On 06/27/2018 10:03 PM, Niels Thykier wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
> As part of the interim architecture qualification for buster, we request
> that DSA, the security team and the toolchain maintainers review and
> update their list of known concerns for buster release architectures.
>
Everyone, please
On Tue, Jan 24, 2017 at 01:12:23 +, James Clarke wrote:
> Hi,
> I've been debugging an issue in gtk2-perl causing it to SIGBUS on
> sparc64, and traced it back to what seems to be dodgy code inside
> libx11. One of the tests calls gdk_window_set_opacity, which calls
> XChangeProperty with a
On Fri, Apr 18, 2014 at 10:44:16 +0200, Sébastien Bernard wrote:
Le 18/04/2014 06:56, Joost van Baal-Ilić a écrit :
I'd guess skilled hacker time is more needed than hardware. Reading
https://release.debian.org/jessie/arch_qualify.html , it seems major
blocking issues are: Using gcc-4.6 as
On Mon, Dec 23, 2013 at 22:14:00 +, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
My intent in _this_ thread was to get a discussion among
debian-ports.org users started for best practices of how
to communicate with package maintainers in Debian. Sorry
for being unclear there. I had hoped for hints ☺ since I
On Tue, Dec 24, 2013 at 10:44:51 -0300, Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer
wrote:
Hi! I'm one of Qt maintainers and I'm contacting you because of the FTBFS of
qtsvg-opensource-src [0]
[0]
https://buildd.debian.org/status/logs.php?pkg=qtsvg-opensource-srcarch=sparc
As it can be seen
On Mon, Dec 2, 2013 at 11:31:58 +0100, Santiago Vila wrote:
Hello.
m4 FTBFS on sparc. I need help to diagnose this.
https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=m4arch=sparcver=1.4.17-2stamp=1385908483
Looks like an issue between the kernel and libsigsegv. As far as I can
tell from
On Wed, Oct 2, 2013 at 11:44:44 +0200, Axel Beckert wrote:
Yesterday I tried to setup a sparc64 chroot on a second disc in one of
my Sparcs, but the currently documented way[1] to do so failed[2] due
to outdated packages. On a first glance it looks like missing BinNMUs
for the Perl 5.14 to
On Sun, Jul 21, 2013 at 21:06:31 +0200, Bernd Zeimetz wrote:
I think all machines except stadler and sompek are US IIIi machines. The
problem with US IIIi is, that sun never published the cpu specs - they would
have done it if somebody would have paid for the lawyers to look trough them
On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 14:51:43 +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
Am 07.05.2013 15:25, schrieb Matthias Klose:
The decision when to make GCC 4.8 the default for other architectures is
left to the Debian port maintainers.
[...]
Information on porting to GCC 4.8 from previous versions of GCC
Michael,
On Mon, May 13, 2013 at 02:51:51 +0200, Michael Biebl wrote:
Since no-one in the systemd/udev team is using SPARC hardware, I was
wondering, if vio_type would have a better home in e.g. the sparc-utils
[2] package, where it would be maintained and tested by people with
knowledge
On Mon, May 13, 2013 at 16:26:05 +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote:
On May 13, Julien Cristau jcris...@debian.org wrote:
I don't think that would make much sense, and this belongs with the
related utils in udev IMO.
Actually the root issue is that the helper is (was?) needed only because
Control: tag 653582 wheezy-ignore
Control: tag 593141 wheezy-ignore
On Sat, Dec 8, 2012 at 11:11:56 -0300, Antonio Terceiro wrote:
On Fri, Dec 07, 2012 at 10:21:57PM +0100, Stephan Schreiber wrote:
For now I'd prefer the 'wheezy-ignore' rather than removing the ia64
ruby package.
Looks
Package: silo
Severity: grave
X-Debbugs-Cc: David Miller da...@davemloft.net, debian-sparc@lists.debian.org
Tags: upstream patch fixed-upstream
Filing this as a bug so it doesn't get lost. Thanks for the heads-up,
David.
