Anyone packaging new smail (to stop spam relays)?

1997-12-05 Thread Petri Wessman
The current version of smail in the 'unstable' Debian release is a bit old and doesn't have support to stop spam relaying. I have heard that version 3.2.0.94 has a new config variable (smail_remote_allow) for this. Is anyone packaging the new smail? There's a very real need for an MTA that blocks

2.1.35 works [was: kernel 2.1.3x?]

1997-04-23 Thread Petri Wessman
On Tue, 22 Apr 1997 21:16:19 -0500 (CDT), Douglas Bates [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: Douglas I just compiled a fresh 2.1.35 kernel for my home machine (IDE-based). Douglas When I try to boot this kernel, either from the IDE disk or from a Douglas floppy disk, I get the messages about uncompressing

'nobody' doesn't exist?

1996-06-11 Thread Petri Wessman
Hmmm, I keep getting inetd[3543]: getpwnam: nobody: No such user messages on my xconsole. The 'nobody' user is defined in /etc/passwd, so what's going on? As far as I know, I'm running the latest development (unstable) release of Debian (1.1). It's not fatal, just annoying. Mostly I'm curious