On Wed, 11 May 2011 23:24:30 -0500, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote:
On 2011-05-11 17:35:20 Freeman wrote:
On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 08:30:49PM +, Camaleón wrote:
(...)
IMHO, that rule lacks the following preface: Should a user states
his/ her desire to keep a private conversation...
+1
On Thursday 12 May 2011 10:20:44 Stan Hoeppner wrote:
~$20k can buy you a 2 socket 24 core AMD Magny Cours HP server with 32GB
RAM, quad GbE ports, a 10 GbE PCIe x4/x8 NIC, LSI's top of the line PCIe
x8 RAID HBA with 1GB BBWC and 2 SFF8088 SAS ports, two LSI 24 drive 2.5
chainable SAS
On Thu, 12 May 2011 00:07:36 +, Juan R. de Silva wrote:
Installed. So far no problems. :-)
Good.
And BTW, why good old gnomebaker is not in squeeze repositories? Where
could I find it and would it work in squeeze?
Gnomebaker has been deprecated upstream in favour of Brasero, AFAICT.
Am 12.05.2011 11:53, schrieb Stan Hoeppner:
On 5/12/2011 4:34 AM, Markus Neviadomski wrote:
You are right...but, read my first post. I wrote about 4-6 cores. This
is a typical sandy bridge system with core i7. No real server hardware,
but fast enough for the OP, when his Sempron is working
Hello,
I added an SSD in my system and moved the root filesystem to the SSD (which
includes now also most of /home in my system). I spin down the regular hard
disks and the system is a lot more quiet than before :-)
Sometimes though something is accessing data on the disk drives, which I do
On Thu, 12 May 2011 02:28:27 +, Juan R. de Silva wrote:
If you install Clamav after HAL was installed, a file /var/run/clamav/
freshclam.pid is created with root:haldaemon group:owner permissions and
the following error is generated after installation: ERROR: Can't save
PID to file
In pan.2011.05.12.09.59...@gmail.com, Camaleón wrote:
On Wed, 11 May 2011 23:24:30 -0500, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote:
On 2011-05-11 17:35:20 Freeman wrote:
On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 08:30:49PM +, Camaleón wrote:
IMHO, that rule lacks the following preface: Should a user states
his/ her
Hi,
I made a fresh install of debian squeeze just after its release and
dutifully installed the updates suggested by the package manager
whenever necessary.
1) This morning, I did the same (what the package manager calls a safe
update, no packages where removed or installed) but in between
On Wed, 11 May 2011 20:11:47 -0400, PMA wrote:
Camaleón wrote:
On Wed, 11 May 2011 11:55:48 -0700, Jeroen van Aart wrote:
Lisi wrote:
Do not quote messages that were sent to you by other people in
private mail, unless agreed beforehand.
IMHO, that rule lacks the following preface: Should
In pan.2011.05.12.10.29...@gmail.com, Camaleón wrote:
On Wed, 11 May 2011 20:11:47 -0400, PMA wrote:
Camaleón wrote:
On Wed, 11 May 2011 11:55:48 -0700, Jeroen van Aart wrote:
Lisi wrote:
Do not quote messages that were sent to you by other people in
private mail, unless agreed beforehand.
I made a fresh install of debian squeeze just after its release and
dutifully installed the updates suggested by the package manager
whenever necessary.
What's the content of your sources.list?
2) The only thing that worked was switching between x (ctrl+alt+f7) and
the terminal
On 12.5.2011 13:19, Rainer Dorsch wrote:
Hello,
I added an SSD in my system and moved the root filesystem to the SSD (which
includes now also most of /home in my system). I spin down the regular hard
disks and the system is a lot more quiet than before :-)
Sometimes though something is
Am 11.05.2011 03:22, schrieb Stan Hoeppner:
On 5/10/2011 8:27 AM, Markus Neviadomski wrote:
This is my mdadm.conf, using a UUID since a long time.
saturn:/home/domski# cat /etc/mdadm/mdadm.conf
DEVICE partitions
ARRAY /dev/md0 level=raid5 num-devices=3 spares=1
On Thu, 12 May 2011 05:21:49 -0500, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote:
In pan.2011.05.12.09.59...@gmail.com, Camaleón wrote:
It's nearly impossible to infer whether the sender meant the message
to be private or not.