On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 01:14:16 -0700, David Miller wrote:
This
On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 22:24:16 +0200, Roland Stigge wrote:
Hi,
for the guitarix package, we noticed various internal compiler error
from g++.
See also log, e.g.
https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=guitarixarch=sparcver=0.22.4-1stamp=133963
Since there are g++ internal
On Fri, May 11, 2012 at 10:25:40 +0200, Thibaut Paumard wrote:
Would it be possible to have access to a porterbox on sparc, s390 and/or
s390x with yorick-av's build dependencies installed?
http://dsa.debian.org/doc/guest-account/
Cheers,
Julien
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Mon, Apr 16, 2012 at 11:03:51 +0200, Ludovic Brenta wrote:
Could someone please schedule a rebuild of gnat-gps on spontini or on
a sompek configured with more paging space? Thanks!
This list is the wrong place, you want sp...@buildd.debian.org.
Cheers,
Julien
signature.asc
Description:
On Wed, Apr 4, 2012 at 19:56:36 -0400, Jack Hill wrote:
Ahoy hoy,
Hi,
How should I go about collecting more information for bug #667504
(libav-tools: bus error on sparc encoding vp8)?
I replied directly to the bug. Thanks for your report.
Cheers,
Julien
signature.asc
Description:
On Sat, Mar 3, 2012 at 09:55:51 -0600, Patrick Baggett wrote:
Where can I read the source for nbd-tester-client.c? I just did a quick
scan of ghash.c but I didn't see anything really silly going on, so I'd
like to check this file. All copies I can find of nbd-tester-client.c
seem to be short
cc+=debian-sparc@
On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 14:14:46 +0100, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
tags 653653 + help
thanks
On Fri, Dec 30, 2011 at 12:40:09AM +0100, Jakub Wilk wrote:
Source: nbd
Version: 1:2.9.25-2
Severity: serious
Justification: fails to build from source
User:
On Sat, Jan 14, 2012 at 20:47:25 +0100, Christian T. Steigies wrote:
Hi,
one of my packages fails to build on sparc. Is it possible to give upstream
an account on one of the porter boxes, and install the build-depends? On
sperger, these packages are missing for gle-graphics in the sid
On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 09:50:11 +, Jurij Smakov wrote:
Thanks, build completed successfully:
https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=ruby1.8arch=sparcver=1.8.7.352-2stamp=1326336427
Closing the bug.
Cheers,
Julien
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 22:55:16 +, Jurij Smakov wrote:
It probably makes sense to ask someone with buildd super-powers
to trigger another build on sparc to see if the problem is somehow
buildd-specific.
It was already tried 3 times on 2 different buildds:
On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 21:21:07 +, Jurij Smakov wrote:
The test fails at sample/test.rb:1848, which is
ary2 = $x.unpack($format)
We had a gcc-4.6 bug (http://bugs.debian.org/635126) which manifested
itself as a miscompilation of pack/unpack function in Ruby. The bug
got fixed in
On Sat, Dec 17, 2011 at 11:37:08 +, Mark Morgan Lloyd wrote:
Certainly. For sure. No problem. And how long did it take Debian to
sort out the known issue that screwed local X on a U1 etc? My
I believe it was broken in squeeze r0, and fixed in r1. I don't have
access to sparc hw, and
On Sat, Dec 17, 2011 at 17:29:24 +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
On Sat, Dec 17, 2011 at 11:37:08 +, Mark Morgan Lloyd wrote:
Certainly. For sure. No problem. And how long did it take Debian to
sort out the known issue that screwed local X on a U1 etc? My
I believe it was broken
On Fri, Nov 4, 2011 at 10:05:49 +0100, Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
Hi all,
I am reporting an ICE for one of my project. Because I am not a DD,
I cannot fill a proper bug report upstream (gcc).
This makes no sense, what does being a DD have to do with upstream
gcc...
Cheers,
Julien
--
On Sun, Oct 23, 2011 at 14:11:26 +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
At this point, I'm confident that we can reach a (at least partially)
working Ruby on kfreebsd, sparc and armel at some point. I'm less
confident about ia64.
