On Friday 2024-05-10 15:59, Rainer Orth wrote:
>Stuff Received writes:
>
>> On 2024-05-10 07:44, Rainer Orth wrote (in part):
>>
>>> Besides, if John had ever tried to build either GCC 13 or 14 on Solaris
>>> 11.3, gcc/configure would have told him about the obsoletion in no
>>> uncertain
On Saturday 2023-10-28 08:30, Rick Mangus wrote:
>
>The partition table is a Sun disk label, which means that /dev/sda1
>starts at sector 0
(which it does not _have_ to)
>and the filesystem header thus starts in the same
>place as if there were no partition table.
yeah, that kind of speaks
On Saturday 2023-08-12 15:29, Stan Johnson wrote:
>On 8/12/23 3:33 AM, Gregor Riepl wrote:
>> ... The V215 is very picky about RAM
>> (requires buffered DDR-333 modules with ECC).
>> I've attached logs from two kernel panics for reference. One happened at
>> boot time, the other after some heavy
On Sunday 2023-06-18 23:37, Rob Landley wrote:
>On 6/18/23 14:58, Rene Engelhard wrote:
>>> Three years ago Samba maintainer Jeremy Allison lamented that "Both GPLv3
>>> and
>>> the AGPL have been rejected soundly by most developers" and talked about
>>> how he
>>> regretted the move and the
On Thursday 2022-07-14 21:37, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
>
>> On Jul 14, 2022, at 9:03 PM, Connor McLaughlan wrote:
>>
>> ctrl+a or do not work. I get a message of "no other window".
>>
>> I am using screen like this. to connect: screen /dev/ttyUSB0 9600,cs8
>
>Don’t use “screen” as a
On Wednesday 2021-03-24 14:57, Frank Scheiner wrote:
> (gdb) l *(sys_mount+0x114/0x1e0)
> 0x6c6380 is in __se_sys_mount (fs/namespace.c:3390).
/0x1e0 does not normally belong there. Just
l *(sys_mount+0x114)
On Monday 2021-03-22 22:55, Frank Scheiner wrote:
>>> Riccardo Mottola first recognized a problem with 5.10.x kernels on his
>>> Sun T2000 with UltraSPARC T1 (details in [this thread]). I could verify
>>> the problem also on my Sun T1000 and it looks like this specific issue
>>> breaks the
On Tuesday 2021-03-23 16:29, Frank Scheiner wrote:
>>
>> while I was able to "install" correctly using a slightly older ISO, I
>> get not a bootable system. The kernel appears to crash very early during
>> boot.
>
> From my current testing it looks like "UltraSPARC IIIi"s are also
> affected by
On Thursday 2021-03-11 23:43, Frank Scheiner wrote:
>>
>> Do you know if I can via serial-console reset the system?
>
> Reset from the serial console might work via the kernel with the [magic
> system request] functionality.
>
> [magic system request]:
>
On Friday 2020-12-18 19:43, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
> notsup:
>- .asciz "Sparc-Linux sun4/sun4c or MMU-less not supported\n\n"
>- .align 4
>-
>-sun4e_notsup:
>-.asciz "Sparc-Linux sun4e support does not exist\n\n"
>+ .asciz "Sparc-Linux sun4* or MMU-less not supported\n\n"
On Friday 2019-05-10 04:06, Rick Leir wrote:
>Oracle Linux .. for Intel processors? Please ask him about Oracle Linux for
>Sparc. I would like to give it a try if they have it.
>Thanks -- Rick
https://oss.oracle.com/linux-sparc/isos/
On Sunday 2019-01-27 20:25, Dennis Clarke wrote:
On a side note: As you also added sparc, say, is it planned to revive
the 32bit sparc userland? :-)
>>>
>>> oh please .. no.
>>
>> Although I don't have much of a preference for 32bit sparc userland, as
>> there is no kernel support for
On Monday 2018-12-17 20:59, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
>On 12/17/18 7:38 PM, Gregor Riepl wrote:
>
>> Or will you add a.out support back into libbfd?
>
>No, that's not really possible as upstream doesn't want to deal with a.out and
>COFF anymore, unfortunately.
Hm? Was COFF/a.out dropped
On Wednesday 2018-08-08 16:55, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
>On 08/08/2018 04:44 PM, Dennis Clarke wrote:
>> Well yes .. however it is sitting inside a rack in a remote datacenter
>> and that makes life a real drag. Sort of why I like network based
>> install processes.
>>
>> Regardless,
On Sunday 2018-05-13 20:02, Dennis Clarke wrote:
> On 05/13/2018 01:55 PM, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
>> On 05/13/2018 06:05 PM, Dennis Clarke wrote:
>>> Hrmm .. new problem. I think that the firmware on ye older Sun Netra
>>> type units was limited as to how much it could fetch and deal
On Sunday 2018-05-13 18:05, Dennis Clarke wrote:
>> Can you try the netboot image contained in this tarball [1]?
>
> Hrmm .. new problem. I think that the firmware on ye older Sun Netra
> type units was limited as to how much it could fetch and deal with
> for a "net boot" process. Looks to be
On Monday 2018-04-30 08:07, Frans van Berckel wrote:
>>
>>Sun 5220 with SAS1068e
>
>For Magaraid there are some kernel modules. 1) megaraid.ko 2)
>megaraid_mbox.ko 3) megaraid_mm.ko 4) megaraid_sas.ko
>
>Not sure these are compiled. I would say, you need sas, but verify.
The LSI1064 and LSI1068
On Wednesday 2018-04-04 15:30, Anatoly Pugachev wrote:
>
>Can someone tell me or suggest why does getconf returns total available to a
>physical machine
>cpu count, and not LDOM allocated processor/vcpu count ?
>
>ttip$ getconf -a | grep PROCESSORS
>_NPROCESSORS_CONF 256
Greetings.
The wiki page https://wiki.debian.org/Sparc64 makes a broad claim,
"""32-bit toolchain is not anymore supported upstream."""
* Which 32-bit does it refer to?
Only v8, or also the ILP32 mode of v9 (v8plus)?
Debian sid/sp64 still allows me to do `gcc -m32` after all,d
and run
The boot hangs, the cursor (in the framebuffer) stops blinking, nothing
is displayed, and the machine seems frozen until I hit a key or a button
Hm. Does this happen if you disconnect the monitor and keyboard and instead
boot with serial console?
Jan Engelhardt
--
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email
20 matches
Mail list logo
