Mon, 11 Mar 2019 22:07:07 +0100
Pascal Hambourg écrivait :
> Certes, LVM permet de faire du RAID nativement et de façon plus souple
> que mdadm, mais est-il aussi robuste et simple à reconstruire que le
> RAID de mdadm en cas de défaillance d'un disque ?
Ce une des questions que je me suis
chiffrer avec 7z , échec pour dossiers et fichiers de plus de 100Mo (
Mediawiki )
Manque de RAM ?
Je suis sur un petit VPS, je ne compte pas investir dans de la ram
actuellement.
Je vois sur le VPS que j'ai une swap à 0.
Tenter d'ajouter de la swap de cette façon pourrait m'aider ?
Dear Sir/Madam
First thanks for your time.
I have an Acer laptop (Aspire E1, x64, amd i7, ram 16, vga 2).
My base tasks are using virtual machines.
I use dual boot for Win10 & Debian 8.6 & the type of Bios boot is “Legacy”.
I gonna change my HDD to SSD & install just Debian 9.8 (so need at
On 3/10/19 3:53 PM, Brian wrote:
On Sun 10 Mar 2019 at 13:18:54 -0400, deb wrote:
Crumogeon tip: It is no longer 1972. If you have nothing nice or at least
helpful to say on a USER list, say nothing at all.
All the responses were helpful. You just have to fit them into your
World View
El lun., 11 de mar. de 2019 a la(s) 12:38, Fernando Romero
(ffrcaraba...@gmail.com) escribió:
>
> Hola como están.
> Necesito cambiar el puerto de https en nginx ya que el estándar lo usa la
> administración del router, cambie el puerto en el archivo de configuración de
> sitio:
>
> server {
>
> OP has a point though. The real world happens to have a huge amount of
> heterogeneous networks, and asking for tools to keep those systems safe
> is legitimate.
I did not perceive the OP's request to be about the case where you
administer lots of machines and you want to use a Debian machine
On Mon 11 Mar 2019 at 20:30:55 +0100, Marek Mosiewicz wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Debian webpage states about greedy of IT corporations. In my opinion it
Citation, please.
[Snip]
> What do you think about this ?
Nothing to do with Debian.
--
Brian.
Curt wrote:
> I don't believe he did, actually. I believe that's what Reco wrote.
but there is no secure OS, as soon as you get connected to the network, and
if you have a server with multiple users ... well. We used to put sensitive
servers in DMZ aside of the user network - for a good reason.
On Mon, 11 Mar 2019 20:30:55 +0100
Marek Mosiewicz wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Debian webpage states about greedy of IT corporations. In my opinion
> it is not so easy to state it. Of course current cloud offer of MS
> Office for $12 per month would means one tryllion a year if 7 billion
> people would
Stefan Monnier writes:
>> re: apt solving all? I understand it recently had a long-time vulnerability
>> itself...
>> Linux will get hit more as it gets more popular.
>
> My point is not that APT and/or Debian is bullet-proof (I live under no
> delusion in this respect). Just that instead of
Hello,
Debian webpage states about greedy of IT corporations. In my opinion it
is not so easy to state it. Of course current cloud offer of MS Office
for $12 per month would means one tryllion a year if 7 billion people
would subscribe. That would be insane. But in fact if 100 million would
Le 11/03/2019 à 10:30, Stephane Ascoet a écrit :
Le 10/03/2019 à 19:04, Pascal Hambourg a écrit :
J'ai fait plusieurs installations de diverses versions stables de Debian
avec /boot en LVM, avec succès.
Bonjour, je ne peux en dire autant. J'ai des resultats aleatoires selon
les ordinateurs,
Le 11/03/2019 à 12:01, Daniel Caillibaud a écrit :
Le 09/03/19 à 12:51, Frédéric MASSOT a
écrit :
Il faut utiliser les deux, tu assembles tes disques dans un ensemble
unique RAID avec mdadm, ensuite tu partitionnes cet ensemble unique avec
LVM.