Question: what should we do in the meantime? Options are:
(1) keep
On Tue, Oct 4, 2011 at 21:57:50 +0200, Laurent Fousse wrote:
- trying to build upstream source directly
(http://www.mpfr.org/mpfr-current/#download) with
./configure make GMP_CHECK_RANDOMIZE=1 make check
You'll need libgmp-dev installed.
- if it fails, let
On Thu, Sep 8, 2011 at 11:41:54 +0200, Frans van Berckel wrote:
root@deblnxsrv254:~# gdb /usr/bin/sudo
GNU gdb (GDB) 7.3-debian
Copyright (C) 2011 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
License GPLv3+: GNU GPL version 3 or later
http://gnu.org/licenses/gpl.html
This is free software: you are
On Thu, Sep 1, 2011 at 18:27:37 +0200, Frans van Berckel wrote:
On Thu, 2011-09-01 at 15:59 +0200, Josip Rodin wrote:
On Thu, Sep 01, 2011 at 10:15:23AM +0200, Frans van Berckel wrote:
So I found the installed libedit2_2.11-20080614-3_sparc64 package is
only symbolic linking, but does
Package: postgresql-9.0
Version: 9.0.4-1
Severity: serious
See
https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=postgresql-9.0arch=sparcver=9.0.4-1%2Bb1stamp=1304474226
The build of postgresql-8.4 got the exact same error on sparc afaict
(https://buildd.debian.org/postgresql-8.4).
set -e; \
On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 18:12:25 +, c...@spamcop.net wrote:
I now have access to a Debian Sparc box, and I can reproduce the
problem. The crash happens in the pthreads library, and I find it
confusing that this should happen on Linux/Sparc, but no other
platforms (that I'm aware of).
On Sun, Jan 23, 2011 at 18:05:25 +0100, Thomas Zimmermann wrote:
Hi ML,
I failed to install the Squeeze preview DVD on my Ultra 10 because the
driver for the CMD646 IDE chipset is missing from the initrd. This
problem has already been reported back in November [1]. Is there any
incentive
On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 07:23:29 +, Jurij Smakov wrote:
That got me thinking... We had this T2K box (zee) donated a while ago
(http://lists.debian.org/debian-sparc/2009/08/msg9.html, for
example), and it shows up as a buildd on a machine page, however I
don't really remember ever
On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 21:29:07 -0500, Matt Turner wrote:
On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 8:15 PM, Samuel Thibault sthiba...@debian.org wrote:
Matt Turner, le Mon 15 Nov 2010 19:51:10 -0500, a écrit :
On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 7:24 PM, Roger Leigh rle...@codelibre.net wrote:
What's the actual
On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 01:14:09 +0100, Matthias Klose wrote:
On 14.11.2010 13:19, Julien Cristau wrote:
On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 15:43:57 +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
For wheezy I'm planning to change the linking behaviour for DSOs
(turning on --as-needed and --no-copy-dt-needed-entries
On Sun, Nov 14, 2010 at 17:50:09 -0500, David Campbell wrote:
Greetings everyone, I have been trying to get a working 64-bit
sparc64 system and having a lot of trouble. Today someone in
#debian-sparc on oftc gave me a link[1]. I copied and pasted
the Apt-lines into my sources.list file and
On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 15:43:57 +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
For wheezy I'm planning to change the linking behaviour for DSOs
(turning on --as-needed and --no-copy-dt-needed-entries. The
rationale is summarized in
http://wiki.debian.org/ToolChain/DSOLinking. I would like to know
about
On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 14:12:19 -0400, Scott Howard wrote:
Hello all,
Would it be possible to give me access to a sparc porter box? I'm a DM
and a current NM applicant that has signed the DMUP and DSC [1]. I'm
working on a bug [2] which upstream has submitted a patch for, but
neither they
On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 07:41:50 +0300, Damyan Ivanov wrote:
(replying to list; please cc)
-=| Alexander Zangerl, Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 10:41:56AM +1000 |=-
On Wed, 22 Sep 2010 18:11:38 +0300, Damyan Ivanov writes:
However, there doesn't seem to be a sparc64 porter box available.
