Re: Bug#401969: please build using hunspell

2006-12-09 Thread Mike Hommey
On Fri, Dec 08, 2006 at 10:58:11PM +0100, Rene Engelhard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Mike Hommey wrote: On Thu, Dec 07, 2006 at 11:26:34AM +0100, Rene Engelhard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: There's no big difference in using hunspell and myspell, except that hunspell dictionaries then

Re: Bug#401969: please build using hunspell

2006-12-09 Thread Davide Prina
Rene Engelhard wrote: MySpell is obsolete. Please build against Hunspell, which is an improved version of MySpell retaining full backwards compatibility. That also would make the usage of hunspell-de-* in iceweasel possible. probably not so full backwards compatibility. [ The Problem is

Re: Bug#401969: please build using hunspell

2006-12-09 Thread Rene Engelhard
Hi, Mike Hommey wrote: On Fri, Dec 08, 2006 at 10:58:11PM +0100, Rene Engelhard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Mike Hommey wrote: On Thu, Dec 07, 2006 at 11:26:34AM +0100, Rene Engelhard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: There's no big difference in using hunspell and myspell, except that

Re: Bug#401969: please build using hunspell

2006-12-09 Thread Rene Engelhard
Hi, Davide Prina wrote: MySpell is obsolete. Please build against Hunspell, which is an improved version of MySpell retaining full backwards compatibility. That also would make the usage of hunspell-de-* in iceweasel possible. probably not so full backwards compatibility. Proof? also

Re: Bug#401969: please build using hunspell

2006-12-09 Thread Mike Hommey
On Sat, Dec 09, 2006 at 01:13:27PM +0100, Rene Engelhard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I do. There's hunspell dictionaries in Debian which have to conflict against all mozillas... I fail to see why. Are the hunspell dictionaries in /usr/share/myspell/dicts or what ? Mike -- To UNSUBSCRIBE,

Re: Bug#401969: please build using hunspell

2006-12-09 Thread Davide Prina
Rene Engelhard wrote: Davide Prina wrote: MySpell is obsolete. Please build against Hunspell, which is an improved version of MySpell retaining full backwards compatibility. That also would make the usage of hunspell-de-* in iceweasel possible. probably not so full backwards compatibility.

Re: Bug#401969: please build using hunspell

2006-12-09 Thread Steve Kemp
On Fri, Dec 08, 2006 at 10:32:50PM +0100, Mike Hommey wrote: How does the security team feel about having to rebuild iceape, iceweasel, icedove (you forgot to file a bug on icedove), OOo and enchant if there happens to be a security bug in hunspell ? In general having multiple packages

Re: Bug#401969: please build using hunspell

2006-12-08 Thread Mike Hommey
On Thu, Dec 07, 2006 at 11:26:34AM +0100, Rene Engelhard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: There's no big difference in using hunspell and myspell, except that hunspell dictionaries then will also work. And you show that hunspell is used so the security team knows that mozilla needs to be rebuilt

Re: Bug#401969: please build using hunspell

2006-12-08 Thread Rene Engelhard
Mike Hommey wrote: On Thu, Dec 07, 2006 at 11:26:34AM +0100, Rene Engelhard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: There's no big difference in using hunspell and myspell, except that hunspell dictionaries then will also work. And you show that hunspell is used so the security team knows that