No, it is not.
I am writing to a public mailing list and I expect that any reply
On 2011-05-12 12:53 +0200, Jochen Schulz wrote:
udevd[58]: error: runtime directory '/run/udev' not writable, for
now falling back to '/dev/.udev'
That looks like you are actually running testing or unstable.
FWIW, the error message has not been present in udev versions before
168, and that
On Thu, 12 May 2011 05:49:53 -0500, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote:
In pan.2011.05.12.10.29...@gmail.com, Camaleón wrote:
On Wed, 11 May 2011 20:11:47 -0400, PMA wrote:
Camaleón wrote:
On Wed, 11 May 2011 11:55:48 -0700, Jeroen van Aart wrote:
Lisi wrote:
Do not quote messages that were sent
On 05/12/2011 12:19 PM, Rainer Dorsch wrote:
Hello,
I added an SSD in my system and moved the root filesystem to the SSD (which
includes now also most of /home in my system). I spin down the regular hard
disks and the system is a lot more quiet than before :-)
Sometimes though something is
Eccles, David wrote:
From: Simon Hoerder [mailto:si...@hoerder.net]
1) This morning, I did the same (what the package manager calls a safe
update, no packages where removed or installed) but in between the
update crashed the system.
...
udevd[58]: error: runtime directory '/run/udev' not
On Wed, 11 May 2011 15:30:22 -0700, Peter Bonucci wrote:
On Wednesday, May 11, 2011 12:04:48 pm Camaleón wrote:
Okay, I've carefully read all of your tests, so let's recap:
- SGD (1.98x) cannot detect the USB drive (¿?)
- SGD (0.99x) can detect the USB drive
- GRUB is installed into
Somewhere I read that this should be done by modifying
the /etc/apt/sources.list file. I tried changing this to:
deb http://debian.uchicago.edu/debian/ lenny main
deb http://debian.uchicago.edu/debian/ lenny non-free
but I'm still only seeing the stuff in main.
The thing I'm
Rainer Dorsch wrote:
Is there a way to trace all accesses to a directory tree (e.g. /mnt/disk) ?
Is there another way to find out which data are accessed and if possible by
which process?
for files that are kept open by particular processes, you might play
with fuser and lsof (see man
On 05/12/2011 01:25 PM, Charles Blair wrote:
Somewhere I read that this should be done by modifying
the /etc/apt/sources.list file. I tried changing this to:
deb http://debian.uchicago.edu/debian/ lenny main
deb http://debian.uchicago.edu/debian/ lenny non-free
deb
Hi Charles,
On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 06:25:53AM -0500, Charles Blair wrote:
Somewhere I read that this should be done by modifying
the /etc/apt/sources.list file. I tried changing this to:
deb http://debian.uchicago.edu/debian/ lenny main
deb http://debian.uchicago.edu/debian/ lenny
On 5/12/11, Charles Blair c-bl...@illinois.edu wrote:
Somewhere I read that this should be done by modifying
the /etc/apt/sources.list file. I tried changing this to:
deb http://debian.uchicago.edu/debian/ lenny main
deb http://debian.uchicago.edu/debian/ lenny non-free
but I'm still
Sorry, meant to send it to the list, not just to Jochen.
Jochen Schulz wrote:
I made a fresh install of debian squeeze just after its release and
dutifully installed the updates suggested by the package manager
whenever necessary.
What's the content of your sources.list?
deb
Camaleón said:
It's nearly impossible to infer whether the sender meant the message to
be private or not.
No, it is not.
I am writing to a public mailing list and I expect that any reply to any
of what I wrote on it is kept the same -public- and directed to the
mailing list.
So as I am not
On 12 May 2011 21:25, Charles Blair c-bl...@illinois.edu wrote:
Somewhere I read that this should be done by modifying
the /etc/apt/sources.list file. I tried changing this to:
deb http://debian.uchicago.edu/debian/ lenny main
deb http://debian.uchicago.edu/debian/ lenny non-free
From: Simon Hoerder [mailto:si...@hoerder.net]
1) This morning, I did the same (what the package manager calls a safe
update, no packages where removed or installed) but in between the
update crashed the system.