On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 13:39:24 +0300, Damyan Ivanov wrote:
Right. So I rephrase my initial question: Is there a box (or perhaps
a chroot?) that uses 64bit userspace available? Supposedly similar to
the one used by the sparc64 buildd?
Not AFAIK.
Cheers,
Julien
signature.asc
Description:
On Thu, Sep 9, 2010 at 11:28:46 +0200, Sylvestre Ledru wrote:
Hello guys,
I would like to know if you could restart the build of the atlas package
in unstable.
You're asking the wrong people. The buildd admin for each arch is
$a...@buildd.d.o.
This fails under sparc probably because the
On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 14:23:52 +0200, Ondřej Surý wrote:
Hi,
could somebody from sparc team take a look at:
https://buildd.debian.org/build.php?arch=sparcpkg=birdver=1.2.3-1
It looks like a bug in the toolchain, but I am unable to test it,
since I don't have a sparc around me.
You
On Wed, May 5, 2010 at 15:31:37 +0200, Frederik Schüler wrote:
Hello,
currently, the 32bit binary build of strace fails on sparc (the 64bit one
succeeds):
https://buildd.debian.org/fetch.cgi?amp;pkg=straceamp;ver=4.5.20-2amp;arch=sparcamp;stamp=1273064636amp;file=log
gcc
+
+ * xserver-xorg.postinst: default to the fbdev driver on sparc, even when we
+find PCI devices, to work around #488669.
+
+ -- Julien Cristau jcris...@debian.org Mon, 25 May 2009 14:58:42 +0200
+
xorg (1:7.3+18) unstable; urgency=low
[ Debconf translations ]
diff --git a/debian/xserver
On Wed, Feb 25, 2009 at 13:41:08 +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
On Mon, 2009-02-09 at 12:49 +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
On Mon, 2009-02-09 at 01:21 -0800, David Miller wrote:
No, I would have said that if time is tight at least we can use
fbdev as the Xorg driver for PCI devices on sparc
On Tue, May 19, 2009 at 20:46:30 +0200, Michael Hanke wrote:
Hi,
could you please trigger a rebuild attempt of the python-nifti package.
Its last attempt failed due to an uninstallable tex-common package:
On Sun, May 3, 2009 at 13:09:23 -0700, David Miller wrote:
The issue is one of communication. If the debian sparc folks don't
communicate with me, things break.
This has been proven over and over again, and the distributions with
people who communicate actively with me over Sparc issues
On Mon, May 4, 2009 at 11:12:38 +0200, Josip Rodin wrote:
On Mon, May 04, 2009 at 09:40:26AM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
As far as I can tell, the main issue is that nobody's actively working
on the debian sparc port in the first place. And without active
maintainers, that port
On Wed, Apr 29, 2009 at 14:11:11 +1000, Felipe Sateler wrote:
Hi sparc porters. I'm writing to ask for your assistance on a FTBFS on
my package csound on sparc. The build log is here[1]. The failure is
the following:
libCsoundAC.so.5.2: undefined reference to `__sync_fetch_and_add_4'
On Thu, Apr 30, 2009 at 00:40:32 +1000, Felipe Sateler wrote:
El 29/04/09 23:02 Julien Cristau escribió:
any reason you're not using libatomic-ops?
This is the first time I heard about libatomic-ops. Is it cross-platform? I
mean cross-platform as in OS, not arch, which it clearly
On Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 22:53:47 -0500, Jon Pruente wrote:
Build Operating System: Linux Debian (xorg-server 2:1.4.2-10.lenny1)
Looks like this got broken by the xorg-server patch in lenny r1. You
should be able to install the version of the xserver-xorg-core package
released with lenny r0 and
On Mon, 2009-04-13 at 13:32 +0530, निशांत / Nishant wrote:
Hi,
I had successfully upgraded to Debian Lenny from Etch on my
SunBlade150 15 days back.
