Original Message
Subject: Re: sound problem debian wheezy
Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2014 21:52:46 -0400
From: Ric Moore
To: tom arnall
On 07/30/2014 12:37 AM, tom arnall wrote:
Ric,
thanks for getting back to me? rest of message inline to yours.
Tom
On 7/29/14, Ric Moore wrot
On Wed, Jul 30, 2014 at 9:50 PM, Bonno Bloksma wrote:
> Hi,
> >> [...]
> >> What may be relevant too is that on the g6 server Debian uses the
> >> CCISS drivers for the raid hardware, the volume shows up as
> >> /dev/cciss/c0d0
> >> On the g7 and g8 hardware the raid volume simply shows up as /de
On Wednesday 30 July 2014 08:05:32 David Baron wrote:
> 1. Now that I have / on a large enough place to not worry over it (and /opt
> and /usr/local are bound to folders on the over-sized home partition), now
> time to deal with /var. Given a mere 2.7g, enough for a couple of KDE users
> and a numb
On Wed, 30 Jul 2014 19:28:32 -0700
Dan Hitt wrote:
> So . . . i'd like to get a laptop for my personal use, but of
> course running a free OS.
>
> Does this exist, with the two finger gesture use?
MSI has such machines (at least in EU); it uses a synaptics
touchpad with this feature (strange wh
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 07/30/2014 04:05 AM, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
> On Ma, 29 iul 14, 22:52:15, The Wanderer wrote:
>
>>
>> Package: removal-prevention
>> Pin: version 1.0
>> Pin-Priority: 1001
>>
>>
>> produces no change in behavior; dist-upgrade s
Hi Debian List,
At work, i've got a mac book pro laptop, which for the first time in
my life is a laptop that i can use like a serious computer. Prior to
this, i refused to use a laptop because they are so much worse than
desktops.
Part of the appeal for me is the two-finger gestures for scrolli
This baby seems to start up for no reason, slowing whatever was being done at
the time. Have to manually kill it.
Somewhere to set its priorities, i.e. nice it?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.
On Wed, 30 Jul 2014 21:34:07 +0200
Pascal Hambourg wrote:
> Joe a écrit :
> >
> > Something else you might do now is to place temporary logging rules
> > before your 'DROP' rules, to confirm whether it is indeed iptables
> > which is blocking those packets.
>
> Or just run tcpdump while the por
Joe a écrit :
>
> Something else you might do now is to place temporary logging rules
> before your 'DROP' rules, to confirm whether it is indeed iptables
> which is blocking those packets.
Or just run tcpdump while the port scan is running.
> No logs, it's somebody or something
> else. And if y
Hi,
>> [...]
>> What may be relevant too is that on the g6 server Debian uses the
>> CCISS drivers for the raid hardware, the volume shows up as
>> /dev/cciss/c0d0
>> On the g7 and g8 hardware the raid volume simply shows up as /dev/sda
>
> cciss has been superseded by hpsa, "The hpsa driver is in
On Wednesday 30 July 2014 08:14:20 David Baron wrote:
> I do not understand the difference. If I hit reply, so I get the title of
> the digest which I replace with the desired re: Should not this be OK.
No. It gives rise to a new thread, with the digest data, which is not the
same as the he
2014-07-30 09:18 keltezéssel, Joe írta:
> Something else you might do now is to place temporary logging rules
> before your 'DROP' rules, to confirm whether it is indeed iptables
> which is blocking those packets. No logs, it's somebody or something
> else.
Perhaps it is not needed.
iptables -L -v
2014-07-30 17:33 keltezéssel, Mike McClain írta:
>> And as someone else asked, why are you worried about this 'stealth'? As
>> long as the bad packets don't get in, what does it matter?
>
> Why is there a DROP instruction in iptables as well as REJECT?
To allow you to do what you want. e.g DROP c
Mike McClain wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 30, 2014 at 08:18:51AM +0100, Joe wrote:
>> And as someone else asked, why are you worried about this 'stealth'?
>> As long as the bad packets don't get in, what does it matter?
> Why is there a DROP instruction in iptables as well as REJECT?
Sometimes you want
Sven Hartge wrote:
> If I try to connect to a system on (for example) IP 192.168.40.60 and
> port 80 and there is no system with that IP, the router for the
> network will tell me via an "ICMP host unreachable" package.
Erm, please replace "package" with "packet" while reading, thanks.
Grüße,
S
Mike McClain wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 30, 2014 at 01:09:24AM +0200, Pascal Hambourg wrote:
>
>> You can safely ignore that "stealth" FUD.
> block:REJECT::Stealth:DROP
> Why do you say it can be ignored?
If I try to connect to a system on (for example) IP 192.168.40.60 and
port 80 and there is no s
On Wed, Jul 30, 2014 at 08:18:51AM +0100, Joe wrote:
> Something else you might do now is to place temporary logging rules
> before your 'DROP' rules, to confirm whether it is indeed iptables
> which is blocking those packets. No logs, it's somebody or something
> else. And if you have anything ot
On Wed, Jul 30, 2014 at 01:09:24AM +0200, Pascal Hambourg wrote:
> You can safely ignore that "stealth" FUD.
block:REJECT::Stealth:DROP
Why do you say it can be ignored?
> Use iptables-save instead.
I do.
Thanks for your thoughts,
Mike
--
Who knows what evil lurks in the hearts of men?
--
On Tue, Jul 29, 2014 at 10:20:57PM +0100, Mark Carroll wrote:
>
> Use iptables --list-rules to check what rules are actually in force,
> applying in what order.
>
> -- Mark
I've been using iptables-save which gives nearly the same output but
fails to explain why 2 online scanners show those ports
On Tue, Jul 29, 2014 at 11:19:18PM +0200, Sven Hartge wrote:
>
> Maybe your ISP already filters those ports?
