and the apropriate module for your scsi card.
Thank you very much. This all looks useful, and I'll be giving it
a try a little later. I hope that my next message here will be a
summary of what I did to get this all working correctly.
--
Lloyd Zusman
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
God bless you.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE
it is. I can
tell that we're getting very close to the point where Hitler is
going to be mentioned, so that we can then put Godwin's law into
effect.
Oh! ... I already mentioned him. OOPS ...
--
Lloyd Zusman
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
God bless you.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, Feb 01, 2003 at 05:30:36PM -0500, Lloyd Zusman wrote:
[ ... ]
Is there something special I have to do to tell my kernel
that there are SCSI disks at the time I make the boot floppy?
That all depends:)
It's a long time since I made boot floppies (prefer
Quoting Nathan E Norman [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
[ ... ]
Gack!
How old is the drive? Any chance the issue is termination or a
misconfigured jumper? You're using an Adaptec 2940?
I'll check the jumper later, when I open up my box. Yes, I believe
it's a 2940
[ ... ]
Lloyd Zusman [EMAIL
Quoting Lloyd Zusman [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
[ ... ]
Well, I'm using LILO. I want to create a proper rescue disk,
and I used the mkboot utility to do so. It told me that it created
a proper disk, but when I tried to boot off of it, I got a kernel
panic with a message that stated
Quoting Carel Fellinger [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Fri, Jan 31, 2003 at 11:17:12PM -0500, Lloyd Zusman wrote:
[ ... ]
I have some more info about my problem that might be useful.
Kernel panic: VFS: Unable to mount root fs on 08:02
...
Would this indicate a hardware problem
start
taking my machine apart.
Thanks in advance for any help you folks can give me on this.
--
Lloyd Zusman
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
God bless you.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thank you VERY much for this help.
I have a question though ... see below:
Lloyd Zusman said:
#/dev/sda2 / ext3 errors=remount-ro 0 1
/dev/sda2/ ext3 0 1
^^
in the options field try putting
Shawn Lamson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote...
On Fri, 31 Jan 2003 21:08:56 -0500 (EST)
Lloyd Zusman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[ ... ]
in the options field try putting 'defaults'
you can also jump to runlevel 1 'init 1', and when you login
type:
mount / -o remount,rw
I did this, but I
to mount root fs on 08:02
The system froze at this point.
Would this indicate a hardware problem? Or is there still hope that
this can be fixed with software?
Thanks again to all of you, for all your help.
--
Lloyd Zusman
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
God bless you.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL
Norman - Incanus Networking mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Warning: dates in calendar are closer than they appear.
--
Lloyd Zusman
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
God bless you.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Quoting Nathan E Norman [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Fri, Jan 31, 2003 at 11:59:28PM -0500, Lloyd Zusman wrote:
[ ... ]
So ... now that things are sort of back to normal, my question
is this: what caused the filesystem to become read-only to
begin with? Could it be hardware errors
be the solution? I guess we would have to
know what testing packages have fixes in unstable, and then use the -t
unstable option to apt-get ... correct?
--
Lloyd Zusman
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Osamu Aoki [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Thu, Jan 23, 2003 at 07:18:18PM -0500, Lloyd Zusman wrote:
[ ... ]
I learned this in this list but reading manual page of apt-get (8)
...
--default-release
This option controls the default input to the policy engine, it
creates a default
Dale Hair [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Thu, 2003-01-23 at 10:57, Lloyd Zusman wrote:
[ ... ]
That is what I do, but as I said earlier a dist-upgrade could remove
some packages you want to keep so the -s option will tell you what it
will do before you regret doing it. A dist-upgrade
-reconfigure localepurge
--
Lloyd Zusman
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
that randompackage is installed? ...
apt-get -t unstable install randompackage
Or do these two methods have equally undesirable effects?
--
Lloyd Zusman
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
this. I've had years of Unix experience,
and so I know all about 'script' and all sorts of other tools.
Sincerely,
- Lloyd
typescript.gz
Description: typescript
grep.gz
Description: grep
--
Lloyd Zusman
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
OOPS. I'm sorry I sent my previous message in this thread to the
mailing list. I intended to send it to Paul Selig, and forgot to change
the address before typing ^C^C in gnus.
--
Lloyd Zusman
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe
Is there a way to comment out lines in /etc/apt/preferences? I tried
various comment characters, but none worked. I couldn't find anything
about this in the documentation.
Thanks in advance.
--
Lloyd Zusman
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject
Osamu Aoki [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Wed, Jan 22, 2003 at 11:08:09PM -0500, Lloyd Zusman wrote:
...
[ ... ]
apt-get update apt-get -t testing dist-upgrade
^^
Why -t is set here
-t set priority of that testing to 990
in unstable, in which case it
installs from unstable
Do I have it right?
Thanks.
--
Lloyd Zusman
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Ron Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Thu, 2003-01-23 at 05:39, Lloyd Zusman wrote:
Is there a way to comment out lines in /etc/apt/preferences? I tried
various comment characters, but none worked. I couldn't find anything
about this in the documentation.