...
udevd[58]: error: runtime directory '/run/udev' not writable, for now
Simon Hoerder:
deb http://ftp.de.debian.org/debian sid main contrib
That line points to unstable, aka sid. Sid is the permanent alias for
the unstable distribution, unlike the rolling aliases for testing and
stable.
Assuming Sven is correct:
B) Am I correct that the easiest way to return to
Hi all,
I installed Debian 6 on my HP Pavilion Netbook. Unfortunately the WiFi Card is
not working. I plan to install a driver manually but don't know which driver
to grab.
lspci -vv tells me
02:00.0 Network controller: RaLink Device 539f
Subsystem: Hewlett-Packard Company Device 1637
Jochen Schulz wrote:
[...]
Since you still have a bootable operating system, you may try the hint
at http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=626450#36.
After taking a second look at Sven's link after lunch I discovered
similar hints there as well. These hints helped to some degree -
On Thu 12 May 2011 at 14:20:43 +0200, Elias Diem wrote:
Hi all,
I installed Debian 6 on my HP Pavilion Netbook. Unfortunately the WiFi Card is
not working. I plan to install a driver manually but don't know which driver
to grab.
lspci -vv tells me
02:00.0 Network controller: RaLink
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi!
Regarding the segmentation fault, if it is due to the ATI driver, this
is beyond me, you'll probably have to contact ATI.
Now about the aticonfig error:
(a) FGLRX driver version 11-5 was released a few days ago, and it
explicitly supports your
On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 8:16 AM, teddi...@tmo.blackberry.net wrote:
+20
Oh and as far as that thing I said about having Cred, Camaleón assist more
people on this list than just about anyone, so he's got Cred.
Pick your battles a bit wiser.
TeddyB
I have tried (rather well) to steer
On 2011-05-11 5:05 PM, Γαβριήλ Τασιόπουλος wrote:
The problem with social software is that you need to support the
platforms non-technical users are using. That inevitably means Windows
and Macs.
I use a mac and I'd like to think I'm a technical user. Isolating
Linux users from the rest of
Jamie Thompson wrote:
You can't deny that when it comes to home users, the majority of Linux
users are technical users, and the majority of Windows and Mac users are
not. There are always exceptions; some people's relatives like and can
deal with Linux (great!), and likewise, some techies like
Dne, 12. 05. 2011 12:21:49 je Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. napisal(a):
In pan.2011.05.12.09.59...@gmail.com, Camaleón wrote:
On Wed, 11 May 2011 23:24:30 -0500, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote:
On 2011-05-11 17:35:20 Freeman wrote:
On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 08:30:49PM +, Camaleón wrote:
IMHO, that
In regards to the Mac vs. Windows vs. Linux/BSD Holy War,
...Not really on topic, but I got a chance to upgrade my Back|Track 4R2
laptops to version 5 released a couple days ago. Very Exciting, I tell you
that's some Hot GNU on Linux Action there!
I run Back|Track on my laptops for War
Aaron Toponce said:
Thanks for hijacking the thread. Next time, fork it instead, and change the
subject line.
Thanks,
Awww, I'm just being playful, and the thread has been going in the direction of
who uses what os for what; I don't think it was a hijack.
But whatever, sorry for
On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 11:03 AM, Aaron Toponce aaron.topo...@gmail.comwrote:
1/2 of their customer base? Are you implying that of all the subscribers to
Skype, 1/2 of them are on GNU/Linux? Even knowing that the GNU/Linux
desktop market share is less than 2% of the total worldwide? That's a
[Sorry, I'm using claws-mail and it doesn't seem to let
me post follow-ups]
Thanks to everyone for the prompt responses, but I still have
a problem. My /etc/apt/sources.list includes
deb http://debian.uchicago.edu/debian/ lenny main contrib non-free
I tried typing aptitude update.
Aaron Toponce wrote:
On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 10:17:17PM -0400, Brad Alexander wrote:
Their Mac support used to include MS office, back in the mid 90s. I know
IT people from that era that said the Mac version of Office was so buggy,
thanks to their putting the Intel debugging
Simon Hoerder:
Is there an easy way to remove all unstable packages?
