Frank Scheiner a écrit :
> Hi Betrand, Dennis,
>
> On 13.05.22 17:32, BERTRAND Joël wrote:
>> Dennis Clarke a écrit :
>>> Thus with 64G of ECC memory and four very expensive 15k rpm SAS disks
>>> the thing is a brick. Or is it ?
&g
Dennis Clarke a écrit :
>
> Somewhat annoyed by reality but I have to ask.
>
> [ here you need to hear a long whine noise like metal failing ]
> I have a Fujitsu/Oracle M3000 brick sitting in my world and near as I
> can tell it runs nothing other than Oracle Solaris 11.3 and will never
> be
Angus MacGyver a écrit :
Hi All,
Hello,
So - struggling to google this definitively - but...
I have a Blade 2500 Silver, 2x16GHz UltraSPARC IIIi CPU's - is this a "pure 64bit" system
- as per "https://oss.oracle.com/projects/linux-sparc/;
I am pretty sure it's a Sun4u
Knut Petter Ølberg a écrit :
Really a pitty, as I would really like to continue to run a updated
debian ldom on my T5140 (sorry about offtopic with regards to sparc32).
I guess the problem here wasn't really access to hardware but lack of
manpower to do the porting?
Don't forget that
Artyom Tarasenko a écrit :
On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 10:56 AM, BERTRAND Joël
joel.bertr...@systella.fr wrote:
Knut Petter Ølberg a écrit :
Really a pitty, as I would really like to continue to run a updated
debian ldom on my T5140 (sorry about offtopic with regards to sparc32).
I guess
Steve Yeats a écrit :
Hello one and all,
Hello,
as I've come into the ownership of quite a few Sun4m SPARC32 machines
in the past few weeks, I've gotten an old install of Sarge with a 2.4
kernel running on one and have been painfully compiling some necessary
files to get newer
Mark Morgan Lloyd a écrit :
Steve Yeats wrote:
Hello one and all,
as I've come into the ownership of quite a few Sun4m SPARC32 machines
in the past few weeks, I've gotten an old install of Sarge with a 2.4
kernel running on one and have been painfully compiling some necessary
files to get
scar a écrit :
BERTRAND Joël wrote on 09/11/2014 12:41 PM:
Hello,
scar a écrit :
how can i test RAM and other hardware,
for example?
You can use diag_switch? = true and diag_level = max (with a null
modem serial line).
i set these options but it doesn't seem to do anything... i
Hermann Lauer a écrit :
On Sun, Sep 14, 2014 at 07:44:31PM +0200, BERTRAND Jo??l wrote:
hmm well where will this info usually show up? in the system/kernel
logs? if it's not showing up then that means the freezes must be caused
by something other than ECC errors?
On console and
Mark Morgan Lloyd a écrit :
BERTRAND Joël wrote:
Hermann Lauer a écrit :
On Sun, Sep 14, 2014 at 07:44:31PM +0200, BERTRAND Jo??l wrote:
hmm well where will this info usually show up? in the system/kernel
logs? if it's not showing up then that means the freezes must be
caused
by something
scar a écrit :
BERTRAND Joël wrote on 09/13/2014 03:37 PM:
If I remember, ECC errors are corrected by psycho. Psycho (and
schizo) return some information about memory error like corrected or
uncorrectable errors. If you only see corrected errors, you have to
change a memory module
scar a écrit :
and now that i think harder, i think i do remember seeing some ECC
errors in the system log back when i was running SunOS. maybe the RAM
does have some issues but the ECC was properly handled by SunOS so i
never experienced any problems. can anyone speak about ECC handling
with
Mark Morgan Lloyd a écrit :
Aaro Koskinen wrote:
Hi,
On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 09:41:09PM +0200, BERTRAND Joël wrote:
BUT : for several months, Linux/Sparc64 is unfortunately not stable
anymore
(or completely broken). After 2.6.35 kernel, I can see random
deadlock on
all my sparc64 (sun4v _and_
Mark Morgan Lloyd a écrit :
BERTRAND Joël wrote:
Mark Morgan Lloyd a écrit :
Aaro Koskinen wrote:
Hi,
On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 09:41:09PM +0200, BERTRAND Joël wrote:
BUT : for several months, Linux/Sparc64 is unfortunately not stable
anymore
(or completely broken). After 2.6.35 kernel, I can
Hello,
scar a écrit :
hi i have an Ultra-5 which has been housed in a datacenter for several
years. It used to be running SunOS 5.9 and i didn't experience any
problems with it. As that OS became obsolete, I installed Wheezy on the
box not too long ago but now am experiencing hard
Hello,
I have installed a long time ago debian/sparc64 on several T1000. /boot
was a raid1 volume.
