Re: missinglib: ftbfs [sparc] *** [test] Bus error

nop 0x0005f688 : mov %o0, %l0 0x0005f68c : mov %l0, %o0 0x0005f690 : mov %i0, %o1 0x0005f694 : call 0x7d814 0x0005f698 : ldd [ %i1 ], %o2 0x0005f69c : call 0x5d3d4 (gdb) p (char*)$o0 $1 = 0xefa8f70e "" (gdb) p (char*)$o1 $2 = 0xa35b0 "%.2f"

Re: missinglib: ftbfs [sparc] *** [test] Bus error

forwarded 344615 http://caml.inria.fr/mantis/view.php?id=3944 kthxbye On Mon, Jan 2, 2006 at 12:26:14 +, Jurij Smakov wrote: > ldd is a double-word load, so the first argument (the memory location) > must be double-word aligned. I bet it's not (what's the value of %i1?) and > that's what c

Re: Please test the new kernel (2.6.18.dfsg.1-9)

On Thu, Jan 25, 2007 at 22:28:12 -0800, Jurij Smakov wrote: > Hi, > > A set of new kernel images has been uploaded to unstable a couple of > days ago, including > > linux-image-2.6.18-4-sparc64_2.6.18.dfsg.1-9_sparc.deb > Seems to work fine on my ultra 5. Cheers, Julien -- To UNSUBSCRIBE,

Re: Dropping sparc32 for lenny

On Sun, Apr 15, 2007 at 17:22:09 -0400, Robert Reif wrote: > Jurij Smakov wrote: > > >Hi, > > > >Now that we have released, we need to set our goals for the future. As > >you probably guessed from the subject, I am strongly in favor of > >dropping sparc32 support for lenny. There are multiple r

Re: Aptitude asks for installation CD

On Fri, Apr 20, 2007 at 13:07:54 -0400, Desmond Rivet wrote: > Hi all, > Hi Desmond > I just installed Debian 4.0 SPARC on my Ultra 10 and it seems to work fine > so far. > > The only glitch I have (so far) is that aptitude keeps asking me for the > Network installation CD every time I want to

Re: smlnj on sparc

On Tue, May 8, 2007 at 17:00:16 +0300, Kari Pahula wrote: > Please CC me, I'm not subscribed. > done. > smlnj-110.62-1 should be buildable on sparc, but it's still in > dep-wait state. Could someone please check on the package? You need to ask the buildd admin, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, to clear t

Re: build sparc32 kernel deb on sparc64

On Sun, Jun 3, 2007 at 17:30:15 -0400, Robert Reif wrote: > This doesn't work for me: > > netra:/usr/src/linux-2.6# sparc32 bash > -bash: sparc32: command not found > > What package do I need to do this? I just installed the standard > (minimum) packages. > sparc-utils Cheers, Julien --

Re: please re-try geomview

On Wed, Jun 20, 2007 at 18:51:58 -0500, Steve M. Robbins wrote: > Hi, > > Would the maintainer of the sparc buildd please have it re-try > geomview? The last attempt failed with an apparently transient error: > The contact address for the buildd maintainer is [EMAIL PROTECTED] HTH, Julien --

Re: linking SPARC applications

On Sat, Jul 21, 2007 at 22:38:05 +1000, Jim Watson wrote: > Yes, but I like them to run on sparc (32) systems too. > Previously they always linked to /lib/blah. > Now something has changed so they now link to /lib/v9/blah > But I didn't change my build system so I guess it is something changed in

Re: linking SPARC applications

On Sat, Jul 21, 2007 at 23:56:41 +1000, Jim Watson wrote: > Thank you Julien, that was it. I removed that package and the linking is > fixed. > The linking was just fine, and removing the package just means you lose the optimizations. Cheers, Julien -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTE

Re: Sparcstation20 (32 bit) user needs good /etc/apt/sources.list

On Mon, Jul 23, 2007 at 00:22:52 +0100, Chris Andrew wrote: > Ludovic, > > Thank you for your reply. As mentioned, I did a dist-upgrade from Sarge. I > can confirm that I am now running Debian 4.0 (Etch). Unfortunately, when I > try to check for updates, I have problems with the following package

Re: Sun Ultra-10 and debian-sparc

On Tue, Jul 24, 2007 at 12:44:50 -0400, ISHWAR RATTAN wrote: > > I may the above box available, the dept is > retiring it. Does debian-sparc install/work on it? > > I assume that it is a 32-bit processor machine. > An ultra sparc is 64-bit, so it should be fine. Cheers, Julien signature.asc De

Re: Sparc32 systems and power consumption

On Fri, Jul 27, 2007 at 17:22:48 +0200, Ludovic Courtès wrote: > Maybe it's time to somehow re-spawn Debian GNU/kNetBSD since NetBSD is > apparently paying more attention to avoiding regressions than Linux > (that's a euphemism---but I don't want this to sound too harsh, though, > being myself a h

Re: Any progress?

