Re: Need help setting up printing in Jessie

2014-10-27 Thread Brian Nelson
Paul E Condon pecon...@mesanetworks.net writes: I'm running Jessie on an HP Pentium host that's a several years old. Desktop software is Xfce4 and CUPS from a Debian repository, as is all software on the box. Printing works for the LibreOffice suite, but not for Emacs23-lucid, or for plain

Re: Definitions of all sections in the Control file.

2010-04-12 Thread Brian Nelson
Xuan Ngo xuanngol...@yahoo.ca writes: Where can I find the definitions of all sections in the Control file? Examples of sections: admin, cli-mono, comm, database, devel, debug, doc, editors, electronics, embedded, fonts, games, gnome, graphics, gnu-r, gnustep, hamradio, haskell, httpd,

Re: Re (2): new udev

2009-12-16 Thread Brian Nelson
On 12/16/2009 1:31 PM, Rick Pasotto wrote: On Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 10:15:30AM -0800, peasth...@shaw.ca wrote: Folk, Observations from bystander. Date: Tue, 15 Dec 2009 16:21:28 -0500 Brian Nelson wrote, Some of the .rules files on your system are using a deprecated syntax

Re: Re (2): new udev

2009-12-16 Thread Brian Nelson
On 12/16/2009 2:52 PM, Tom H wrote: And yet the udev maintainer's response to the 'CONFIG_SYSFS_DEPRECATED syslog message is So do it. http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=560821 I assume that if you are using testing, you have to be prepared for problems and to make system changes.

Re: new udev

2009-12-15 Thread Brian Nelson
On 12/14/2009 10:16 AM, Rick Pasotto wrote: The udev module in testing got updated this morning. As a result I got these lines in my syslog: Dec 14 09:51:02 niof udevd[15399]: SYSFS{}= will be removed in a future udev version, please use ATTR{}= to match the eventdevice, or ATTRS{}= to match a

Re: what's your favourite FLOSS?

2009-11-10 Thread Brian Nelson
Tshepang Lekhonkhobe wrote: On Sat, Nov 7, 2009 at 18:42, Chrisrac...@makeworld.com wrote: web browser: Firefox (Not IceWeasel) am curious: what's wrong with Iceweasel? It fails to work in some cases where Firefox does work, due to it reporting a different User-Agent string. -- To

Re: what's your favourite FLOSS?

2009-11-10 Thread Brian Nelson
Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote: On Tuesday 10 November 2009 10:46:50 Wolodja Wentland wrote: On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 17:29 +0100, Sjoerd Hardeman wrote: comply with recommendations, you can use the User Agent plugin https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/59 to have Iceweasel report a

Re: X11 without HAL: DontZap in /etc/X11/xorg.conf doesn't work anymore

2009-07-16 Thread Brian Nelson
Dirk noi...@gmx.net writes: Jochen Schulz wrote: Nobody forces you to do anything. You can compile patch X.org yourself, run oldstable, switch to another distribution or throw your computer out of the window. Or you could just accept HAL and go on with your life. You suggest that everyone

Re: Removing Stuck Process

2009-07-14 Thread Brian Nelson
David Baron d_ba...@012.net.il writes: I mean, really stuck, with oops-like kernel messages complaining about the process. How do I get rid of it? Reboot? -- Captain Logic is not steering this tugboat. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of

Re: How do you get aptitude to do what you want?

2009-06-24 Thread Brian Nelson
lee l...@yun.yagibdah.de writes: On Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 04:58:21PM -0500, green wrote: lee wrote at 2009-06-23 14:13 -0500: I'm trying to upgrade my testing installation, but aptitude keeps yelp in its current state, claiming that upgrading yelp would break a dependency with gman. But

Re: kernel-2.6.15 cannot compile

2006-01-11 Thread Brian Nelson
Eike Lantzsch [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I attempted to compile kernel-2.6.15 with make-kpkg but I got this error: gzip -9qf /usr/src/linux-source-2.6.15/debian/linux-image-2.6.15.20060111/usr/share/doc/linux-image-2.6.15.20060111/conf.vars install -p -m 644 debian/buildinfo

Re: Why does Debian default to Gnome?

