Re: cli64 CPU segfaults

2024-01-30 Thread Adam Weremczuk
Thanks everyone for useful feedback :) On 29/01/2024 21:05, Gremlin wrote: On 1/29/24 14:35, Michael Kjörling wrote: On 29 Jan 2024 19:20 +, from ad...@matrixscience.com (Adam Weremczuk): I have 2 bare metal Debian 12.4 servers with fairly new Intel CPUs and plenty of memory. On both

cli64 CPU segfaults

2024-01-29 Thread Adam Weremczuk
Hi all, I have 2 bare metal Debian 12.4 servers with fairly new Intel CPUs and plenty of memory. On both, dmesg continuously reports: (...) [Mon Jan 29 12:13:00 2024] cli64[1666090]: segfault at 0 ip 0040dd3b sp 7ffc2bfba630 error 4 in cli64[40+18a000] likely on CPU 41

systemd-journald log location

2023-12-04 Thread Adam Weremczuk
Hi all, Is it a good idea to move it from /run/log/journal to e.g. /var/journal-log? I can't find a suitable option in /etc/systemd/journald.conf I recently increased SystemMaxUse and RuntimeMaxUse which quickly filled up all space. I didn't realise that our cloud provider decided to image

logrotate failed state

2023-11-29 Thread Adam Weremczuk
Hi all, Debian 10.13 Is it normal for logrotate service to go from "inactive (dead)" to "failed (Result: exit-code)" state every time logrotate.timer (active-waiting) kicks in? E.g. "sudo systemctl restart logrotate" brings back "inactive (dead)" but only until the next logrotate.time

unexplained crash

2023-11-17 Thread Adam Weremczuk
Hello, Yesterday SSH on my desktop PC running Ubuntu 20.04 became unresponsive. The machine was responding to ping and "telnet 22" was briefly connecting before connection closed. The graphical login prompt was visible, but when I tried to log in, it threw me to the text console. No login

LTFS in Debian 11

2022-11-14 Thread Adam Weremczuk
Hi, Has anybody had much success with it? This is the closest thing that I've managed to find: https://github.com/LinearTapeFileSystem/ Only Debian 10 version with no updates for almost 2 years :( My tape drive is Quantum LTO8 HH SAS External and works pretty well with WS 2019. Regards,

permanently adding driver to Debian live USB stick

2022-10-20 Thread Adam Weremczuk
Hi all, My Deb 11.5 live bootable USB stick is missing a driver for Intel Wireless-AC 9560 adapter. Intel provides a link to the missing firmware: https://www.intel.com/content/www/us/en/support/articles/05511/wireless.html and instruct to copy files (iwlwifi-9000-pu-b0-jf-b0-34.ucode

Re: apt-cacher internal error (died)

2022-09-21 Thread Adam Weremczuk
Thanks David, the server runs 9.2 and clients 9.1 so hopefully it will work ok. Another reason I kept changing sources.list in the client was in the aftermath of my recent attempts against apt-cacher. In apt-cacher you change every line to point to apt-cacher:3142. At least that's what I

Re: apt-cacher internal error (died)

2022-09-21 Thread Adam Weremczuk
Thank you Darac, that was my problem indeed! What confused me was the fact that, despite being fundamentally misconfigured, it appeared to be almost working. Just complaining about one security mirror. On 21/09/2022 15:36, Darac Marjal wrote: I'm no expert in apt-cacher-ng, but the error here

Re: apt-cacher internal error (died)

2022-09-21 Thread Adam Weremczuk
Hi David, There is still something wrong with my /etc/apt/sources.list Perhaps caused by stretch reaching end of life on 30 June 2022. Can somebody provide me with a tested list of mirrors for stretch working in Sep 2022 for apt-cacher-ng server and clients? I've tried several different

Re: apt-cacher internal error (died)

2022-09-12 Thread Adam Weremczuk
this is a typical scenario where you want to use apt-cacher. Regards, Adam On 12/09/2022 16:42, David Wright wrote: On Mon 12 Sep 2022 at 14:33:59 (+0100), Adam Weremczuk wrote: Switching to apt-cacher-ng brings no immediate joy :( CLIENT (192.168.100.243) sudo apt update Err:5 http://192.168.100.1:3142

Re: apt-cacher internal error (died)

2022-09-12 Thread Adam Weremczuk
. ? Thanks, Adam On 08/09/2022 19:12, Adam Weremczuk wrote: Hi David, From SERVER:/etc/apt-cacher/apt-cacher.conf user = www-data group = www-data sudo chown -R www-data:www-data /var/cache/apt/archives/* Same error on the CLIENT :( I think I'll give apt-cacher-ng a shot instead although I

