Re: SOLVED: help! - how to get postgres 7.3 back

On Sunday 11 January 2004 09:27, Paul Morgan wrote: > On Sun, 11 Jan 2004 00:14:45 +, Richard Lyons wrote: > > On Saturday 10 January 2004 01:08, Oliver Elphick wrote: > > > > [...snipped: details of stupidly upgrading postgres > > without first doing pg_dumpall, causing need to > > dow

Re: Woody/stable: kernel-source-* kernel-headers-* ?!? Confused.

On Sat, Jan 10, 2004 at 09:16:23PM -0700, s. keeling said > Could someone please 'splain to me what goes with what here? I've > updated to 3.0r2. The plan so far is: > > (i) Install kernel-image-2.4.18-686 > (ii) Go for updated kernel sources and re-build. > > I see there's kernel-source-2

cancel <1cNcA-3Zg-3@gated-at.bofh.it>

This message was cancelled from within Mozilla. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: dma timeout

additional information. (sorry for my verbose mail) (please tell me if you feel this mail focus on off-topic subject. and, if possible, appropriate place, too) I've took another approch to get by. my plan is ... 1. installing another OSes, such as FreeBSD 4.9 and Windows98, 2. make sure where DMA

Re: apt-check-sigs problem (plz cc adambarton@mac.com)

Adam Barton wrote: [SNIP] If I manually verify ftp://ftp.debian.org/debian/dists/stable/Release & Release.gpg I get the following: blueboy:~# gpg --verify ./Release.gpg ./Release gpg: Signature made Thu Nov 20 19:57:33 2003 CET using DSA key ID 38C6029A gpg: Good signature from "Debian Archive

Re: Kernel issues

On Sun, Jan 11, 2004 at 12:25:56PM +, Matthew Bates wrote: > I currently have an install of Woody 3.0r1 with the "2.4.18-bf2.4 #1 Son Apr > 14 09:53:28 CEST 2002 i686 GNU/Linux" kernel. > > I have been following the Debian security announcements and I am aware of > the kernel security vulnerab

Kernel issues

I currently have an install of Woody 3.0r1 with the "2.4.18-bf2.4 #1 Son Apr 14 09:53:28 CEST 2002 i686 GNU/Linux" kernel. I have been following the Debian security announcements and I am aware of the kernel security vulnerabilities. I would therefore like to upgrade as soon as possible, really.

2.6 and /dev/dsp

hi i compiled 2.6.1 on my testing system from the sources from kernel.org. seems to work so far (alsa sound module is loaded fine) but there are (not unexpectedly) some issues with devices. i compiled devfs support into the kernel and started devfsd (like in 2.4.x). result: no /dev/dsp. next t

Re: OT: ISO and Image files-semantics problem

On Sat, Jan 10, 2004 at 08:01:41AM -0600, Hugo Vanwoerkom wrote: > Nano Nano wrote: > > On Sat, Jan 10, 2004 at 09:46:47AM -0500, alex wrote: > > [snip] > > > > A downloaded ISO is an image. > > The installation CD is not an image > > ?? > debian-30r1-i386-binary-1.iso > debian-30r1-i386-binary-2

Re: building ati radeon driver on linux2.6 - version.h not found

On Sun, Jan 11, 2004 at 09:36:28AM +, Alan Chandler wrote: > On Sunday 11 January 2004 07:08, hanasaki wrote: > > Hello all, > > > > Trying to get the ATI radeon driver build for an ATI 9000 board. > > Debian Sarge with kernel 2.6.x > > I am interested in the replies to this, because I hav

CUPS messed up in sid?

Last night I tried printing and got some tilted text on the page (rotated about +3 deg, + angle meaning tilting the top border to the left). I then checked cups from localhost:631, everything seemed fine. Well, restarted the computer, after checking as much as I could and having not much else to do

Re: 3COM Gig ethernet driver compile woes (source from 3COM/ASUS)

Ramasubramanian Ramesh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I got the source for 3COM gig ethernet card from Asus website and I > am having compile issue. I have compiled it without real problems on Debian woody... I know, this will not help you much, but maybe it's good to know that it *can* work...

Re: Missing package on mirror

On Sat, Jan 10, 2004 at 12:38:23PM +, Colin Watson wrote: > On Fri, Jan 09, 2004 at 10:45:53AM -0700, Monique Y. Herman wrote: > > On 2004-01-09, Russell Shaw penned: > > > Hi, That bug is quite old, and seems to be not precisely the thing i'm > > > seeing. I found that the package catalog: > >

Re: Remove E-mail Headers

Joer, how can I remove the "Message-Id" generated by Evolution? Do you know how to remove it? Onestly, I have checked the Evolution-Hacker mailing list. The Evolution hackers made available 3 patches to do remove or mangle the headers, but the problem is: 1) you have to download source via CVS. 2

Re: Remove E-mail Headers

Hubert, thanks, this could be an idea... I go to verify... ..until now, what I see looking at the e-mails message headers I sent to debian mailing list, is that the headers: "X-Evolution-Source: imap://[EMAIL PROTECTED]" is stil present. Do not care about "X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.5", b

Re: localhost -> /etc/hosts?

