I'm quite confident
my DHCP server is giving out DNS servers too), so I presume something
is going very wrong.
Any pointers or helpful hints would be welcomed.
Thanks!
- Rich
bHi Adrian!
On Sun, May 9, 2021 at 9:26 AM John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
wrote:
>
> Hello Rich!
>
> On 5/9/21 3:24 PM, Rich wrote:
> > I tried just handing it vmlinux from
> > https://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/ports/debian-installer/2021-04-17/sparc64/debian-installer-images
t least).
https://lists.debian.org/debian-sparc/2016/09/msg2.html is even an
example of someone on this very list.
Does anyone have any insights? Or am I going to have to resort to
printks in random parts of the thread the panic notes and hope I find
the problem?
Thanks!
- Rich
ls on this hardware will take an age each
time, so I was hoping to get better insight into the bug through a
stacktrace.
- Rich
On Wed, May 12, 2021 at 10:49 PM Rich wrote:
>
> Hi all,
> So, I got my earlier system running sparc64 using a terrible method
> (from inside the existing sparc
directly useful at the moment...unless I want to clobber a disk
with a bootable sparc64 image, I suppose.
I tried editing the boot command in GRUB on the disc to say 'set
options="priority=high nomsi"', but it didn't affect the behavior. I
could blacklist the niu
em's, whether it's set to true or
false. (Amusingly, the "niu" driver has special casing for this and
instead of setting everything to e.g. 00:aa:aa:aa:aa:aa, sets the
first port to 00:aa:aa:aa:aa:aa, second to 00:aa:aa:aa:aa:ab, and so
on.)
- Rich
On Tue, Nov 16, 2021 at 3:39 A
olved, and didn't want to just blast multiple lists.
- Rich
On Sat, Nov 20, 2021 at 5:06 AM John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
wrote:
>
> Hello Rich!
>
> On 11/20/21 07:38, Rich wrote:
> > Curiously, I didn't see other people's replies to my message, probably
> > du
At least on my old Netra T1, SILO has never believed in booting vmlinuz,
only vmlinux, and faults similarly if you try.
So if it just recently started faulting that way for you, perhaps any glue
that knew to unpack vmlinuz into vmlinux isn't working?
- Rich
On Sun, Jan 23, 2022 at 1:30 PM
a problem related to kernel shared memory being set too low. Had
the same issue on my SS5. You need to up the limit in /proc/sys/kernel/shmmax
Stick something like this in /etc/sysctl.conf and you should be fine
(worked for me on my SS5 with 104MB RAM).
kernel/shmmax=4000
Hope this helps,
Rich.
It's been a while since I built a kernel on a sparc, have patience
with me please...
While doing make vmlinux for 2.4.9 I get:
make[2]: sparc64-linux-ld: Command not found
Where is this? I don't see it in a quick scan of Contents-sparc.gz.
Thanks,
Rich
PS... Why no netfilter supp
Then something is wrong with the package. I installed egcs64 and it
supplied sparc64-linux-gcc but did not supply sparc64-linux-ld. I
saw an earlier note from Ben C. that talked about using
gcc-3.0-sparc64 instead of egcs64. I uninstalled egcs64 and tried
gcc-3.0 and make vmlinux fails in the same
I'm getting timeouts on my Ultra1 hme with all 2.4.x kernels
through 2.4.13:
kernel: NETDEV WATCHDOG: eth0: transmit timed out
kernel: eth0: transmit timed out, resetting
kernel: eth0: Happy Status 0303 TX[03ff:0101]
Once this starts it never seems to recover and requires reboot.
This
ver
for around 250 machines and the load average never top 0.3.
Rich.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and the LOM is very useful for
the rare occasion I need to power cycle it remotely. I usually leave it
sat at the LOM> prompt and not the console as the terminal server it's
connected to isn't break safe.. the LOM will catch the break instead of it
halting the box.
Hope this helps,
Rich
> I am attempting a floppy installation onto my SparcStation IPX.
> When I boot off of the rescue disk, it gets past the SILO boot
> prompt, lets me hit return (I assume that is what I hit), then
> dies with:
> Read error on block 50
>
> Cannot find /linux (Attem
- Forwarded message from Eric Delaunay -
>> I get the same thing on my IPX, but if I take the same disks and try them
>> in an older Sparc 1 or 1+ they work just fine. Could this be a ROM version
>> thing? I'm sure the ROM versions in the 1/1+ is 1.x_something but the IPX
>> is 2.4. I have
hanks.
Best regards,
Rich Ralph
Just last week I installed via 2 floppy and internet on an Ultra 1
behind a firewall. No problems here. Most of the problems I've had
or seen are with older prom versions on sun4m and sun4c. The sun4u
installs are quite smooth lately on both desktop Ultras and
Enterprise servers.
On Tue, May 02, 2
screens found
X connection to :0.0 broken (explicit kill or server shutdown).
$
Anyone know what's up before I spend time debugging a known problem?
Thanks,
Rich
fb7
crw--w--w-1 root tty 29, 225 Mar 30 22:46 /dev/fb7autodetect
crw--w--w-1 root tty 29, 224 Mar 30 22:46 /dev/fb7current
#
On Tue, 6 Jun 2000, Ben Collins wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 06, 2000 at 02:21:58PM -0400, Rich Sahlender wrote:
> > Just did an "apt-g
1 root tty 29, 224 Mar 30 22:46 /dev/fb7current
#
Thanks,
Rich
On Tue, 6 Jun 2000, Sergio Mendoza wrote:
> Hi,
>
> This problem has a solution and it has already been reported:
>
> http://www.debian.org/Bugs/db/65/65150.html
>
> Sergio
>
>
> --
>
Interesting. I'm not using xdm here but tried the "-dev /dev/fb0"
in .xserverrc and also tried "startx -- -dev /dev/fb0". Neither
seems to make any difference. I'll keep trying things...
On Tue, 6 Jun 2000, Peter Haworth wrote:
> Rich Sahlender wrote:
> &
user to group tty and
added read to the group perms X starts fine for normal user.
What should the perms be for the /dev/fb* devices? Should MAKEDEV
have run for one of the updates and didn't?
Regards,
Rich
On Tue, 6 Jun 2000, Rich Sahlender wrote:
> Just did an "apt-get update;ap
:
/usr/bin/X11/Xsun24
Console
This should permit anyone logged in at the console to run X. Have
I missed something?
Regards,
Rich
On Thu, 8 Jun 2000, Sergio Mendoza wrote:
> -> It turns out there was a little more to this than just a symlink
> -> for /dev/fb to /dev/fb0. In my ca
24 matches
Mail list logo