Everything was working fine until today morning when I did aptitude
safe-upgrade and it upgraded xserver-xorg-core package. After upgrade,
On Mon, 2009-04-13 at 16:47 +0530, निशांत / Nishant wrote:
Also, Xorg.0.log file is not updated at every failure. The log pasted
here is of the last but one X start attempt.
Can you add the following to xorg.conf:
Section ServerFlags
Option Log sync
EndSection
so there's a better
On Mon, 2009-04-13 at 12:17 -0400, Howard Eisenberger wrote:
On 2009-03-26, Howard Eisenberger wrote:
On 2009-03-25, Julien Cristau wrote:
It'd be nice if someone could try the attached patch on sparc and see if
they can reproduce the browser crash.
It works! With the new libnssd3
On Wed, 2009-03-25 at 21:20 +0100, Mike Hommey wrote:
On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 09:14:56AM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
On Wed, 2009-03-25 at 07:47 +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
I've spent some time looking at this, and I'm a bit worried about
PKIX_PL_Object_Alloc. Specifically, sizeof
On Wed, 2009-03-25 at 04:58 +, Howard Eisenberger wrote:
On 2009-03-25, Julien Cristau wrote:
Core was generated by `/usr/lib/iceweasel/firefox-bin -a iceweasel
https://signin.ebay.ca/ws/eBayISAPI'.
Program terminated with signal 10, Bus error.
#0 0xf69bf6bc
On Wed, 2009-03-25 at 07:47 +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
I've spent some time looking at this, and I'm a bit worried about
PKIX_PL_Object_Alloc. Specifically, sizeof(PKIX_PL_Object) seems to be
28 on 32bit, and __alignof__(PKIX_PL_Object) is 4. PKIX_PL_Object_Alloc
goes to allocate some
On Wed, 2009-03-25 at 01:44 +, Howard Eisenberger wrote:
#0 0xf69776bc in ?? () from /usr/lib/libnssutil3.so.1d
(gdb) bt
#0 0xf69776bc in ?? () from /usr/lib/libnssutil3.so.1d
#1 0xf69776bc in ?? () from /usr/lib/libnssutil3.so.1d
Backtrace stopped: previous frame identical to this
On Wed, 2009-03-25 at 03:55 +, Howard Eisenberger wrote:
Core was generated by `/usr/lib/iceweasel/firefox-bin -a iceweasel
https://signin.ebay.ca/ws/eBayISAPI'.
Program terminated with signal 10, Bus error.
[New process 2771]
#0 0xf69bf6bc in der_TimeStringToTime (dst=0x115f574,
On Wed, 2009-02-25 at 13:41 +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
On Mon, 2009-02-09 at 12:49 +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
On Mon, 2009-02-09 at 01:21 -0800, David Miller wrote:
No, I would have said that if time is tight at least we can use
fbdev as the Xorg driver for PCI devices on sparc until
On Mon, 2009-02-09 at 12:49 +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
On Mon, 2009-02-09 at 01:21 -0800, David Miller wrote:
No, I would have said that if time is tight at least we can use
fbdev as the Xorg driver for PCI devices on sparc until we have a
better fix for Xorg.
We can probably do
On Mon, 2009-02-09 at 01:21 -0800, David Miller wrote:
No, I would have said that if time is tight at least we can use
fbdev as the Xorg driver for PCI devices on sparc until we have a
better fix for Xorg.
We can probably do that for r1.
Cheers,
Julien
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
On Tue, 2009-01-20 at 08:53 +, Mark Morgan Lloyd wrote:
xorg.conf does get rewritten by an apt-get upgrade on x86 Lenny, and
If so that's a pretty serious bug. But I can't see how that could
happen in an etch-lenny upgrade, so any details (preferrably in a bug
report against xserver-xorg)
On Tue, 2009-01-20 at 10:35 +, Julien Cristau wrote:
On Tue, 2009-01-20 at 08:53 +, Mark Morgan Lloyd wrote:
I know
that DefaultDepth is what I want, but what I don't know is why the
installer is setting it to the default 24 for hardware that doesn't have
that capability
On Mon, 2009-01-19 at 23:24 +, Mark Morgan Lloyd wrote:
Also, if installing on a machine with cg6 is it possible to lock
xorg.conf down to 8 bits (the hardware won't do the default 24) such
that it doesn't revert on upgrades?
