Hi Riccardo,
ok, so where could we "hire" a graphics driver developer that would be willing
(will get paid) to support the SPARC community? At least with a "decent" X
support we can do most of the things. And the more people can use it on SPARC
we may attract more people to return to the
Hi,
Phillip Stevens wrote:
> I can only comment on mach64 on 32 bit Sparc, it was working
fine. The
> desktop was reasonably responsive.
Did you try the mach64 driver that was reintroduced to the Debian
package archive?
Not yet.
How are things with it? I think I use
For what it is worth I have XVR-100 on Ultra 5 which does provide graphics at 640x480 with the default fb… I would love support for XVR-100 (Raedon 7000) to come back and would be willing to add cash to the bounty if that route taken. Attached is my Xorg.0.logroot@xray:/var/log# uname -aLinux xray
>
> >> Did these boards work in the past with the 32-bit sparc ?
> >
> > I can only comment on mach64 on 32 bit Sparc, it was working fine. The
> > desktop was reasonably responsive.
>
> Did you try the mach64 driver that was reintroduced to the Debian package
> archive?
Not yet.
Can you verify
On 8/24/21 3:20 PM, Phillip Stevens wrote:
>> It might also be an idea to contact the original author/maintainer of the
>> PGX-64 and XVR-100 graphics boards and ask whether they're willing to fix
>> the issue.
>>
>> Did these boards work in the past with the 32-bit sparc ?
>
> I can only comment
5 matches
Mail list logo