2005-12-29 Thread Brian Nelson
Adam Fabian [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Edward C. Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Why does Debian default to gnome? When I install a recent testing, I believe GNOME sprang up partially in response to KDE using Qt, which had a non-free license at the time. s/non-free/GPL-incompatible/ --

Re: aspell error in sarge

2005-12-24 Thread Brian Nelson
Rodney D. Myers [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: For the past month I have been trying to get a friends computer working with Sylpheed-claws gaim, but libaspell has an ongoing error within it. I keep getting this error message; sylpheed-claws: relocation error: /usr/lib/libaspell.so.15:

Re: aspell error in sarge

2005-12-24 Thread Brian Nelson
Rodney D. Myers [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On Sat, 24 Dec 2005 10:00:35 -0500 Brian Nelson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Rodney D. Myers [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: For the past month I have been trying to get a friends computer working with Sylpheed-claws gaim, but libaspell has an ongoing

Re: Crossfade effect with GStreamer?

2005-11-12 Thread Brian Nelson
All Nicks Are Taken [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I've just started to use Quod Libet, which is a really great jukebox style music player, but it doesn't seem to have a crossfade effect plugin. I've googled for it, and the only useful thing I found was this link:

Re: Mounting an iPod via USB

2005-11-10 Thread Brian Nelson
Josh Battles [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I got something like that... Here's the relevant information that dmesg outputs about the ipod, but it doesn't seem to be doing anything with it. Initializing USB Mass Storage driver... usb.c: registered new driver usb-storage scsi3 : SCSI emulation

Re: Mounting an iPod via USB

2005-11-10 Thread Brian Nelson
Josh Battles [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Brian Nelson said: Josh Battles [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I got something like that... Here's the relevant information that dmesg outputs about the ipod, but it doesn't seem to be doing anything with it. Initializing USB Mass Storage driver... usb.c

Re: QQ about apt.

2005-10-28 Thread Brian Nelson
Scott Muir [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: (noob) I would like to know if and how it is possible to do a non-interactive install of an .deb package. The pages I have read talk only of a 'yes to all questions' option which is obviously useless if the package you are installing has questions other

Re: apt-0.6 off line usage

2005-10-20 Thread Brian Nelson
Marty [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Andrew M.A. Cater wrote: On Tue, Oct 18, 2005 at 09:38:58PM -0700, Brian Nelson wrote: Marty [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: golfer wrote: The only way I seem to be able to get packages installed is to go back on line and do the 'apt-get dist-upgrade

Re: apt-0.6 off line usage

2005-10-18 Thread Brian Nelson
Marty [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: golfer wrote: The only way I seem to be able to get packages installed is to go back on line and do the 'apt-get dist-upgrade'. For one or two packages, this may be ok, but it's not something I want to waste time doing routinely. The dist-upgrade option is

Re: libmysqlclient12 and libmysqlclient14

2005-10-04 Thread Brian Nelson
Christopher L. Everett [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Maurits van Rees wrote: snip So if I would remove libmysqlclient12 then these packages would be removed as well. Not all packages that you mention are in this list. But there are packages that also depend on packages in this list, so they

Re: libmysqlclient12 and libmysqlclient14

2005-10-03 Thread Brian Nelson
Christopher L. Everett [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: For various reasons (I believe a version conflict is causing selects to return no rows when it clearly has data to return), Yes, that can happen due to lack of versioned symbol support in all but the most recent MySQL libs in unstable. I want

Re: How-to build deb package from already installed package

2005-09-30 Thread Brian Nelson
Petr Mandys [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: is it possible to build deb package from package which is currently installed in the system? How to? dpkg-repack -- Captain Logic is not steering this tugboat. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble?

Re: [boot optimization] How to speed up the boot?

2005-09-27 Thread Brian Nelson
belbo [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: my etch works very well, but the startup process takes too long... I can see many useless probing scripts working during the startup. I thought I could remove some autoprobing script from /etc/rc*, but I don't know which. Here's the list: [...] Which scripts

Re: KDE font size changes randomly

2005-09-13 Thread Brian Nelson
J F [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: The KDE font size keeps changing randomly. I set the font size to Arial 10 and use it for about a week or 2. I shut down my desktop every night. Then, the next morning, Arial 10 is huge and I can't fit 80 character across on the screen. I switch it back to

Re: announcing the beginning of security support for testing

2005-09-12 Thread Brian Nelson
Oliver Lupton [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Joey Hess wrote: deb http://secure-testing.debian.net/debian-secure-testing etch/security-updates main contrib non-free deb-src http://secure-testing.debian.net/debian-secure-testing etch/security-updates main contrib non-free Alternatively, replace

Re: Compiling Kernel for Bootsplash: The Whole Seven Metres.

2005-09-05 Thread Brian Nelson
David R. Litwin [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Before I go any further, yes, I need bootsplash: My computer is dual-boot and the other user insists on A: Using Windows and B: Shutting Down every Evening. In addition, I shall be getting a lap-top soon. (By the bye, why doesn't Debian have

Re: Compiling Kernel for Bootsplash: The Whole Seven Metres.

