Package: cross-gcc-dev
Version: 11
User: helm...@debian.org
Usertags: rebootstrap
A wdotap stage2 cross build from amd64 targeting powerpc with multilib
fails. The tail of the log[1] is:
| : # ppc 64bit build slaps libgcc and libstdc++ to powerpc64-linux-gnu
| mkdir -p
/debian/changelog cross-gcc-13+nmu1/debian/changelog
--- cross-gcc-13/debian/changelog
+++ cross-gcc-13+nmu1/debian/changelog
@@ -1,3 +1,10 @@
+cross-gcc (13+nmu1) UNRELEASED; urgency=medium
+
+ * Non-maintainer upload.
+ * Fix cross-ma-install-location.diff for gcc-5. (Closes: #-1)
+
+ -- Helmut
Package: src:cross-gcc-defaults
Version: 0.4
User: helm...@debian.org
Usertags: rebootstrap
While gcc-4.9-base is essential in unstable and jessie, it is
unavailable in wheezy. Therefore it would be good to mark
cross-gcc-defaults as not being buildable there by Build-Depending on
gcc-4.9-base.
-defaults-0.4+nmu1/debian/changelog2015-01-06
20:15:13.0 +0100
@@ -1,3 +1,10 @@
+cross-gcc-defaults (0.4+nmu1) UNRELEASED; urgency=low
+
+ * Non-maintainer upload.
+ * Add a gcc-ar symlink to the gcc-* packages. (Closes: #-1)
+
+ -- Helmut Grohne hel...@subdivi.de Tue, 06 Jan 2015 20:14
clone 774719 -1
reassign -1 src:gcc-cross-support
retitle -1 dependencies on cross-gcc-defaults must be versioned
thanks
On Wed, Jan 07, 2015 at 06:30:41PM +, Wookey wrote:
But I see that the actual point here (which you didn't make clear
above) is that currently it fails if gcc-4.9-base is
for gcc-5. (Closes: #-1)
+
+ -- Helmut Grohne hel...@subdivi.de Wed, 29 Apr 2015 16:58:16 +0200
+
cross-gcc (17) experimental; urgency=medium
* rules.generic now specifies bash as the SHELL (Closes: #780583)
diff -Nru
cross-gcc-17/patches/gcc-5/0004-reverted-removal
.
+ * Fix gcc-5 patches to apply against 5-20150404. (Closes: #-1)
+
+ -- Helmut Grohne hel...@subdivi.de Tue, 07 Apr 2015 13:11:36 +0200
+
cross-gcc (13) unstable; urgency=medium
* Supporting multiple gcc trees at the same time. Currently 4.9 and 5
diff -Nru
cross-gcc-13/patches/gcc-5/0004-reverted
Package: cross-gcc-dev
Severity: important
User: helm...@debian.org
Usertags: rebootstrap
Please add support for gcc-8. That can have multiple forms, each of
which has its own benefit:
a) Just copy the gcc-7 patches to gcc-8 and hope for the best.
b) Make the patches apply to the gcc-8 source
Package: cross-gcc-dev
Version: 154
Tags: patch
User: helm...@debian.org
Usertags: rebootstrap
Hi Dima and Wookey,
thanks for maintaining cross-gcc-dev. I noticed while the present gcc-8
patches do apply against gcc-8, they end up breaking
g++-multiarch-incdir.diff.
Source: cross-gcc
Version: 163
Tags: patch
User: helm...@debian.org
Usertags: rebootstrap
cilkrts got removed from gcc-8, so cross-ma-install-location.diff needs
to stop patching it.
Helmut
--- 0004-added-multi-arch-specific-install-location-patch.patch
+++
Package: cross-gcc-dev
Version: 149
Severity: serious
The patches no longer apply to gcc-7 nor gcc-8. Most likely this is due
to the Priority change. Please rebase.
Helmut
+
+ * Non-maintainer upload.
+ * Update for FORCE_CROSS_LAYOUT. (Closes: #-1)
+
+ -- Helmut Grohne <hel...@subdivi.de> Tue, 03 Apr 2018 21:34:54 +0200
+
cross-gcc (184) unstable; urgency=medium
* rebuild for 8-20180331-1
---
cross-gcc-184/patches/gcc-7/0005-setting-all-the-various
Package: cross-gcc-dev
Version: 217
Severity: important
User: helm...@debian.org
Usertags: rebootstrap
Please rebase the patch series for gcc-9, which is available in
experimental since today.