The hash (#) always works
Dale Hair [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Thu, 2003-01-23 at 07:06, Lloyd Zusman wrote:
[ ... ]
# apt-get update
... normal `apt-get update' output, followed by:
E: Invalid record in the preferences file, no Package header
If I remove the hashes before lines in the ruby* section, I
Dale Hair [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Thu, 2003-01-23 at 06:32, Lloyd Zusman wrote:
[ ... ]
Do I have it right?
[ ... ]
This should work but I don't pin individual packages on mine just the
distributions. Once a package is installed from unstable apt-get
upgrade or dist-upgrade
andrej hocevar [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Thu, Jan 23, 2003 at 09:59:10AM -0500, Lloyd Zusman wrote:
That still doesn't work for me ...
# cat /etc/apt/preferences
Package: mplayer*
Pin: release a=unstable
Pin-Priority: 700
# Package: ruby*
# Pin: release a=unstable
a has to one of the blank lines, to accomplish the same trick.
no?
Yes, that works, as well.
--
Lloyd Zusman
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Osamu Aoki [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Thu, Jan 23, 2003 at 06:57:53AM -0500, Lloyd Zusman wrote:
[ ... ]
Is it also true that setting /etc/apt/apt.conf to contain
`APT::Default-Release testing;' also sets testing to 990?
Yes, that is my understanding. man apt_preferences
100
the internet) for determining which
sites in `mirrors_full' contain any given distribution?
Thanks in advance.
--
Lloyd Zusman
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
a short explanation here?
Since we are talking about downgrading to `stable', I don't understand
why the presence of `APT::Default-Release stable;' would prevent that.
Thanks.
--
Lloyd Zusman
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe
Dale Hair [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Wed, 2003-01-22 at 12:22, Lloyd Zusman wrote:
Simon Law [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Wed, Jan 22, 2003 at 06:15:53PM +0200, Mohammed Sameer wrote:
[ ... ]
here's my /etc/apt/preferences
Package: *
Pin: release a=stable
Pin-Priority
Mike Dresser [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Mon, 20 Jan 2003, Lloyd Zusman wrote:
Does anyone know of a way to use the standard 'ps' to get a process
listing without showing the pid of that instance of 'ps' itself, WITHOUT
any piping being performed or auxiliary processes being done
this mailing list.
Thanks in advance for any pointers and suggestions you can offer.
Current /etc/apt/preferences
Package: *
Pin: release a=stable
Pin-Priority: 500
Package: *
Pin: release a=testing
Pin-Priority: 600
Package: *
Pin: release a=unstable
Pin-Priority: 5
--
Lloyd
shows
me that I can perform a downgrade (everything looks the same as
it did before I changed the `testing' priority to 1001).
Thanks again, in advance.
--
Lloyd Zusman
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL
Dale Hair [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Sat, 2003-01-18 at 12:03, Lloyd Zusman wrote:
Dale Hair [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
[ ... ]
Giving testing a priority of 1001 will downgrade to testing.
Thank you. I just did that. And now, which `apt-get' or `aptitude'
command(s) should I
Dale Hair [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Sat, 2003-01-18 at 13:04, Lloyd Zusman wrote:
[ ... ]
I did this, but nothing happened. The command session is shown below.
I know that a number of unstable packages had been previously installed.
Any ideas?
Thanks.
# apt-get dist-upgrade
in the
salt mines.
Well, enough of my ranting. But just wait until you read the replies of
someone who is _really_ biased! :)
:o)
Scott (sidewalking)
--
Lloyd Zusman
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble
remove this completely, or else you can right-click on it and
select Preferences to configure its behavior.
HTH
--
Lloyd Zusman
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
/preferences before starting
aptitude?
Thanks in advance.
--
Lloyd Zusman
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
the php4 source packages and rebuild
them myself? Send a message to the package maintainer(s)? Or ... ???
Thanks.
--
Lloyd Zusman
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Thu, Jan 02, 2003 at 11:43:42AM -0500, Lloyd Zusman wrote:
I noticed that the standard debian php4 package doesn't seem to be built
with the --enable-mime-magic option, and therefore, it doesn't provide
the capability to use the mime_content_type
abides by this
APT::Default-Release property in /etc/apt/apt.conf?
Thanks.
--
Lloyd Zusman
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
91480 2 (autoclean) [usb-storage microtek sd_mod aic7xxx]
unix 15784 108 (autoclean)
--
Lloyd Zusman
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
nate [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Lloyd Zusman said:
audio_oss_out: Opening audio device...
audio_oss_out: using device /dev/dsp1
audio_oss_out: opening audio device /dev/dsp1 failed:
No such device
load_plugins: audio output plugin
/usr/lib/xine/plugins/xineplug_ao_out_oss.so
| |
--
--
Lloyd Zusman
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
, opinions, or recommendations
about each of these?
If not, then could someone point me to some documentation as to which
packages of each that I need to install, in which order, in order to
avoid installation conflicts?
Thanks in advance.
