On 2022-01-06 23:00, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
On 1/6/22 22:54, Drew Parsons wrote:
I will build the current version manually for now with the testsuite
disabled and
upload the package.
Thanks Adrian. I guess disabling tests permanently for sparc64 is a
reasonable
(if regrettable) wo
> The package is currently blocked on sparc64 because the testsuite kept
> crashing
> the host system and no solution was found yet. It seems that the testsuite
> will
> put a lot of strain on the host system when the machine has many CPU cores
> which
> is true for most sparc64 systems we use.
On 1/6/22 22:54, Drew Parsons wrote:
>> I will build the current version manually for now with the testsuite
>> disabled and
>> upload the package.
>
> Thanks Adrian. I guess disabling tests permanently for sparc64 is a
> reasonable
> (if regrettable) work-around if they continue to cause troubl
On 2022-01-06 22:38, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
Hello!
On 1/5/22 18:02, Drew Parsons wrote:
cython previously built on sparc64 for bullseye (stable) at version
0.29.21-3
Now (for version 0.29.24-2), cython is marked "Not For Us" on sparc64
and is no longer building.
The package is cur
Hello!
On 1/5/22 18:02, Drew Parsons wrote:
> cython previously built on sparc64 for bullseye (stable) at version 0.29.21-3
>
> Now (for version 0.29.24-2), cython is marked "Not For Us" on sparc64
> and is no longer building.
The package is currently blocked on sparc64 because the testsuite kep
Source: cython
Version: 0.29.24-2
Severity: normal
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-sparc@lists.debian.org
cython previously built on sparc64 for bullseye (stable) at version 0.29.21-3
Now (for version 0.29.24-2), cython is marked "Not For Us" on sparc64
and is no longer building.
python3.10 is still buildi
6 matches
Mail list logo