Last week, I have replaced one disk (/dev/sdb) and rebuilt all raid
volumes :
md5 : active raid1 sda8[0] sdb8[1]
14538752 blocks [2/2] [UU]
md4 : active raid1 sda7[0] sdb7[1]
Fred a écrit :
On 07/22/2014 08:20 AM, Patrick Baggett wrote:
On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 9:55 AM, BERTRAND Joël
joel.bertr...@systella.fr mailto:joel.bertr...@systella.fr wrote:
Fred a écrit :
Hello,
A recent post mentioned having USB on a U10. I bought a StarTech
Fred a écrit :
On 07/23/2014 12:26 AM, BERTRAND Joël wrote:
Fred a écrit :
On 07/22/2014 08:20 AM, Patrick Baggett wrote:
On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 9:55 AM, BERTRAND Joël
joel.bertr...@systella.fr mailto:joel.bertr...@systella.fr wrote:
Fred a écrit :
Hello,
A recent
Fred a écrit :
Hello,
A recent post mentioned having USB on a U10. I bought a StarTech
PCIUSB7 card because it is said to be Linux compatible. With the PCI
USB card installed the U5 flashes the keyboard leds twice and does
nothing else. Stop-a doesn't do anything. It has debian 7.5.0
BERTRAND Joël a écrit :
BERTRAND Joël a écrit :
This kernel is a SMP kernel. Is there any issue with this kernel ?
With maxcpus=1, the same kernel boots fine.
Another strange bug. On one of my T1000, I cannot boot recent kernel.
2.6.30.9 boots fine, 2.6.38 doesn't. I have tried
Hello,
I have several Sun Fire and Enterprise T1000. I have some trouble with
internal SAS adapter. Some T1000 work fine with Fusion MPT SAS Host
driver 3.04.18, some don't but perfectly run with older drivers.
I have tested all T1000 that don't run with 3.04.18 driver with SunVTS
BERTRAND Joël a écrit :
This kernel is a SMP kernel. Is there any issue with this kernel ?
With maxcpus=1, the same kernel boots fine.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-sparc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Artyom Tarasenko a écrit :
On Sun, Jun 2, 2013 at 11:38 PM, BERTRAND Joël
joel.bertr...@systella.fr wrote:
Andreas Barth a écrit :
Hi,
today I tried to resurrect our buildd on schroeder (which is from
architecture sparc). While trying to do so, I had a couple of strange
behaviours like vi
Andreas Barth a écrit :
Hi,
today I tried to resurrect our buildd on schroeder (which is from
architecture sparc). While trying to do so, I had a couple of strange
behaviours like vi freezing after 20-30 seconds, or I couldn't about
tail with ctrl+c or suspend with ctrl+z. This didn't change
Hello,
I have upgraded an Ultra5 from stable to testing. When it ran with
2.6.32 kernel, this workstation was rock solid. With 3.2 kernel, it
randomly freezes without any information in log or console. No
information on serial line also.
If I restart testing release with
Rene Engelhard a écrit :
Hi,
On Tue, Sep 07, 2010 at 08:50:03PM +0200, BERTRAND Benedicte wrote:
I'm trying tu use Openoffice on a Blade 2000 (sparc64/smp).
I have upgraded my squeeze (dist-upgrade) the last sunday. Since upgrade,
From what? 1:3.2.1-5 (In that case I don't see a
Hello,
I'm trying to configure X on a Blade2000. Framebuffer is XVR500 and
works fine in console. I know that this fb is not supported by Xorg.
Thus, I have tried to configure fbdev to use linux framebuffer. I cannot
obtain any running X (on regular PC, I have configured some
BERTRAND Joël a écrit :
Hello,
I'm trying to configure X on a Blade2000. Framebuffer is XVR500 and
works fine in console. I know that this fb is not supported by Xorg.