No, at least no easy way I could come up with. You could use aptitude
search to identify installed packages from unstable, remove them and
reinstall them from squeeze. But since you apparently already have libc
from unstable,
Hi Charles,
On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 10:38:10AM -0500, Charles Blair wrote:
[Sorry, I'm using claws-mail and it doesn't seem to let
me post follow-ups]
Thanks to everyone for the prompt responses, but I still have
a problem. My /etc/apt/sources.list includes
deb
On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 6:26 PM, Jochen Schulz m...@well-adjusted.de wrote:
Simon Hoerder:
Is there an easy way to remove all unstable packages?
No, at least no easy way I could come up with. You could use aptitude
search to identify installed packages from unstable, remove them and
Hi,
I am having a HP EliteBook 6930p laptop with Intel Ultimate N WiFi Link
5300. Though the card supports master mode I am not able to set it to run in
master mode. Is there anyway I can enable this mode?
$ sudo iwconfig wlan0 mode master
Error for wireless request Set Mode (8B06) :
SET
On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 10:24:15PM +1000, Heddle Weaver wrote:
I don't know about this as I'm one of the lucky ones that uses Vim, but I
should suspect that those should be in main anyway?
Regards,
You would think so, but due to invariant sections in the documentation
they're stuck in
Javier Barroso:
So, why not, simply wait one month without upgrading, remove sid from
your sources.list (and keep only wheezy), and then aptitude update;
aptitude safe-upgrade; aptitude full-upgrade ?
Because the OP would still run some kind of more or less mixed
wheezy/sid system even
On 13 May 2011 01:38, Charles Blair c-bl...@illinois.edu wrote:
[Sorry, I'm using claws-mail and it doesn't seem to let
me post follow-ups]
Thanks to everyone for the prompt responses, but I still have
a problem. My /etc/apt/sources.list includes
deb
12/05/2011 14:59, Simon Hoerder wrote:
Jochen Schulz wrote:
[...]
Since you still have a bootable operating system, you may try the hint
at http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=626450#36.
After taking a second look at Sven's link after lunch I discovered
similar hints there as
I couldn't fathom where to report this , so I'm hoping that
here it will meet the appropriate eyes. On http://wiki.debian.org/IRC
it's told that #debian-cli is link to
http://wiki.debian.org/CommandLineInterface; however, accesing the channel (on
oftc,
obviously), show me the topic as being
On Thu, 12 May 2011 22:30:49 +0300
Rares Aioanei scha...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello Rares,
I couldn't fathom where to report this , so I'm hoping that
here it will meet the appropriate eyes. On http://wiki.debian.org/IRC
{etc}
It's a *wiki*
--
Regards _
/ ) The
jida...@jidanni.org (jida...@jidanni.org on 2011-05-11 21:58 +0800):
What does it mean here on sid, when plugging in memory cards works
fine in single user mode, with only
[..]
running, but then in multi user mode, with
[..]
running, plugging in many of the same memory cards results in
On Thursday, May 12, 2011 04:38:18 am Camaleón wrote:
On Wed, 11 May 2011 15:30:22 -0700, Peter Bonucci wrote:
On Wednesday, May 11, 2011 12:04:48 pm Camaleón wrote:
Okay, I've carefully read all of your tests, so let's recap:
- SGD (1.98x) cannot detect the USB drive (¿?)
- SGD
Charles Blair (c-bl...@illinois.edu on 2011-05-12 10:38 -0500):
[Sorry, I'm using claws-mail and it doesn't seem to let
me post follow-ups]
Are you sure? I'm using claws-mail (granted, from Wheezy, so newer than
your version) and am writing this message with Reply to list (Ctrl+L)
[..]
I
On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 11:24:30PM -0500, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote:
On 2011-05-11 17:35:20 Freeman wrote:
On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 08:30:49PM +, Camaleón wrote:
On Wed, 11 May 2011 11:55:48 -0700, Jeroen van Aart wrote:
Lisi wrote:
It is list policy not to send private replies to
On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 8:35 PM, Jochen Schulz m...@well-adjusted.de wrote:
Javier Barroso:
So, why not, simply wait one month without upgrading, remove sid from
your sources.list (and keep only wheezy), and then aptitude update;
aptitude safe-upgrade; aptitude full-upgrade ?