Nothing should mess with xorg.conf on upgrades, so any
On Sun, 2008-12-07 at 20:16 +0100, Baurzhan Ismagulov wrote:
Now that #506713 is closed, I have a couple of questions regarding the
process:
* The closing message mentions experimental; will the package be
available in lenny? If yes, will this happen automatically, or does
someone need
On Tue, Nov 11, 2008 at 18:22:57 +0100, Bastian Blank wrote:
The first patch is fine. The revert is not.
Even if the revert is the only way to get X to work on those machines in
lenny?
Cheers,
Julien
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble?
On Tue, Nov 11, 2008 at 22:10:03 +0100, Bastian Blank wrote:
On Tue, Nov 11, 2008 at 08:20:01PM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
On Tue, Nov 11, 2008 at 18:22:57 +0100, Bastian Blank wrote:
The first patch is fine. The revert is not.
Even if the revert is the only way to get X to work
On Mon, Oct 20, 2008 at 22:55:18 -0400, Dave Barnett wrote:
[I was expecting to find information that tells me where the config
file details are contained on a running system (under /proc, I thought),
but I haven't found that, yet Perhaps that functionality isn't
available /
On Wed, Oct 15, 2008 at 23:39:52 +0300, Niko Tyni wrote:
This is reproducible on sperger.d.o.
It's an alignment problem that only shows up with an optimization level
of at least -O2.
Program received signal SIGBUS, Bus error.
0xf7ec1134 in decode_json (string=0x192280, json=0x39f18,
On Sat, Sep 27, 2008 at 15:22:49 +0200, Josip Rodin wrote:
On Sat, Sep 27, 2008 at 02:53:46PM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
On Sat, Sep 27, 2008 at 14:48:42 +0200, Josip Rodin wrote:
Oh, and we already have one in 488669, but it's filed against the core
X server package. I'll leave
On Sat, Sep 27, 2008 at 14:48:42 +0200, Josip Rodin wrote:
Oh, and we already have one in 488669, but it's filed against the core
X server package. I'll leave it to the X guys to decide where to merge.
In any case it's a clear regression from etch. :(
Feel free to provide a patch, or revert
On Tue, Jul 15, 2008 at 09:07:05 +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
Howard Eisenberger wrote:
I just came across this message and didn't see a response.
Did you find a fix?
X.Org X Server 1.4.0.90
Are you running Debian? 1.4.0 is not a current version in either testing
or unstable.
The log
On Fri, Feb 29, 2008 at 23:31:16 +, Jurij Smakov wrote:
Hi,
I've noticed something strange: even though the newer versions of the
kernel (like linux-image-2.6.24) for sparc have been uploaded to the
archive [0], they are not showing up in 'apt-cache search' and cannot be
installed
Hi,
I ran your test programs on sparc, with the following results:
On Sat, Feb 16, 2008 at 23:17:09 +0530, Kumar Appaiah wrote:
1. Please build and run the following programs
g++ progfile.cpp -lblas should do.
Program 1
-
$ make blastest1 CXXFLAGS='-Wall -g' LDFLAGS=-lblas
g++
On Fri, Jan 18, 2008 at 17:07:30 +0100, Jachym Cepicky wrote:
when I try to run lspci and/or Xorg -scanpci to find out, which PCI
number to use, I'm confused
lspci gives me [1]
[...]
0001:00:00.0 Host bridge [0600]: 3DLabs Unknown device [3d3d:0032] (rev
01)
0001:02:00.0 VGA compatible
On Mon, Oct 8, 2007 at 16:15:48 +0200, Mario Iseli wrote:
So, who wants to help us?
(I CCed [EMAIL PROTECTED], maybe there are some other people who are
interested in rescuing the sparc32 arch)
I'm not sure what the point of using a different list for the 1 or 2
people interested in
On Mon, Oct 8, 2007 at 19:26:49 +0100, Chris Andrew wrote:
Hi, Julien.