C'est visiblement ce que tout le monde fait,
On 03/11/2019 03:45 PM, Brian wrote:
NULL set
On Mon 11 Mar 2019 at 13:48:04 -0400, deb wrote:
>
> re: Canonical being a great company as postured by one here:
>
>
> * They have already been caught selling search results to Amazon.
>
> * the board let go ALL non-corporate members - the People's voice.
>
> * they sleep with
On Mon, 11 Mar 2019 14:59:25 -0400
deb wrote:
> On 3/11/19 2:47 PM, Joe wrote:
> > On Mon, 11 Mar 2019 14:13:38 -0400
> > deb wrote:
> >
> >> I saw this question come up
> >>
> >> and it set off bells.
> >>
> >>
> >> Someone asked what the status of WRITING to NTFS drives was.
> >>
> >> That
On Mon, 2019-03-11 at 14:13 -0400, deb wrote:
> I saw this question come up
>
> and it set off bells.
>
>
> Someone asked what the status of WRITING to NTFS drives was.
>
> That it was not yet supported (?) .
>
>
>
> *MY* Assumptions:
>
> * MIXED NETWORK, with Win, Mac, Linux (EXT4
On 11.03.2019 23:13, deb wrote:
>
>
> I saw this question come up
>
> and it set off bells.
>
>
> Someone asked what the status of WRITING to NTFS drives was.
>
> That it was not yet supported (?) .
>
>
>
> *MY* Assumptions:
>
> * MIXED NETWORK, with Win, Mac, Linux (EXT4 formatted).
>
> * many
On Sun 10 Mar 2019 at 09:21:37 (-0500), Richard Owlett wrote:
> I'm running Stretch with MATE desktop.
>
> If I submit a sub-string of a filename to "MATE Search Tool", *ANY*
> hit reports the full path to the target. That is *GOOD*!
>
> HOWEVER, if I'm exploring a specific directory with Caja
On 3/11/19 2:47 PM, Joe wrote:
On Mon, 11 Mar 2019 14:13:38 -0400
deb wrote:
I saw this question come up
and it set off bells.
Someone asked what the status of WRITING to NTFS drives was.
That it was not yet supported (?) .
I don't think that has been true for several years, though
> There is a spectrum of Windows software than runs between evil malware
> and legitimate programs, it isn't just black and white, and many
Agreed, but I doubt A/V software will know where to draw the line.
Stefan
On Mon, 11 Mar 2019 14:13:38 -0400
deb wrote:
> I saw this question come up
>
> and it set off bells.
>
>
> Someone asked what the status of WRITING to NTFS drives was.
>
> That it was not yet supported (?) .
>
I don't think that has been true for several years, though it certainly
was at
On Sat 09 Mar 2019 at 20:31:36 (+0100), Pascal Hambourg wrote:
> Le 08/03/2019 à 04:15, David Wright a écrit :
> > On Thu 07 Mar 2019 at 23:12:29 (+0100), Pascal Hambourg wrote:
> > > Le 07/03/2019 à 20:23, David Wright a écrit :
> > > >
> > > > A filesystem
> > > > that has a label, has that
On Mon, 11 Mar 2019 13:53:39 -0400
Stefan Monnier wrote:
> > re: apt solving all? I understand it recently had a long-time
> > vulnerability itself...
> > Linux will get hit more as it gets more popular.
>
> My point is not that APT and/or Debian is bullet-proof (I live under
> no delusion in
I saw this question come up
and it set off bells.
Someone asked what the status of WRITING to NTFS drives was.
That it was not yet supported (?) .
*MY* Assumptions:
* MIXED NETWORK, with Win, Mac, Linux (EXT4 formatted).
* many portable 1-5TB drives making the rounds, formatted with
On Mon, 11 Mar 2019 11:45:28 -0400
Stefan Monnier wrote:
> > I think the premises of your syllogism might lead some to another
> > conclusion---that the livelihood of the AV software houses depends
> > upon the innate insecurity of the Windows OS.