Re: apt-cacher internal error (died)

2022-09-08 Thread Adam Weremczuk
. Regards, Adam On 08/09/2022 16:28, David Wright wrote: Disclaimer: I run apt-cacher-ng, and have never looked at apt-cacher. On Wed 07 Sep 2022 at 17:50:16 (+0100), Adam Weremczuk wrote: SERVER Wed Sep 7 17:06:40 2022|error [10088]: Failed to open/create /var/cache/apt-cacher/packages/memtest86

apt-cacher internal error (died)

2022-09-07 Thread Adam Weremczuk
Hi all, The server runs Debian 9.2 and the client Debian 9.1 My errors: CLIENT $ sudo apt update Ign:1 http://192.168.1.100:3142/debian stretch InRelease Hit:2 http://192.168.1.100:3142/debian stretch-updates InRelease Hit:3 http://192.168.1.100:3142/debian stretch Release Reading package

Re: swap maxed out when plenty of RAM available

2022-03-25 Thread Adam Weremczuk
-rss:0kB On 22/03/2022 14:55, Adam Weremczuk wrote: Hi all, I run a tiny and lightweight Debian 9.9 LXC container on Proxmox 6.2-6. It has 512 MB of memory and 512 MB of swap assigned and typically needs 50-100 MB to operate. Last year I started seeing about half of swap being used with very

swap maxed out when plenty of RAM available

2022-03-22 Thread Adam Weremczuk
Hi all, I run a tiny and lightweight Debian 9.9 LXC container on Proxmox 6.2-6. It has 512 MB of memory and 512 MB of swap assigned and typically needs 50-100 MB to operate. Last year I started seeing about half of swap being used with very little use of RAM. I then made the following

Re: deprecated options in openssh

2021-09-10 Thread Adam Weremczuk
On 10/09/2021 17:46, Greg Wooledge wrote: Depends on which syslog daemon implementation you're using, I think. My environment: Linux deb10 5.4.44-1-pve #1 SMP PVE 5.4.44-1 (Fri, 12 Jun 2020 08:18:46 +0200) x86_64 GNU/Linux Pretty minimalistic set up. Rsyslog 8.1901.0-1 out of the box, no

Re: deprecated options in openssh

2021-09-10 Thread Adam Weremczuk
On 10/09/2021 17:51, David Wright wrote: When you commence your call, both you and the person at the other end probably exchange some pleasantries, which confirm that you're both who you say you are. These all get recorded too. Ssh is no different. Are you saying these entries could belong to

Re: deprecated options in openssh

2021-09-10 Thread Adam Weremczuk
On 10/09/2021 13:11, Greg Wooledge wrote: Not matching what's in the file: awk 'NR==25' /etc/ssh/sshd_config awk 'NR==28' /etc/ssh/sshd_config awk 'NR==29' /etc/ssh/sshd_config # Lifetime and size of ephemeral version 1 server key OK, so "it" is in fact "The warnings in syslog contain line

Re: deprecated options in openssh

2021-09-10 Thread Adam Weremczuk
/sshd_config # Logging awk 'NR==28' /etc/ssh/sshd_config awk 'NR==29' /etc/ssh/sshd_config # Authentication: What's going on here? :) Regards, Adam On 16/08/2021 18:27, David Wright wrote: On Mon 16 Aug 2021 at 16:49:16 (+0100), Adam Weremczuk wrote: Installation and configuration

Re: deprecated options in openssh

2021-08-16 Thread Adam Weremczuk
UsePrivilegeSeparation {} \; Still puzzled... On 16/08/2021 15:34, Greg Wooledge wrote: On Mon, Aug 16, 2021 at 03:06:30PM +0100, Adam Weremczuk wrote: I run openssh 7.9p1-10+deb10u2 on Debian 10.10. Logwatch, which runs daily, occasionally (maybe 2-3 times per month) reports the following: Sometimes you get

deprecated options in openssh

2021-08-16 Thread Adam Weremczuk
Hi all, I run openssh 7.9p1-10+deb10u2 on Debian 10.10. Logwatch, which runs daily, occasionally (maybe 2-3 times per month) reports the following: - SSHD Begin  Deprecated options in SSH config:     KeyRegenerationInterval - line 28    

chrome and chromium crashing every minute

2019-12-20 Thread Adam Weremczuk
Hi all, My environment: $ uname -a Linux ubuntu 4.4.0-170-generic #199-Ubuntu SMP Thu Nov 14 01:45:04 UTC 2019 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux Ubuntu 16.04.6 LTS $ dpkg -l | grep -i chrome ii  chrome-gnome-shell 9-0ubuntu1~ubuntu16.04.3 all  GNOME Shell extensions integration for web

