote:
Requiring users to install an important component (which Mozilla is) from
other sources is a bad idea in this context. I think it should not be the
way how Debian solves it's problems.
in thecase of mozilla this is not
On Fri, Jul 08, 2005 at 09:33:29AM -0400, Phillip Hofmeister wrote:
On Fri, 08 Jul 2005 at 01:58:40AM -0400, Martin Schulze wrote:
The security team will continue to support Debian GNU/Linux 3.0 alias
woody until May 2006, or if the security support for the next release,
codenamed etch,
On Fri, Jun 17, 2005 at 09:03:57AM +0200, martin f krafft wrote:
also sprach Florian Weimer [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2005.06.17.0848 +0200]:
These are *cipher* blocks, and they are chained only within
a *block device* block.
Who guarantees that? If Cipherblock CB_x depends on CB_(x-1), then
On Thu, Jul 08, 2004 at 06:39:50AM +0200, Mezig wrote:
Phillip Hofmeister wrote:
You should start by updating any Bayesian filters you have on your
machine and then deleting the message. After you have done this you
I always keep my spam archived in a separate mailbox; it's good for
training
On Sun, Jun 27, 2004 at 01:43:45PM +0200, martin f krafft wrote:
also sprach Horst Pflugstaedt [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2004.06.26.2155 +0200]:
what would be the alternative?
The security team would have to annonce there's a possible security
flaw in package XY, we're on it, but it may take some
On Sat, Jun 26, 2004 at 02:39:02PM +0200, martin f krafft wrote:
anything from its users. If a root exploit is out there, users want
to know about it. Keeping it a secret is childish.
what would be the alternative?
The security team would have to annonce there's a possible security
flaw in
On Sat, Apr 17, 2004 at 10:00:23AM -0400, Michael Stone wrote:
On Thu, Apr 15, 2004 at 08:19:24PM +1000, Joshua Goodall wrote:
In other words, people are ready to pounce, and that short gap of time
after server installation and before installing patched code cannot be
considered safe. Quite
On Sat, Apr 17, 2004 at 10:00:23AM -0400, Michael Stone wrote:
On Thu, Apr 15, 2004 at 08:19:24PM +1000, Joshua Goodall wrote:
In other words, people are ready to pounce, and that short gap of time
after server installation and before installing patched code cannot be
considered safe. Quite
On Wed, Feb 25, 2004 at 02:47:57PM -0800, Jonathan Walther wrote:
I have never endorsed any particular political point of view while using
my debian.org address. I feel rather uncomfortable with the way the
thread has been going; could you clarify whether you meant that I
actually had done
On Wed, Feb 25, 2004 at 02:47:57PM -0800, Jonathan Walther wrote:
I have never endorsed any particular political point of view while using
my debian.org address. I feel rather uncomfortable with the way the
thread has been going; could you clarify whether you meant that I
actually had done
On Wed, Feb 25, 2004 at 03:41:13PM +, Dale Amon wrote:
Yes, as long as his personal beliefs are kept outside
of Debian. I think a severe warning to keep his politics
outside of Debian would be sufficient.
I do strongly disagree with his personal thoughts, but I must grant
him the right to
On Wed, Feb 25, 2004 at 03:41:13PM +, Dale Amon wrote:
Yes, as long as his personal beliefs are kept outside
of Debian. I think a severe warning to keep his politics
outside of Debian would be sufficient.
I do strongly disagree with his personal thoughts, but I must grant
him the right to
On Sat, Feb 07, 2004 at 10:38:51AM +0200, EErdem wrote:
Hi,
I've been using iptables (or i assuming that). But at boot time it gives
an error: Aborting iptables load: unknown rulesets active . I
you should first try zo find out, what ruleset iptables tries to load
on boot-time (go, find
On Sat, Feb 07, 2004 at 10:38:51AM +0200, EErdem wrote:
Hi,
I've been using iptables (or i assuming that). But at boot time it gives
an error: Aborting iptables load: unknown rulesets active . I
you should first try zo find out, what ruleset iptables tries to load
on boot-time (go, find
On Sun, Jan 25, 2004 at 04:12:59PM +0100, Erik Hjelmås wrote:
Hi,
I've spent a few hours searching, what Im looking for is a discussion
of different security aspects of apt, questions like
- What are the possible threats in terms of ip spoofing, dns cache
poisoning? (are there any solutions
On Wed, Jan 21, 2004 at 02:11:39PM -0500, Walter Tautz wrote:
#! /bin/sh
[...]
which DOES work. I wonder why it's complaining about the line #! /bin/sh
during the boot messages. Note no such output is in dmesg.
Hi,
ever tried the line
#!/bin/sh
?
all my scripts seem to lack the space.
On Wed, Jan 21, 2004 at 02:11:39PM -0500, Walter Tautz wrote:
#! /bin/sh
[...]
which DOES work. I wonder why it's complaining about the line #! /bin/sh
during the boot messages. Note no such output is in dmesg.
Hi,
ever tried the line
#!/bin/sh
?
all my scripts seem to lack the space.
On Sun, Dec 07, 2003 at 09:27:04AM +0100, mi wrote:
Hello,
Can you tell me what are the default permissions for /etc/group and
/etc/passwd ?