>
> Hmm... they don't actually need that:
Bob Weber writes:
> On 3/10/19 5:20 PM, Joe Pfeiffer wrote:
>
> Since a recent update, my /var/log/syslog is getting spammed with huge
> numbers of messages of the form
>
> Mar 10 14:02:25 snowball systemd-udevd[18681]: Process '/sbin/mdadm
> --incremental --export /dev/sda3 --offroot
>
> re: apt solving all? I understand it recently had a long-time vulnerability
> itself...
> Linux will get hit more as it gets more popular.
My point is not that APT and/or Debian is bullet-proof (I live under no
delusion in this respect). Just that instead of keeping your A/V
up-to-date, the
re: Canonical being a great company as postured by one here:
* They have already been caught selling search results to Amazon.
* the board let go ALL non-corporate members - the People's voice.
* they sleep with Microsoft of E-E-E fame.
* The owner is hell bent on getting to IPO
Bon dia,
Aquest dissabte 16 tenim lloc a la UPC (Campus Nord, edifici D4) per fer
una trobada tècnica. La idea és aprofitar per tancar bugs RC, treballar
en altres projectes relacionats amb Debian juntament amb altres
debianites, etc. He creat un Dudle per confirmar l'assitència [0].
Lloc:
On 3/10/19 1:33 PM, Mart van de Wege wrote:
deb writes:
Starting assumption: I do want to run A/V.
* I get that it may actually INCREASE attack surface.
* But I have Windows & Mac stuff going back and forth to Debian 9.8
and just want to check.
When you say going back and forth, do
On 3/10/19 5:20 PM, Joe Pfeiffer wrote:
Since a recent update, my /var/log/syslog is getting spammed with huge
numbers of messages of the form
Mar 10 14:02:25 snowball systemd-udevd[18681]: Process '/sbin/mdadm
--incremental --export /dev/sda3 --offroot
On Sun, Mar 10, 2019, 7:54 AM 황병희
wrote:
> Dear Brad,
>
> On Sun, Mar 10 2019, Brad Rogers wrote:
> > [...snip...]
> >>Who is it? Really is him Queen's guitarist?!
> >
> > Debian's Brian appears to have the middle initial A, whereas Queen's
> > guitarist has H (for Harold) as his middle initial.
On 3/10/19, Richard Owlett wrote:
> I'm running Stretch with MATE desktop.
>
> If I submit a sub-string of a filename to "MATE Search Tool", *ANY* hit
> reports the full path to the target. That is *GOOD*!
>
> HOWEVER, if I'm exploring a specific directory with Caja and then search
> for the
> I think the premises of your syllogism might lead some to another
> conclusion---that the livelihood of the AV software houses depends upon
> the innate insecurity of the Windows OS.
Hmm... they don't actually need that: they only need people to
think that they're vulnerable (regardless if
Hola como están.
Necesito cambiar el puerto de https en nginx ya que el estándar lo usa la
administración del router, cambie el puerto en el archivo de configuración
de sitio:
server {
listen 943;
server_name _;
root /var/www/html;
index index.php index.html;
Pero una vez que
Le 11/03/2019 à 12:23, ajh-valmer a écrit :
Est-ce qu'un noyau Linux récent gère bien maintenant le tactile ?
(c'était il y a plus de 5 ans).
Bonjour, ce n'est pas le noyau qui gere cela mais Xorg. Ca a toujours
fonctionne sur mon GOBook depuis les environs de 2008(mais par contre
j'ai du
On 2019-03-11, Stefan Monnier wrote:
>> Not that I'm aware of. The thing is - instead of taking an insecure OS
>> and building assorted kludges (in the form of anti-virus) around it,
>> it's considered wise here to use a secure OS from the beginning.
