Hi Debian User!
I write to you, because it's that time again. You know, we've gotten a
brand new release, and I have to spend yet a day or two in frustration over
why python isn't enabled in the inn2 package.
This time, however, I want to ask beforehand, what the proper way of doing
such a
I'm in the rather unlucky circumstances of trying to rebuild a md array,
where the good drive is starting to report UNC errors, like this:
Apr 7 11:11:18 rollo kernel: [15659.604216] sd 0:0:0:0: [sda] Unhandled
sense c ode
Apr 7 11:11:18 rollo kernel: [15659.604243] sd 0:0:0:0: [sda] Result:
On Sat, 22 Nov 2014 22:43:01 +1100
Scott Ferguson scott.ferguson.debian.u...@gmail.com wrote:
On 22/11/14 22:14, Renaud (Ron) OLGIATI wrote:
On Sat, 22 Nov 2014 21:46:19 +1100
Scott Ferguson scott.ferguson.debian.u...@gmail.com wrote:
It lost. Developers are not being forced to do what
On Wed, 22 Oct 2014 13:40:49 +0200
Jochen Spieker m...@well-adjusted.de wrote:
I really don't get why Debian receives so much hate in this discussion.
Upstream software depending on systemd is not Debian's choice.
Because of the abysmal lack of communication of the reasons behind the
On Wed, 15 Oct 2014 14:01:44 -0700
Bob Holtzman hol...@cox.net wrote:
What I read of your post wasn't dissent. It was character
assassination.
Please let me know how to point out that an idiotic behaviour is disruptive
to the whole process, without actually telling the person in question,
On Thu, 16 Oct 2014 11:38:59 +0100
Lisi Reisz lisi.re...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thursday 16 October 2014 07:55:40 Anders Wegge Keller wrote:
On Wed, 15 Oct 2014 14:01:44 -0700
Bob Holtzman hol...@cox.net wrote:
What I read of your post wasn't dissent. It was character
assassination
On Thu, 16 Oct 2014 11:59:24 +0100
Lisi Reisz lisi.re...@gmail.com wrote:
My golly, you are an arrogant self-opinionated individual. As well as
misinformed and mistaken.
Thank you for those kind words. However, I think you are undermining your
attempt at establishing your moral superiority,
On Wed, 15 Oct 2014 04:07:25 +1100
Scott Ferguson scott.ferguson.debian.u...@gmail.com wrote:
Given that your only contribution to the list is outright and offensive
hypocrisy why should you not be rightfully dismissed as an abusive and
offensive poster who contributes nothing to the subject.
On Mon, 13 Oct 2014 22:43:48 +0300
Andrei POPESCU andreimpope...@gmail.com wrote:
There's -offtopic (see my .sig), but apparently the anti-systemd crowd
wants an audience :(
Stop your condescending tone, and make your self useful by reading a book
about change mangament. I don't know who you
On Tue, 14 Oct 2014 17:33:55 +0100
Lisi Reisz lisi.re...@gmail.com wrote:
This to one of our best and most measured contributors. It's enough to
make one weep.
He could have been the pope. His attitude is part of the problem, not the
solution. If you have read the book about change
It seems that there's a lot of controversy about the SysV-replacement that
should not be named. Most, if not all of the arguments for, as well as
against seem to be of a philosophical, rather than stringent technichnical
nature. As such, they are probably not suited for this list. So my question
11 matches
Mail list logo