On 2004-01-11 14:57:07 +1100, Russell Shaw wrote: > In /etc/hosts: > 127.0.0.1 localhost > 192.168.0.1 mypc According to what has been said somewhere else, this is incorrect. You need a FQDN here. -- Vincent Lefèvre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - Web:

Re: Remove E-mail Headers

Am So, den 11.01.2004 schrieb Wayne Topa um 00:56: > Joerg Rossdeutscher([EMAIL PROTECTED]) is reported to have said: > > Am Sa, den 10.01.2004 schrieb Wayne Topa um 19:52: > > > If you remove the Message-Id: you might run into some problems. I > > > have found that a lot of spam 'does not' inclu

Re: SOLVED: help! - how to get postgres 7.3 back

On Sun, 11 Jan 2004 00:14:45 +, Richard Lyons wrote: > On Saturday 10 January 2004 01:08, Oliver Elphick wrote: > > [...snipped: details of stupidly upgrading postgres > without first doing pg_dumpall, causing need to > downgrade from 7.4 to 7.3 temporarily...] > [snip] > > The

Re: building ati radeon driver on linux2.6 - version.h not found

On Sunday 11 January 2004 07:08, hanasaki wrote: > Hello all, > > Trying to get the ATI radeon driver build for an ATI 9000 board. > Debian Sarge with kernel 2.6.x I am interested in the replies to this, because I have just ordered an ATI9200 board to replace an aging nvidia based card beca

Re: ALSA and Kernel 2.6

On Sun, Jan 11, 2004 at 09:23:19AM +, Alan Chandler wrote: > > IN 2.6, these alsa modules where incorporated into the kernel - so there is > not need for the separate alsa-modules-2.xxx packages anymore. Will disabling alsa in the kernel and building from alsa-source work? I know I need to d

Re: ALSA and Kernel 2.6

On Sunday 11 January 2004 02:38, uGAH man! wrote: > Hi... I have interest in using the linux kernel 2.6 but i'm afraid i > won't be able to use ALSA since it has a module in the kernel and the > ALSA kernel modules package is only available for kernels up to 2.4.22 ... > What should i do? C

Re: localhost -> /etc/hosts?

>> Ok. Strange my install didn't have it. Creating it was enough to satisfy SM. > > I think etherconf handles it via debconf. apt-get install etherconf. I'm running in a User Mode Linux Virtual Private Server (UMLVPS?) instance at linode.com so it probably wasn't there for a reason. I think I'll s

Re: 2.6 and devfsd

On Sunday 11 January 2004 06:39, Nitebirdz wrote: > > Yes, devfs is considered to be deprecated in the 2.6 kernel and it has been > replaced with sysfs and udev. I guess ultimately what is important is the "debian" support for these. I see there is a sysfsutils package, but little else at the m

OpenLDAP needs X?!

Why does OpenLDAP need X? How do I get around this? Mike # apt-cache show slapd Package: slapd Priority: extra Section: net Installed-Size: 1768 Maintainer: Wichert Akkerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Architecture: i386 Source: openldap2 Version: 2.0.23-6.3 Provides: ldap-server Depends: libc6 (>= 2.2.4

unsubscribe

[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- ## # "Remember,no question is too stupid and no problem # # too small--We've all been beginners" # # # ##

gkrellm and SMP

hello, I'm running gkrellm on a SMP box (dual Celeron, Abit BP6) and it uses 60-70% of one CPU. Otherwise on a single-CPU box it only uses ~3%? Is gkrellm not SMP save? I'm using unstable Peter PS: sorry for my earlier german post -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a su

Re: Ifup/ifdown

Matt Perry wrote: On Sun, 11 Jan 2004, Russell Shaw wrote: The problem is that when i put http://127.0.0.1/ or http://192.168.0.1/ into mozilla, it goes thru the dialup isp instead of going direct to my own system. It seems more like a mozilla problem. In mozilla: Edit|Preferences...|Advanced|Prox

Test

-- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re:Connecting ADSL

I tried all this with much frustration. Best to forget all the "kuntzn". If the ethernet is set up and you can ping the modem and the "network", a provider file like this worked for me, suggested by list members: # These are the options to dial out to your default service provider. # Please cust

Re: Ifup/ifdown

On Sun, 11 Jan 2004, Russell Shaw wrote: > The problem is that when i put http://127.0.0.1/ or http://192.168.0.1/ > into mozilla, it goes thru the dialup isp instead of going > direct to my own system. > > It seems more like a mozilla problem. > In mozilla: Edit|Preferences...|Advanced|Proxies,

Re: Saving multiple workspaces in gnome sid

Antonio Rodriguez wrote: I've been trying to figure out how to save the settings with multiple workspaces, but without success. How do you do that? A little more information would be great, but I think to know that your pronlem is related to metacity, which you are probably not using. try righ

Re: Ifup/ifdown

Michael D Schleif wrote: Russell Shaw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004:01:11:14:37:42+1100] scribed: netstat -rn gives: Kernel IP routing table Destination Gateway Genmask Flags MSS Window irtt Iface 192.168.0.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 U40 0 0 e

<    1   2