On Mon, Oct 8, 2007 at 16:15:48 +0200, Mario Iseli wrote: > So, who wants to help us? > > (I CCed [EMAIL PROTECTED], maybe there are some other people who are > interested in rescuing the sparc32 arch) > I'm not sure what the point of using a different list for the 1 or 2 people interested in s

Re: Any progress?

On Mon, Oct 8, 2007 at 19:26:49 +0100, Chris Andrew wrote: > Hi, Julien. > > People have mentioned sparc (32) becoming a separate port on Debian, > so that we can rally the troops and make a concerted effort. This > idea seems not to be of any interest, so I think that it is good that > this li

Re: Please reschedule build for knetworkmanager_0.2-2

On Sun, Oct 14, 2007 at 17:22:14 +0200, Michael Biebl wrote: > Hi, > > knetworkmanager_0.2-1 has been held back from entering testing because > it wasn't built for the arm, hppa and sparc architecture for quite some > time. > > Please reschedule builds for these architectures. > Hi, The contac

Re: Request for a rebuild of fslview package

On Tue, Dec 11, 2007 at 13:43:05 +0100, Michael Hanke wrote: > > Hi all, > > [ Please CC me, as I'm not subscribed to this list. ] Then don't set the mail-followup-to header to just the list. > I posted this problem to debian-devel [0] and was suggested to ask for a > give-back on this list [1

Re: Ultra Sparc 45 Workstation

On Fri, Jan 18, 2008 at 17:07:30 +0100, Jachym Cepicky wrote: > when I try to run lspci and/or Xorg -scanpci to find out, which PCI > number to use, I'm confused > > lspci gives me [1] > > [...] > 0001:00:00.0 Host bridge [0600]: 3DLabs Unknown device [3d3d:0032] (rev > 01) > 0001:02:00.0 VGA co

Re: zdotu_ problem on libblas3gf on sparc and alpha

Hi, I ran your test programs on sparc, with the following results: On Sat, Feb 16, 2008 at 23:17:09 +0530, Kumar Appaiah wrote: > 1. Please build and run the following programs > g++ .cpp -lblas should do. > > Program 1 > - > $ make blastest1 CXXFLAGS='-Wall -g' LDFLAGS=-lblas g++ -Wal

Re: Newer kernels not seen by apt

On Fri, Feb 29, 2008 at 23:31:16 +, Jurij Smakov wrote: > Hi, > > I've noticed something strange: even though the newer versions of the > kernel (like linux-image-2.6.24) for sparc have been uploaded to the > archive [0], they are not showing up in 'apt-cache search' and cannot be > install

Re: xorg not working on 2.6.24-1 (smp and single)

On Tue, Jul 15, 2008 at 09:07:05 +0200, Frans Pop wrote: > Howard Eisenberger wrote: > > I just came across this message and didn't see a response. > > Did you find a fix? > > > >> X.Org X Server 1.4.0.90 > > Are you running Debian? 1.4.0 is not a current version in either testing > or unstable

Re: Xorg with ATI driver and Linux 2.6.25 (on Ultra 5)

On Sat, Sep 27, 2008 at 14:48:42 +0200, Josip Rodin wrote: > Oh, and we already have one in 488669, but it's filed against the core > X server package. I'll leave it to the X guys to decide where to merge. > In any case it's a clear regression from etch. :( > Feel free to provide a patch, or reve

Re: Xorg with ATI driver and Linux 2.6.25 (on Ultra 5)

On Sat, Sep 27, 2008 at 15:22:49 +0200, Josip Rodin wrote: > On Sat, Sep 27, 2008 at 02:53:46PM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote: > > On Sat, Sep 27, 2008 at 14:48:42 +0200, Josip Rodin wrote: > > > Oh, and we already have one in 488669, but it's filed against the core >

Re: Bug#501825: libjson-xs-perl_2.23-1(sparc/unstable): FTBFS on sparc, fails in tests