Re: clone ACL permissions

2019-07-23 Thread Adam Weremczuk
On 23/07/19 12:20, Thomas Schmitt wrote: Hi, consider this from man setfacl: --restore=file Restore a permission backup created by `getfacl -R' or similar. All permissions of a complete directory subtree are restored using this mechanism. If the input contains

clone ACL permissions

2019-07-23 Thread Adam Weremczuk
Hi all, I've just found out that my backups were missing ACL and the restore will not work until this is fixed. Luckily I have the luxury of checking what the permissions should look like on a running system, e.g: RESTORED: # file: samba/sysvol # owner: root # group: 300 user::rwx

Re: apt-cacher errors

2019-03-25 Thread Adam Weremczuk
Hi Greg, Thank you for taking the time to point out all the shortcomings. On 25/03/19 13:21, Greg Wooledge wrote: On Mon, Mar 25, 2019 at 12:11:21PM +, Adam Weremczuk wrote: I've found 30 entries referencing wheezy and removed them all: sudo find /var/cache/apt-cacher/ -type f -name

Re: apt-cacher errors

2019-03-25 Thread Adam Weremczuk
wrote: On Mon, Mar 25, 2019 at 08:59:40AM +, Adam Weremczuk wrote: Hi all, On 24th March (last Sunday) I received the following (for the first time): Subject: Cron test -x /usr/share/apt-cacher/apt-cacher-cleanup.pl && /usr/share/apt-cacher/apt-cacher-cleanup.pl Error: cannot open ..

apt-cacher errors

2019-03-25 Thread Adam Weremczuk
Hi all, On 24th March (last Sunday) I received the following (for the first time): Subject: Cron test -x /usr/share/apt-cacher/apt-cacher-cleanup.pl && /usr/share/apt-cacher/apt-cacher-cleanup.pl Error: cannot open ../headers/debian_dists_wheezy_Release for locking: No such file or directory

Re: Please Recommend Affordable and Reliable Cloud Storage for 50 TB of Data

2019-02-18 Thread Adam Weremczuk
Has anybody tried: https://rclone.org ? I still think something like this combined with 5  x G Suite Business accounts would be the best value for money. I.e. $50 pm for unlimited storage. On 18/02/19 08:57, Curt wrote: No support for standard protocols that I can see and you need to

Re: P2V Debian 9 with VMware Converter

2019-02-15 Thread Adam Weremczuk
I've investigated a bit more and it actually has something to with EFI rather than Debian version. This Debian 9 clones fine: Model: IBM ServeRAID M5014 (scsi) Disk /dev/sda: 998GB Sector size (logical/physical): 512B/512B Partition Table: gpt Disk Flags: Number  Start   End Size    File

Re: P2V Debian 9 with VMware Converter

2019-02-15 Thread Adam Weremczuk
Hi Calbaza, I'm not surprised it works for Debian 8 (released in 2015) as the tool officially supports Ubuntu 16 (released in 2016). It also works like a charm for Debian 7 (2013) but not Debian 9 (2017). All my VMs run as version 11 too. It fails with the same error when tried against 3

Re: Please Recommend Affordable and Reliable Cloud Storage for 50 TB of Data

2019-02-15 Thread Adam Weremczuk
fast internet connection to go much faster with any provider anyway. On 15/02/19 09:48, Adam Weremczuk wrote: Actually even a cheaper "Business" plan offers unlimited storage for 5 or more users. So you might spend as little as $50 per month: https://gsuite.google.com/intl/en_us/pr

Re: Please Recommend Affordable and Reliable Cloud Storage for 50 TB of Data

2019-02-15 Thread Adam Weremczuk
Actually even a cheaper "Business" plan offers unlimited storage for 5 or more users. So you might spend as little as $50 per month: https://gsuite.google.com/intl/en_us/pricing.html My links are for UK and US. Edit the URL to browse different regions. On 15/02/19 09:34, Adam