2005-09-05 Thread Brian Nelson
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Bob Proulx) writes: I find it easiest to just grab the vanilla sources straight from kernel.org. The Debian ones tend to be crippled and patched, which makes it a pain to apply new patches. I always find it easier to use the Debian stock kernels. They have all of the

Re: Coexistence of Qt3 and Qt4 development (or at least compilation)

2005-09-04 Thread Brian Nelson
Gregory Seidman [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I have written some apps with Qt3 and I still work on them from time to time. I have libqt3-mt-dev installed for this purpose. I'd like to start working with Qt4, so I tried installing libqt4-dev. Of course, it conflicts with libqt3-mt-dev. Is this a

Re: apt-get update works fine; but apt-get upgrade does not

2005-07-27 Thread Brian Nelson
Joe Potter [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I am running Sid, and I can use apt-get update just fine. However, when I then run apt-get upgrade I see apt fail to get even a single file. Each one yields the message about failed to open the file. I thought that if the server was down, update would

Re: Aspell British

2005-07-24 Thread Brian Nelson
Steve Å [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I'm having a devil of a time with Aspell. When I first installed Sarge (Testing over 2 years ago), I had Aspell replace Ispell. It took some work at the time to get Aspell spell checking for British English. Over the past few weeks, (I think it was when

Re: Aspell British

2005-07-24 Thread Brian Nelson
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Bob Proulx) writes: Steve Å wrote: Obviously, I wasn't paying close attention to the messages aptitude was giving me. 8( :-) I've spent time searching the archives, and checking that the needed dictionaries are present, but I can't see the forest for the trees. Any

Re: cahnging debian version

2005-07-24 Thread Brian Nelson
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Quoting Alan Ianson [EMAIL PROTECTED]: security team. Are you sure i cannot go back to stable ? I don't think so, at least not without reinstalling. You can upgrade from Woody (old stable) to sarge (current stable) or from stable to testing or unstable. But

Re: upgrade woody=sarge, aptitude-update

2005-07-23 Thread Brian Nelson
On Sat, Jul 23, 2005 at 04:16:26PM +0200, Felix Natter wrote: hi, I'm trying to upgrade from woody to sarge by following the release notes, which state that I should first upgrade to sarge's aptitude. However, when I do this, aptitude tries to update glibc and a lot of other packages, and

Re: unstable update today

2005-07-11 Thread Brian Nelson
Merijn Schering (Intermesh) [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Hi I updated unstable with apt and now I have two problems: The new udev package removed a lot of /dev/* links. My mouse and sound card stopped working because all the dev symlinks were gone. http://bugs.debian.org/udev The other

Re: No security updates for sarge ?

2005-06-30 Thread Brian Nelson
On Wed, Jun 29, 2005 at 04:51:18PM +0200, Hannes Mayer wrote: I've been wondering the past few days why there are no updates via apt-get update/upgrade (I have the correct entries in sources.list!). A few days ago I was reading at heise.de (http://www.heise.de/newsticker/meldung/61076) that

Re: aspell no umlauts

2005-06-29 Thread Brian Nelson
On Tue, Jun 28, 2005 at 01:43:46PM +0200, wegner wrote: After upgrading to the latest stable distribution of debian, aspell no longer shows german umlauts in the upper window. It uses blanks instead. But it shows umlauts in the lower window with the suggestions. I would like to have umlauts

Re: Sarge SM security question

2005-06-16 Thread Brian Nelson
On Wed, Jun 15, 2005 at 06:10:55PM -0500, John Fleming wrote: SquirrelMail has released a security patch. Will that eventually show up in a Sarge security update? As a new user of stable (previously testing), I have no experience with security updates. Tnx - John Normally, yeah, but...

Re: a question about apt_preferences,

2005-06-14 Thread Brian Nelson
On Sun, Jun 12, 2005 at 03:47:16PM -0600, Paul E Condon wrote: [...] I've looked at the contents of several release files, and see that in these files the stable/testing/unstable value is in the 'Suite:' field. In man apt_preferences, this is called the Archive, not the Suite. This, I think,

Re: Oldstable? Abandoned Packages? Alternatives?