On Wed, Oct 15, 2008 at 23:39:52 +0300, Niko Tyni wrote: > This is reproducible on sperger.d.o. > > It's an alignment problem that only shows up with an optimization level > of at least -O2. > > Program received signal SIGBUS, Bus error. > 0xf7ec1134 in decode_json (string=0x192280, json=0x39f18

Re: XVR-500 support in Lenny

On Mon, Oct 20, 2008 at 22:55:18 -0400, Dave Barnett wrote: > [I was expecting to find information that tells me where the "config" > file details are contained on a running system (under /proc, I thought), > but I haven't found that, yet Perhaps that functionality isn't > available / c

Re: Bug#500358: Fix found

On Tue, Nov 11, 2008 at 18:22:57 +0100, Bastian Blank wrote: > The first patch is fine. The revert is not. > Even if the revert is the only way to get X to work on those machines in lenny? Cheers, Julien -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? C

Re: Bug#500358: Fix found

On Tue, Nov 11, 2008 at 22:10:03 +0100, Bastian Blank wrote: > On Tue, Nov 11, 2008 at 08:20:01PM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote: > > On Tue, Nov 11, 2008 at 18:22:57 +0100, Bastian Blank wrote: > > > The first patch is fine. The revert is not. > > Even if the revert is the o

Re: Bug#490999: gcc-4.3 / qt3 misalignment

On Sun, 2008-12-07 at 20:16 +0100, Baurzhan Ismagulov wrote: > Now that #506713 is closed, I have a couple of questions regarding the > process: > > * The closing message mentions experimental; will the package be > available in lenny? If yes, will this happen automatically, or does > someone

Re: Debian+KDE for SPARC

On Mon, 2009-01-19 at 23:24 +, Mark Morgan Lloyd wrote: > Also, if installing on a machine with cg6 is it possible to lock > xorg.conf down to 8 bits (the hardware won't do the default 24) such > that it doesn't revert on upgrades? Nothing should mess with xorg.conf on upgrades, so any modif

Re: Debian+KDE for SPARC

On Tue, 2009-01-20 at 08:53 +, Mark Morgan Lloyd wrote: > xorg.conf does get rewritten by an apt-get upgrade on x86 "Lenny", and If so that's a pretty serious bug. But I can't see how that could happen in an etch->lenny upgrade, so any details (preferrably in a bug report against xserver-xor

freeze exception for xserver-xorg-video-suncg6

On Tue, 2009-01-20 at 10:35 +, Julien Cristau wrote: > On Tue, 2009-01-20 at 08:53 +, Mark Morgan Lloyd wrote: > > I know > > that DefaultDepth is what I want, but what I don't know is why the > > installer is setting it to the default 24 for hardware t

Re: [FIX]: ultra45 boot failing...

On Mon, 2009-02-09 at 01:21 -0800, David Miller wrote: > No, I would have said that if time is tight at least we can use > "fbdev" as the Xorg driver for PCI devices on sparc until we have a > better fix for Xorg. We can probably do that for r1. Cheers, Julien -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debia

Re: [FIX]: ultra45 boot failing...

On Mon, 2009-02-09 at 12:49 +0100, Julien Cristau wrote: > On Mon, 2009-02-09 at 01:21 -0800, David Miller wrote: > > No, I would have said that if time is tight at least we can use > > "fbdev" as the Xorg driver for PCI devices on sparc until we have a > > b

Re: [FIX]: ultra45 boot failing...

On Wed, 2009-02-25 at 13:41 +0100, Julien Cristau wrote: > On Mon, 2009-02-09 at 12:49 +0100, Julien Cristau wrote: > > On Mon, 2009-02-09 at 01:21 -0800, David Miller wrote: > > > No, I would have said that if time is tight at least we can use > > > "fbdev"

Re: x-www-browser for ultra5 ultra60

On Wed, 2009-03-25 at 01:44 +, Howard Eisenberger wrote: > #0 0xf69776bc in ?? () from /usr/lib/libnssutil3.so.1d > (gdb) bt > #0 0xf69776bc in ?? () from /usr/lib/libnssutil3.so.1d > #1 0xf69776bc in ?? () from /usr/lib/libnssutil3.so.1d > Backtrace stopped: previous frame identical to this

Re: x-www-browser for ultra5 ultra60

On Wed, 2009-03-25 at 03:55 +, Howard Eisenberger wrote: > Core was generated by `/usr/lib/iceweasel/firefox-bin -a iceweasel > https://signin.ebay.ca/ws/eBayISAPI'. > Program terminated with signal 10, Bus error. > [New process 2771] > #0 0xf69bf6bc in der_TimeStringToTime (dst=0x115f574, str

