On 01/02/2015 10:27 AM, Pascal Hambourg wrote:
maderios a écrit :
On 12/30/2014 05:25 PM, maderios wrote:
Je suis passé à une conf dhcp (pas de 'manager' ou autres interfaces
diaboliques), et ça marche pour le moment.
Quand même bien ennuyeux de ne pas avoir trouvé de solution pour le
maderios a écrit :
On 12/30/2014 05:25 PM, maderios wrote:
Je suis passé à une conf dhcp (pas de 'manager' ou autres interfaces
diaboliques), et ça marche pour le moment.
Quand même bien ennuyeux de ne pas avoir trouvé de solution pour le
statique.
Tu as comparé les paramètres IP obtenus
Bonjour,
Le 02/01/2015 14:47, andre_deb...@numericable.fr a écrit :
On Friday 02 January 2015 14:46:49 Philippe Deleval wrote:
Je ne sais pas si une nouvelle version stable fait partie des voeux de
bonne année...
Quelle est environ la date de sortie prévue de Jessie ?
André
En novembre,
Bonjour à tous les utilisateurs et développeurs de Debian :
Le vendredi 2 janvier 2015 à 13:47, andre_deb...@numericable.fr a écrit :
Quelle est environ la date de sortie prévue de Jessie ?
Lucas Nussbaum (voir lien a) - l'actuel chef du projet Debian - souhaite que
cela soit fait fin janvier
bonjour,
sysV: même vœu :) en espérant qu'on soit entendu :)
Le 2 janv. 2015 14:45, Philippe Deleval philippe.dele...@wanadoo.fr a
écrit :
Bonjour et bonne année à tout le monde
Je ne sais pas si une nouvelle version stable fait partie des voeux de
bonne année, sur mon ordi personnel et
Bonjour et bonne année à tout le monde
Je ne sais pas si une nouvelle version stable fait partie des voeux de
bonne année, sur mon ordi personnel et gardant l' habitude de me
connecter au prompt, j'espère que l' initialisation de type System V
restera au moins en option
Avec mes meilleurs
On Friday 02 January 2015 14:46:49 Philippe Deleval wrote:
Je ne sais pas si une nouvelle version stable fait partie des voeux de
bonne année...
Quelle est environ la date de sortie prévue de Jessie ?
André
--
Lisez la FAQ de la liste avant de poser une question :
Le vendredi 2 janvier 2015, 10:27:34 Pascal Hambourg a écrit :
[…]
Ce qui est bizarre, c'est l'adresse MAC qui n'est pas
l'adresse MAC du modem-routeur. Celle de l'interface wifi du
routeur, donc 2 MAC pour un modem-routeur?
J'ai déjà vu ça sur une Neufbox 4 : l'adresse MAC du point
Le jeudi 1 janvier 2015, 22:15:33 andre_deb...@numericable.fr a écrit :
On Thursday 01 January 2015 21:57:59 MERLIN Philippe wrote:
J'ai également testé un des CD qui me cause des problèmes sur un autre
ordinateur et tout marche bien, donc le CD en lui même est bon.
Sans doute le
On Friday 02 January 2015 18:57:29 MERLIN Philippe wrote:
J'ai testé sur une clé USB même problème on voit la clé qui clignote
indéfiniment et l'écran reste statique.
Je m'oriente vers un Bug de syslinux qui a maintenant la possibilité de
fonctionner en UEFFI or le Bios de mon ordi permet
Es una maquina virtual bajo vmware y si, están conectadas al mismo
switch, no se si llamarla vlan, porque fue siempre la subred 0 lisa y
llanamente. Siempre funciono de maravillas hasta que implementamos
esta subred 30 que si es una vlan.