>
> This is misleading: all OSes are somewhat
Rsync et Rsnapshot semblent intéressant :
https://wiki.visionduweb.fr/index.php?title=Sauvegarder_et_reinstaller_Linux#Rsync_et_Rsnapshot
Le 09/03/2019 à 20:15, fab a écrit :
> 'lut,
>
> Juste un conseil: à mon avis, inutile de sauver tout ton home. Par
> exemple, le cache de ton navigateur, tu t'en fiches un peu. Par
> ailleurs, pour tes mails, il est préférable d'utiliser le stockage
> maildir plutôt que mailbox. Ainsi, ça
Dzień dobry,
zajmujemy się profesjonalnym prowadzeniem
*FanPage* na *Facebook**'u. *
Jeżeli chcieliby Państwo otrzymać bezpłatną
propozycję w tym zakresie prosimy odpowiedzieć "*TAK"//*na tę wiadomość
e-mail .
_ _ _
Pozdrawiamy Serdecznie!
Dzień dobry,
zajmujemy się profesjonalnym prowadzeniem
*FanPage* na *Facebook**'u. *
Jeżeli chcieliby Państwo otrzymać bezpłatną
propozycję w tym zakresie prosimy odpowiedzieć "*TAK"//*na tę wiadomość
e-mail .
_ _ _
Pozdrawiamy Serdecznie!
I use clamav along with clamav-unofficial-sigs, Sanesecurity and Securiteinfo
(which I pay for)
Secondly, I use “Bitdefender Security for Mail Servers – Linux”, again which I
pay for.
I use clamav-milter and the bdmilterd to scan mail using clamav and Bit
Defender.
I must say that it was
bonjour
chez moi, tous mes contacts sont sur un serveur Caldav (OwnCloud)
répartis dans 2 carnets (pro/perso).
c'est géré depuis Thunderbird par Cardbook qui permet de créer des
groupes et y répartir les contacts.
Certains contacts peuvent être dans plusieurs groupes.
On peut n'avoir que
On Mon, Mar 11, 2019, 03:45 Sven Hartge wrote:
> Default User wrote:
>
> > I will just have to either ignore the problem and pretend it doesn't
> > exist, or just purge the minissdpd package completely, and hope
> > nothing really needs it. Decisions, decisions . . .
>
> "Nothing really needs
> Not that I'm aware of. The thing is - instead of taking an insecure OS
> and building assorted kludges (in the form of anti-virus) around it,
> it's considered wise here to use a secure OS from the beginning.
This is misleading: all OSes are somewhat insecure, in practice.
The question is what
Le 11/03/2019 à 12:23, ajh-valmer a écrit :
Est-ce qu'un noyau Linux récent gère bien maintenant le tactile ?
(c'était il y a plus de 5 ans).
J'utilise un Dell Latitude tactile Ubuntu 16 (2013) et un chromebook
Asus Flip avec crouton+Ubuntu 16 (1 an), tout fonctionne. J'ai également
Bonjour,
Nous vous prions de trouver en pièce jointe votre facture.
Nous restons à votre disposition pour tout renseignement complémentaire.
Bien cordialement
Yoann Mallet
Garanti sans virus. www.avast.com
N'attendez plus, cela ne prend que quelques secondes
On 2019-03-11, Paul Sutton wrote:
>
> On 10/03/2019 15:04, Sven Hartge wrote:
>> deb wrote:
>>
>>> a. What does the group suggest running on debian beyond
>>> - chkrootkit
>> Useless.
>>
>>> - rkhunter
>> Crap, unmaintained.
>>
>> Both tools produce more false positives than finding
On Monday 11 March 2019 09:22:33 Erwann Le Bras wrote:
> ma compagne a un petit Lenovo (Yoda 300) une bouse sous Win10 que
> j'utilise de temps en temps avec un Debian démarré depuis un disque externe.
> Outre le fait qu'il fonctionne bien mieux ainsi, je peux interagir en
> tactile dessus,
Le 09/03/19 à 12:51, Frédéric MASSOT a
écrit :
> Il faut utiliser les deux, tu assembles tes disques dans un ensemble
> unique RAID avec mdadm, ensuite tu partitionnes cet ensemble unique avec
> LVM.
