On Fri, 7 Jun 1996, Dale Scheetz wrote:
On Fri, 7 Jun 1996, Steve Preston wrote:
Ok! We are narrowing the field.
The above command locks up the terminal big time, but...
stty cs7 cstopb
fixes it!
Now the question is: How do I get login to leave the stop bits alone?
I can put
Where are the debian news groups? Have they completely shut down
or do we need to resubscribe (again)?
--
/--\
| James D. Freels, P.E._i, Ph.D. | Phone: (423)576-8645 | | L |
| Oak Ridge National Laboratory | FAX:
I remember seeing in the kernel mailing list that pre2.0.13 breaks
incoming telnets. Are you by chance using this kernel?
Gerry
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Fri, 7 Jun 1996, Brian Sulcer wrote:
I recently upgraded one of our machine's base packages and other packages
to the latest 1.1 versions.
I'm doing my first install of Debian Linux using the 1.1-Beta. I have
the initial system installed and now I'm trying to install the
packages that I want. When I tried I got many errors that say it
needs libc.so.4. Where is it?
I'm obviously a newbie to Debian and appreciate any help some
Richard Lovison writes (sysklogd upgrade):
I recently upgraded from syslogd 1.3-2 to sysklogd 1.3-6 manually using
dpkg. When I started dselect I was informed that syslogd and sysklogd were
in conflict, the configuration files for syslogd were still on the system.
I proceeded to purge syslogd
On Thu, 6 Jun 1996, Ian Jackson wrote:
Paul Schoenly writes (gzip and dpkg problem):
...
$ dpkg --install package_x.deb
...
gzip:stdout: Broken pipe
dpkg-deb: subprocess gzip -dc returned error exit status 1
dpkg: error processing package_x.deb (--install)
subprocess
Dear Debian-Linux colleagues:
A few days ago, I had mentioned in this newsgroup a problem I was
having with using my commercial license of NAG Fortran on the new
Debian 1.1 upgrade. I wish to report here the fix to the problem.
As one might expect, the problem is due to Debian 1.1 being an
Now the question is: How do I get login to leave the stop bits alone?
/etc/gettydefs is used for this, but debian has no support for it.. hmm..
guess thats a login problem.
Greetings
Bernd
--
(OO) -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] --
( .. ) [EMAIL PROTECTED],ka.sub.org}
I think it would be sufficient for people to list their qualifications
and let the customer decide.
The Better Business Bureau approach of keeping a file of complaints might
also be useful.
On Mon, 10 Jun 1996, Ian Jackson wrote:
It should be a simple fix to getty_ps; if anyone packages it for
Debian this will be an easy thing to do at the same time.
Yep, it looks REAL simple. It there isn't a current maintainer, I'll
package it up.
L.Lucius
__ Y_ a_ m_ b_ o_ | The leanest,
I tried to send this to debian-bugs, but it hasn't been delivered for
2 days, so I'm posting it here as well.
Carlos
--- start of forwarded message (RFC 934 encapsulation) ---
From: Mail Delivery Subsystem [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Returned mail: Cannot send message for 2 days
Date: Sun,
Hmmm, I keep getting
inetd[3543]: getpwnam: nobody: No such user
messages on my xconsole. The 'nobody' user is defined in /etc/passwd,
so what's going on? As far as I know, I'm running the latest
development (unstable) release of Debian (1.1).
It's not fatal, just annoying. Mostly I'm curious
On Thu, 6 Jun 1996, Fundamental wrote:
The only thing that could be the problem (?) is that i have a softlink
from my mailbox in /var/spool to my home directory (because my / is
full)
You probably should have partitioned the disk so that /var and/or
/var/spool were separate partitions. Too
Miquel van Smoorenburg writes (Re: gzip and dpkg problem):
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Ian Jackson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This means that SIGPIPE was set to SIG_IGN when dpkg started. For
reasons too complicated to explain here this means that dpkg can't do
proper error trapping (it
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes (Re: gzip and dpkg problem):
On Thu, 6 Jun 1996, Ian Jackson wrote:
Please do tell us what the problem is if you find out. Telling us
which ways of logging in cause the problem and which don't will help
us a lot :-).
Well, I just checked and even the latest(?)
I haven't heard anything from the list in a while, just checking to see if
I'm still subscribed!