Re: Please Recommend Affordable and Reliable Cloud Storage for 50 TB of Data

2019-02-15 Thread Adam Weremczuk
Hi, It could make sense to sign up for Google Enterprise subscription: https://gsuite.google.co.uk/intl/en_uk/pricing.html 5 users will cost you 5 x £20 = £100 per month and give 5 accounts with unlimited storage in a trusted and reliable place. AFAIK there is upload speed cap in place so

Re: P2V Debian 9 with VMware Converter

2019-02-13 Thread Adam Weremczuk
Forgot to mention the source server was up and running the entire time, no down time. On 13/02/19 14:06, Alexandre GRIVEAUX wrote: It's hard to beat 20-30 seconds it takes to click and type into VMware Converter and leave it running. It works well for Debian 7, probably 8 as well but not 9 :(

Re: P2V Debian 9 with VMware Converter

2019-02-13 Thread Adam Weremczuk
Short answer - because it will take significantly longer and potentially lead to more errors. Especially if I have a number of servers with different structures and purposes. It's hard to beat 20-30 seconds it takes to click and type into VMware Converter and leave it running. It works well

P2V Debian 9 with VMware Converter

2019-02-13 Thread Adam Weremczuk
Hi all, I persistently get "The destination does not support EFI firmware" . Apparently the latest Converter doesn't support Debian 9 (yet?). More details on my issue here: https://communities.vmware.com/message/2837600 Has anybody had success tricking Converter to perform a migration? Any

Re: dd performance test differences

2018-11-02 Thread Adam Weremczuk
Hi Mike, Thanks for the suggestion. New test results with suggested parameters below: Slower server W: 1310720 bytes (13 GB, 12 GiB) copied, 97.5106 s, 134 MB/s R: 1310720 bytes (13 GB, 12 GiB) copied, 28.6353 s, 458 MB/s Faster server W: 1310720 bytes (13 GB) copied, 83.7368 s,

Re: dd performance test differences

2018-11-02 Thread Adam Weremczuk
Forgot to mention both run Debian (7.1 and 9.5) and filesystems are ext4 on both. On 02/11/18 11:58, Adam Weremczuk wrote: Hi all, Can somebody explain this huge difference between 2 (almost) identical servers

dd performance test differences

2018-11-02 Thread Adam Weremczuk
Hi all, Can somebody explain this huge difference between 2 (almost) identical servers: - dd if=/dev/zero of=test.bin bs=512 count=1024 oflag=sync 524288 bytes (524 kB) copied, 0.00133898 s, 392 MB/s vs

Re: Latest Thunderbird update breaks multiple plugins

2018-10-16 Thread Adam Weremczuk
Hi Martin, I suffered this pain earlier this morning on Ubuntu 16.04. For Lightning you might tried to substitute it with "xul-ext-lightning" but I ended up removing Thunderbird and rolled back to 52.9

Re: DRBD sync speed

2018-10-11 Thread Adam Weremczuk
Hi Dan, Yes, I tried tweaking config following that link but for some reason the sync progress is not showing any more. I guess I need to fiddle with it more. I have 16 x 500 GB disks in each server and my layout is as below: 1-4: VD0: RAID10: 2 spans of 2 disks -> 1TB for Proxmox containers

DRBD sync speed

2018-10-10 Thread Adam Weremczuk
Hi all, I'm trying out DRBD Pacemaker HA Cluster on Debian 9.5 I have 2 identical servers connected with 2 x 1 Gbps links in bond_mode balance-rr. The bond is working fine; I get a transfer rate of 150 MB/s with scp. Following this guide:

[SOLVED] Re: dual port cross over cable bonding

2018-10-05 Thread Adam Weremczuk
A single dual port gigabit card on each server. I'm more concerned about performance than redundancy. The bond operates in 2 gigabit mode: ethtool bond1 (...)     Speed: 2000Mb/s     Duplex: Full (...) My working config (will play with it a bit more): auto bond1 iface bond1 inet static    

[SOLVED] Re: dual port cross over cable bonding

2018-10-05 Thread Adam Weremczuk
My config was ok and it's working like a charm after both servers have been rebooted. For some reason "systemctl restart networking" wasn't enough.