2005-06-14 Thread Brian Nelson
On Tue, Jun 14, 2005 at 10:40:24AM -0400, Thomas H. George wrote: I just discovered the oldstable distribution. What are the implications of this? For example, for years I have used cbb (checkbook balancer) which I find is in the oldstable distribution but not in Sarge. From

Re: dpkg status (deinstall) question

2005-06-08 Thread Brian Nelson
On Wed, Jun 08, 2005 at 02:25:08PM -0400, Marc Shapiro wrote: Now that Sarge has gone stable and I have done an 'apt-get dist-upgrade' I am left with only a few packages held back. These are all, I believe, due to the fact that I have put them on 'hold.' I don't think that any of them are

Re: Clarify Sarge Release

2005-06-08 Thread Brian Nelson
On Wed, Jun 08, 2005 at 09:08:20PM -0600, Paul E Condon wrote: On Wed, Jun 08, 2005 at 08:27:55PM -0400, Tom Allison wrote: Yesterday on the chat rooms it was claimed that using aptitude was more successful and effective than using apt-get dist-upgrade. Apparently aptitude is supposed to

Re: DVORAK

2005-06-06 Thread Brian Nelson
On Mon, Jun 06, 2005 at 09:57:30PM -0400, Hal Vaughan wrote: Questions for you and others now using Dvorak: I could change my own keyboard to whatever I want, but I know I'll still have to use other keyboards, and I've been using QWERTY for close to 30 years. So: 1) How hard is it to

Re: apt-get question

2005-05-17 Thread Brian Nelson
On Wed, May 11, 2005 at 12:11:51PM +0200, Dominik Epple wrote: Hi list, I have an empty /var/cache/apt/archives directory. For building a custom CD, I want to have all packages that are installed on the machine as a file on my computer, e.g. in the /var/cache/apt/archives directory. Can I

Re: Removing what a meta-package provided

2005-05-14 Thread Brian Nelson
On Sun, May 08, 2005 at 01:28:58AM +0200, Daniel Déchelotte wrote: [...] I think that an history-independent behaviour makes senses for meta-packages. Let's imagine a prerm script for package kde. On running apt-get remove kde, the user would see this warning:

Re: apt-get deprecated?

2005-05-03 Thread Brian Nelson
Monique Y. Mudama [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On 2005-05-01, Paul E Condon penned: In most cases this is good, but it can lead to aptitude doing really bad things in some special situations. For instance, I once installed kde by requesting the single over-all package that exists only to bring

Re: Silence apt-get for real

2005-05-03 Thread Brian Nelson
On Mon, May 02, 2005 at 12:53:08PM +0200, Lars Roland wrote: [...] -- Configuration file `/etc/qmail/tcp.smtp' == Modified (by you or by a script) since installation. == Package distributor has shipped an updated version. What would you like to do about it ? Your

Re: apt-get deprecated?

2005-05-03 Thread Brian Nelson
On Tue, May 03, 2005 at 04:31:59PM -0600, Monique Y. Mudama wrote: On 2005-05-03, Brian Nelson penned: Monique Y. Mudama [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Ah, yes. I've run into that kind of obnoxiousness before. I think the right thing to do here would be to mark all the kde-related

Re: updated debian development diagram -- comments?

2005-01-09 Thread Brian Nelson
Olaf Conradi [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On Sun, 09 Jan 2005 15:42:36 -0600, Ron Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Sun, 2005-01-09 at 16:20 -0500, Tom Allison wrote: Ron Johnson wrote: On Sun, 2005-01-09 at 15:04 +0100, Olaf Conradi wrote: Most of the development work that is done in

Re: Debian sid and risk management

2004-12-26 Thread Brian Nelson
On Sun, Dec 26, 2004 at 02:42:31PM -0500, William Ballard wrote: On Sat, 2004-12-25 at 10:05 -0600, Alex Malinovich wrote: Sid is probably not the right choice if you need to run a nuclear defense grid, but for day to day work on the desktop and even on servers, it's plenty stable

Re: Debian sarge and production servers is it ready on 12/26/2004?

2004-12-26 Thread Brian Nelson
On Mon, Dec 27, 2004 at 12:54:01AM -0500, Mitchell Laks wrote: On Monday 27 December 2004 12:32 am, Roberto Sanchez wrote: I think the issue is that packages are not directly uploaded to testing. So it is possible to have version X of package A installed in testing. ... If a serious or

Re: Why isn't MPlayer in Debian?