Thanks
Richard G. Roberto
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
201-739-2886 - whippany, nj
--
***
Bear Stearns is not responsible for any
I remember seeing in the kernel mailing list that pre2.0.13 breaks
incoming telnets. Are you by chance using this kernel?
Gerry
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
It turns out that the problem was with the version of login I had installed.
The maintainer pointed me to the newest version and that fixed the
Before installing Debian Linux, I was able to log in
as root over telnet. Now it is refused. I am simply
using a Windows system as a Linux console over
ethernet. How do I fix this?
Paul Wsde
As Linux 2.0 already released, I think it should be included
in the debain 1.1 official release.
Hi again,
I just noticed I didn't metion that I am running debian 1.1 (beta) and
dpkg -s dpkg gives:
Package: dpkg
Essential: yes
Status: install ok installed
Priority: required
Section: base
Maintainer: Ian Jackson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Version: 1.2.3elf
Replaces: dpkgname
Pre-Depends: libc5 (=
Hi,
I have just had something strange happening to me. I tried to update some
packages using dselect with the NFS option. When going into the install option
I would get an error from find about not being able to find the directory. The
strange thing though is that the directory was correct and the
It would appear that the boot disks for debian 1.1 beta don't have
generic ncr-810 SCSI support - the .93 disks did. Are there
alternative boot disks available with this support? I perused the
installation document and saw no mention of it.
Thanks,
Dale
On Mon, 10 Jun 1996, Larry Loos wrote:
I'm doing my first install of Debian Linux using the 1.1-Beta. I have
the initial system installed and now I'm trying to install the
packages that I want. When I tried I got many errors that say it
needs libc.so.4. Where is it?
This is in the libc4
Hi,
Is Linux 2.0 going to be included in Debian 1.1 once it's
release?
Thanks.
--
Arthur D. Jerijian | Who on earth can blame them? Ah, no wonder the
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | men of Troy and Argives under arms have suffered
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | years of agony all for her, for
In your email to me, Paul Wade, you wrote:
Before installing Debian Linux, I was able to log in
as root over telnet. Now it is refused. I am simply
using a Windows system as a Linux console over
ethernet. How do I fix this?
Fix it? It's not really broken. The 'normal' security rules say
no
Hi,
I want to upgrade my debian 1.0 to 1.1.
I have installed the new dpkg (1.2.3 elf)
then followed the steps in dselect.
then dselect failed in the Install step with the following error:
Running dpkg -iGROEB /u2/debian/binary
find: /u2/debian/binary/admin/tob-0.14-1.deb: No such file or
In your email to me, Larry Loos, you wrote:
I'm doing my first install of Debian Linux using the 1.1-Beta. I have
the initial system installed and now I'm trying to install the
packages that I want. When I tried I got many errors that say it
needs libc.so.4. Where is it?
I'm obviously
Juhani Luhtanen writes (Howto upgrade 0.93 -- 1.1):
Is there anywhere a simple step-by-step guide on how to go and upgrade
one's debian?
1. Install the latest a.out dpkg from the `upgrades' directory, for
example `dpkg --install dpkg-1.2.3.deb'.
2. Run dselect and go through
A list reader kindly replied:
in unstable/devel/libc4-4.6.27-15.deb . Are you sure you're installing
packages from the correct tree (_un_stable)? Packages that depend on libc4
are
in the a.out binary format, which is being replaced by ELF.
I received several private messages from readers
On Mon, 10 Jun 1996, Larry Loos wrote:
I'm doing my first install of Debian Linux using the 1.1-Beta. I have
the initial system installed and now I'm trying to install the
packages that I want. When I tried I got many errors that say it
needs libc.so.4. Where is it?
Hmm... Many packages
On Sun, 9 Jun 1996, Paul Wade wrote:
Before installing Debian Linux, I was able to log in
as root over telnet. Now it is refused. I am simply
using a Windows system as a Linux console over
ethernet. How do I fix this?
man securetty
I can point setserial at a particular port, but can't seem to tell it to
set the stop bits to two.
I can tell stty to set the stop bits, but can only seem to use it while on
the tty in question. Is there any way to point stty at the port I want
changed?
TIA,
Dwarf
I just upgraded my 0.93 laptop to 1.1, and now traceroute
doesn't work... traceroute to anyplace returns
traceroute: IP_HDRINCL:Protocol not available
any ideas anyone?