El día 2 de enero de 2015, 14:13, Ramses
El 02/01/2015, a las 17:57, Fernando Miculan fernandocmicu...@gmail.com
escribió:
Buenas buenas, paso a comentar la estructura de red y un resumen:
El equipo en donde corre el firewall-squid tiene dos eth (eth0:
192.168.0.194 y eth1: 192.168.0.193), el gw brindado a todos los
usuarios
Buenas buenas, paso a comentar la estructura de red y un resumen:
El equipo en donde corre el firewall-squid tiene dos eth (eth0:
192.168.0.194 y eth1: 192.168.0.193), el gw brindado a todos los
usuarios mediante dhcp es el 192.168.0.194 (eth0)
A partir de la implementacion de la subred 30, se
Hola, que tal
¿que puede pasar cuando tienes en un ordenador Windows (para jugar) y
Debian, y lo tienes que reiniciar al menos una vez al dia para ir de
un sistema operativo a otro?. Los pantallazos propios de Windows van
aparte. Ya sea por reinicio desde el sistema operativo o dandole al
boton
2014-12-31 10:58 GMT+01:00 j...@lillahusetiskogen.se:
On Wed, 31 Dec 2014 09:16:44 +0100
Anders Jackson anders.jack...@gmail.com wrote:
Strängt taget hatar jag IDEer men jag
vill ha ett bra grafiskt gränssnitt till debuggern.
Har du testat cgdb eller ddd?
--
Per
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email
Boa noite,
A conexão é BRIDGE via tap e de ip dinâmico, por isso gostaria de acessar
via hostname.
Acabei de emular o debian 7 e é a mesma coisa, talvez tenho que fazer
alguma configuração, mas estou em um terreno desconhecido.
Boas horas tentando resolver isso, mas até agora nada.
Em 1 de
Brigde é tranquilo,
Se ele esta pegando o ip na mesma faixa da máquina que hospeda a vm
não tem muito o que se fazer, só é necessário ter um servidor ssh na
vm e pronto
Em 02/01/15, Luiz Carlos da Silveira Júniorlcsjunio...@gmail.com escreveu:
Boa noite,
A conexão é BRIDGE via tap e de ip
On Jan 02 11:52, Joel Rees (joel.r...@gmail.com) wrote:
There can be reasons to do such things on production servers, but
even then, you are basically only going to do it to salvage data,
never the OS.
LVM is also a great way to avoid downtime when adding or replacing
disks. A couple months
Debian might well work for your purposes as it's relatively easy to set
up and has a huge software repository; but your problem appears to be
memory. If your CAD software was sluggish even when you were running
Windows 7 directly, it's not going to be better when you're running
Windows in a
On Thu, Jan 1, 2015 at 10:42 PM, Bob Proulx b...@proulx.com wrote:
Kevin O'Gorman wrote:
I do want to insulate the one drive from any failures on the other three.
That data is not at all temporary, but it is backed up regularly. I want
to limit it's failure profile.
Using mdadm RAID?
On Fri, Jan 2, 2015 at 3:37 PM, Bob Proulx b...@proulx.com wrote:
Frank Miles wrote:
I recently added a new hard drive to my home system. I decided to use it
to create an all-new bootable 'jessie' system. I created a partition
table that I thought would be flexible:
/dev/sdb1 /
On 31/12/14 04:57 PM, Kevin O'Gorman wrote:
I've just gotten 4 4TB drives to replace my 4 2TB drives. I'm wanting
to have one normal 4TB drive and one logical 12TB drive, so I will
make three physical drives into one group, one logical volume and one
partition support the big partition. My
Thanks for the quick response Patrick. I have given the full path for all
the executables in the script. Still i'm not getting the email. The first
line of the script works which updates the details-file. The third line of
the script works which updates the status of the email operation. Both the
On Fri, Jan 2, 2015 at 1:39 PM, Manikandan M mani@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I have written a small script to email (using ssmpt) some details, and
scheduled it in crontab. The script is running as per time mentioned in the
cron but ssmtp is not sending the mail. please find the details below.
Bob Proulx b...@proulx.com writes:
Even though this is a Debian list and not an Ubuntu one I wouldn't run
from Ubuntu to Debian because of this. I would expect their behavior
to be identical.