2004-12-24 Thread Brian Nelson
On Fri, Dec 24, 2004 at 06:03:42PM +1100, James Foster wrote: Hello, I'm curious about why there isn't an MPlayer package in Debian. The MPlayer website says that MPlayer is available under the GNU General Public License v2, so I don't see why it wouldn't be considered free software. Even

Re: erased iPod software

2004-12-24 Thread Brian Nelson
On Fri, Dec 24, 2004 at 07:58:21PM +0200, George Iordanou wrote: I've purchased an iPod (40GB) for Macs. I've mounted the hfs+ partition to /media/ipod. Then i've had the *stupid* idea to rm -rf /media/ipod/*. Unfortunately the ipod won't start since i erased its software. Any ideas how to

Re: dpkg install and extract options

2004-12-23 Thread Brian Nelson
On Thu, Dec 23, 2004 at 10:21:20AM -0800, Paul Johnson wrote: On Thursday 23 December 2004 6:48 am, Bahadir Balban wrote: just a simple question - if I use dpkg -i option, does it do anything extra than resolving dependencies and extracting the packages? Yes, lots. It calls debconf

Re: Majordomo

2004-12-21 Thread Brian Nelson
On Tue, Dec 21, 2004 at 07:01:29PM -0500, Tom Allison wrote: Franz Gustav Niederheitmann wrote: Em Ter, 2004-12-21 ??s 20:23 -0200, Franz Gustav Niederheitmann escreveu: Em Ter, 2004-12-21 ??s 17:08 -0500, Tom Allison escreveu: Franz Gustav Niederheitmann wrote: Em Ter, 2004-12-21 ??s 16:20

Re: Why does Sid debootstrap install ipchains? Why does sarge?

2004-12-13 Thread Brian Nelson
William Ballard [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Sarge installs ipchains by default. Nothing that depends on ipchains is installed by default. I don't use ipchains. I use less. Can we have less in the base install and not ipchains? It already is that way. less is Priority: standard, so it

Re: Okay. debootstrap sid worked and I can chroot. Now what?

2004-12-13 Thread Brian Nelson
On Mon, Dec 13, 2004 at 11:01:56PM -0500, William Ballard wrote: I've run debootstrap sid (it spewed an ungodly number of warnings and failed to configure many packages, but it essentially worked) and I can chroot into it. Now what? Is there a way to run the rest of debian-installer

Re: Questions on Conffiles

2004-12-07 Thread Brian Nelson
On Tue, Dec 07, 2004 at 02:50:39PM +0800, ?? wrote: I was reading the introduction about Conffiles in Debian Policy Manual, section 10.7 and appendix E, Don't trust anything in the appendix. That stuff tends to be way out of date. and modified conffiles of package debconf,

Re: logging of dpkg actions

2004-12-07 Thread Brian Nelson
On Sun, Dec 05, 2004 at 05:12:49PM +0100, J.Rinas wrote: Is there a a logfile anywhere for the actions dpkg did ... like installation/deinstallation/update of packages? No. See http://bugs.debian.org/957 (almost 10 years old!) If there is no logfile, Is there another chance to get this

Re: AGP

2004-12-07 Thread Brian Nelson
On Tue, Dec 07, 2004 at 03:09:07PM -0500, Michael Spang wrote: Hugo Vanwoerkom wrote: Paul Johnson wrote: On Tuesday 07 December 2004 8:30 am, Giorgio Raccanelli wrote: I'm in trouble in the installation of the x-server. I have an ATI Radeon 9600, so I installed the driver radeon as

Re: Questions on Conffiles

2004-12-07 Thread Brian Nelson
On Tue, Dec 07, 2004 at 11:23:48PM +0800, ?? wrote: Just replace them with the original files. You may have a /etc/deconf.conf.dpkg-dist file--this is the unmodified file from the package. I am sorry I did not find such file, this means I have to backup first next time. But what

Re: On unresponsive maintainers (was: Re: On using magicfilter and gs)

2004-11-27 Thread Brian Nelson
Michael D. Crawford [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Is there any formal requirement that a maintainer be responsive, or even do his job at all? No. Debian's Constitution actually states that you can't force a developer to do any work he or she doesn't want to do. Is there a procedure for taking a

Re: Fedora

2004-11-25 Thread Brian Nelson
On Thu, Nov 25, 2004 at 12:47:07AM -0800, ken keanon wrote: Hi, This Fedora project is developing along the same line as Debian i.e. community-base, open-sourced. What's more, It is supported by RedHat. Anybody has any opinion about it? Is it better than Debian? I think this pretty much

Re: Mass bug reports for packages with GFDL documentation?

2004-11-24 Thread Brian Nelson
On Wed, Nov 24, 2004 at 09:03:33PM +0100, Alexander Schmehl wrote: * Adam Funk [EMAIL PROTECTED] [041124 19:26]: What about the practical implications? How can you have a GNU/Linux distribution without gcc, make and especially coreutils? If it's not possible to write free documentaion

Re: Is it possible to upgrade Woody to Sarge?