Re: dual port cross over cable bonding

2018-10-05 Thread Adam Weremczuk
Yes, 192.168.200.1 and 192.168.200.2 netmask 30 All ports and cables work when tested 1-1 but not with my 2-2 bonding config. Looks like your LACP is correct but your IP addressing is wrong. Do you have parentheses in it, or are you trying to suggest that one is .1 and the other is .2?

dual port cross over cable bonding

2018-10-05 Thread Adam Weremczuk
Hello, I have 2 servers running Proxmox 5.2 (based on Debian 9). I've connected Ethernet ports between them with a pair of cross over cables. When only 1 port on each and 1 cable are used connectivity looks fine with the following config:

Re: increasing size of /run

2018-07-13 Thread Adam Weremczuk
Thank you both for useful advice. For me the AIDE script is a bit too complex (700+ lines) to quickly analyse and experiment with. I've decided to take a lazy path which is simply increasing the size of /run and retrying AIDE job. No problem if it buzzes in the background for a couple of

increasing size of /run

2018-07-13 Thread Adam Weremczuk
Hi all, I have a one off big job (full AIDE report on millions of files) which I'm trying to run on old Debian 7.1. The system uses 2 physical disks and physical volumes, no LVM. It has 8GB or RAM and 32GB of swap which appears to be just enough. After running for a couple of days the job

squid proxy fails to resolve LAN host names

2018-03-26 Thread Adam Weremczuk
Hi all, Steps to reproduce (query any LAN host running a web server): $wgethttp://lanhost 2>&1 | grep response HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 200 OK $export http_proxy=proxy:3128 $wgethttp://lanhost 2>&1 | grep response Proxy request sent, awaiting

Re: password hash in shadow file

2018-03-13 Thread Adam Weremczuk
Quite possibly I changed it to the same password. Not sure now as it was almost a month ago but can't find any better explanation. Of course hashes are meant to be irreversible. I guess I'm trying to catch my own shadow ;) On 13/03/18 16:19, to...@tuxteam.de wrote: Still strange. Are you

Re: password hash in shadow file

2018-03-13 Thread Adam Weremczuk
I think it was me invoking "passwd" as root and aborting (ctrl+D) without making any changes. Would that be enough to update the shadow file? On 13/03/18 15:47, to...@tuxteam.de wrote: What I don't understand is how the system changed the hashing method without getting you involved. You don't

password hash in shadow file

2018-03-13 Thread Adam Weremczuk
Hi all, I've just spotted that on one of my old wheezy servers root entry in /etc/shadow was updated just over 3 weeks ago. The root password is still the same and the lastchanged count is much higher than 3 weeks. The difference I've noticed is the hashed password string being much

Re: gnats user

2018-03-06 Thread Adam Weremczuk
Thanks, a useful read. But all it says regarding gnats is "." :) On 2018-03-06 16:57, Reco wrote: [1], chapter 12.1.12.1. Reco [1]https://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/securing-debian-howto/ch12.en.html

gnats user

2018-03-06 Thread Adam Weremczuk
Hi all, Can somebody explain why gnats user comes even with a minimalistic netinstall Debian? I briefly used Gnats Bug-Reporting System long time ago but AFAIR this project died in 2005. It just feels weird for me to see it in /etc/passwd all the time. Thanks Adam

Re: Dell Open Manage

2018-02-13 Thread Adam Weremczuk
Please keep me updated Dave. Especially if you discover something big :) I'm not desperate , happy to wait for another few weeks or so. Thanks Adam On 13/02/18 13:37, Dave Sherohman wrote: Coincidentally, earlier today I installed srvadmin-idracadm8 on stretch from

openssh-server change log

2018-02-13 Thread Adam Weremczuk
Hello, Just to let you know - the link on Debian website gives 404: https://packages.debian.org/wheezy/openssh-server http://metadata.ftp-master.debian.org/changelogs/main/o/openssh/openssh_6.0p1-4+deb7u7_changelog I got it from the tarball so it's not critical. Thanks Adam

end of security support for wheezy LTS

2018-02-13 Thread Adam Weremczuk
Hi all, Our PCI compliance scanner (probably falsely) claims it's 2018-05-01. The Wikipedia page: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Debian_version_history just says "May 2018". Debian website: https://www.debian.org/releases/wheezy/ https://wiki.debian.org/LTS clearly states "end of May 2018".

Dell Open Manage

2018-02-12 Thread Adam Weremczuk
Hello, I'm referring to: http://linux.dell.com/repo/community/debian/ Does anybody know if jessie version works well on stretch? Or if an official release for stretch is going to be available soon? Thanks Adam

hostname issue

2018-01-15 Thread Adam Weremczuk
Hi all, Today when I logged into my Debian 9.2 VM I noticed that the hostname has changed to the first block of the IP address I was accessing this VM from last: root@83:~# "hostname" command was returning the full IP address 83.xxx.xxx.xxx Cat /etc/hostname was still showing the correct