Thus, I have tried to configure fbdev to use linux framebuffer. I cannot
obtain any running X (on regular PC, I have
Chris Andrew a écrit :
I don't have the URL to hand, but support for sparc (32-bit) was dropped
with Lenny. In practice the best I managed was Sarge on an SS20, with
multiple problems with Etch, even if I installed Sarge then did a
dist-upgrade.
Etch worked fine. Sarge doesn't work due to
gavin duley a écrit :
On 10 Mar 2009, at 04:58, Howard Eisenberger wrote:
On 2009-03-10, gavin duley wrote:
At the moment, I am using Epiphany. This is part of the GNOME project.
It's not as sophisticated as iceweasel, but it does pretty much
everything I need from a browser and works well.
' build of the kernel aborts a couple of
times with a bus error or similar vague errors.
I'd be interested in a V8 repository.
Martin
On Sat, Feb 16, 2008 at 10:34:03AM +0100, BERTRAND Joël wrote:
Hi folks,
I have built a 2.6.24.2 linux kernel on my SS20 (dual SM71
Good news,
With kernel (2.6.24.2) and libc6 I have uploaded, SS20 boots fine with
dual RT626 (double CPU module). At this time, I don't see any strange
memory error I have seen with older kernel. I shall try with four RT626
this evening, but it sounds good :
hilbert:[~] cat
Hello,
Last message... 2.6.24.2 is _not_ stable on HyperSPARC/SMP. It randomly
hangs without any message. I shall investigate. On dual SuperSPARC,
2.6.24.2 can hang with ESP DMA error when raid1 is active. Without
raid1, I cannot reproduce DMA error.
Regards,
JKB
Ludovic Courtès wrote:
Hi,
BERTRAND Joël [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
If you try HyperSPARC, please test without and with SMP.
Do you expect it to work at all, even UP? :-)
I'm asking because it used to be considered a lost cause but I did not
follow development recently.
Last
Hi folks,
I have built a 2.6.24.2 linux kernel on my SS20 (dual SM71) and it is
stable in SMP configuration with HIGHMEM. I haven't tested with
HyperSPARC. Has anyone any information about HyperSPARC support ? I
shall test, but if someone has tried before me... ;-)
I'm building
Martin wrote:
On Thu, 2008-01-31 at 18:27 +0100, BERTRAND Joël wrote:
Hello,
I'm using a Adaptec 29160 in a U60/SMP workstation. For 2.6.23.11, I
see these messages in log file :
(scsi2:A:4:0): data overrun detected in Data-in phase. Tag == 0x12.
(scsi2:A:4:0): Have seen Data
Hello,
I'm using a Adaptec 29160 in a U60/SMP workstation. For 2.6.23.11, I
see these messages in log file :
(scsi2:A:4:0): data overrun detected in Data-in phase. Tag == 0x12.
(scsi2:A:4:0): Have seen Data Phase. Length = 24576. NumSGs = 1.
sg[0] - Addr 0x0c087e840 : Length 32
Hello,
I have seen a very strange timeout when my U2E boots. I use the same
kernel (2.6.23.11) on all my sparc64. On U60, U80, U420R, T1000, it
boots fine, but on my U2E (2*300 MHz, 2GB), boot process waits for a
timeout when udev is started:
Waiting for /dev/to be fully populated
David Miller wrote:
From: BERTRAND_Joël [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Tue, 18 Dec 2007 09:33:46 +0100
If I restart udev, it is restarted without any timeout. I don't
understand where is the mistake (PCI support ?). It seems to be a bad
interaction between udev and kernel but I don't know the last
Ludovic Courtès wrote:
Hi,
I just bought a 4-port USB 2.0 controller with the intent to plug it in
the PCI bus of my Ultra 5. Unfortunately, once it's plugged in, the
machine doesn't even reach the OBP prompt and the screen remains off.
The controller is nameless (the card reads CK-0001C,
Sergei Golovan wrote:
Hi!
Hello,
Recent build of erlang package failed on sparc architecture
(http://buildd.debian.org/build.php?pkg=erlangarch=sparcfile=log).
I cannot find a reason looking at the log file, and I don't have an
access to any sparc machine to debug the failure.
I
Josip Rodin wrote:
On Sun, Nov 25, 2007 at 03:53:37PM +0100, BERTRAND Joël wrote:
Recent build of erlang package failed on sparc architecture
(http://buildd.debian.org/build.php?pkg=erlangarch=sparcfile=log).