Because the OP
Javier Barroso (javibarr...@gmail.com on 2011-05-12 19:11 +0200):
Other possible solution would be pinning all packages from sid to
their current version (upgrading glibc with the bug, of course), and
removing sid from sources.list, and again wait, but this time you
could upgrade your system.
On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 02:15:55PM -0700, evenso wrote:
On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 11:24:30PM -0500, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote:
On 2011-05-11 17:35:20 Freeman wrote:
On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 08:30:49PM +, Camaleón wrote:
On Wed, 11 May 2011 11:55:48 -0700, Jeroen van Aart wrote:
On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 08:30:49PM +, Camale�n wrote:
On Wed, 11 May 2011 11:55:48 -0700, Jeroen van Aart wrote:
Lisi wrote:
It is list policy not to send private replies to list mail. And I
thought that it was rude of you to email me privately, not to mention
unpleasant.
What
On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 09:59:42AM +, Camale�n wrote:
.snip
I'm fine if someone asks me off-list about anything (I reply almost all
of them) but something that is being discussed in a public thread should
be kept public... unless (I repeat) the user
Actually Re: Posting Style (nevermind a new thread):
It seems to me that bottom-posting is for people who want to read
in one direction, while top-posting is for people who want to see the
current message immediately.
I am wedded to the latter by profession, game in any case for either,
and
On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 8:22 PM, PMA peterarmstr...@aya.yale.edu wrote:
Actually Re: Posting Style (nevermind a new thread):
It seems to me that bottom-posting is for people who want to read
in one direction, while top-posting is for people who want to see the
current message immediately.
I
Sorry, i did not cc to the list:
Chris Brennan wrote:
On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 8:22 PM, PMApeterarmstr...@aya.yale.edu wrote:
Actually Re: Posting Style (nevermind a new thread):
It seems to me that bottom-posting is for people who want to read
in one direction, while top-posting is for
Hello,
I'm interested in trying out Debian's OS. I downloaded from your website,
which
took a half hour even with a high speed cable connection. I then sent it on to
my
E-drive, to burn it onto a disc. After 17 mins., I forced a shutdown...log
message
Burn failed. I'm at a loss. Never
Make sure you are burning as an iso image and not just burning the actual file
to the media
Sent from my BlackBerry®
-Original Message-
From: Michael Selinger mikes...@yahoo.com
Date: Thu, 12 May 2011 17:29:58
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Download onto CD failed to burn
Chris Brennan writes:
This list and many others policy is to bottom-post.
With appropriate trimming of quoted material.
--
John Hasler
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
I'm sorry i'm late for reply, yes it is old server but still used. I don't
install any desktop and xserver, it is pure CLI because i'm install from
debian netinst.
On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 5:14 PM, Markus Neviadomski
li...@dieitexperten.dewrote:
Am 12.05.2011 11:53, schrieb Stan Hoeppner:
On
I'm sorry i'm late for reply, yes it is old server but still used. I don't
install any desktop and xserver, it is pure CLI because i'm install from
debian netinst.
Just sharing something that happened to me.
After a recent upgrade with debian/testing, I noticed that ssh would
pop up a window asking for my password, and this would be AFTER
running ssh-add.
Turns out that I needed to read this bit in
/usr/share/doc/gnome-keyring/README.Debian:
The GNOME
On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 10:03:52AM -0400, Chris Brennan wrote:
On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 8:16 AM, teddi...@tmo.blackberry.net wrote:
+20
Oh and as far as that thing I said about having Cred, Camaleón assist more
people on this list than just about anyone, so he's got Cred.
Pick your
On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 10:58:21AM -0400, Curt Howland wrote:
So Skype has been bought by Microsoft.
I expect the Linux version of Skype to be abolished in short order. Oh
well, thus the fate of proprietary software. I'm sure St. Ignucious is
shaking his head with the inevitability of it
On 2011-05-10 9:43 AM, Tom Grace wrote:
On 10/05/11 16:50, Jim Pazarena wrote:
I have a debian based appliance which is running 2.6.16.62, I am unsure
how to
determine debian version.
You may have some luck with:
cat /etc/debian_version
ahhh.. 4.0
Is there a way around this? Other than
101 - 173 of 173 matches
Mail list logo