Re: x-www-browser for ultra5 ultra60

On Wed, 2009-03-25 at 04:58 +, Howard Eisenberger wrote: > On 2009-03-25, Julien Cristau wrote: > > >> Core was generated by `/usr/lib/iceweasel/firefox-bin -a iceweasel > >> https://signin.ebay.ca/ws/eBayISAPI'. > >> Program terminated with signal 10,

Re: x-www-browser for ultra5 ultra60

On Wed, 2009-03-25 at 07:47 +0100, Julien Cristau wrote: > I've spent some time looking at this, and I'm a bit worried about > PKIX_PL_Object_Alloc. Specifically, sizeof(PKIX_PL_Object) seems to be > 28 on 32bit, and __alignof__(PKIX_PL_Object) is 4. PKIX_PL_Object_Alloc >

Re: x-www-browser for ultra5 ultra60

On Wed, 2009-03-25 at 21:20 +0100, Mike Hommey wrote: > On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 09:14:56AM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote: > > On Wed, 2009-03-25 at 07:47 +0100, Julien Cristau wrote: > > > I've spent some time looking at this, and I'm a bit worried about > > >

Re: Lenny Sunblade 150 xserver issue

On Mon, 2009-04-13 at 13:32 +0530, निशांत / Nishant wrote: > Hi, > > I had successfully upgraded to Debian Lenny from Etch on my > SunBlade150 15 days back. > > Everything was working fine until today morning when I did aptitude > safe-upgrade and it upgraded xserver-xorg-core package. After upgr

Re: Lenny Sunblade 150 xserver issue

On Mon, 2009-04-13 at 16:47 +0530, निशांत / Nishant wrote: > Also, Xorg.0.log file is not updated at every failure. The log pasted > here is of the last but one X start attempt. Can you add the following to xorg.conf: Section "ServerFlags" Option "Log" "sync" EndSection so there's a bett

Re: x-www-browser for ultra5 ultra60

On Mon, 2009-04-13 at 12:17 -0400, Howard Eisenberger wrote: > On 2009-03-26, Howard Eisenberger wrote: > > > On 2009-03-25, Julien Cristau wrote: > > > >> It'd be nice if someone could try the attached patch on sparc and see if > >> they can reproduce

Re: X/GDM fails on Ultra 10 w/ Creator 3D under Lenny

On Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 22:53:47 -0500, Jon Pruente wrote: > Build Operating System: Linux Debian (xorg-server 2:1.4.2-10.lenny1) Looks like this got broken by the xorg-server patch in lenny r1. You should be able to install the version of the xserver-xorg-core package released with lenny r0 and

Re: FTBFS on sparc: __sync_test_and_add_4

On Wed, Apr 29, 2009 at 14:11:11 +1000, Felipe Sateler wrote: > Hi sparc porters. I'm writing to ask for your assistance on a FTBFS on > my package csound on sparc. The build log is here[1]. The failure is > the following: > > > libCsoundAC.so.5.2: undefined reference to `__sync_fetch_and_add_4'

Re: FTBFS on sparc: __sync_test_and_add_4

On Thu, Apr 30, 2009 at 00:40:32 +1000, Felipe Sateler wrote: > El 29/04/09 23:02 Julien Cristau escribió: > > any reason you're not using libatomic-ops? > > This is the first time I heard about libatomic-ops. Is it cross-platform? I > mean cross-platform as in OS, not ar

Re: debian unusable on niagara

On Sun, May 3, 2009 at 13:09:23 -0700, David Miller wrote: > The issue is one of communication. If the debian sparc folks don't > communicate with me, things break. > > This has been proven over and over again, and the distributions with > people who communicate actively with me over Sparc issu

Re: debian unusable on niagara

On Mon, May 4, 2009 at 11:12:38 +0200, Josip Rodin wrote: > On Mon, May 04, 2009 at 09:40:26AM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote: > > As far as I can tell, the main issue is that nobody's actively working > > on the debian sparc port in the first place. And without active > &

Re: Rebuild attempt of python-nifti

On Tue, May 19, 2009 at 20:46:30 +0200, Michael Hanke wrote: > Hi, > > could you please trigger a rebuild attempt of the python-nifti package. > Its last attempt failed due to an uninstallable tex-common package: > > > https://buildd.debian.org/fetch.cgi?&pkg=pynifti&ver=0.20090303.1-1&arch=s

Re: [FIX]: ultra45 boot failing...