>
Now that's a thought I hadn't considered.
If the ISP is REJECTing those ports that would explain the responces
I'm seeing.
Thanks I'll look into it.
Mike
--
Who knows what evil lurks in th
Hi all,
I have just configured a preseed file to include a local repository.
# Debian mirrors
d-i apt-setup/local0/comment string local mirror
d-i apt-setup/local0/repository string http://
d-i apt-setup/local0/key string http://
The main issue I am facing here is that the repo is not added to t
On Wed, 30 Jul 2014 08:26:04 -0400
The Wanderer wrote:
Hello The,
>(References: and In-Reply-To:, surely?)
You are, of course, right. My brain was waaay ahead of my fingers at
the time. My apologies for any confusion caused.
--
Regards _
/ ) "The blindingly obvious is
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 07/30/2014 04:42 AM, Brad Rogers wrote:
> On Wed, 30 Jul 2014 10:14:20 +0300 David Baron
> wrote:
>
> Hello David,
>
>> Or is there some header or marker I should be hitting as well?
>
> Reference and/or Reply-To headers.
(References: and In
On Wed, Jul 30, 2014 at 4:12 AM, Andrei POPESCU
wrote:
>
> When mounting a tmpfs on /tmp systemd sets 'strictatime'. I was
> wondering whether this is really needed. Does anybody know of software
> that would break with 'relatime' (the default) or even 'noatime'?
>
> I'd be happy to RTFM if anybod
On Wed, 30 Jul 2014, B wrote:
> > When mounting a tmpfs on /tmp systemd sets 'strictatime'. I was
> > wondering whether this is really needed.
>
> From what I found on the web, it seems to be related to busybox
> that apparently needs it.
They added it to BusyBox *because* systemd passes str
On Wed, 30 Jul 2014 11:12:09 +0300
Elvire POPESCU wrote:
> When mounting a tmpfs on /tmp systemd sets 'strictatime'. I was
> wondering whether this is really needed.
From what I found on the web, it seems to be related to busybox
that apparently needs it.
I've found a post about adding the BB s
Le 29.07.2014 22:32, Joe a écrit :
On Tue, 29 Jul 2014 16:16:44 +0100
Lisi Reisz wrote:
On Tuesday 29 July 2014 15:11:38 Zenaan Harkness wrote:
> i also downloaded a creative cloud setup-exe. from photo shop and
>
> > it wont install
You can't install Windows programs directly on Linux - no
Le 29.07.2014 18:22, Paul E Condon a écrit :
On Tue, Jul 29, 2014 at 11:08:41AM +0200,
berenger.mo...@neutralite.org wrote:
Le 28.07.2014 22:36, Andrei POPESCU a écrit :
>On Lu, 28 iul 14, 11:24:31, berenger.mo...@neutralite.org wrote:
>>Le 27.07.2014 01:42, PaulNM a écrit :
>>
>>>Inodes are
On Wed, 30 Jul 2014 10:14:20 +0300
David Baron wrote:
Hello David,
>Or is there some header or marker I should be hitting as well?
Reference and/or Reply-To headers. The digest, depending on /exactly/
how it as constructed and /exactly/ how you reply, won't necessarily
carry the right headers
Le vendredi 25 juillet 2014 à 15:46:29 +0200, Jörg-Volker Peetz a écrit:
> This version is a little bit outdated (Feb 2013). At least concerning ext4.
> I would try if a newer version shows something different.
> Have you tried smartctl (smartmontools) and seen anything striking?
Yes, I tried smart
On Ma, 29 iul 14, 18:20:42, Rick Thomas wrote:
>
> On Jul 29, 2014, at 2:05 AM, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
>
> > Sure, it's a tmpfs, and the penalty for updating atime is probably much
> > lower than any other conventional storage (though /tmp contents might
> > end up being swapped), but is there a
On Tue, 29 Jul 2014 23:10:48 -0400
The Wanderer wrote:
once every few years, and nothing
> seems to do it automatically.)
>
> Admittedly I have ridiculous amounts of local storage space, but even
> when I install Debian in a VM on a 40GB virtual hard disk, I wouldn't
> consider allocating less
On Ma, 29 iul 14, 22:52:15, The Wanderer wrote:
>
>
> Package: removal-prevention
> Pin: version 1.0
> Pin-Priority: 1001
>
>
> produces no change in behavior; dist-upgrade still wants to remove
> removal-prevention, and the packages it depends on.
>
> Similar things happen wit
Hello,
On Wed, Jul 30, 2014 at 05:28:10AM +, Bonno Bloksma wrote:
> [...]
> What may be relevant too is that on the g6 server Debian uses the
> CCISS drivers for the raid hardware, the volume shows up as
> /dev/cciss/c0d0
> On the g7 and g8 hardware the raid volume simply shows up as /dev/sda
On Tue, 29 Jul 2014 14:04:23 -0700
Mike McClain wrote:
> I've run into a difficulty with iptables in that both GRC.com and
> PCFlank.com's firewall scans show ports 137-139 and 445 as blocked but
> not stealthed in spite of the fact that I have these statements in my
> firewall script:
> ipta
On Wednesday 30 July 2014 02:52:38 debian-user-digest-requ...@lists.debian.org
wrote:
> > When you reply threading is broken. Surely you can see that. Could be
> > kmail of course.
>
> Replying from the digest breaks threads. I eschew KDE 4, so I don't know
> about KMail in KDE4, but KDE3 KMail
1. Now that I have / on a large enough place to not worry over it (and /opt
and /usr/local are bound to folders on the over-sized home partition), now
time to deal with /var. Given a mere 2.7g, enough for a couple of KDE users
and a number of apt downloads. Can easily go over 90% for large upgra
37 matches
Mail list logo