Larry Loos [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I'm doing my first install of Debian Linux using the 1.1-Beta. I have
the initial system installed and now I'm trying to install the
packages that I want. When I tried I got many errors that say it
needs libc.so.4. Where is it?
Where did you get the
Would the release of debian 1.1 use the new stable Linux (v2.0)?
--Derek Lee
Dale Martin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
] It would appear that the boot disks for debian 1.1 beta don't have
] generic ncr-810 SCSI support - the .93 disks did. Are there
] alternative boot disks available with this support? I perused the
] installation document and saw no mention of it.
I ran
Rob Browning wrote:
I'm not sure if it'll be packaged in time for the initial 1.1 release,
but it'll certainly be available shortly thereafter.
Anyway, using the new kernel-package package, it's pretty trivial to
do it yourself.
I am afraid I am not familiar with the kernel-package
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Would the release of debian 1.1 use the new stable Linux (v2.0)?
I'm not sure if it'll be packaged in time for the initial 1.1 release,
but it'll certainly be available shortly thereafter.
Anyway, using the new kernel-package package, it's pretty trivial to
do it
binnxr9gL1hks.bin
Description: application/pgp-message
First, thanks to all who assisted me with the Tulip+2940 kernel-- as it
turns out, debian 1.1 ships with the tulip driver as a dynamically loadable
module... so, merely adding 'tulip' to /etc/modules fixes the lacking driver
problem!!! [though, tulip didn't work for me-- i had to use the
Work-Needing and Prospective Packages for Debian Linux
Sven Rudolph, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
$Id: packages.sgml,v 1.18 1996/06/11 19:54:00 sr1 Exp sr1 $
__
Table of Contents:
1.General Questions
1.1. What is Debian
I have compiled the 2.0.0 kernel (successfully), but lost my routing
info in the process (coming from 1.3.95). route only shows the
machine itself.
If i manually add the missing router gateway, it works fine, but i
lose this on reboot.
help! :)
rick
Dale Scheetz [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I can point setserial at a particular port, but can't seem to tell it to
set the stop bits to two.
I can tell stty to set the stop bits, but can only seem to use it while on
the tty in question. Is there any way to point stty at the port I want
changed?
Derek Lee [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I am afraid I am not familiar with the kernel-package package.
Is this a package to build any kernel version and install it in
a debian way?
Bingo. I'm using it as we speak. I'm not sure if it has made it to
the unstable tree on all the mirrors yet, but
On Tue, 11 Jun 1996, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Would the release of debian 1.1 use the new stable Linux (v2.0)?
Yes, Debian 1.1 will ship with a 2.0 kernel.
(In fact, the latest available kernel will generally be made available
as the kernel-image-2.0.xx-0.deb).
Austin
On Tue, 11 Jun 1996, Chris Nielsen wrote:
I just downloaded what I think is Debian Linux v.93R6 And I need help
installing
it. I have three files called 1440_base_floppy_[1|2|3], as well as what
appear to be
root and boot files on my d:. I have created a seperate partition on my C:
I see everyone wants to know. Yes, I will include the Linux 2.0 kernel in the
latest boot disk set, which will be uploaded this evening. I also have a
kernel-image package, although I am not the official kernel maintainer.
Thanks
Bruce
Rick Hawkins [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I have compiled the 2.0.0 kernel (successfully), but lost my routing
info in the process (coming from 1.3.95). route only shows the
machine itself.
If i manually add the missing router gateway, it works fine, but i
lose this on reboot.
I don't
Kernel-package seems to be in the project/experimental directory of the
archive. I don't know why...
Bruce
Hi Debian Linux users:
I am a Linux novice and I have a Slackware Linux distribution installed
on my Toshiba 105CS Satellite, which works fine. I am planning to install
DEBIAN Linux on to my Laptop. Unfortunately I have no CD-ROM drive avail-
able with this Laptop which make this attempt
traceroute: IP_HDRINCL:Protocol not available
Probably you're still running the 1.2.13 kernel, but the new
traceroute uses some features only in 1.3... at least that's why I see
that message.
I just downloaded what I think is Debian Linux v.93R6 And I need help
installing
it. I have three files called 1440_base_floppy_[1|2|3], as well as what
appear to be
root and boot files on my d:. I have created a seperate partition on my C: for
MS-DOS,
and left an un-partitioned area of
52 matches
Mail list logo