On Wed, Feb 25, 2009 at 13:41:08 +0100, Julien Cristau wrote: > On Mon, 2009-02-09 at 12:49 +0100, Julien Cristau wrote: > > On Mon, 2009-02-09 at 01:21 -0800, David Miller wrote: > > > No, I would have said that if time is tight at least we can use > > > "f

[SRM] xorg and xorg-server update for lenny

) UNRELEASED; urgency=low + + * xserver-xorg.postinst: default to the fbdev driver on sparc, even when we +find PCI devices, to work around #488669. + + -- Julien Cristau Mon, 25 May 2009 14:58:42 +0200 + xorg (1:7.3+18) unstable; urgency=low [ Debconf translations ] diff --git a/debian/xserver-

Re: RFH: strace FTBFS

On Wed, May 5, 2010 at 15:31:37 +0200, Frederik Schüler wrote: > Hello, > > currently, the 32bit binary build of strace fails on sparc (the 64bit one > succeeds): > > https://buildd.debian.org/fetch.cgi?&pkg=strace&ver=4.5.20-2&arch=sparc&stamp=1273064636&file=log > > gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I.

Re: Failed bird/1.2.3-1 build

On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 14:23:52 +0200, Ondřej Surý wrote: > Hi, > > could somebody from sparc team take a look at: > > https://buildd.debian.org/build.php?arch=sparc&pkg=bird&ver=1.2.3-1 > > It looks like a bug in the toolchain, but I am unable to test it, > since I don't have a sparc around m

Re: Bug#593193: gmp-ecm: FTBFS on sparc: Assertion failed during tests

cc:ing debian-sparc in case someone there would be able to help. On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 21:06:42 +0200, Laurent Fousse wrote: > Hello, > > * Mehdi Dogguy [Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 08:18:16AM +0200]: > > Your package gmp-ecm/6.3-2 fails to build from source on sparc: > [...] > > The full build log c

Re: Build of atlas under sparc

On Thu, Sep 9, 2010 at 11:28:46 +0200, Sylvestre Ledru wrote: > Hello guys, > > I would like to know if you could restart the build of the atlas package > in unstable. You're asking the wrong people. The buildd admin for each arch is $a...@buildd.d.o. > This fails under sparc probably because

Re: sparc64 porterbox

On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 07:41:50 +0300, Damyan Ivanov wrote: > (replying to list; please cc) > > -=| Alexander Zangerl, Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 10:41:56AM +1000 |=- > > On Wed, 22 Sep 2010 18:11:38 +0300, Damyan Ivanov writes: > > >However, there doesn't seem to be a sparc64 porter box available. >

Re: sparc64 porterbox

On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 13:39:24 +0300, Damyan Ivanov wrote: > Right. So I rephrase my initial question: Is there a box (or perhaps > a chroot?) that uses 64bit userspace available? Supposedly similar to > the one used by the "sparc64" buildd? Not AFAIK. Cheers, Julien signature.asc Descript

Re: DM access to sparc porter boxes for bug fixing

On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 14:12:19 -0400, Scott Howard wrote: > Hello all, > > Would it be possible to give me access to a sparc porter box? I'm a DM > and a current NM applicant that has signed the DMUP and DSC [1]. I'm > working on a bug [2] which upstream has submitted a patch for, but > neither

Re: DSO linking changes for wheezy

On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 15:43:57 +0200, Matthias Klose wrote: > For wheezy I'm planning to change the linking behaviour for DSOs > (turning on --as-needed and --no-copy-dt-needed-entries. The > rationale is summarized in > http://wiki.debian.org/ToolChain/DSOLinking. I would like to know > about i

Re: 64-bit sparc64

On Sun, Nov 14, 2010 at 17:50:09 -0500, David Campbell wrote: > Greetings everyone, I have been trying to get a working 64-bit > sparc64 system and having a lot of trouble. Today someone in > #debian-sparc on oftc gave me a link[1]. I copied and pasted > the Apt-lines into my sources.list file and

Re: DSO linking changes for wheezy

On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 21:29:07 -0500, Matt Turner wrote: > On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 8:15 PM, Samuel Thibault wrote: > > Matt Turner, le Mon 15 Nov 2010 19:51:10 -0500, a écrit : > >> On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 7:24 PM, Roger Leigh wrote: > >> > What's the actual problem --as-needed is trying to so