2004-11-22 Thread Brian Nelson
Robert Cates [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: is it possible with apt-get to upgrade a Woody installation to Sarge? If so, would that be with: apt-get dist-upgrade or is that just to completely upgrade the Woody installation.? Read the release notes, available at:

Re: apt-get Failure

2004-11-17 Thread Brian Nelson
On Wed, Nov 17, 2004 at 09:13:12AM +, michael wrote: Michael Spang wrote: Sed's postinst contains this line, which fails: sudo install-info --quiet --section General commands General commands /usr/share/info/sed.info The bug is apparently resolved so a fix should be on the way.

Re: testing .v. unstable .v. sarge (WAS Re: apt-get Failure)

2004-11-17 Thread Brian Nelson
On Wed, Nov 17, 2004 at 03:45:43PM -0500, Carl Fink wrote: On Wed, Nov 17, 2004 at 01:22:44PM -, michael wrote: I initially went for 'stable' (woody) but it was too out of date for my Ethernet card hard drive. I've now installed 'testing' (sarge) and have followed recommendations in

Re: apt .v. aptitude (was Re: how to remove exim4 without removing mysql-server?)

2004-11-16 Thread Brian Nelson
On Tue, Nov 16, 2004 at 12:14:42AM -0800, Marc Wilson wrote: On Mon, Nov 15, 2004 at 01:54:19PM +, Brian Nelson wrote: What dpkg does is broken. It has no business storing that stuff in the status file. Now you're echoing Colin Watson. And we all know what a poor source of wisdom

Re: Testing to Sarge sources.list

2004-11-16 Thread Brian Nelson
On Tue, Nov 16, 2004 at 08:23:16PM -0500, Ralph Crongeyer wrote: Hi all, Hey, is now a good time to switch my sources from testing to sarge? If you have to ask, you shouldn't even be running testing in the first place. -- For every sprinkle I find, I shall kill you! -- To UNSUBSCRIBE,

Re: apt .v. aptitude (was Re: how to remove exim4 without removing mysql-server?)

2004-11-15 Thread Brian Nelson
a case of putting typing aptitude where you would have typed apt-get. Now, wait just a second... Brian Nelson says no one is recommending aptitude over apt-get for command-line use. :) I never said that. In fact, the above entry in the reference contains text that was added at my

Re: apt .v. aptitude (was Re: how to remove exim4 without removing mysql-server?)

2004-11-15 Thread Brian Nelson
On Mon, Nov 15, 2004 at 11:26:07AM -0800, Marc Wilson wrote: On Mon, Nov 15, 2004 at 11:14:54AM -, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: So, is the consensus to stick with 'apt'? Or at least to choose one and stick with that and not to mix apt and aptitude (it sounds to me as though Marc is saying

Re: Will Debian grow and stay?

2004-11-15 Thread Brian Nelson
On Sun, Nov 14, 2004 at 07:41:04AM -0600, John Hasler wrote: I believe that the only things left in non-us are programs that infringe US patents. No, software that cannot be distributed because of patents (e.g. lame) is not included in Debian. AFAIK, non-us is not used for anything anymore.

Re: why debian

2004-11-14 Thread Brian Nelson
On Sat, Nov 13, 2004 at 12:20:02PM -0800, Paul Johnson wrote: Brian Nelson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Debian isn't a true democracy. We elect our leader, and thereafter the leader acts under his own accord. It's a representative democracy, much like the US government. Except Debian

Re: how to remove exim4 without removing mysql-server?

2004-11-14 Thread Brian Nelson
On Sat, Nov 13, 2004 at 08:01:14PM -0800, Marc Wilson wrote: On Fri, Nov 12, 2004 at 12:13:05AM +, Brian Nelson wrote: This is another good example of why apt-get should be avoided, since it gave absolutely no indication as to the problem you correctly diagnosed. Funny, I was able

Re: Debian for business?

2004-11-14 Thread Brian Nelson
On Sat, Nov 13, 2004 at 02:26:50AM -0800, ken keanon wrote: Read all the responses to Why debian. My summary: 1. It is free, w/o any non-free components. 2. It can be easily updated and upgraded. My questions: 1. Is it free because it is not popular? You got it backwards. It's popular

Re: how to remove exim4 without removing mysql-server?

