On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 08:46:07AM +0100, godo wrote:
On 01/30/2011 10:16 PM, Nick Lidakis wrote:
I have been buying music from a website called HDtracks.com recently using my
Debian Sid desktop. They're wensite requires your run a download manager that
is a Java application for all music
On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 9:31 PM, tv.deb...@googlemail.com
tv.deb...@googlemail.com wrote:
Regarding sfdisk -d, if you ran this command with a filesystem already
on the source drive you'll run into problems due to the filesystem
boundaries being misplaced.
Thanks for the reply but I did not
Hello all,
I've got udev and automount working very nicely, EXCEPT,
regular users can't umount the mounted device.
the strangest thing is that I'm sure I had it working at some point
such that regular users COULD umount.
The fstab has the user keyword in it.
Strangely passing user in the
Joe Riel wrote:
Why are there no alternatives, configurable with update-alternatives,
for gcc? Seems like I should be able to configure whether /usr/bin/gcc
is linked to gcc-4.3, gcc-4.4, etc. Of course I can just set the link
manually (which I do), but ...
every normal automake or cmake
On Tue, Feb 01, 2011 at 01:16:30PM -0800, Steven Rosenberg wrote:
On 01/31/2011 11:30 PM, Remco Rijnders wrote:
Hi,
Yesterday I upgraded my Samsung netbook running Squeeze. I got all
updates released for installed packages since last thursday. After this
upgrade, my desktop in X looks very
On 02/01/2011 09:56 PM, Remco Rijnders wrote:
On Tue, Feb 01, 2011 at 01:16:30PM -0800, Steven Rosenberg wrote:
On 01/31/2011 11:30 PM, Remco Rijnders wrote:
Hi,
Yesterday I upgraded my Samsung netbook running Squeeze. I got all
updates released for installed packages since last thursday.
On 02/02/11 04:28, bri...@aracnet.com wrote:
Hello all,
I've got udev and automount working very nicely, EXCEPT,
regular users can't umount the mounted device.
the strangest thing is that I'm sure I had it working at some point
such that regular users COULD umount.
The fstab has the user
On Tue, 01 Feb 2011 21:01:13 -0500
Andrew Reid rei...@bellatlantic.net wrote:
On Tuesday 01 February 2011 20:11:31 Joe Riel wrote:
Why are there no alternatives, configurable with
update-alternatives, for gcc? Seems like I should be able to
configure whether /usr/bin/gcc is linked to
On Wed, 02 Feb 2011 06:31:30 +0100
deloptes delop...@yahoo.com wrote:
Joe Riel wrote:
Why are there no alternatives, configurable with
update-alternatives, for gcc? Seems like I should be able to
configure whether /usr/bin/gcc is linked to gcc-4.3, gcc-4.4,
etc. Of course I can just
2011-02-01 21:40, Sven Joachim skrev:
On 2011-02-01 22:26 +0100, Csanyi Pal wrote:
and after I run 'sudo aptitude update' I still can't find etoile with
'aptitude search etoile'. Why?
Because aptitude only deals with binary packages, and the etoile source
package builds a binary package
also sprach lrhorer lrho...@satx.rr.com [2011.02.01.2123 +0100]:
far too quickly to be seen, but then an error pops up concerning
an address space collision of some PCI device. Then it shows three
errors for RAID devices md1. md2, and md3, saying they are already
in use.
This looks like a
101 - 111 of 111 matches
Mail list logo