Re: DSO linking changes for wheezy

On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 01:14:09 +0100, Matthias Klose wrote: > On 14.11.2010 13:19, Julien Cristau wrote: > >On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 15:43:57 +0200, Matthias Klose wrote: > > > >>For wheezy I'm planning to change the linking behaviour for DSOs > >>(turning

Re: SPARC daily d-i builds

On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 07:23:29 +, Jurij Smakov wrote: > That got me thinking... We had this T2K box (zee) donated a while ago > (http://lists.debian.org/debian-sparc/2009/08/msg9.html, for > example), and it shows up as a buildd on a machine page, however I > don't really remember eve

Re: cmd64x driver missing from Squeeze initrd

On Sun, Jan 23, 2011 at 18:05:25 +0100, Thomas Zimmermann wrote: > Hi ML, > > I failed to install the Squeeze preview DVD on my Ultra 10 because the > driver for the CMD646 IDE chipset is missing from the initrd. This > problem has already been reported back in November [1]. Is there any > incent

Re: bus error in ps2pdf

On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 18:12:25 +, c...@spamcop.net wrote: > > I now have access to a Debian Sparc box, and I can reproduce the > problem. The crash happens in the pthreads library, and I find it > confusing that this should happen on Linux/Sparc, but no other > platforms (that I'm aware of)

Bug#626054: postgresql-9.0: FTBFS on sparc (testsuite failure)

Package: postgresql-9.0 Version: 9.0.4-1 Severity: serious See https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=postgresql-9.0&arch=sparc&ver=9.0.4-1%2Bb1&stamp=1304474226 The build of postgresql-8.4 got the exact same error on sparc afaict (https://buildd.debian.org/postgresql-8.4). set -e; \

Re: libedit.so.2: cannot open shared object file

On Thu, Sep 1, 2011 at 18:27:37 +0200, Frans van Berckel wrote: > On Thu, 2011-09-01 at 15:59 +0200, Josip Rodin wrote: > > On Thu, Sep 01, 2011 at 10:15:23AM +0200, Frans van Berckel wrote: > > > > So I found the installed libedit2_2.11-20080614-3_sparc64 package is > > > only symbolic linking,

Re: [sparc64] sudo command causes a bus error

On Thu, Sep 8, 2011 at 11:41:54 +0200, Frans van Berckel wrote: > root@deblnxsrv254:~# gdb /usr/bin/sudo > GNU gdb (GDB) 7.3-debian > Copyright (C) 2011 Free Software Foundation, Inc. > License GPLv3+: GNU GPL version 3 or later > > This is free software: you

Re: mpfr4 FTBFS on sparc

On Tue, Oct 4, 2011 at 21:57:50 +0200, Laurent Fousse wrote: > - trying to build upstream source directly > (http://www.mpfr.org/mpfr-current/#download) with > > ./configure && make && GMP_CHECK_RANDOMIZE=1 make check > > You'll need libgmp-dev installed. > > - if it

Re: ruby1.9.1 migration to testing

On Sun, Oct 23, 2011 at 14:11:26 +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > At this point, I'm confident that we can reach a (at least partially) > working Ruby on kfreebsd, sparc and armel at some point. I'm less > confident about ia64. > > Question: what should we do in the meantime? Options are: > (1) kee

Re: gcc ICE

On Fri, Nov 4, 2011 at 10:05:49 +0100, Mathieu Malaterre wrote: > Hi all, > > I am reporting an ICE for one of my project. Because I am not a DD, > I cannot fill a proper bug report upstream (gcc). > This makes no sense, what does being a DD have to do with upstream gcc... Cheers, Julien -

Re: Sparc 6.0.3: multiple Nautilus file manager process after few minutes from fresh install

On Sat, Dec 17, 2011 at 11:37:08 +, Mark Morgan Lloyd wrote: > Certainly. For sure. No problem. And how long did it take Debian to > sort out the known issue that screwed local X on a U1 etc? My I believe it was broken in squeeze r0, and fixed in r1. I don't have access to sparc hw, and nobo

Re: Sparc 6.0.3: multiple Nautilus file manager process after few minutes from fresh install

On Sat, Dec 17, 2011 at 17:29:24 +0100, Julien Cristau wrote: > On Sat, Dec 17, 2011 at 11:37:08 +, Mark Morgan Lloyd wrote: > > > Certainly. For sure. No problem. And how long did it take Debian to > > sort out the known issue that screwed local X on a U1 etc? My >