I cannot find a reason looking at the log file, and I don't have an
access to any
Hello,
I have build a new 2.6.23.1 kernel to fix some trouble with 2.6.21.3.
When I have rebooted my U2E ([EMAIL PROTECTED], 2 GB), system says :
Waiting for /dev to be fully populated
Uniform CD-ROM driver Revision: 3.20
sr 0:0:6:0: Attached scsi CD-ROM sr0
sd 0:0:0:0: Attached scsi
Hello,
I have build a new 2.6.23.1 kernel to fix some trouble with 2.6.21.3.
When I have rebooted my U2E ([EMAIL PROTECTED], 2 GB), system says :
Waiting for /dev to be fully populated
Uniform CD-ROM driver Revision: 3.20
sr 0:0:6:0: Attached scsi CD-ROM sr0
sd 0:0:0:0: Attached scsi
BERTRAND Joël wrote:
Hello,
I have build a new 2.6.23.1 kernel to fix some trouble with
2.6.21.3. When I have rebooted my U2E ([EMAIL PROTECTED], 2 GB), system says :
Waiting for /dev to be fully populated
Uniform CD-ROM driver Revision: 3.20
sr 0:0:6:0: Attached scsi CD-ROM sr0
sd 0
Hello,
I'm working on huge databases on several amd64 server and I have to
change these servers. I have some Sun T1000 servers, but I don't know
what is the performance of SQL servers (pg and mysql) on this arch. My
first question is simple. If I run
rayleigh:[/usr/sbin] file
Hello,
How can I select sound output between internal speaker and line? With
Debian 3.1, there was audioctl, but this program is not provided by etch
or lenny ?
Thanks,
JKB
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble?
Aurelien Jarno wrote:
Mark Morgan Lloyd a écrit :
I'm trying to track down problems in a development tool (Free Pascal) which
I'm running on Etch. I notice that if I do getconf GNU_LIBPTHREAD_VERSION it
reports linuxthreads-0.10, while on an x86 Sarge+2.6 system the same command
reports
Aurelien Jarno wrote:
BERTRAND Joël a écrit :
Aurelien Jarno wrote:
Mark Morgan Lloyd a écrit :
I'm trying to track down problems in a development tool (Free Pascal) which
I'm running on Etch. I notice that if I do getconf GNU_LIBPTHREAD_VERSION it
reports linuxthreads-0.10, while
Ludovic Courtès wrote:
Hi,
BERTRAND Joël [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Maybe, but NetBSD kernel does not correctly work on sun4m/SMP,
like Linux. Today, no one OS can be used on sun4m/SMP workstations,
and I think that it will be easier to fix linux 2.6 sparc32 kernel
than work on debian
Ludovic Courtès wrote:
Hi,
BERTRAND Joël [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Maybe, but NetBSD kernel does not correctly work on sun4m/SMP,
like Linux. Today, no one OS can be used on sun4m/SMP workstations,
and I think that it will be easier to fix linux 2.6 sparc32 kernel
than work on debian
Uwe Hermann wrote:
[CC to debian-bsd as it's relevant there, too]
On Sun, Jul 29, 2007 at 03:13:03PM +0200, Maciej Jan Broniarz wrote:
Dnia 2007-07-29, o godz. 15:11:55
Ulrich Teichert [EMAIL PROTECTED] napisał(a):
I tend to differ. It will be easier to fix the Linux kernel, find a
gavin duley wrote:
On Sat, Jul 21, 2007 at 10:45:22AM +0200, BERTRAND Joël [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
gavin duley wrote:
On 20 Jul 2007, at 17:41, gavin duley wrote:
Hello,
I'm not certain if this is a bug with some package, or whether it's just
something odd on my machine, but IceWeasel
gavin duley wrote:
On 20 Jul 2007, at 17:41, gavin duley wrote:
Hello,
I'm not certain if this is a bug with some package, or whether it's just
something odd on my machine, but IceWeasel hasn't been working for me
for a few days. I'm running Debian testing on a Sun Ultra 5.
