-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Monday 02 December 2002 18:25, Raymond Wood wrote:
OK, so the problem is not with reporting genuine Spam to Razor;
rather the problem is with incorrectly reporting legitimate
email as Spam to Razor?
Well, AFAICT razor seems to derive keyword
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Monday 02 December 2002 18:25, Raymond Wood wrote:
OK, so the problem is not with reporting genuine Spam to Razor;
rather the problem is with incorrectly reporting legitimate
email as Spam to Razor?
Well, AFAICT razor seems to derive keyword
On Tuesday 26 November 2002 23:48, Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña wrote:
[why non-subscribed users are allowed to post to the list is a FAQ, but
there is no compiled FAQ on this list which covers that question]
No need to dredge up an old topic. However, I could
not find a FAQ for this
On Mon, Dec 02, 2002 at 04:54:34PM +0100, Janßen, Dirk wrote:
Ich bin erst am 03.12.2002 wieder im Haus. Bei dringenden dienstlichen
Angelegenheiten wenden Sie sich bitte an Herrn Igor Spanz
(mailto:removed), Tel. -368.
===
I am absent
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Monday 02 December 2002 16:43, Nathan E Norman wrote:
On Mon, Dec 02, 2002 at 03:21:28PM +0100, IT - Sven Mueller wrote:
However, I am not really able to tell why this kind of users is allowed
to post here. A pointer to a previous discussion
On Mon, Dec 02, 2002 at 05:37:54PM +0100, IT - Sven Mueller remarked:
On Monday 02 December 2002 16:43, Nathan E Norman wrote:
On Mon, Dec 02, 2002 at 03:21:28PM +0100, IT - Sven Mueller wrote:
However, I am not really able to tell why this kind of
users is allowed to post here. A
On Mon, Dec 02, 2002 at 11:48:23AM -0500, Raymond Wood wrote:
This makes sense to me, so I can accept the Spam I receive
through the debian lists. One thing I'm still unclear about
though is the recent post from someone who requested that people
*not* report Spam received through the debian
On Mon, Dec 02, 2002 at 11:11:41AM -0600, Nathan E Norman remarked:
On Mon, Dec 02, 2002 at 11:48:23AM -0500, Raymond Wood wrote:
This makes sense to me, so I can accept the Spam I receive
through the debian lists. One thing I'm still unclear about
though is the recent post from someone
On Monday 02 December 2002 18:25, Raymond Wood wrote:
OK, so the problem is not with reporting genuine Spam to Razor;
rather the problem is with incorrectly reporting legitimate
email as Spam to Razor?
Right! And, if they are not spammers who do this (see my other mail),
then it might well be
On Tuesday 26 November 2002 23:48, Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña wrote:
[why non-subscribed users are allowed to post to the list is a FAQ, but
there is no compiled FAQ on this list which covers that question]
No need to dredge up an old topic. However, I could
not find a FAQ for this
On Mon, Dec 02, 2002 at 03:21:28PM +0100, IT - Sven Mueller wrote:
However, I am not really able to tell why this kind of users is allowed to
post here. A pointer to a previous discussion would be enough for me, but I
couldn't find one in the archives (maybe I'm using the wrong keywords in
On Mon, Dec 02, 2002 at 04:54:34PM +0100, Janßen, Dirk wrote:
Ich bin erst am 03.12.2002 wieder im Haus. Bei dringenden dienstlichen
Angelegenheiten wenden Sie sich bitte an Herrn Igor Spanz
(mailto:removed), Tel. -368.