2004-11-14 Thread Brian Nelson
On Sun, Nov 14, 2004 at 11:36:00AM -0800, Marc Wilson wrote: On Sun, Nov 14, 2004 at 01:12:47AM +, Brian Nelson wrote: Aptitude does an OK job in this respect. It doesn't make conflict resolution completely obvious, but the information is there. Aptitude shouldn't be used until its

Re: how to remove exim4 without removing mysql-server?

2004-11-14 Thread Brian Nelson
On Sun, Nov 14, 2004 at 10:33:32PM -0800, Marc Wilson wrote: On Sun, Nov 14, 2004 at 01:43:38PM +, Brian Nelson wrote: On Sun, Nov 14, 2004 at 11:36:00AM -0800, Marc Wilson wrote: On Sun, Nov 14, 2004 at 01:12:47AM +, Brian Nelson wrote: Aptitude does an OK job in this respect

Re: how to remove exim4 without removing mysql-server?

2004-11-12 Thread Brian Nelson
On Thu, Nov 11, 2004 at 11:08:35PM -0800, Marc Wilson wrote: On Fri, Nov 12, 2004 at 02:46:31PM +0800, cwinl-debian-user wrote: But my mysql server shouldn't be remove. how to remove exim4 without removing mysql-server? Of course it should be removed. The 'mysql-server' package depends on

Re: why debian

2004-11-12 Thread Brian Nelson
On Fri, Nov 12, 2004 at 08:53:58PM -0600, Tim Kelley wrote: On Friday 12 November 2004 02:11, ken keanon wrote: Hi, There are so many distros out there its confusing. Any reason(s) why Debian should be the preferred choice? Any statistics from any source(s) to proof the popularity of

Re: when sarge will be released?

2004-11-08 Thread Brian Nelson
On Mon, Nov 08, 2004 at 02:15:26AM -0800, RituRaj wrote: Any approx dates? No. Subscribe to debian-devel-announce if you want to receive the latest release info. The most recent announcement regarding the release is: http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2004/09/msg5.html -- For

Re: howto close a Debian bug?

2004-11-07 Thread Brian Nelson
On Mon, Nov 08, 2004 at 01:39:55AM +0100, Alexander Schmehl wrote: * Alexandros Papadopoulos [EMAIL PROTECTED] [041107 23:51]: Following the instructions at http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Reporting I filed a couple of bugs. Now one of them has been resolved, how can I report this and

Re: [OT?] recreating lost iPod database

2004-11-05 Thread Brian Nelson
Nori Heikkinen [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: the iPod itself shows that i have no music, no artists, no anything. it also shows that i have 18.5G used, and 2.8G available. all consistent. so what i need to do is recreate the table, if possible. my only other option, afaict, is to delete all

Re: user-friendly mp3/cd player combination

2004-11-05 Thread Brian Nelson
Matt Price [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: our cd player died so I'm converting my old laptop to a part-time mp3-player/ cdp player. I usually use xmms groovycd to play music, but that combination is a little clumsy for my family members. here's what I want: -an mp3 organizer that makes it

Re: Debian defaults: Are them a democratic process?

2004-11-03 Thread Brian Nelson
ROBERTOJIMENOCA [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I'd like to know if there's a formal process where defaults like the ones I proposed can be voted to please the majority of the users. Good God, NO! We've already seen how poorly the majority choose things, like the President of the US for example.

Re: Getting rid of rc packages

2004-11-01 Thread Brian Nelson
On Mon, Nov 01, 2004 at 11:03:30PM +, Thomas Adam wrote: --- Ron Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, What's the best way to remove Remove Config-file packages? COLUMNS=200 dpkg -l | awk '/^rc/ {print $2}' | xargs dpkg --purge Jeez. Save yourself that pain and just run aptitude,

Re: USE flags ??

2004-10-26 Thread Brian Nelson
On Tue, Oct 26, 2004 at 08:40:00PM +, Nick Smith wrote: i use gentoo primarily now because i like the feeling that every piece of software on my system from the bootstrap up is compiled for my hardware aka p4, every debian binary is built for a 386 machine to keep compatibility! and on

Re: Building binaries for older versions of libc6

2004-10-20 Thread Brian Nelson
On Wed, Oct 20, 2004 at 02:58:16PM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote: I have a C++ program which requires g++ 3.4 to build due to parser bugs in older versions of g++. I'm currently building on a development machine running mostly woody with some packages from sarge, including g++-3.4 of course.