Looks like
andrew holway wrote:
just thinkin, I don't think a sparc32 chip has been released in more
than 12 years. Surely these cannot be energy efficient machines ;)
And LEON processor ? A sparc V8 that can be written in a FPGA ? It runs
with Linux. Berkeley university has a work in progress on a
Chris Newport wrote:
BERTRAND Joël wrote:
andrew holway wrote:
just thinkin, I don't think a sparc32 chip has been released in more
than 12 years. Surely these cannot be energy efficient machines ;)
And LEON processor ? A sparc V8 that can be written in a FPGA ? It
runs with Linux
Mark Morgan Lloyd wrote:
BERTRAND Joël wrote:
Berkeley university has a work in progress on a super computer that
uses sparc32 too.
Interesting- do have a URL for that?
No. Only this mail :
I have a feeling that the broken sparc32 SMP is related to
the CPU-specific SMP code
Frans Pop wrote:
On Sunday 15 July 2007 03:53, Austin Denyer wrote:
On Sat, 14 Jul 2007 18:08:57 -0700, Steven Ringwald [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I, for one, will be sorry to see it go, as I actively use my SS10's
and 20's. Anyone know of any other Linux distros out there that
support the Sparc32
Emanuele Rocca a écrit :
Hello BERTRAND,
* BERTRAND Joël [EMAIL PROTECTED], [2007-07-02 20:09 +0200]:
Xorg works fine, but gdm cannot start. I can see in /var/log/syslog :
Jul 2 15:22:08 fermat gdm[7287]: Xinerama active, but = 0 screens?
Jul 2 15:22:09 fermat gdm[7286
Hello,
This bug comes from xorg. Indeed, I have tried to start xscreensaver
and it returns :
munmap(0xf7f82000, 8192)= 0
munmap(0xf77ee000, 286720) = 0
writev(3, [{b\0\0\4\0\10\0, 8}, {XINERAMA, 8}], 2) = 16
read(3, 0xfffa3580, 32) = -1
Emanuele Rocca a écrit :
Hi Joël (I'm not sure if your first name is Joël or Bertrand).
First name is Joël ;-)
* BERTRAND Joël [EMAIL PROTECTED], [2007-07-03 13:17 +0200]:
I suspect all programs that test Xinerama flags will crash.
XineramaIsActive returns TRUE
Dave Smith a écrit :
On Mon, 02 Jul 2007 20:39:08 -0700, Kevin Diggs wrote:
Hi,
Anyone know if a 501-5539 will work in a u2? These are 450 MHz.
kevin
My money would be on no, as the highest speed processor for the U2 was
400MHz and that only
Hello,
My U2 runs debian testing (up to date). Its framebuffer is a UPA
Creator3D. This morning, I have done a apt-get update and a new Xorg and
a new gdm have been installed.
Xorg works fine, but gdm cannot start. I can see in /var/log/syslog :
Jul 2 15:22:08 fermat
BERTRAND Joël a écrit :
Clint Adams a écrit :
On Sat, Jun 09, 2007 at 08:46:53PM +0200, BERTRAND Joël wrote:
Right. For me, one think is very suspect. Milter-greylist nor
clamd are not able to fork on kant.
What makes you think that they're unable to fork?
Because clamd uses
Clint Adams a écrit :
On Sat, Jun 09, 2007 at 08:46:53PM +0200, BERTRAND Joël wrote:
Right. For me, one think is very suspect. Milter-greylist nor clamd
are not able to fork on kant.
What makes you think that they're unable to fork?
Because clamd uses multithread and multitask
Hello,
I use two UltraSparc workstations, the first one is an U80 named kant
([EMAIL PROTECTED]), the other one is an U60 named rayleigh ([EMAIL
PROTECTED]). kant is
a MX1 mail server that runs on debian testing sendmail, milter-greylist,
mimedefang with spamassassin and clamd.
Clint Adams a écrit :
On Sat, Jun 09, 2007 at 07:51:26PM +0200, BERTRAND Joël wrote:
Some inbound mails are refused by kant (because clamd cannot scan all
inbound mails). They remain in sendmail DATA stage and SMTP transaction
aborts due to a timeout. I don't understand why
Jordan Bettis a écrit :
Thanks to Martian, I've bought a sun video card from ebay.
Hope I can get it working.
I have another question: I'd like to see if I can get USB
working on my Ultra 5. Anyone have any recommendations for
a PCI host adapter that'll work with it?