===
I am absent
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Monday 02 December 2002 16:43, Nathan E Norman wrote:
On Mon, Dec 02, 2002 at 03:21:28PM +0100, IT - Sven Mueller wrote:
However, I am not really able to tell why this kind of users is allowed
to post here. A pointer to a previous discussion
On Mon, Dec 02, 2002 at 05:37:54PM +0100, IT - Sven Mueller remarked:
On Monday 02 December 2002 16:43, Nathan E Norman wrote:
On Mon, Dec 02, 2002 at 03:21:28PM +0100, IT - Sven Mueller wrote:
However, I am not really able to tell why this kind of
users is allowed to post here. A
On Mon, Dec 02, 2002 at 11:48:23AM -0500, Raymond Wood wrote:
This makes sense to me, so I can accept the Spam I receive
through the debian lists. One thing I'm still unclear about
though is the recent post from someone who requested that people
*not* report Spam received through the debian
On Monday 02 December 2002 18:11, Nathan E Norman wrote:
Some people[1] report non-spam as spam to razor. For example,
several security announcements from Debian have found their way into
the razor database. This is obviously stupid.
[1] At least, we think they are people, but the level of
On Monday 02 December 2002 18:25, Raymond Wood wrote:
OK, so the problem is not with reporting genuine Spam to Razor;
rather the problem is with incorrectly reporting legitimate
email as Spam to Razor?
Right! And, if they are not spammers who do this (see my other mail),
then it might well be
Kjetil Kjernsmo [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
(Aside: I do that by having a line link rel=NeverEMail
href=mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] in many web pages, and that
works excellently, this address is harvested and spammed, and when that
happens, the intention is that subsequent mail is stopped. This
On Mon, Dec 02, 2002 at 06:52:27PM +0100, Kjetil Kjernsmo remarked:
On Monday 02 December 2002 18:25, Raymond Wood wrote:
OK, so the problem is not with reporting genuine Spam to
Razor; rather the problem is with incorrectly reporting
legitimate email as Spam to Razor?
Right! And, if
Raymond Wood wrote:
Alright, based on what you say then, I will assume that it is
fine to *manually* forward obvious Spams received via the debian
lists to Razor via the 'spamassassin -r' command. I only report
the definite Spams that are not already being caught by
Spamassassin.
If there
This is a test to see if a non-subscribed user can
post to the debian security list.
This is only a test. If you are reading this, then
the answer is yes and that just doesn't seem
right.
__
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail Plus - Powerful.
On Tue, Nov 26, 2002 at 08:08:40AM -0800, Ted Parvu wrote:
This is a test to see if a non-subscribed user can
post to the debian security list.
This is only a test. If you are reading this, then
the answer is yes and that just doesn't seem
right.
*plonk*
This has been discussed *at
Hmmm, my bad
No need to dredge up an old topic. However, I could
not find a FAQ for this list? Does one exist?
I have been on this list for a few months now and I
find it informative enough to stay subscribed but I
have to admit there is a fair amount of noise to which
I am now adding. :(
This is a test to see if a non-subscribed user can
post to the debian security list.
This is only a test. If you are reading this, then
the answer is yes and that just doesn't seem
right.
__
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail Plus - Powerful.
On Tue, Nov 26, 2002 at 08:08:40AM -0800, Ted Parvu wrote:
This is a test to see if a non-subscribed user can
post to the debian security list.
This is only a test. If you are reading this, then
the answer is yes and that just doesn't seem
right.
*plonk*
This has been discussed *at
Hmmm, my bad
No need to dredge up an old topic. However, I could
not find a FAQ for this list? Does one exist?
I have been on this list for a few months now and I
find it informative enough to stay subscribed but I
have to admit there is a fair amount of noise to which
I am now adding. :(
hi Ted
On Tue, Nov 26, 2002 at 09:19:43AM -0800, Ted Parvu wrote:
Hmmm, my bad
No need to dredge up an old topic. However, I could
not find a FAQ for this list? Does one exist?
not a faq, but i think solutions disscussed here go there:
http://www.debian.org/doc/user-manuals#securing
On Tue, Nov 26, 2002 at 09:50:16PM +0100, Thomas Fischer wrote:
hi Ted
On Tue, Nov 26, 2002 at 09:19:43AM -0800, Ted Parvu wrote:
Hmmm, my bad
No need to dredge up an old topic. However, I could
not find a FAQ for this list? Does one exist?
not a faq, but i think
28 matches
Mail list logo