Helmut
Control: fixed -1 cross-gcc-dev/230
Hi Dima,
Great to see that you've already taken care. Much appreciated.
On Fri, Mar 29, 2019 at 02:07:11PM -0700, Dima Kogan wrote:
> My key situation should be resolved with the next keyring update, but
> this will take a few weeks probably. If it's useful
Package: cross-gcc-dev
Version: 226
Severity: serious
Tags: patch
The patches for gcc-8 and gcc-9 no longer apply to unstable. Around two
weeks ago that used to work. Apparently, Matthias fixed a typo in
debian/control.m4 and that happens to break the hunk context of one
patch. The following sed
Package: cross-gcc-dev
Version: 230
Tags: patch bullseye sid
Control: fixed 925950 230
When trying to apply the patched gcc-9 patches during a gcc-9 build, one
gets a patch application failure during cross-ma-install-location.diff.
It turns out that libmpx got removed in gcc-9, so it needs to be
Package: cross-gcc-dev
Version: 226
Severity: important
Tags: patch
User: helm...@debian.org
Usertags: rebootstrap
This bug is the second half of #925950. The bug was fixed for gcc-8, but
not for gcc-9. Filing a new one at non-rc severity now. The fix is:
sed -i -e 's/\(`TARGET\))/\1/'
Source: cross-gcc
Version: 231
Severity: serious
Tags: patch
Control: block -1 by 928035
On top of #928035, there is another change in gcc-9 that makes the gcc-9
patches no longer apply. The attached patch resolves the relevant hunk.
Please consider uploading a new version that works with the
Package: file
Version: 1:5.37-3
Severity: serious
Control: affects -1 + src:unbound
file no longer works under fakeroot. For example:
$ fakeroot file /bin/true
Bad system call
$ echo $?
159
$
This is relevant when packages that still require root for building use
fakeroot and then call file.
Hi,
around September 13th, support for cross building packages for mipsen
(i.e. crossbuild-essential-*) was removed from unstable without any
coordination with debian-cr...@lists.debian.org. Since then, I inquired
multiple times on the state of these cross toolchains without any useful
replies.
Hi Matthias,
On Mon, Oct 28, 2019 at 09:28:14PM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote:
> If you think, there is coordination needed, then you were probably not aware
> of dropping mips as a release architecture and not adding it as a port.
I'm sorry, my previous mail contained a very misleading typo.
Package: cross-gcc-dev
Severity: important
User: helm...@debian.org
Usertags: rebootstrap
Please add an initial patch stack for gcc-10 from experimental. If it
doesn't work, I'll send patches to make it work. Just make it available
soon please. If you also check that the patches apply, that could
Package: cross-gcc-dev
Version: 242
Severity: important
Tags: patch
User: helm...@debian.org
Usertags: rebootstrap
Hi Dima,
cross-ma-install-location.diff no longer applies during gcc-10. I'm
attaching an updated version that applies cleanly to gcc-10. I'm not
entirely sure that it is fully
-maintainer upload.
+ * Bootstrap with fewer stages. (Closes: #-1)
+
+ -- Helmut Grohne Wed, 15 Apr 2020 11:35:18 +0200
+
cross-toolchain-base (45) unstable; urgency=medium
* Build using glibc 2.30-2.
diff --minimal -Nru cross-toolchain-base-45/debian/rules
cross-toolchain-base-45+nmu1/debian
Package: cross-gcc-dev
User: helm...@debian.org
Usertags: rebootstrap
Initial please add support for gcc-11. As usual, I don't expect it to
work. Just make it apply (on the outer level), I'll send fixes for
further issues.
Helmut
Package: cross-gcc-dev
Hi,
gcc-13 has entered experimental. Please copy over the gcc-12 patches for
gcc-13. It would be nice if you could rebase them to be applicable, but
as usual, I don't expect them to work in any way and will file patches.
Helmut
/changelog 2023-01-26 08:32:03.0 +0100
+++ cross-gcc-247+nmu1/debian/changelog 2023-01-28 20:11:48.0 +0100
@@ -1,3 +1,10 @@
+cross-gcc (247+nmu1) UNRELEASED; urgency=medium
+
+ * Non-maintainer upload.
+ * Update hunk context for gcc-13 patches. (Closes: #-1)
+
+ -- Helmut Grohne
27 matches
Mail list logo