Hello,
I have
Michelle Konzack a écrit :
Hello *,
Am 2007-04-19 09:31:43, schrieb Mark Morgan Lloyd:
Martin wrote:
I was under the impression that there were other SPARC based embedded
chips around. Is it worth contacting the developers of the Leon about
this? IIRC one of their selling points was a
Ludovic Courtès a écrit :
Hi,
Hello,
Jurij Smakov [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Now that we have released, we need to set our goals for the future. As
you probably guessed from the subject, I am strongly in favor of
dropping sparc32 support for lenny. There are multiple reasons for
Mark Morgan Lloyd a écrit :
BERTRAND Joël wrote:
4/ The last 2.4 kernel that is _usable_ is the 2.4.21 if I remember. All
releases after this kernel are not usable for production workstations
(on sparc32 [that randomly crash with 'watchdog error'] _and_ sparc64
[that randomly freeze without
Josip Rodin a écrit :
On Sun, Apr 01, 2007 at 03:39:37PM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
But... that's not actually supposed to be necessary. Quoting:
[...]
| The first partition has to be ext3 or fd, not swap because swap
| writes from first block and avoid silo block. If swap begins on the
|
Daniel Smolik a écrit :
BERTRAND Joël napsal(a):
Frans Pop a écrit :
tags 334339 - wontfix
thanks
On Sunday 25 March 2007 20:02, BERTRAND Joël wrote:
See bug #334339 (wontfix).
IMO the wontfix tag is not correct. There should at least be an
explanation by the maintainer _why_ he
Hello,
I use for a long time mysql server on several sparc64 workstations
running debian testing. I have to rebuild mysql when I need to upgrade
these systems. Endeed, due to a bug in gcc, I have to rebuild the debian
package, and after configure stage, I stop the process, edit
Frans Pop a écrit :
On Sunday 25 March 2007 19:18, BERTRAND Joël wrote:
I use for a long time mysql server on several sparc64 workstations
running debian testing. I have to rebuild mysql when I need to upgrade
these systems. Endeed, due to a bug in gcc, I have to rebuild the
debian
Frans Pop a écrit :
tags 334339 - wontfix
thanks
On Sunday 25 March 2007 20:02, BERTRAND Joël wrote:
See bug #334339 (wontfix).
IMO the wontfix tag is not correct. There should at least be an
explanation by the maintainer _why_ he considers this an issue that is
does not need
Mark Morgan Lloyd a écrit :
BERTRAND Joël wrote:
2.4 kernels (after 2.4.21) are not stable on sparc32-smp. On all
sun4m-smp I have tested, they randomly hang with watchdog reset.
2.4.27 reliable here on an SS20 with 2x80MHz processors, but not with Ross
modules.
Irrespective
Michelle Konzack a écrit :
Hello,
Hello,
I have seen on several mailinglists peoples asking about Debian support
for sun machines, namely older ones...
Since the CPU of my Sparc Ultra 20 is exploded (!!!) I have the need to
reinstall my SS10/512 (Dual-PU) and since I use older
Ludovic Courtès a écrit :
Hi,
Michelle Konzack [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
2) Is there a list of hardware which work or does not work?
Support for `sun4c' machines (e.g., SS2, SS1, IPC) was officially
dropped in Etch. I believe Sarge was already hardly installable on such
machines [0].
Hello,
One of my U80 writes
Jan 25 14:24:29 kant kernel: CPU[1]: Correctable ECC Error AFSR[10]
AFAR[464fe8e0] UDBL[0] UDBH[0] TL1[0]
Jan 25 14:24:29 kant kernel: CPU[1]: Correctable ECC Error AFSR[10]
AFAR[464fe8e0] UDBL[0] UDBH[0] TL1[0]
in
Guillem Jover a écrit :
Hi,
On Sat, 2006-11-25 at 19:19:58 +0100, BERTRAND Joël wrote:
Package: dpkg
Version: 1.13.24
Architecture: sparc
Severity: grave
I have some SparcSTATION 20 with one or two SuperSPARC-II and 448 MB
of memory (thus, HIGHMEM is used). On these workstations, dpkg
Dieszel a écrit :
BERTRAND Joël wrote:
Donald Parsons a écrit :
My debian-31r0a-sparc-binary-1 CD image installs completely without
error . On removing the CD and booting the install fails as follows:
calibrating delay loop
2 CPUs activated
kencpd16 RAM disks of 8192k size
loading 2140
Donald Parsons a écrit :
My debian-31r0a-sparc-binary-1 CD image installs completely without
error . On removing the CD and booting the install fails as follows:
calibrating delay loop
2 CPUs activated
kencpd16 RAM disks of 8192k size
loading 2140 blocks in ram disk
memory 2140k freed
It need a 2.2 linux kernel :-( I have obtanined a stable kernel with
only 128 MB (without highmem) and only one ROSS.
