Re: Rbl

2006-03-31 Thread Sven 'Rae the Git' Grounsell
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Thiago Ribeiro [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb am Fri, 31 Mar 2006
11:25:45 -0300:

 Hi guys,
 
 A friend has a problem with rbl. The address is rbl.kropka.net.
 The company's ip address was added in this list some time ago, before
 he started working there. Now he fixed the problems with the mail
 server and would like to remove his company's address from the
 blacklist. So the rbl site hasnt email contact to remove the ip from
 the blacklist.
 
 Anyone can help me?

how about writing a mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] the person answering
that mailbox should at least know who to contact for this issue.

sven

- -- 
http://www.tuxhilfe.de/ - Linux Hilfe und Support Forum
sven at tuxhilfe dot de
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.2 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFELUun3Fv/ndb4AqsRArCaAJ92Q1uLo8oyYmohrXgEt1oZwSTD1ACgvwkv
Kf4UQl39YFubJS/RW7k00nw=
=dvoy
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Debian Security Support in Place

2005-07-09 Thread Sven 'Rae the Git' Grounsell
Robert Lemmen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 On Sat, Jul 09, 2005 at 10:22:29AM +0200, Lupe Christoph wrote:
  So in essence the announcement says screw you, commercial
  customers.
  
  Please don't do that. It makes promoting Debian awkward.
 
 are you aware that we are talking about *oldstable* here? it was
 released july 2002, i think if it is supported until may 2006(one
 year after it got replaced with a new stable version) that's quite a
 long timeframe and a very good reason for promoting debian!

Also, you are IMHO ignoring, that Debian is one of the _very_ few
distros, that provides _seamless_ upgrades between even major
releases. The only other distro, which comes close to the debian-way
of upgrading is afaik Gentoo (which is no alternative for productive
server-systems for obvious reasons).

On my behalf, i used to install a base-system with a
woody-netinstall-image to setup a sarge-system for customers, who
wanted a more up2date system - this never made any problems worth
speaking of.

And THIS is a very strong pro Debian argument - you don't need to
re-setup your server every so-often (like you would have to do with,
say, SuSE), but you can, if you wish, even slowly migrate your server,
service by service to more recent versions/releases and deal with
probable changes in configuration or handling one by one and don't
have to do the whole lot at once.

Regards,
Sven

-- 
http://www.tuxhilfe.de/ - Linux Hilfe und Support Forum
http://www.best-of-us.de/ - Bekanntschaften und Freunde finden/treffen
sven at tuxhilfe dot de


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]