Kirk Hilliard [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
grin [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The 'mountable' method of dselect is great -- you don't have to wait for
thousands of packages telling you it's already installed.
Agreed! BZ to its author (Andy Mortimer, I think).
But while from the local disk
was running it from inetd anyway, so it was a
little more complicated, but you can probably just remove apache before
starting boa and it'll all be fine. Either that, or just run
/etc/init.d/boa start once you've removed apache.
E
--
Andy Mortimer, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.poboxes.com
On Jun 3, Alexander Stavitsky wrote
On Tue, 3 Jun 1997, Andy Mortimer wrote:
On Jun 3, Fredrik Ax wrote
I agree with you that it is a bit irretating that deselect scans for ALL
pakages ... I can see that it's done for consistency reasons, BUT it would
be great if there was a switch
it
manually, but it's mostly only for convenience; unless you're fairly sure
what you're doing, you'd probably do better to steer clear of it,
especially as unstable is going over to use libc6 fairly soon.
Neither of these two methods, though, should have any problem with
symlinks.
E
--
Andy
On May 28, Kendall P. Bullen wrote
On Mon, 26 May 1997, Andy Mortimer wrote:
This is probably not the case, but I thought I'd mention it; you aren't
by any chance using XEmacs rather than FSF Emacs, are you? ISTR getting
this problem with 19.14; although it has been fixed in 19.15
I'd mention it; you aren't
by any chance using XEmacs rather than FSF Emacs, are you? ISTR getting
this problem with 19.14; although it has been fixed in 19.15 (in Hamm),
this version has it's own problems.
Sorry I can't suggest any fixes if this is the case, though. :(
E
--
Andy Mortimer
just this. It can be run at bootup
and from cron, and if it hasn't been run yet that day, executes the
scripts. So you can turn your machine on, and go and have breakfast, and
come back when it's done! (I too have a lowly 486 :)
E
--
Andy Mortimer, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.netforward.com
]:~$
---
The fix is to recompile your kernel, and include support for a.out
binaries either as a module or in the kernel. If you just want it as a
module (which I'd recommend), you probably only need to make the modules.
I have no idea why it compiled as a.out for you, though ...
HTH,
E
--
Andy
yellow
Hope this helps. I find it very useful.
E
--
Andy Mortimer, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.netforward.com/poboxes/?andy.mortimer
Finger [EMAIL PROTECTED] for PGP public key
--
i've been looking so long at these pictures of you that I almost believe
that they're real i've been living so long
[ CC to debian-user left in, but I don't read it, so please preserve
a CC to me if you respond to it on there ]
On 3 Apr 97, Lars Hallberg Micro++ wrote:
What do You think of a Wrapper Class Libary that makes it easy to
write code that runns on diferent widget sets? If it makes it
posably
. The only
way I could find to get around it was to log out and back in again. I
suppose I ought to do some more research on this, actually ...
HTH,
E
--
Andy Mortimer, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.netforward.com/poboxes/?andy.mortimer
Finger [EMAIL PROTECTED] for PGP public key
--
i've been looking
11 matches
Mail list logo