Re: Using an unstable package with an otherwise stable distribution

2004-10-12 Thread Brian Nelson
On Tue, Oct 12, 2004 at 11:08:44PM -0400, ted wrote: I'd really like to use Mozilla 1.7.3 on my powerpc, but either the documentation I've read on how to do so is wrong or I don't understand it. I've tried editing my /etc/apt/sources.list to include unstable, and then gave the command

Re: Fast photo scaling

2004-10-07 Thread Brian Nelson
On Wed, Oct 06, 2004 at 04:40:27PM -0500, Rich Wellner wrote: The photo questions reminded me I have an outstanding issue. I fequently resize hundreds of photos at a time and it takes a heck of a long time under convert. I know from experience that convert can be dog in some circumstances so

Re: Is there a stable mail client for linux?

2004-10-01 Thread Brian Nelson
On Fri, Oct 01, 2004 at 04:30:15PM +0200, Francois Cerbelle wrote: Le Fri, Oct 01, 2004 at 10:02:52AM -0400, Ed Sutherland ecrit : had to log-out and reboot in order to regain control. Is there a secure, solid and stable e-mail client built for linux? I don't want applications to have a

Re: Is there a stable mail client for linux?

2004-10-01 Thread Brian Nelson
On Fri, Oct 01, 2004 at 02:23:53PM -0500, Douglas G. Phillips wrote: It might not complain, but it'll take its sweet ass time loading a large mailbox. It's a lot faster than some others, especially Evolution with huge mbox files, IMHO. If you have issues with the speed, try switching to

Re: Is there a stable mail client for linux?

2004-10-01 Thread Brian Nelson
On Fri, Oct 01, 2004 at 10:02:52AM -0400, Ed Sutherland wrote: Is there a secure, solid and stable e-mail client built for linux? No. Every mail client in existence is utter crap, including mutt and gnus. The best you can hope for is something that is barely tolerable, and I'm still searching

Re: [solved] Re: mounting iPod with USB

2004-09-28 Thread Brian Nelson
On Mon, Sep 27, 2004 at 12:34:25PM -0400, Nori Heikkinen wrote: on Mon, 27 Sep 2004 11:17:23AM -0400, Nori Heikkinen insinuated: i just got an iPod(!), and i'm very excited to start using it. however, i can't figure out how to mount it. i'm not even trying to set up automounting or

Re: BRAZIL

2004-09-25 Thread Brian Nelson
On Sat, Sep 25, 2004 at 10:19:20AM -0300, JAIME GIMENEZ JR wrote: I?m brazilian and I need your help to understand a english word: What means this word.nasally-insertable You can stick it in your nose. It?s usual find this words... But what we need to know is, do people

Re: Does Unstable become Testing?

2004-09-24 Thread Brian Nelson
On Fri, Sep 24, 2004 at 06:14:32PM -0700, Paul Johnson wrote: Thomas H. George [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: When Sarge is released does Unstable suddenly become Testing or is Testing simply empty until new programs gradually migrate from Unstable to Testing? Testing becomes frozen, which

Re: sarge release

2004-09-23 Thread Brian Nelson
On Wed, Sep 22, 2004 at 03:21:00PM -0500, John Fleming wrote: because the final Sarge will be ready when it will be ready, and it will be _good_ and _stable_ That's what's really important, no? Really naive question - Could recently-released SpamAssassin 3.0 still make it into Sarge, or

Re: sarge release

2004-09-22 Thread Brian Nelson
On Wed, Sep 22, 2004 at 09:36:22AM -0700, Jianbo Wang wrote: Does anyone know the frozen, release data of sarge? Thanks! http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2004/09/msg5.html -- Blast you and your estrogenical treachery! -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a

Re: aptitude changelog says new upstream release ?

2004-09-18 Thread Brian Nelson
On Sat, Sep 18, 2004 at 09:51:27PM -0400, William Ballard wrote: The changelog entry for aptitude says new upstream release. I know Debian is trying to be Kernel-neutral, but isn't aptitude a Debian-native package which might happen to run on things like Redhat? It just means the source and

Re: about:config in Firefox is broken

2004-09-10 Thread Brian Nelson
On Fri, Sep 10, 2004 at 03:03:45PM -0400, Norman Walsh wrote: Trying to load about:config results in XML Parsing Error: syntax error Location: jar:resource:///chrome/toolkit.jar!/content/global/config.xul Line Number 1, Column 1:ig.xulUT Is it just me, or is this a problem with the

Re: Why Does apt-get Want to Uninstall KDE?

2004-08-31 Thread Brian Nelson
On Tue, Aug 31, 2004 at 09:56:20PM -0700, Scarletdown wrote: I was wanting to install KOrganizer, since the version currently installed crashes. However, when I do apt-get install korganizer, I am informed that kde is to be uninstalled? Why is that? Why use apt-get, which gives absolutely

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   >