Regards,
JKB
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Blars Blarson a écrit :
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I never see any SMP bug on sparc64 after 2.6.14 release... While
debian/Sparc uses a 32 bits userland, I don't understand why we have to
cut the sparc port in sparc32 and sparc64 ports. Today, the main problem
Blars Blarson a écrit :
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Can anyone tell me if Sarge can be installed on an SS2 (it will be a
system logger) with Boot 2.6 ? Or can I upgrade it to Open Boot ? If
neither what is the newest version of SunOS or Saolaris that will run on
Hello,
I'm trying to install a HP PSC 1315 on my U60/smp running up to date
Debian/testing (2.6.15.6 official kernel). I can send a file to this
printer with cupsd (usb). But I cannot use the scanner :
Root bohr:[~] /etc/init.d/hpoj setup
Stopping the HP OfficeJet Linux driver.
Jurij Smakov a écrit :
On Mon, 17 Apr 2006, BERTRAND Joël wrote:
Thanks. But I cannot try on my SS20 (HyperSPARC) due to a bug in
initramfs-tools (HyperSPARC cannot use a ramfs to boot). Can you send
to me a patch file with your fixes ?
I'm booting my SS20 (with HyperSPARC CPU) quite
Jurij Smakov a écrit :
On Mon, 24 Apr 2006, BERTRAND Joël wrote:
I have tested your patch with a SuperSPARC-II/smp workstation and
I cannot obtain any error. I have seen that the last release candidate
(2.6.17-rc2) is given with this patch. Thus, I have tried to boot in
smp configuration
Jurij Smakov a écrit :
On Thu, 20 Apr 2006, BERTRAND Joël wrote:
No, I'm not able to get a backtrace or any other log because my
workstation does not respond (all physical disks are deconnected). It
can do an Oops, but it prints on console a lot of SCSI error, thus I
do not have the time
Jurij Smakov a écrit :
On Tue, 18 Apr 2006, Ludovic Court�s wrote:
In fact, I was using 2.6.14 (with Bob Breuer's SMP patch) which does
_not_ have this lock sequence change.
Now, I tried to apply this lock sequence change to my 2.6.14 tree to see
what happens and, well, the kernel does not
Jurij Smakov a écrit :
On Tue, 11 Apr 2006, Ludovic Court�s wrote:
Just in case it is of interest to you, I got the same sort of problem
with an SS20 equipped with 2 SuperSPARCs, 2 hard disks and a 2.6 kernel:
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.ports.sparc/5979
I haven't had time to dig
Hendrik Sattler a écrit :
Am Freitag, 7. April 2006 04:42 schrieb Jurij Smakov:
Hm, I believe that no patches should be necessary. I've finally managed to
install 2.6.16 on my ss20 with hypersparc processor, it worked ok so far,
but I wasn't really stressing it. From experience, it is really
Blars Blarson a écrit :
I've submitted bug 361214 about the frequent sparc SMP crashes with 2.6
kernels.
Is anyone running a sparc 2.6 SMP kernel and NOT having the system
crash under heavy disk I/O? Please let the bug know if you have any
additional information.
I use a sparc64 SMP kernel
Ashley Hooper a écrit :
Hi all,
Hello,
I've been struggling with this for the last few days but no matter what I do I
cannot get a mirrored root filesystem on my V240. Generally what happens is
that SILO refuses to boot from the partition as soon as it's changed to type
'fd'
Hello,
I have a SparcSTATION 20 with dual SuperSPARC-II/75, 448 MB of RAM, and
a 4MB-VSIMM for the internal CG14. It runs fine with a 2.6.16.1 linux
kernel (official / no-SMP). If I replace both processors by one (or two)
HyperSPARC/200 (from ROSS), the workstation boots but... dpkg
Hello,
I'm trying to install etch on a SS20 using raid 1. I have built a
2.6.16.1 official kernel with built-in esp and raid 1 support. When I
try to initialize /dev/md? partitions, kernel always returns :
esp0 resetting SCSI bus. Is there a workaround to fix this trouble ?
The same
97 matches
Mail list logo