Yes you would. But that's assumption that can definitely bite you in the
ass. Ubuntu has a bad
Hi,
I have written a small script to email (using ssmpt) some details, and
scheduled it in crontab. The script is running as per time mentioned in the
cron but ssmtp is not sending the mail. please find the details below.
user@host ~ $ cat bin/email-script
/home/user/bin/actual-script
Kevin O'Gorman wrote:
Bob Proulx wrote:
For people adding additional mdadm raid volumes later they need to
do some configuration for it.
This is exactly my case. I'm installing a RAID-0 for gigantic
transient files. I do not anticipate using RAID for the system,
partly because all bays
On 02/01/15 11:57 AM, Kevin O'Gorman wrote:
On Fri, Jan 2, 2015 at 8:50 AM, Gary Dale garyd...@torfree.net
mailto:garyd...@torfree.net wrote:
On 31/12/14 04:57 PM, Kevin O'Gorman wrote:
I've just gotten 4 4TB drives to replace my 4 2TB drives. I'm
wanting to have one
On Fri, Jan 2, 2015 at 11:57 AM, Bob Proulx b...@proulx.com wrote:
Kevin O'Gorman wrote:
There's one remaining question I have, which is fortunately not urgent.
It's not clear what I'm going to have to do to bring the RAID online
after
a reboot. It doesn't seem to be as simple as
On Fri, 02 Jan 2015 21:10:02 +0100, Bob Proulx wrote:
Joel Rees wrote:
Bob Proulx wrote:
the disk as physical volumes for lvm. For you I might suggest:
/dev/sdb1 /boot {256M} /dev/sdb4 extended
{remainder}
Why extended? I generally put my LVM partition straight
Ric Moore wrote:
Trying to automount a dvd for playback and I'm seeing this.
I'm seeing these messages, too, even for removable USB drives. (Jessie,
amd64, running Xfce.)
Jan 1 15:50:52 allegro kernel: [314184.131707] EXT4-fs (sdb1): mounting ext3
file system using the ext4 subsystem
In the midst of other activities around my hard drives, I realized one of
my old backup drives has suffered some damage. Not all of the files are
readable.
I have more recent backups, so there's nothing catasrophic here, but before
I jettison this drive I'd like to get off of it what i can. I
I have been trying to upgrade a system that is running testing. for the
past couple of weeks and have been getting the following errors:
root@tuatara:/home/poormigrant# apt-get update apt-get dist-upgrade
lots of output
Fetched 70.5 kB in 13s (5,300 B/s)
Reading package lists... Done
Reading
On 02/01/15 01:54 AM, Bob Proulx wrote:
Cadman wrote:
I need help determining whether Debian OS is the right OS for my needs.
You are asking on a Debian user list. Any answer other than yes here
would lead me to seriously question the responses. Meanwhile I would
expect that a Fedora list
On 01/02/2015 at 04:06 PM, The Wanderer wrote:
On 01/02/2015 at 03:01 PM, Peter Easthope wrote:
Hi,
Does the IMAP protocol allow retrieving a message, body included,
from a server and then deleting from the server while keeping on
the client? This might be described as simulating a POP
On Thu, 01 Jan 2015, Bob Proulx wrote:
Cadman wrote:
I need help determining whether Debian OS is the right OS for my
needs.
You are asking on a Debian user list. Any answer other than yes here
would lead me to seriously question the responses. Meanwhile I would
expect that a Fedora
On Jan 2, 2015 6:33 PM, Sam Varghese s...@gnubies.com wrote:
I have been trying to upgrade a system that is running testing. for the
past couple of weeks and have been getting the following errors:
[oodles of errors]
Processing was halted because there were too many errors.
E: Sub-process
Sam Varghese wrote:
I am not subscribed to the list so I would appreciate being copied in.