Re: Bug#652115: ruby1.8: FTBFS on sparc: ./sample/test.rb:1848: [BUG] Bus Error

On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 22:55:16 +, Jurij Smakov wrote: > It probably makes sense to ask someone with buildd super-powers > to trigger another build on sparc to see if the problem is somehow > buildd-specific. > It was already tried 3 times on 2 different buildds: https://buildd.debian.org

Re: Bug#652115: ruby1.8: FTBFS on sparc: ./sample/test.rb:1848: [BUG] Bus Error

On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 21:21:07 +, Jurij Smakov wrote: > The test fails at sample/test.rb:1848, which is > > ary2 = $x.unpack($format) > > We had a gcc-4.6 bug (http://bugs.debian.org/635126) which manifested > itself as a miscompilation of pack/unpack function in Ruby. The bug > got fixe

Re: Bug#652115: ruby1.8: FTBFS on sparc: ./sample/test.rb:1848: [BUG] Bus Error

On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 09:50:11 +, Jurij Smakov wrote: > Thanks, build completed successfully: > > https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=ruby1.8&arch=sparc&ver=1.8.7.352-2&stamp=1326336427 > > Closing the bug. Cheers, Julien -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-sparc-requ...@li

Re: [GLE-general] GLE 4.2.4 Released

On Sat, Jan 14, 2012 at 20:47:25 +0100, Christian T. Steigies wrote: > Hi, > one of my packages fails to build on sparc. Is it possible to give upstream > an account on one of the porter boxes, and install the build-depends? On > sperger, these packages are missing for gle-graphics in the sid dchr

Re: Bug#653653: nbd: FTBFS on sparc: Bus error (core dumped) - FAIL: integrity

cc+=debian-sparc@ On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 14:14:46 +0100, Wouter Verhelst wrote: > tags 653653 + help > thanks > > On Fri, Dec 30, 2011 at 12:40:09AM +0100, Jakub Wilk wrote: > > Source: nbd > > Version: 1:2.9.25-2 > > Severity: serious > > Justification: fails to build from source > > User: deb

Re: Bug#653653: nbd: FTBFS on sparc: Bus error (core dumped) - FAIL: integrity

On Sat, Mar 3, 2012 at 09:55:51 -0600, Patrick Baggett wrote: > Where can I read the source for "nbd-tester-client.c"? I just did a quick > scan of "ghash.c" but I didn't see anything really silly going on, so I'd > like to check this file. All copies I can find of "nbd-tester-client.c" > seem to

Re: Help debugging bug #667504

On Wed, Apr 4, 2012 at 19:56:36 -0400, Jack Hill wrote: > Ahoy hoy, > Hi, > How should I go about collecting more information for bug #667504 > (libav-tools: bus error on sparc encoding vp8)? > I replied directly to the bug. Thanks for your report. Cheers, Julien signature.asc Description:

Re: Rebuild request: gnat-gps on sparc

On Mon, Apr 16, 2012 at 11:03:51 +0200, Ludovic Brenta wrote: > Could someone please schedule a rebuild of gnat-gps on spontini or on > a sompek configured with more paging space? Thanks! > This list is the wrong place, you want sp...@buildd.debian.org. Cheers, Julien signature.asc Descriptio

Re: DM needs access to porterbox to port yorick-av to sparc and s390(x)

On Fri, May 11, 2012 at 10:25:40 +0200, Thibaut Paumard wrote: > Would it be possible to have access to a porterbox on sparc, s390 and/or > s390x with yorick-av's build dependencies installed? http://dsa.debian.org/doc/guest-account/ Cheers, Julien signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: gcc 4.6.3-5 internal compiler error on sparc/stadler for package guitarix

On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 22:24:16 +0200, Roland Stigge wrote: > Hi, > > for the guitarix package, we noticed various internal compiler error > from g++. > > See also log, e.g. > https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=guitarix&arch=sparc&ver=0.22.4-1&stamp=133963 > > Since there are g

Bug#685245: [PATCH] silo: Don't touch %tick_cmpr on sun4v cpus.