C'est visiblement ce que tout le monde fait, mais je ne sais pas pourquoi
car lvm sait très
On 10/03/2019 15:04, Sven Hartge wrote:
> deb wrote:
>
>> a. What does the group suggest running on debian beyond
>> - chkrootkit
> Useless.
>
>> - rkhunter
> Crap, unmaintained.
>
> Both tools produce more false positives than finding anything, just
> creating a false sense of security
Le 11/03/2019 à 08:41, Pierre L. a écrit :
> Bonjour,
>
> Oui tu avais dans l'idée quand dans 1 carnet d'adresses, tu aies
> plusieurs "répertoires" pour "classer" tes contacts ?
> Ex:
> - professionnel
> - personnel
> - famille
> etc.
>
> Mais le truc qui m'a toujours paru déroutant avec ces
Le 10/03/2019 à 19:04, Pascal Hambourg a écrit :
J'ai fait plusieurs installations de diverses versions stables de Debian
avec /boot en LVM, avec succès.
Bonjour, je ne peux en dire autant. J'ai des resultats aleatoires selon
les ordinateurs, les distributions, etc. Je me suis pris la tete
Le 11/03/2019 à 08:41, Pierre L. a écrit :
Mais le truc qui m'a toujours paru déroutant avec ces "listes" qu'on
peut créer, c'est que le contact reste affiché à la racine du carnet
d'adresses, un peu à la façon "tous les contacts". Mais je pense que
Jean-Philippe désirait justement n'afficher
Ostres, però no hi ha res redactat per la versió 10, encara.
Hi ha algun altre lloc on es puguin veure les decisions preses que
conduiran a les novetats de Debian 10?
>>> Com ja et vaig dir quan el cas d'arquitectura i586 per a Debian 9 que
>>> esmentes, tot això s'anuncia a la
On 2019-03-11, deloptes wrote:
> deb wrote:
I don't believe he did, actually. I believe that's what Reco wrote.
>> Not that I'm aware of. The thing is - instead of taking an insecure OS
>> and building assorted kludges (in the form of anti-virus) around it,
>> it's considered wise here to use a
bonjour
ma compagne a un petit Lenovo (Yoda 300) une bouse sous Win10 que
j'utilise de temps en temps avec un Debian démarré depuis un disque externe.
Outre le fait qu'il fonctionne bien mieux ainsi, je peux interagir en
tactile dessus, (c'est XFCE le gestionnaire de fenêtre), le multipoint
bonjour
je dirais que les deux sont complémentaires :
* la synchronisation est une procédure PRA (Procédure de Reprise
d'Activité) qui permet de redémarrer très rapidement en cas de
sinistre : le PC ne démarre plus, panne, crash disque Elle
implique souvent d'avoir un système de
Default User wrote:
> I will just have to either ignore the problem and pretend it doesn't
> exist, or just purge the minissdpd package completely, and hope
> nothing really needs it. Decisions, decisions . . .
"Nothing really needs it." is the answer here. It speeds up some
operations in some
Bonjour,
Oui tu avais dans l'idée quand dans 1 carnet d'adresses, tu aies
plusieurs "répertoires" pour "classer" tes contacts ?
Ex:
- professionnel
- personnel
- famille
etc.
Mais le truc qui m'a toujours paru déroutant avec ces "listes" qu'on
peut créer, c'est que le contact reste affiché à la
deb wrote:
> Not that I'm aware of. The thing is - instead of taking an insecure OS
> and building assorted kludges (in the form of anti-virus) around it,
> it's considered wise here to use a secure OS from the beginning.
If you have windows users in your network, the best is to pay for a server
deb wrote:
> ClamAV
I recall 15y ago we integrated kasperky into ClamAV. Easy to integrate and
easy to use. Worked great. I left this company couple of years later, but
it will not surprise me if they are still using the same setup.
63 matches
Mail list logo