--
Lloyd Zusman
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE
Lin Hua [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Safe Sex Shell + Condom = Total Protection
[ ... ]
I know that there are already debian packages for the shells csh, tcsh,
bash, zsh, etc. But this is a new shell, and I think that we should
package this one up as well, possibly as sssh.
--
Lloyd Zusman
of the phrase use it
or lose it? :)
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED]|| http://www.acampbell.org.uk
using Linux GNU/Debian || for book reviews, electronic
Windows-free zone || books and skeptical articles
--
Lloyd Zusman
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED
Rob Weir [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Sat, Dec 14, 2002 at 11:25:33PM -0500, Lloyd Zusman wrote:
[ ... ]
[ ... ]
For example, mozilla (version 1.0.0) comes up with that default font on
its menu bar. I've looked in app-defaults and in the various X startup
files, but I can't figure out
Lloyd Zusman [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
[ ... ]
Files: $HOME/.gtkrc-kde
/usr/share/gnome/gtkrc
/usr/share/themes/Default/gtk-2.0-key/gtkrc
/usr/share/themes/Default/gtk-2.0/gtkrc
/usr/share/themes/Default/gtk/gtkrc
/etc/gtk/gtkrc.en
. This is really a pain to figure out without
suitable docs. Thanks again.
--
Lloyd Zusman
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
font is set would be greatly appreciated.
--
Lloyd Zusman
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
in. It provides a separate apache-ssl executable which allows
this ssl-enabled Apache server to run in parallel with the standard one.
I'm running the servers from both the apache and apache-ssl packages
on my system, and everything works fine.
--
Lloyd Zusman
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email
and reappear every time I go to that
configuration section.
Any ideas?
Thanks in advance.
--
Lloyd Zusman
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
when I log in:
sessionoptional pam_lastlog.so silent
Apparently, this line is getting ignored, and something else is causing
that Last login: ... message to get printed.
But what ... ???
--
Lloyd Zusman
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED
martin f krafft [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
also sprach Lloyd Zusman [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002.12.12.1719 +0100]:
I mentioned in my original message about pam_lastlog.so.
Sorry, didn't see that...
No problem.
Apparently, this line is getting ignored, and something else is causing
that Last
.
Problem solved. I'm happy. :)
--
Lloyd Zusman
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
in advance.
--
Lloyd Zusman
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Wed, Dec 11, 2002 at 06:34:48AM -0500, Lloyd Zusman wrote:
[ ... ]
[cjwatson@arborlon /etc/init.d]$ grep motd *
bootmisc.sh:# Update /etc/motd.
bootmisc.sh:uname -a /etc/motd.tmp
bootmisc.sh:sed 1d /etc/motd /etc/motd.tmp
section.
Any ideas?
Thanks in advance.
--
Lloyd Zusman
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Sat, Dec 07, 2002 at 01:46:11AM -0500, Lloyd Zusman wrote:
Is it correct to assume that any given debian package whose name is of
the form lib.*-perl corresponds to one and only one CPAN module,
Not quite, but more or less.
and that the algorithm
Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Sat, Dec 07, 2002 at 01:46:11AM -0500, Lloyd Zusman wrote:
Is it correct to assume that any given debian package whose name is of
the form lib.*-perl corresponds to one and only one CPAN module,
Not quite, but more or less.
and that the algorithm
to debug the code above and eventually
to get it to work. But I'm hoping I can find a utility that might allow
me to do this in a more elegant way.
Any ideas?
Thanks in advance.
--
Lloyd Zusman
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe
Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Thu, Dec 05, 2002 at 07:50:44PM -0500, Lloyd Zusman wrote:
[ ... ]
OK. So then I won't worry about --purge not working here. I guess
I'll just dig into the installation scripts and try to figure out what
they created, so I can get rid of it all
Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Fri, Dec 06, 2002 at 07:34:40AM -0500, Lloyd Zusman wrote:
Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
That does indeed suggest that it's those packages you need to purge.
Aha! Yes, that did the trick. I incorrectly assumed that dpsyco-lib
and dpsyco
= lib${cpanModuleName}-perl) =~ s/::/-/g;
system(apt-cache search --names-only '^${debianPackageName}\$');
}
This little program seems to work, but are my assumptions correct?
Thanks in advance.
--
Lloyd Zusman
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED
; do break; done
After this, the '$result' variable will be empty unless there are one or
more files which match the pattern.
--
Lloyd Zusman
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
to perform this task for me.
Any ideas?
Thanks in advance.
--
Lloyd Zusman
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Thu, Dec 05, 2002 at 09:34:01AM -0500, Lloyd Zusman wrote:
In other words, I intended to type this:
apt-get --purge remove the-package
... but I inadvertantly typed this:
apt-get remove the-package
In these cases, is there any way that I
Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Thu, Dec 05, 2002 at 10:14:01AM -0500, Lloyd Zusman wrote:
[ ... ]
dpkg - warning: ignoring request to remove the-package which
isn't installed.
... and none of the remaining pieces of the-package are removed.
Then there's nothing more
70 matches
Mail list logo