Package: silo Severity: grave X-Debbugs-Cc: David Miller , debian-sparc@lists.debian.org Tags: upstream patch fixed-upstream Filing this as a bug so it doesn't get lost. Thanks for the heads-up, David. On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 01:14:16 -0700, David Miller wrote: > > This generates an illegal in

Re: Bug#593141: Bug#653582: ruby-hpricot: FTBFS on ia64: ruby crashes while running tests

Control: tag 653582 wheezy-ignore Control: tag 593141 wheezy-ignore On Sat, Dec 8, 2012 at 11:11:56 -0300, Antonio Terceiro wrote: > On Fri, Dec 07, 2012 at 10:21:57PM +0100, Stephan Schreiber wrote: > > For now I'd prefer the 'wheezy-ignore' rather than removing the ia64 > > ruby package. > >

Re: VIO on sparc / udev support

Michael, On Mon, May 13, 2013 at 02:51:51 +0200, Michael Biebl wrote: > > Since no-one in the systemd/udev team is using SPARC hardware, I was > > wondering, if vio_type would have a better home in e.g. the sparc-utils > > [2] package, where it would be maintained and tested by people with > > kn

Re: [Pkg-systemd-maintainers] VIO on sparc / udev support

On Mon, May 13, 2013 at 16:26:05 +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote: > On May 13, Julien Cristau wrote: > > > I don't think that would make much sense, and this belongs with the > > related utils in udev IMO. > Actually the root issue is that the helper is (was?) needed

Re: Current and upcoming toolchain changes for jessie

On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 14:51:43 +0200, Matthias Klose wrote: > Am 07.05.2013 15:25, schrieb Matthias Klose: > > The decision when to make GCC 4.8 the default for other architectures is > > left to the Debian port maintainers. > [...] > > Information on porting to GCC 4.8 from previous versions of

Re: DSA concerns for jessie architectures

On Sun, Jul 21, 2013 at 21:06:31 +0200, Bernd Zeimetz wrote: > I think all machines except stadler and sompek are US IIIi machines. The > problem with US IIIi is, that sun never published the cpu specs - they would > have done it if somebody would have paid for the lawyers to look trough them > be

Re: Results of the porter roll call (Was: Roll call for porters of architectures in sid and testing)

On Wed, Oct 2, 2013 at 11:44:44 +0200, Axel Beckert wrote: > Yesterday I tried to setup a sparc64 chroot on a second disc in one of > my Sparcs, but the currently documented way[1] to do so failed[2] due > to outdated packages. On a first glance it looks like missing BinNMUs > for the Perl 5.14 t

Re: m4 FTBFS

On Mon, Dec 2, 2013 at 11:31:58 +0100, Santiago Vila wrote: > Hello. > > m4 FTBFS on sparc. I need help to diagnose this. > > https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=m4&arch=sparc&ver=1.4.17-2&stamp=1385908483 > Looks like an issue between the kernel and libsigsegv. As far as I can tel

Re: maintainer communication

On Mon, Dec 23, 2013 at 22:14:00 +, Thorsten Glaser wrote: > My intent in _this_ thread was to get a discussion among > debian-ports.org users started for best practices of how > to communicate with package maintainers in Debian. Sorry > for being unclear there. I had hoped for hints ☺ since I

Re: -Werror=cast-align setted by default?

On Tue, Dec 24, 2013 at 10:44:51 -0300, Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer wrote: > Hi! I'm one of Qt maintainers and I'm contacting you because of the FTBFS of > qtsvg-opensource-src [0] > > [0] > > > As it can

Re: Sparc status ?

On Fri, Apr 18, 2014 at 10:44:16 +0200, Sébastien Bernard wrote: > Le 18/04/2014 06:56, Joost van Baal-Ilić a écrit : > >I'd guess skilled hacker time is more needed than hardware. Reading > >https://release.debian.org/jessie/arch_qualify.html , it seems major > >blocking issues are: "Using gcc-4.

Re: libx11: Issues with Data32/_XData32

On Tue, Jan 24, 2017 at 01:12:23 +, James Clarke wrote: > Hi, > I've been debugging an issue in gtk2-perl causing it to SIGBUS on > sparc64, and traced it back to what seems to be dodgy code inside > libx11. One of the tests calls gdk_window_set_opacity, which calls > XChangeProperty with a po

Re: Arch qualification for buster: call for DSA, Security, toolchain concerns

On 06/27/2018 10:03 PM, Niels Thykier wrote: > Hi, > > > As part of the interim architecture qualification for buster, we request > that DSA, the security team and the toolchain maintainers review and > update their list of known concerns for buster release architectures. > Everyone, please avoi

Re: Bug#1092497: mercurial: Please raise timeout for slower architectures and use --allow-slow-tests

On Wed, Jan 22, 2025 at 10:34:25 +0100, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote: > Hello Julien, > > On Wed, 2025-01-22 at 10:15 +0100, Julien Cristau wrote: > > Hmm, so I don't think I want to do that: > > - the default timeout is 360, so 1800 is already way above that,