-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Petter Reinholdtsen schrieb:
[Martin Wodrich]
IIRC security-support for sarge started befor its release.
But only one month before the release.
That depends on your definition of support.
Ok, thats true.
I mean the posibility of security
also sprach Sven 'Rae the Git' Grounsell [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2005.07.09.1851
+0200]:
Also, you are IMHO ignoring, that Debian is one of the _very_ few
distros, that provides _seamless_ upgrades between even major
releases.
No matter how seamless, dist-upgrades require a lot of time for
The security team will continue to support Debian GNU/Linux 3.0 alias
woody until May 2006, or if the security support for the next release,
codenamed etch, starts, whatever happens first.
This is equivalent to saying We will rip security support for oldstable
from under your feet at any time
also sprach Lupe Christoph [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2005.07.09.1022 +0200]:
The security team will continue to support Debian GNU/Linux 3.0
alias woody until May 2006, or if the security support for the
next release, codenamed etch, starts, whatever happens first.
This is equivalent to saying
(open letter to the debian security team)
Greetings,..
on friday, 8th july 2005 07:58 Martin Schulze wrote:
[...]
The Debian project confirms that the security infrastructure for both
the current release Debian GNU/Linux 3.1 (alias sarge) and the former
release 3.0 (alias woody) is working
On Saturday, 2005-07-09 at 10:37:27 +0200, martin f krafft wrote:
also sprach Lupe Christoph [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2005.07.09.1022 +0200]:
The security team will continue to support Debian GNU/Linux 3.0
alias woody until May 2006, or if the security support for the
next release, codenamed
On Sat, Jul 09, 2005 at 10:22:29AM +0200, Lupe Christoph wrote:
So in essence the announcement says screw you, commercial customers.
Please don't do that. It makes promoting Debian awkward.
are you aware that we are talking about *oldstable* here? it was
released july 2002, i think if it is
Robert Lemmen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, Jul 09, 2005 at 10:22:29AM +0200, Lupe Christoph wrote:
So in essence the announcement says screw you, commercial
customers.
Please don't do that. It makes promoting Debian awkward.
are you aware that we are talking about *oldstable*
[Martin Wodrich]
IIRC security-support for sarge started befor its release.
But only one month before the release.
That depends on your definition of support. The testing security team
was working hard to secure it a long time before sarge was released.
[Sven 'Rae the Git' Grounsell]
Also, you are IMHO ignoring, that Debian is one of the _very_ few
distros, that provides _seamless_ upgrades between even major
releases.
This is a slight exaggeration, as this do not really work very
seamlessly for packages where the configuration was changed.
On Fri, 08 Jul 2005 at 01:58:40AM -0400, Martin Schulze wrote:
The security team will continue to support Debian GNU/Linux 3.0 alias
woody until May 2006, or if the security support for the next release,
codenamed etch, starts, whatever happens first.
Now I LOVE Debian a lot. It is my
On Fri, Jul 08, 2005 at 09:33:29AM -0400, Phillip Hofmeister wrote:
On Fri, 08 Jul 2005 at 01:58:40AM -0400, Martin Schulze wrote:
The security team will continue to support Debian GNU/Linux 3.0 alias
woody until May 2006, or if the security support for the next release,
codenamed etch,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Phillip Hofmeister schrieb:
The security team will continue to support Debian GNU/Linux 3.0 alias
woody until May 2006, or if the security support for the next release,
codenamed etch, starts, whatever happens first.
Now I LOVE Debian a lot. It
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Horst Pflugstaedt schrieb:
Now I LOVE Debian a lot. It is my favorite distro, and I hope this
isn't seen as a flame. But, two Debian releases in one year? That's
kind of funny grins.
IIRC security-support for sarge started befor its release.
14 matches
Mail list logo