People have mentioned sparc (32) becoming a separate port on Debian,
so that we can rally the troops and make a concerted effort. This
idea seems not to be of any interest, so I think that it is good that
this list
On Fri, Jul 27, 2007 at 17:22:48 +0200, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
Maybe it's time to somehow re-spawn Debian GNU/kNetBSD since NetBSD is
apparently paying more attention to avoiding regressions than Linux
(that's a euphemism---but I don't want this to sound too harsh, though,
being myself a
On Tue, Jul 24, 2007 at 12:44:50 -0400, ISHWAR RATTAN wrote:
I may the above box available, the dept is
retiring it. Does debian-sparc install/work on it?
I assume that it is a 32-bit processor machine.
An ultra sparc is 64-bit, so it should be fine.
Cheers,
Julien
signature.asc
On Mon, Jul 23, 2007 at 00:22:52 +0100, Chris Andrew wrote:
Ludovic,
Thank you for your reply. As mentioned, I did a dist-upgrade from Sarge. I
can confirm that I am now running Debian 4.0 (Etch). Unfortunately, when I
try to check for updates, I have problems with the following packages:
On Sat, Jul 21, 2007 at 22:38:05 +1000, Jim Watson wrote:
Yes, but I like them to run on sparc (32) systems too.
Previously they always linked to /lib/blah.
Now something has changed so they now link to /lib/v9/blah
But I didn't change my build system so I guess it is something changed in
On Sat, Jul 21, 2007 at 23:56:41 +1000, Jim Watson wrote:
Thank you Julien, that was it. I removed that package and the linking is
fixed.
The linking was just fine, and removing the package just means you lose
the optimizations.
Cheers,
Julien
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Wed, Jun 20, 2007 at 18:51:58 -0500, Steve M. Robbins wrote:
Hi,
Would the maintainer of the sparc buildd please have it re-try
geomview? The last attempt failed with an apparently transient error:
The contact address for the buildd maintainer is
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
HTH,
Julien
--
To
On Sun, Jun 3, 2007 at 17:30:15 -0400, Robert Reif wrote:
This doesn't work for me:
netra:/usr/src/linux-2.6# sparc32 bash
-bash: sparc32: command not found
What package do I need to do this? I just installed the standard
(minimum) packages.
sparc-utils
Cheers,
Julien
--
To
On Fri, Apr 20, 2007 at 13:07:54 -0400, Desmond Rivet wrote:
Hi all,
Hi Desmond
I just installed Debian 4.0 SPARC on my Ultra 10 and it seems to work fine
so far.
The only glitch I have (so far) is that aptitude keeps asking me for the
Network installation CD every time I want to
On Sun, Apr 15, 2007 at 17:22:09 -0400, Robert Reif wrote:
Jurij Smakov wrote:
Hi,
Now that we have released, we need to set our goals for the future. As
you probably guessed from the subject, I am strongly in favor of
dropping sparc32 support for lenny. There are multiple reasons for
On Thu, Jan 25, 2007 at 22:28:12 -0800, Jurij Smakov wrote:
Hi,
A set of new kernel images has been uploaded to unstable a couple of
days ago, including
linux-image-2.6.18-4-sparc64_2.6.18.dfsg.1-9_sparc.deb
Seems to work fine on my ultra 5.
Cheers,
Julien
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email
forwarded 344615 http://caml.inria.fr/mantis/view.php?id=3944
kthxbye
On Mon, Jan 2, 2006 at 12:26:14 +, Jurij Smakov wrote:
ldd is a double-word load, so the first argument (the memory location)
must be double-word aligned. I bet it's not (what's the value of %i1?) and
that's what
(char*)$o0
$1 = 0xefa8f70e
(gdb) p (char*)$o1
$2 = 0xa35b0 %.2f
(gdb) p *(double*)$i1
$3 = 0.013319015502929688
Any hint would be appreciated.
Cheers,
Julien Cristau
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
91 matches
Mail list logo