The following packages have unmet dependencies:
libpam-systemd : Depends: systemd (= 215-6) but 215-8 is installed
Package libpam-systemd version 215-8 is current in Testing.
What is the output of:
Trying to automount a dvd for playback and I'm seeing this. I'm finding
almost zip using google. Basically, it seems automount is looking for
something that doesn't exist. I think it's related to blueray but
removal of libbluray rips out half the system as depends. Anyone have a
clue towards
Pascal Hambourg wrote:
Bob Proulx a écrit :
Personally I tend to have more than four partitions. Therefore I will
almost always end up using extended partitions.
Consider using GPT partition scheme instead.
In the future GPT partitions will probably become almost universially
seen
Bob Proulx a écrit :
Personally I tend to have more than four partitions. Therefore I will
almost always end up using extended partitions.
Consider using GPT partition scheme instead.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble?
Please find attached the relavant reportbug file. I do not know what
headers i should use - please forward it to th right recipient.
TKU. 'b'ye - Bruce Gilbert.
---BeginMessage---
Dear Maintainer,
* What led up to the situation?
I had effectively 'hosed' my original Debian installation -
Bob Proulx wrote:
Cadman wrote:
I need help determining whether Debian OS is the right OS for my needs.
You are asking on a Debian user list. Any answer other than yes here
would lead me to seriously question the responses. Meanwhile I would
expect that a Fedora list would respond for Fedora
Manikandan M wrote:
I have written a small script to email (using ssmpt) some details, and
scheduled it in crontab. The script is running as per time mentioned in the
cron but ssmtp is not sending the mail. please find the details below.
A couple of details to provide background to
Kevin O'Gorman wrote:
There's one remaining question I have, which is fortunately not urgent.
It's not clear what I'm going to have to do to bring the RAID online after
a reboot. It doesn't seem to be as simple as tweaking /etc/fstab, like it
is on bare drives. I suppose I can do an assemble
Joel Rees wrote:
Bob Proulx wrote:
the disk as physical volumes for lvm. For you I might suggest:
/dev/sdb1 /boot {256M}
/dev/sdb4 extended {remainder}
Why extended? I generally put my LVM partition straight in a DOS
primary partition, unless I needed more than
On 01/02/2015 at 03:01 PM, Peter Easthope wrote:
Hi,
Does the IMAP protocol allow retrieving a message, body included,
from a server and then deleting from the server while keeping on the
client? This might be described as simulating a POP behavour in
IMAP.
IMAP allows retrieving a
debian-user:
I would like to transfer files between Debian Wheezy Xfce computers
(i386 and amd64) and iOS devices (iPod, iPad, iPhone).
On Debian, I have installed:
libimobiledevice-utils
When I connect the charging cable between an iPad Mini (Model A1489) and
a USB 2.0 port on a
On Fri, 02 Jan 2015, Manikandan M wrote:
I have written a small script to email (using ssmpt) some details, and
scheduled it in crontab. The script is running as per time mentioned in the
cron but ssmtp is not sending the mail. please find the details below.
user@host ~ $ cat
On Jan 01 23:42, Bob Proulx (b...@proulx.com) wrote:
Using mdadm RAID? Or LVM raid? I have personally only used mdadm
raid and not lvm raid.
Yes. LVM raid is today usually best to avoid. I generally use mdadm
for raid (unless hardware raid is available) and put lvm on top of that.
And I
Hi,
Does the IMAP protocol allow retrieving a message, body included, from
a server and then deleting from the server while keeping on the client?
This might be described as simulating a POP behavour in IMAP.
If the protocol allows this, is the capability implemented in most clients?
Thanks,
On Fri, Jan 02, 2015 at 06:39:27PM +, Manikandan M wrote:
Are other scripts running fine? Can you throw a silly date /tmp/imalive into
it and see?
Does ssmtp (I'm unfamilar with it) requies some special env-var that can be
unset when running from Cron?
--
People are like potatos. They
52 matches
Mail list logo
