Hi Riccardo,
ok, so where could we "hire" a graphics driver developer that would be willing
(will get paid) to support the SPARC community? At least with a "decent" X
support we can do most of the things. And the more people can use it on SPARC
we may attract more people to return to the platfo
Hi,
Phillip Stevens wrote:
> I can only comment on mach64 on 32 bit Sparc, it was working
fine. The
> desktop was reasonably responsive.
Did you try the mach64 driver that was reintroduced to the Debian
package archive?
Not yet.
How are things with it? I think I use it
For what it is worth I have XVR-100 on Ultra 5 which does provide graphics at 640x480 with the default fb… I would love support for XVR-100 (Raedon 7000) to come back and would be willing to add cash to the bounty if that route taken. Attached is my Xorg.0.logroot@xray:/var/log# uname -aLinux xray
>
> >> Did these boards work in the past with the 32-bit sparc ?
> >
> > I can only comment on mach64 on 32 bit Sparc, it was working fine. The
> > desktop was reasonably responsive.
>
> Did you try the mach64 driver that was reintroduced to the Debian package
> archive?
Not yet.
Can you verify
On 8/24/21 3:20 PM, Phillip Stevens wrote:
>> It might also be an idea to contact the original author/maintainer of the
>> PGX-64 and XVR-100 graphics boards and ask whether they're willing to fix
>> the issue.
>>
>> Did these boards work in the past with the 32-bit sparc ?
>
> I can only comment
5 matches
Mail list logo