> I have been a Debian user for more than 15 years, when the "war" about systemd
> broke out I mostly ignored it, I just removed systemd from my systems because
> I
> don't like the implementation.
>
> Today I was setting up a new Debian system and wanted to remove systemd only
> to
> find our th
On Sep 5, 2015, at 8:40 PM, Doug wrote:
> The last time I looked--about 6 months ago--FreeBSD requires a file system
> that is not compatible with Linux or Windows; nothing can
> communicate with it. Has that changed? Or is there a way to install FreeBSD
> on an ext4 or NTFS file system, or so
On Sep 5, 2015, at 8:40 PM, Doug wrote:
> The last time I looked--about 6 months ago--FreeBSD requires a file system
> that is not compatible with Linux or Windows; nothing can
> communicate with it. Has that changed? Or is there a way to install FreeBSD
> on an ext4 or NTFS file system, or so
I would like to configure LVMs for everything including boot. I have read that
others have done this but an I have not found the method.
While my desire is to boot from the LVM, I would consider an alternative, if I
could find one.
System description:
amd64 with a HDD and 3 pairs of SSDs. The
On 09/05/2015 09:40 PM, Glenn English wrote:
On Sep 5, 2015, at 6:23 PM, Erik Lauritsen wrote:
I have been a Debian user for more than 15 years, when the "war" about systemd
broke out I mostly ignored it, I just removed systemd from my systems because I don't
like the implementation.
Toda
I have been a Debian user for more than 15 years, when the "war" about systemd
broke out I mostly ignored it, I just removed systemd from my systems because I
don't like the implementation.
Today I was setting up a new Debian system and wanted to remove systemd only to
find our that the old too
On Sep 5, 2015, at 6:23 PM, Erik Lauritsen wrote:
> I have been a Debian user for more than 15 years, when the "war" about
> systemd broke out I mostly ignored it, I just removed systemd from my systems
> because I don't like the implementation.
>
> Today I was setting up a new Debian system
On 2015-09-05 at 20:23, Erik Lauritsen wrote:
> I have been a Debian user for more than 15 years, when the "war"
> about systemd broke out I mostly ignored it, I just removed systemd
> from my systems because I don't like the implementation.
>
> Today I was setting up a new Debian system and want
Erik Lauritsen writes:
> Freedom of choice my ass!
You are free to choose FreeBSD.
--
John Hasler
jhas...@newsguy.com
Elmwood, WI USA
On 05/09/15 23:21, Michael Grant wrote:
I have to say in some ways this seems like a feature not a bug! I've
long missed the option some other unixes have to inhibit resolving the
name. But at the moment the hostname! Frankly, there should be an
option to w, who, finger, and last to not resolv
I'm running debian testing. Just did an apt-get update. who, w, finger,
and last are all now printing the ip address instead of the hostname. the
wtmp seems to have the ip address now instead of the hostname. Last shows
hostnames up to when I did the apt-get update today and then ip addresses.
mizuki:
>
> I have multiple apache virtual namehosts configured on a single backend
> server, respectively named as serverA.local and serverB.local, then I have
> Apache reverse proxy configured to proxy these 2 namehosts also under 2
> virtual names hosts on proxy as below:
I fail to understand
On Sat, 5 Sep 2015 01:54:53 -0500
rlhar...@oplink.net wrote:
>
> Having grown old sitting in front of a desktop, I always viewed
> suspend, hibernate, etc., as nuisances; so even after acquiring a
> laptop, I never have learned to use those features.
I've had a couple of laptops and a netbook,
13 matches
Mail list logo