%--(6)--$ ls -l /etc/passwd
-rw-r--r--1 root root 1276 17. Sep 22:57 /etc/passwd
I restricted them to rw for root only, but some
On Sun, Dec 07, 2003 at 09:27:04AM +0100, mi wrote:
Hello,
Can you tell me what are the default permissions for /etc/group and
/etc/passwd ?
%--(6)--$ ls -l /etc/passwd
-rw-r--r--1 root root 1276 17. Sep 22:57 /etc/passwd
I restricted them to rw for root only, but some
On Sat, Aug 30, 2003 at 09:58:58PM +0200, Rudy Gevaert wrote:
Hello,
But nothing gets logged to /var/log/iptabels... It does show in
dmesg...
How can I correctly redirect logs with level debug to the
/var/log/iptables file?
perhaps it's not quite the answer you expected... I'm using
On Wed, Jul 02, 2003 at 11:38:57PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Can anyone help me with this firewall.I would like to change
INTNET=192.168.0.0/24 to more exacts ips like 192.168.0.1,192.168.0.22 and
so one.
you will either have to rewrite every rule matching 192.168.0.0/24 to
match
On Wed, Jul 02, 2003 at 11:38:57PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Can anyone help me with this firewall.I would like to change
INTNET=192.168.0.0/24 to more exacts ips like 192.168.0.1,192.168.0.22 and
so one.
you will either have to rewrite every rule matching 192.168.0.0/24 to
match
On Tue, Jul 01, 2003 at 05:52:35PM +0200, Peter A. Felvegi wrote:
hello!
i'm about to set up port forwarding on a firewall to be able to reach
some hosts on the lan from the outside. i wish to use iptables prerouting
rules. my question is, is there a way to detect the port forwarding,
On Tue, Jul 01, 2003 at 05:52:35PM +0200, Peter A. Felvegi wrote:
hello!
i'm about to set up port forwarding on a firewall to be able to reach
some hosts on the lan from the outside. i wish to use iptables prerouting
rules. my question is, is there a way to detect the port forwarding,
On Tue, May 06, 2003 at 01:07:24PM -0500, Mark Edgington wrote:
Hi,
I'm not sure whether this idea has been considered or implemented
anywhere, but I have been thinking about it, and believe it would provide a
fairly high-level of security for systems which only run a few public
On Wed, Apr 23, 2003 at 07:43:36PM +0200, Stefan Neufeind wrote:
Hi,
what is the best way to remotely syslog? In
RE: HELP, my Debian Server was hacked! by James Duncan he wrote to
use syslog to log locally AND remotely. This is a good idea. But I
wonder how to make it safe. Let's say I
Hi
On Sun, Apr 13, 2003 at 12:14:32PM +0200, Kay-Michael Voit wrote:
Hi,
how do you suggest dealing with firewall logs from a computer which is
connected through a dialup connection?
For I receive a new IP every 24h hours, my logs are full of P2P
connection attempts.
How can I log
On Fri, Apr 18, 2003 at 03:19:34PM +0200, Emmanuel Lacour wrote:
On Fri, Apr 18, 2003 at 12:54:19PM +0200, Juerg Schneider wrote:
On Freitag, 18. April 2003 11.16, Horst Pflugstaedt wrote:
Hi
I tried my logging rules with '--log-prefix IPTables DROP:'
and use syslog-ng to filter
Working on running a SMTP server inside the firewall that takes incoming
SMTP traffic from outside the firewall. The below rules are not
working. The firewall refuses connections. Any input on what wrong?
Thanks,
internal mailserver = 192.168.1.2
#$PROG -t nat -A PREROUTING -i
Working on running a SMTP server inside the firewall that takes incoming
SMTP traffic from outside the firewall. The below rules are not
working. The firewall refuses connections. Any input on what wrong?
Thanks,
internal mailserver = 192.168.1.2
#$PROG -t nat -A PREROUTING -i
On Wed, Jan 22, 2003 at 06:49:17PM -0600, Hanasaki JiJi wrote:
eterm and feh, on sarge, are reporting invalid archive signatures of
their dependancies.
I have tried the US and Japan mirrors.
As Jan Niehusman stated about two days ago:
I assume this is because the 2002 Archive Signing Key
On Sun, Jan 19, 2003 at 12:45:03PM +0100, Ivo Marino wrote:
Hello debian-security folks,
I'll post my question on this mailing list in the hope to find some
interesting pointers and I'm quite sure someone in here has or has
allready solved my same problems.
Well, I admin different Debian
On Sun, Jan 19, 2003 at 12:45:03PM +0100, Ivo Marino wrote:
Hello debian-security folks,
I'll post my question on this mailing list in the hope to find some
interesting pointers and I'm quite sure someone in here has or has
allready solved my same problems.
Well, I admin different Debian
On Fri, Nov 15, 2002 at 06:46:25PM +0100, Thomas Horsten wrote:
Are you thick or what?
the last days it seems to me that those unsubscribe-messages more and
more become a security-problem (health-risk) to the remaining members of this list...
calm down, please. need some valium? :-)
On Fri, Nov 15, 2002 at 06:46:25PM +0100, Thomas Horsten wrote:
Are you thick or what?
the last days it seems to me that those unsubscribe-messages more and
more become a security-problem (health-risk) to the remaining members of this
list...
calm down, please. need some valium? :-)
44 matches
Mail list logo
